Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. 11:119 reason for God creating us

11:119 reason for God creating us

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
65 Posts 10 Posters 1.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    muslimahandproud
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Salaam
    Are you asking if 11119 is the reason for God creating us? Verse 119 is just a continuation of verse 118
    "If your Lord had please, He would have made all people a single community, but they continue to have their differences execpt those on whom your Lord has mercy-for he created them to be this way and the word of your Lord is final "I shall definitely fill Hell with both jinn and men."

    I think it means that Allah put people in different communities but if He created us as a single one, we would argue anyway, except those who believe.

    peace

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      belH
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Peace all

      Just wanted to know what you all thought of this verse. The first section of it that is

      "Except whom your Lord has mercy upon; and for that he has created them."

      What other meanings could be ascribed to the use of the word Rahm in this verse?

      Peace
      Please read my understanding of this verse on

      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=16909.msg169913#msg169913

      May God Bless You

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        nimnimak_11
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Thank you two for replying

        I apologise for my late reply.
        I've been occupied with exams.

        Peace and God bless

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          nimnimak_11
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Peace

          Thanks for the link Belalhammad

          I found this to be an interesting reminder

          "Except Making Humans true Submitters by their Free-Well. Indeed, if God wants All humans to be Submitters, he could by saying "Be and it will Be". But he chose to not interfer"

          But my understanding of 11119 is different

          All together I understand that this part of the verse "Except whom your Lord has mercy upon; and for that he has created them"

          Means that God created us so that he can bestow his Rahm upon us. Which i understand to be as God bestowing mercy, kindness and other defenitions of Rahm upon us as from my understanding they cannot be bestowed upon things such as trees.

          Overall i see it as Our sustainer creating us so that he may bless us with things like the reward of success eg keep practicing piano and you suddenly realise you have progressed because it's like God has taught you it (your sustainer).

          I have some difficulty with explaining that which is exactly on my mind but i hope that my post can be understood ;D

          The reason i started this topic, was to check how the word Rahm could be understood in the context of 11119

          Peace and God bless

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            arnoldyasin
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            11119 Save him on whom your Developer of all your stages of evolution has given His Rahma, His continuous nourishment; and for that He did create them.

            http//deenrc.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/quranic-cosmology-a-short-introduction-by-ay-mol-f.pdf

            Raheem - Rahmat - Rahman - (Ra-Ha-Meem).
            According to Arabic grammar Raheem (at the balance of F'aeel like 'Aleem, Hakeem) means one who provides nourishment in the normal course of growth and development, and Rahman (at the balance of F'ulan like 'Atashan) means one who provides nourishment in full force and manifold in an emergency (Al-Minar). In modern biological terms, one can say that the first form Raheem would mean one who provides nourishment during Progressive Evolution and the second Rahman, one who provides nourishment during Emergent Evolution. This needs some more explanation. The Quran says that whatever is there in the universe is constantly developing, and looks towards Him for its nourishment (55/29). So He provides nourishment in every situation - may it be normal state of growth or the accelerated form, so that everything reaches its destination as ordained.
            Reham means a mother's womb, where a foetus gets nourishment, (ready-made, without any effort) and is kept immune from outside influences (Taj). Since mother's womb (Reham) is soft, therefore, this word is also used as against things stiff and unyielding; as verse (48/29) says that one of the qualities of the companions of Rasool-Allah (peace be upon him) is that "they are compassionate among themselves but unyielding to the Kuff'ar."

            The concept of mercy is un-Quranic. It is a Christian concept that a child is born in sin which cannot be washed away with any act that he does, except when he brings faith on Jesus as the son of God and his crucifixion. But according to the Quran, the growth or progress in the process of development is according to the good deeds and all this is according to His Laws which is called Mukaf'at-ul-'Amal. This is the greatest incentive to do upright deeds. One does not achieve this stage of development out of Allah's Grace; he achieves this on account of his own positive actions. This is the basic difference in Islamic and Christian concept of life. Dr. Muhammad Iqbal has mentioned this in one of his verses. A life of Jannah (paradise) which Allah bestows out of grace is not worth it, but the one acquired by one's own deeds and on merit is something really worthwhile. The Quran creates a people, who by virtue of their own actions and noble deeds, win the paradise on merit and not as gratis.

