Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Did God punish and kill innocent children too?

Did God punish and kill innocent children too?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
67 Posts 7 Posters 876 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    If that is so, why doesn't He feed the poor? Or does He only intervene to punish people and not help the needy?

    Salam,

    Arnold, I agree with RasulHamsa's answer.

    Salam,
    Arnab

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #47

      This is exactly what I said in my post also, it is the enviroment which will create the fajra and kafara. But the FM translation can be misunderstood as can be seen how Arnab tried to use it.

      Salam Arnold,

      First I never used a translation to understand 3030 (not even Free-minds).

      I read Arabic. I do not rely on translations. And since I never even posted 3030 with or without a translation, I did not try to "use it" in any fashion.

      Second, it is true that when I do post a verse, I usually use the Free-minds translation.
      This is for the benefit of those who do not speak Arabic, to give them a general idea of what the verse says I only use the Free-minds translation as a reference. This is not my translation.

      Third, For clarification I, too, have a different understanding of 3030 than the Free-Minds Translation.

      Fourth, my brief comment on your understanding of 3030 was in an earlier post

      Quote from Arnold Yasin
      In 3030 we are told all humans are born with the fitra in them, the nature of the Deen, so no one can be born as a wicked rejector. This is why the FM translation creates a contradiction.

      Quote from Arnab
      I do not see that 3030 is evidence that humans are not born "bad." Fitra= open, free. My understanding of the word Fitra is based on the word as used in Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic. So, we may have a different definition of the word. I can post my references if requested.

      Salam,
      Arnab

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        arnoldyasin
        wrote on last edited by
        #48

        Peace Arnab,

        I wasn't referring to 3030 but to 7127, and I meant Supernaut, please excuse me for the mistake.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          arnoldyasin
          wrote on last edited by
          #49

          Salam,

          Arnold, I agree with RasulHamsa's answer.

          Salam,
          Arnab

          3647 And when it is said to them, ?Spend on others of the provision Allah has given to you?, the rejecters say to the believers, ?Shall we feed anyone whom Allah could have fed if He so willed? You people are obviously lost in error.?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #50

            Salam,
            Just to be clear

            Quote from Arnab on Yesterday at 095150 AM
            I believe it is both God intervening and the laws of nature.

            Quote from Arnold Yasin on Yesterday at 111145 AM
            If that is so, why doesn't He feed the poor? Or does He only intervene to punish people and not help the needy?

            Quote from RasulHamsa Yesterday at 114407 AM
            Majority of the people living in this world are poor, hence proved God does feed them! yes

            Quote from Arnab
            Arnold, I agree with RasulHamsa's answer.

            3647 And when it is said to them, ?Spend on others of the provision Allah has given to you?, the rejecters say to the believers, ?Shall we feed anyone whom Allah could have fed if He so willed? You people are obviously lost in error.?

            Stating the fact that God provides for the needy, does not (in any way) imply that we can ignore our obligation to help others in every way we can.

            These are two seperate topics.

            Salam,
            Arnab

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #51

              Peace Arnab,

              I wasn't referring to 3030 but to 7127, and I meant Supernaut, please excuse me for the mistake.

              Salam,

              No problem, it happens. peace

              Salam,
              Arnab

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                arnoldyasin
                wrote on last edited by
                #52

                The funny thing is, Rasulhamsa is always sarcastic and never means his statements.. D

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  arnoldyasin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #53

                  I'll try to ignore that the Deen Research Centre believes that the Quran ordains a socialistic system. I suspected Shabbir Ahmed was a socialist long ago when I read his commentary of 1164, which by the way I found completely implausible. I'm not a die-hard capitalist, but I find socialism to be completely unquranic and therefore unjust.

                  We at DRC are not socialistic, nor is Dr. Shabbir. Please read everything before making your judgements.

                  The Qur'an urges to be social with your own capital, thus it does not present a social system wherein everything belongs to the state. It urges mankind to be social with what it has earned themselves, thus it presents a social-capitalism. If you had read the articles and books you would have understood this.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    arnoldyasin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #54

                    Stating the fact that God provides for the needy, does not (in any way) imply that we can ignore our obligation to help others in every way we can.

                    God has made the earth in a way so people can grow their own food. But as long as the rich majority abuses the poor majority, they cannot develop. God has provided the means (rizq), we must use them (jihad). This is God being Rahman, making the universe in such a way we can be self-sustaining like all other species.

                    But I was referring to the people dying now directly of starvation, water shortage, diseases and so on. The people in Birma and so on. They die if WE do not intervene and provide for them. God gave us the means on earth to help others, from there on it is our responsibility.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #55

                      Salam Arnold,

                      God has made the earth in a way so people can grow their own food. But as long as the rich majority abuses the poor majority, they cannot develop. God has provided the means (rizq), we must use them (jihad). This is God being Rahman, making the universe in such a way we can be self-sustaining like all other species.

                      But I was referring to the people dying now directly of starvation, water shortage, diseases and so on. The people in Birma and so on. They die if WE do not intervene and provide for them. God gave us the means on earth to help others, from there on it is our responsibility.