            Rahmat is that gift which would compensate one's shortcomings, visible or invisible, and which should be given according to the requirement. A gift is something which is given free - therefore, Rahmat is that Attribute of Allah by which He provides sources of nourishment free of cost. In verse (17/24) there is a prayer to Rabb, asking Him to provide nourishment "as was provided to me when I was young." Sources of nourishment which come out of rain like crops, etc., are also called Rahmat (30/46, 42/2. All the joys of life (No'ama) which one gets free are also Rahmat (11/9-10). In verse (18/82) the treasure of those two minor children which was preserved and kept hidden under a wall so that they may get it when they grow up was also called Rahmat of Allah.

            Rahmat also means to cover, protect and to provide means of protection. That is why in the Quran Rahmat has been used in contrast to Zarar (10/21, 30/33) and also in contrast to Sayyi'at (30/36) and Ahlaka (67/2.

            One of the most important Attributes of Allah is Rabubiyyat, which is the provision of nourishment to the body as well as to the Nafs through His Laws given through Wahi; therefore, Wahi is also called Rahmat (2/105, 43/32) and Allah, "Rabb-ul-'Al'ameen" - one who provides nourishment to the entire universe. He has, therefore, made it incumbent upon Himself the responsibility of providing nourishment (6/54). In this way He has covered everything in the universe under His Law of Rabubiyyat (40/7). The first verse of Surah Al-F'atiha, therefore, opens with the wordings of Rabbil 'Al'ameen, followed by Ar-Rahman Ar-Raheem (1/1-2).

            http//deenrc.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/glossary-parwez.pdf

            page 52-53

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Salam,

              The concept of mercy is un-Quranic.

              Are you sure you want to make this statement?

              The definition of Mercy From Merrium Webster's online dictionary (http//www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mercy)

              1
              a compassion or forbearance shown especially to an offender or to one subject to one's power; also lenient or compassionate treatment <begged for mercy>

              b imprisonment rather than death imposed as penalty for first-degree murder

              2
              a a blessing that is an act of divine favor or compassion

              b a fortunate circumstance <it was a mercy they found her before she froze>

              3 compassionate treatment of those in distress <works of mercy among the poor>

              ? mercy adjective

              ? at the mercy of
              wholly in the power of with no way to protect oneself against

              synonyms
              mercy, charity, clemency, grace,

              leniency mean a disposition to show kindness or compassion.

              mercy implies compassion that forbears punishing even when justice demands it <threw himself on the mercy of the court>.

              charity stresses benevolence and goodwill shown in broad understanding and tolerance of others <show a little charity for the less fortunate>.

              clemency implies a mild or merciful disposition in one having the power or duty of punishing <the judge refused to show clemency>.

              grace implies a benign attitude and a willingness to grant favors or make concessions <by the grace of God>.

              leniency implies lack of severity in punishing <criticized the courts for excessive leniency>.

              Salam,
              Arnab

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Offline
                B Offline
                belH
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                The concept of mercy is un-Quranic.

                Peace Mr. Arnold Yasin

                Please let me know how would you translate the arabic word "Raham" in the following verses without useing the English word MERCY. confused

                (&#1635
                The son replied "I will be take myself to some mountain it will save me from the water." Noah said "This day nothing can save, from the Command of Allah, any but those on whom He hath mercy!" and the waves came between them, and the son was among those overwhelmed in the Flood. (11-43)

                (&#1639 (&#1640 (&#1641

                Those who sustain the Throne (of Allah) and those around it sing Glory and Praise to their Lord; believe in Him; and implore forgiveness for those who believe "Our Lord! Thy reach is over all things in Mercy, and Knowledge. Forgive, then, those who turn in repentance, and follow Thy Path and preserve them from the Penalty of the Blazing Fire! (7) "And grant our Lord! that they enter the Gardens of Eternity, which Thou hast promised to them, and to the righteous among their fathers, their wives and their posterity! For Thou art (He), the Exalted in Might, Full of Wisdom. "And preserve them from (all) ills; and any whom thou dost preserve from ills that Day on them wilt Thou have bestowed mercy indeed and that will be truly (for them) the highest Achievement.
                (40-9)

                (&#1637 (&#1638

                Say "I would if I disobeyed my Lord, indeed have fear of the penalty of a Mighty Day. (15) "On that day, if the penalty is averted from any, it is due to Allah's Mercy; and that would be (Salvation), the obvious fulfillment of all desire. (6-16)

                (&#1639 (&#1640

                But those whose faces will be (lit with) white, they will be in (the light of) Allah's mercy; therein to dwell (forever). (107) These are the Signs of Allah We rehearse them to thee in Truth and Allah means no injustice to any of His creatures. (3-10

                Now, how would you translate The arabic word "Rezk" in the following verse

                (&#65279
                Eat of the things which Allah hath provided for you, lawful and good but fear Allah, in Whom ye believe. (5-8

                peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Salam,

                  The root rahm has had the same meanings through out the semitic languages.
                  Here is a word study on the root.

                  Hebrew

                  From Strong's Concordance and Hebrew and Greek Lexicon and The Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon

                  H7355

                  racham
                  raw-kham'
                  A primitive root; to fondle; by implication to love, especially to compassionate - have compassion (on, upon), love, (find, have, obtain, shew) mercy (-
                  iful, on, upon), (have) pity, Ruhamah, X surely.
                  BDB Definition

                  1. to love, love deeply, have mercy, be compassionate, have tender affection, have compassion
                    1a) (Qal) to love
                    1b) (Piel)
                    1b1) to have compassion, be compassionate
                    1b1a) of God, man
                    1c) (Pual) to be shown compassion, be compassionate
                    Part of Speech verb
                    A Related Word by BDB/Strong?s Number a primitive root
                    Same Word by TWOT Number 2146

                  H7356

                  racham
                  rakh'-am
                  From H7355; compassion (in the plural); by extension the womb (as cherishing the foetus); by implication a maiden - bowels, compassion, damsel,
                  tender love, (great, tender) mercy, pity, womb.
                  BDB Definition

                  1. womb (noun masculine)
                  2. compassion (noun masculine absolute plural intensive)
                    Part of Speech see above in Definition
                    A Related Word by BDB/Strong?s Number from H7355
                    Same Word by TWOT Number 2146a

                  H7357

                  racham
                  rakh'-am
                  The same as H7356; pity; Racham, an Israelite - Raham.
                  BDB Definition
                  Raham = ?belly?

                  1. a Judaite, son of Shema, father of Jorkoam, and of the descendants of Caleb
                    Part of Speech noun proper masculine
                    A Related Word by BDB/Strong?s Number the same as H7356

                  H7358

                  rechem
                  rekh'-em
                  From H7355; the womb (compare H7356) - matrix, womb.
                  BDB Definition

                  1. womb
                    1a) womb
                    1b) womb-man, woman-slave, woman, two women
                    Part of Speech noun masculine
                    A Related Word by BDB/Strong?s Number from H7355
                    Same Word by TWOT Number 2146a

                  From the Theological Word Book of the Old Testament

                  2146 - raham

                  Hebrew Word raham
                  Strong's Cross Reference 7355
                  Definition I, love deeply; have mercy, be compassionate. Denominative verb.

                  Derivative TWOT Number 2146a
                  Derivative Transliteration rehem, raham
                  Derivative Strong's Cross Reference 7356
                  Derivative Definition womb.

                  Derivative TWOT Number 2146b
                  Derivative Transliteration rahamim
                  Derivative Strong's Cross Reference 7358
                  Derivative Definition tender mercy.

                  Derivative TWOT Number 2146c
                  Derivative Transliteration rahum
                  Derivative Strong's Cross Reference 7361
                  Derivative Definition compassionate.

                  Derivative TWOT Number 2146d
                  Derivative Transliteration rahamani
                  Derivative Strong's Cross Reference 7362
                  Derivative Definition compassionate women (Lam_410).

                  This root refers to deep love (usually of a "superior" for an "inferior&quot rooted in some "natural" bond. In the Piel it is used for the deep inward feeling

                  we know variously as compassion, pity, mercy. Probably raham is related to Akkadian remu (cf. Ugaritic rhm, G. Schmuttermayr, "RHM----Eine

                  lexikalische Studie," Bib 51499ff). This root is to be distinguished in emphasis from hus and hamal. Sometimes hanen is rendered "mercy" with

                  emphasis on the graciousness with which such is extended. This verb and its derivatives occur 133 times.

                  raham is used infrequently (twelve of forty- seven times) of men. It is used only once in the Qal when the Psalmist confesses his love for Jehovah