                      There is no disagreement here.

                      1. God does provide for the needy.
                      2. We have a responsibility to do everything we can (as humans) to help those in need.

                      You asked a direct question and it was answered with #1, because that was the direct answer.
                      That does not mean that #2 is no longer true.

                      Salam,
                      Arnab

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        arnoldyasin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #56

                        Salam Arnold,
                        There is no disagreement here.

                        1. God does provide for the needy.
                        2. We have a responsibility to do everything we can (as humans) to help those in need.

                        You asked a direct question and it was answered with #1, because that was the direct answer.
                        That does not mean that #2 is no longer true.

                        Salam,
                        Arnab

                        The question remains, why would He intervene to punish people and not to help them directly instead of indirectly as discussed above.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #57

                          Salam,

                          The question remains, why would He intervene to punish people and not to help them directly instead of indirectly as discussed above.

                          What makes you think that God working through humans to help the needy is "indirect?"

                          By that same reasoning you can say..."why does God use earthquakes or hurricanes or hail stones instead of something more "direct?"

                          We know that in some cases the earthquake and the hail stones (as an example) are direct from God. Just because they can be explained by nature does not mean that they are not "directly from God."

                          The fact is that the hurricane, earthquake for punishment
                          and
                          the person helping the needy for benefit is direct from God.

                          What would satisfy you as "direct?" Angels being sent down in white with halos that shine? (sarcasm)

                          God works through his laws and he intervenes through his laws. And we have the Quran to tell us how to follow these laws to make sure that they are carried out. This includes helping those in need.

                          Salam,
                          Arnab

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Supernaut
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #58

                            We at DRC are not socialistic, nor is Dr. Shabbir. Please read everything before making your judgements.

                            I will never say all of you are. Forgive me if I implied this; however the following is from the DRC intro

                            The need for them to unite under a secular, socialistic political system wherein man can find peace and is focused on benefiting the species as a whole.

                            And the following excerpt is from Dr. Shabbir Ahmed?s qxp-iv

                            The Qur'an urges to be social with your own capital, thus it does not present a social system wherein everything belongs to the state.

                            I completely agree with you.

                            It urges mankind to be social with what it has earned themselves, thus it presents a social-capitalism.

                            Precisely.

                            If you had read the articles and books you would have understood this.

                            I suppose you?re right. I suppose I do need to read the articles on the DRC website.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              arnoldyasin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #59

                              Salam,

                              What makes you think that God working through humans to help the needy is "indirect?"

                              By that same reasoning you can say..."why does God use earthquakes or hurricanes or hail stones instead of something more "direct?"

                              We know that in some cases the earthquake and the hail stones (as an example) are direct from God. Just because they can be explained by nature does not mean that they are not "directly from God."

                              The fact is that the hurricane, earthquake for punishment
                              and
                              the person helping the needy for benefit is direct from God.

                              What would satisfy you as "direct?" Angels being sent down in white with halos that shine? (sarcasm)

                              God works through his laws and he intervenes through his laws. And we have the Quran to tell us how to follow these laws to make sure that they are carried out. This includes helping those in need.

                              Salam,
                              Arnab

                              Now we are almost on the same line of thinking, before you only said God intervened, now you use words I agree with.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #60

                                Salam Arnold,

                                LOL bravo

                                Salam,
                                Arnab

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  arnoldyasin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #61

                                  The need for them to unite under a secular, socialistic political system wherein man can find peace and is focused on benefiting the species as a whole.

                                  Socialistic doesn't make it Marxist or Communistic, it just makes it more social.

                                  And the following excerpt is from Dr. Shabbir Ahmeds qxp-iv

                                  This doesn't take away that people still work for their own capital. It only refers to that the land must be shared equally and not be owned through "I got here first" or to landlord-ship as is done now in many poor countries. Land can be rent or bought, but everyone must have the same opportunity to have access to it.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Prince
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #62

                                    Intervention is a hard subject to understand at the moment for me.

                                    Some opinions are God doesn't intervene.

                                    Some say God does intervene and breaks His Laws.

                                    Some others state God intervenes through His Laws.

                                    Im confused ???

                                    Which option would you choose or have I missed an option?

                                    PEACE

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      arnoldyasin
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #63

                                      I do not believe He intervenes, all things are already programmed into the universe itself, so it needs no outside working anymore. There ar eno flaws in it (506).

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Prince
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #64

                                        Wouldn't you say wahi=divine inspiration is a form of intervention as God didn't have to send us a message??

                                        "It is not fitting for a man that Allah should speak to him except by inspiration, or from behind a veil, or by the sending of a Messenger to reveal, with Allah's permission, what Allah wills, for He is most high, most wise."

                                        From this one could understand that God does intervene through His laws in the form of inspiration.

                                        I guess with intervention at the moment in my understanding its all or nothing, either God intervenes or He doesn't!

                                        PEACE

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          arnoldyasin
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #65

                                          That is also the only intervention I agree on, but even this is an information exchange, not a change of the universe or an overruling of its laws.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users