                  (Psa_181 ). The depth of this love is shown by the connection of this word with rehem/raham. Compare, Isaiah (Isa_4915) who uses it of a

                  mother's love toward her nursing baby. It can also refer to a father's love (Psa_10313). Apparently, this verb connotes the feeling of mercy which

                  men have for each other by virtue of the fact that they are human beings (Jer_5042) and which is most easily prompted by small babies (Isa_131

                  or other helpless people. It is this natural mercy for the helpless that Israel's and Babylon's enemies will lack in their cruelty (Isa_1318; Jer_623),

                  although God may give Israel's enemies such feeling (compassion) (1Ki_850; Jer_4212). Indeed, the prophets (Isa_131 conjoin hus (the feeling

                  which flows from one to another), hamal (the strength of feeling which leads one to action in behalf of another, i.e. to spare them some difficulty), and

                  raham (the deep inner feeling based on some "natural" bond) when describing what Babylon (Jer_217) and God (Jer_1314) will lack toward Israel.

                  This root is frequently used of God. It incorporates two concepts first, the strong tie God has with those whom he has called as his children

                  (Psa_10313). God looks upon his own as a father looks upon his children; he has pity on them (cf. Mic_717). The second concept is that of God's

                  unconditioned choice (hanen, grace). God tells Moses that he is gracious and merciful to whomever he chooses (Exo_3319).

                  There are several ideas attached to God's deep, tender love first, the unconditional election of God (Exo_3319); next, his mercy and forgiveness

                  toward his people in the face of deserved judgment and upon the condition of their repentance (Deu_1317 ); also, God's continuing mercy and

                  grace in preserving his unrepentant people from judgment (2Ki_1323) Thus this attribute becomes the basis in part of an eschatological hope (cf.

                  Isa_141; Isa_4913; Isa_547; Jer_1215; Jer_3326; Eze_3425; Mic_719; Zec_116). It is noteworthy that Deuteronomy (Deu_303) prophesies

                  the exile because of Israel's sin, stipulating that repentance will meet with God's tender compassion. So we read of the withdrawal of God's merey

                  resulting in harsh judgment at the hands of Babylon (Isa_917 ; Isa_2711; Hos_24 . During the exile Israel's leaders encouraged the

                  people with God's electing love and tender-mercy (Lam_332), and led them in humbling themselves in repentance, calling upon God to reinstate his

                  fatherlike compassion (Zec_112). The restitution of the father-son relation ship and the return from the exile witnesses this accompanying loving care

                  (Hos_223 ). Scripture makes it certain that the exile was brought by God and terminated by God (Eze_3925) according to his sovereign

                  providence (Isa_3018; cf. E. J. Young, The Book of Isaiah, 11, p. 353f.). Finally, the prophets' message regarding the return from the exile opens

                  onto a permanent state where the father-son relationship will never be broken (Hos_223 ; Isa_548, Isa_5410).

                  rehem, raham. Womb, maiden. The latter usage occurs in Jdg_530 and is attested in Ugaritic (Jug 4911,27) where btlt 'nt (Maiden Anat) is called

                  rhm 'nt (Maiden Anat) (UT 19 no. 2321). 19 no. 2321).

                  rehem/raham is to be distinguished from beten "belly." (Cf. Jdg_530 where pars pro toto it refers w a woman.) Hence beten and rehem/ raham are

                  used as parallels only when speaking of conception and birth.

                  That rehem/raham designates the womb is clear from passages like Jer_2017 where the prophet bemoans his birth. He wishes that he had been

                  slain in the womb and thus his mother's womb would always have been great. Job (Job_101 says that had he not been brought forth from the

                  womb, no eye would have seen him. Even clearer is God's analogy depicting his sovereign cutting of the flood waters of Noah's day which broke

                  forth "as if it had issued out of the womb" (Job_388 ).

                  It is clear that birth and conception are controlled by God who opens (Gen_2931) or closes (Gen_201 the womb at will (cf. Num_816 where

                  "firstborn" is the one who opens the womb). Consequently, birth is not merely a product of natural law, but a blessing from God (Gen_4925). The

                  rebellious sinner, however, bears no children ("the womb shall forget him, " Job_2420) or is to be cursed with a miscarrying womb (Hos_914). Israel

                  is to confess that having and keeping children is God's doing. They do this by setting apart all the firstborn (human or beast) to God. God is a

                  covenant God who requires a "covering" or "atonement" (see kipper), a blood sacrifice. Because of the blood, God passed over the firstborn of

                  "believers" in Egypt. Hence all firstborn of those under the covenant belong to God and are to be sacrificed to him. He does direct, however, that

                  children (and unclean animals) are to be redeemed (Num_1815). He claims the Levites in their place (Num_312). Israel's idolaters recognized

                  God's claim on their firstborn children but wrongly sacrificed them to him (Eze_2026).

                  All men (righteous and wicked) owe their birth to God and are responsible to serve him (Job_3115). God's people Israel were recipients of his

                  special care (election) from conception to death. He sustained them in all of life (Isa_463). God encourages them by reminding them of this during

                  the affliction of the exile. God applies this principle to an individual when he tells Jeremiah (Jer_15) that before he was formed in the womb, he had

                  designated and appointed him a prophet to the nations. David, a type of the Messiah, find solace in this thought when he freely confessed his

                  dependence on God since his birth (cast forth from the womb, Psa_2210 . This is also true of the Servant, the messianic King, whose ever

                  step reflected his dependence on the Father (cf. Isa_491). The elect are sustained by God from birth. It is their responsibility to confess and submit

                  to that calling (Jer_15). God so works in life to bring them to that confession and submission (Isa_463, cf. 'ana, III, "affliction&quot. Contrariwise, from

                  birth the wicked are estrange from God and go astray (Psa_483 ).

                  rahamim. Tender mercy, compassion. This word shows the link between rabam, "to have compassion" (Piel) and rehem/raham, "womb, ' for rahamim

                  can refer to the seat of one's emotions (Gen_4330) or the expression of one's deep emotion (1Ki_326); cf. J. Pedersen, Israel, 1936, pp. 309,

                  525).

                  rahamim recalls in various situations that God's tender-mercy is rooted in his free love and grace. Hence, God's punishment is more desirable than

                  man's wrath (2Sa_2414). God's mercy is often combined with his hesed "love, " "kindness" and hen, in "grace, " "unmerited favor." God's anger and

                  wrath are the opposite of his loving mercy (Deu_1318; Zec_112; Psa_779). In times of captivity (esp. the exile, Dan_91 Israel is summoned to

                  repentance on the grounds of God's fatherlike compassion (2Ch_309), and God responds (Isa_547). The Psalmist often beseeches God for

                  expressions of his tender mercies to relieve his distress (Psa_511 ) or confesses that undeserved relief is due to God's tender mercies and

                  grace (Psa_1034). The eschaton is to witness God's unconditional and unbroken love and care (Hos_219 ); when Israel repents (Deu_303;

                  Isa_557; Zec_1210).

                  rahum. Compassionate, merciful- This adjective is used only of God (with the possible exception of Psa_1124) setting forth one of his attributes, i.e.

                  what God gives forth in raham he has in rahum.

                  rahamani. compassionate. This adjective describes the depth of feeling a mother's love can reach. Women who so loved their children boiled them

                  for food during the siege by the Babylonians (Lam_410).

                  Bibliography Dahood, M., "Denominative rihham, 'to conceive, enwomb', " Bib 44204- 205. THAT, II, pp. 761-67. L.J.C.

                  From Vine's Complete Expository Dictionary of Old Testament Words

                  Compassion, Be Merciful

                  A. Verb.
                  racham (H7355), "to have compassion, be merciful, pity." The words from this root are found 125 times in all parts of the Old Testament. The root is

                  also found in Assyrian, Ethiopic, and Aramaic.
                  The verb is translated "love" once "I will love thee, O Lord..." (Psa_181). Racham is also used in God's promise to declare His name to Moses "I

                  will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and

                  will show mercy on whom I will show mercy" (Exo_3319). So men pray "Remember, O Lord, thy tender mercies and thy loving-kindnesses"

                  (Psa_256); and Isaiah prophesies messianic restoration "...With great mercies will I gather thee.... But with everlasting kindness will I have mercy on

                  thee, saith the Lord thy Redeemer" (Isa_547-. This is the heart of salvation by the suffering Servant-Messiah.
                  B. Nouns.
                  rechem (H735, "bowels; womb; mercy." The first use of rechem is in its primary meaning of "womb" "The Lord had fast closed up all the wombs of

                  the house of Abimelech" (Gen_201. The word is personified in Jdg_530 "Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two...?" In

                  another figurative sense, the KJV reads in 1Ki_326 "Her bowels yearned upon her son," which the NIV translates more idiomatically " was

                  filled with compassion for her son." The greatest frequency is in this figurative sense of "tender love," such as a mother has for the child she has

                  borne.
                  rachamim (H7356), "bowels; mercies; compassion." This noun, always used in the plural intensive, occurs in Gen_4314 "And God Almighty give

                  you mercy ." In Gen_4330, it is used of Joseph's feelings toward Benjamin "His bowels did yearn upon his brother." (NIV,

                  "He was deeply moved at the sight of his brother.&quot Rachamim is most often used of God, as by David in 2Sa_2414 "Let us fall now into the hand of

                  the Lord; for his mercies are great...." We have the equivalent Aramaic word in Daniel's request to his friends "That they would desire mercies of the

                  God of heaven concerning this secret..." (Dan_21.
                  The Greek version of the Old Testament racham consists chiefly of three groups of words that come into the New Testament. Eleos is the most

                  important, and it is used to translate several Hebrew words. Mary's song recalls the promise in Psa_10311, Psa_10317, where eleos translates both

                  rechem and chesed as "mercy" "His mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation" (Luk_150). Racham is probably behind the often

                  -heard plea "Thou son of David, have mercy on us" (Mat_927).
                  C. Adjective.
                  rachum (H7349), "compassionate; merciful." The adjective is used in that important proclamation of God's name to Moses "The Lord, The Lord God,

                  merciful and gracious..." (Exo_346, NASB, NIV, "compassionate&quot.

                  Aramaic

                  From Strong's Concordance and Hebrew and Greek Lexicon and The Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon

                  H7359

                  rechem
                  rekh-ame'
                  (Chaldee); corresponding to H7356; (plural) pity - mercy.
                  BDB Definition

                  1. compassion
                    Part of Speech noun masculine plural intensive
                    A Related Word by BDB/Strong?s Number corresponding to H7356
                    Same Word by TWOT Number 2995

                  From the Theological Word Book of the Old Testament

                  2995 - rahamin

                  Aramaic Word rahamin
                  Strong's Cross Reference 7359
                  Definition compassion. Used in the plural to express intensity. Common in Hebrew, which also uses the root raham.

                  Arabic

                  From Project Root List / Edward Lane's Arabic English Lexicon
                  http//www.studyquran.co.uk/PRLonline.htm

                  Ra-Ha-Miim =
                  Rahima - He favored, benefited, pardoned, or forgave him. To love, have tenderness, mercy, pity, forgiveness, have all that is required for exercising

                  beneficence.
                  Tarhamu - He had mercy, pity, or compassion on him; he pitied or compassionated him much.
                  Arham - Wombs (singular) womb, i.e. place of origin. The receptacle of the young in the belly.
                  Ruhmun - Relationship, i.e. nearness of kin, connection by birth; relationship connecting with an ancestor. A connection or tie of relationship.
                  Rahman - it is active participle noun in the measure of fa'lan which conveys the idea of fullness and extensiveness.
                  Rahim - it is in the measure of fa'il which denotes the idea of constant repetition and giving.

                  rahima vb. (1)
                  perf. act. 616, 1143, 11119, 1253, 2375, 409, 4442, 6728
                  impf. act. 723, 7149, 971, 1147, 178, 1754, 2921
                  impv. 2286, 7155, 1724, 23109, 23118
                  impf. pass. 3132, 6155, 763, 7204, 2456, 2746, 3645, 4910
                  n.vb. 264, 2105, 2157, 2178, 2218, 38, 374, 3107, 3157, 3159, 483, 496, 4113, 4175, 612, 654, 6133, 6147, 6154, 6157, 749, 752,

                  756, 757, 772, 7151, 7154, 7156, 7203, 921, 961, 999, 1021, 1057, 1058, 1086, 119, 1117, 1128, 1158, 1163, 1166, 1173, 1194,

                  1256, 12111, 1256, 1664, 1689, 1724, 1728, 1757, 1782, 1787, 17100, 1810, 1816, 1858, 1865, 1882, 1898, 192, 1921, 1950, 1953,

                  2175, 2184, 2186, 21107, 2410, 2414, 2420, 2421, 2548, 2719, 2763, 2777, 2843, 2846, 2873, 2886, 2923, 2951, 3021, 3033, 3036,

                  3046, 3050, 313, 3317, 352, 3644, 389, 3843, 399, 3938, 3938, 3953, 407, 4150, 428, 4228, 4248, 4332, 4332, 446, 4520, 4530,

                  4612, 4825, 5713, 5727, 5728, 7631
                  pcple. act. 7151, 7151, 1264, 1264, 1292, 1292, 2183, 2183, 23109, 23118

                  arham n.m. (pl. of rahim or rihm) 2228, 36, 41, 6143, 6144, 875, 138, 225, 3134, 336, 4722, 603

                  marhamah n.f. 9017

                  rahim n.m. (pl. ruhama) 11, 13, 237, 254, 2128, 2143, 2160, 2163, 2173, 2182, 2192, 2199, 2218, 2226, 331, 389, 3129, 416, 423,

                  425, 429, 464, 496, 4100, 4106, 4110, 4129, 4152, 53, 534, 539, 574, 598, 654, 6145, 6165, 7153, 7167, 869, 870, 95, 927, 991,

                  999, 9102, 9104, 9117, 9118, 9128, 10107, 1141, 1190, 1253, 1298, 1436, 1549, 167, 1618, 1647, 16110, 16115, 16119, 1766,

                  2265, 245, 2420, 2422, 2433, 2462, 256, 2570, 269, 2668, 26104, 26122, 26140, 26159, 26175, 26191, 26217, 2711, 2730, 2816,

                  305, 326, 335, 3324, 3343, 3350, 3359, 3373, 342, 365, 3658, 3953, 412, 4132, 425, 4442, 468, 4814, 4829, 495, 4912, 4914,

                  5228, 579, 5728, 5812, 5910, 5922, 607, 6012, 6414, 661, 7320

                  rahman n.m. (always with the definite article)11, 13, 2163, 1330, 17110, 1918, 1926, 1944, 1945, 1958, 1961, 1969, 1975, 1978, 1985,

                  1987, 1988, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 205, 2090, 20108, 20109, 2126, 2136, 2142, 21112, 2526, 2359, 2560, 2560, 2563, 265, 2730,

                  3611, 3615, 3623, 3652, 412, 4317, 4319, 4320, 4333, 4336, 4345, 4381, 5033, 551, 5922, 673, 6719, 6720, 6729, 7837, 7838

                  ruhm n.m. 1881

                  LL, V3, p 221, 222, 223

                  From Hans Wehr
                  http//www.ghazali.org/books/wehr-cowan-76.pdf

                  1. to have mercy, have compassion,
                  2. uterus, womb, relationship, kinship

                  Salam,
                  Arnab

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    arnoldyasin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Salaam,

                    Are you sure you want to make this statement?

                    A 100%. The Qur'an does not uphold the concept of religious mercy as displayed in Christianity. You can come with the ENGLISH definition but this is NOT the Arabic defintion of Rahima. Rahima means a womb, and so the "mercy" displayed by a womb is that of non-discriminating nourishment and protection until the foetus is completed into perfection. This has nothing to do with sin or being "merciful" in judgement.

                    For example

                    mercy implies compassion that forbears punishing even when justice demands it <threw himself on the mercy of the court>.

                    996-8 On that Day will all people come forth as separate entities, to be shown their deeds.
                    Then whoever has done an atom's
                    weight of good, will see it. And whoever has done an atom's weight of evil, will see it.

                    2147 We will set up the scales of justice on the Day of Resurrection,
                    and no person will be wronged in the least. Though the good or evil be
                    of the weight of a mustard seed, We will bring it forth. We are Sufficient
                    for reckoning and none can take account as We do.

                    EVERY deed will have an effect on your evolution, the above verses are clear on this.

                    From "Qur'anic Cosmology a modern introduction"

                    Many religions use the word sin for certain acts they claim are wrong and for
                    which you will be punished by their deity. The Quran is very clear, God cannot be
                    offended or harmed in any way. So any deed will only be judged on its beneficence
                    towards humanity (1317), or how it harms and corrupts your own personality. The
                    consequences of any harmful deed will be experienced over time if they are not
                    compensated by contributing to humanity. But the consequences, or effects of a persons
                    deeds are not present immediately. A delay is made in them so every person has the time
                    to gain more knowledge and understand the wrong they have done, the delay gives time
                    for the persons to reform themselves and compensate the damage done.
                    Mankind has created several concepts on how to redeem its sins they believe they will be
                    punished for by the deity. It is a mythological concept of how their deeds effect their
                    environment and the universe. The main concept man has created is the concept of
                    salvation. Salvation is based on the concept of pleasing or acknowledging a god or gods
                    through rituals, good deeds and/or faith and thus hope to have his sins forgiven by the
                    deity to be rewarded by a mythological paradise or easy rewards on earth. The Quran
                    breaks away this man-made belief by saying not even a deed smaller than an atom will be
                    neglected (997- and thus completely rejecting the concept of salvation.

                    996-8 On that Day will all people come forth as separate entities, to be shown their deeds.
                    Then whoever has done an atom's
                    weight of good, will see it. And whoever has done an atom's weight of evil, will see it.

                    I am in agreement with scholar Muhammed Ali and Dr. Sayed Abdul Wadud37 that
                    Maliki Yauwme AldDeen (verse 14), refers to a sort of Quranic karma as it can be
                    understood as He that controls the Realm of Existence (Malik) through the System of
                    Judgement (Deen) that is present in this period of the Universe (Yauwme)38. Whereby a

                    Footnote
                    37 Page 4-5. Quran translation and commentary by Muhammed Ali, 2004 2nd edition. And Gateway to the
                    Quran by Dr. Sayed Abdul Wadud where on page 137 he says verse 14 means The sustenance of
                    human body is a gift from Allah but the nourishment and development of his Personality is subject to the
                    deeds he performs, the results of which are under complete control of Allah's law of requital, in this world
                    and in the hereafter.

                    constant system of cause and effect creates the outcomes of your deeds and the effects of
                    them on your further evolution in the Universe.

                    The Quran gives thus a far more practical concept then salvation, that of compensation.
                    To attain salvation is many times very vague within religions, and people will always just
                    hope for it, by performing rituals and be good and the rest depends on the mood or the
                    mercy of their deity. It creates a very uncertain situation where man doesnt know the
                    outcome. The Quran presents a more logical and fair system, where mankind know
                    exactly what to do to redress and how to correct their mistakes.
                    When a person has done a deed which has hurt his fellow men, or when a person has
                    done deeds which corrupts its own character, the Quran gives a simple solution. The
                    person must first understand what he has done wrong, and then take action by not
                    adopting that path again, this is called Tauba in the Quran. Tauba means To return to
                    the correct point on a path after it is discovered the wrong path had been taken39. After
                    this, another action must be taken, not that of rituals, but of humanistic action.

                    11114 Strive to establish and consolidate the Divine System, day and night.
                    Actions that create balance in the society, Al-Hassanat 40remove the ill effects of inequities,
                    Al-Sayyi41.Good deeds remove bad deeds. This is a Reminder for those who pay attention.

                    Footnotes
                    38 Exposition of Surah Al-Fatiha by Arnold Yasin Mol, 2007. Explanation of the words usedMalik means
                    ruler, king, the one who is control and authority of a realm, former of Rules and Laws and the one who
                    also executes them. It doesn't refer to a human king in this verse, as the Alif makes the word and its
                    definitions in an absolute form and thus makes it refer to the Universal Force. Thus Malik means the
                    Divine Appointer and Executer of Laws and Rules. Yauwme doesn't mean Day in its original sense, but
                    Time, Era or Period. It was used for day but also for long periods as can be seen for example in the
                    Quran where it is used for a moment , 1000 years and 50.000 years . Yauwme in this verse
                    and some other verses in the Quran refers to this phase of existence, the first Era of Life. Deen has many
                    meanings. System of law, Debt, Cause and Effect, Judgment, Order, Way of Life, Requital, Outcome of an
                    Affair. To translate it with Religion is wrong, as Islam covers all fields of Life, from Economics to State to
                    Individual affairs. Religions mostly only control personal affairs and moral. In 933 it is foretold that Islam
                    will overcome all other Deen, this thus also refer to Communism, Capitalistic Secularism and all other
                    systems of life on Earth. Again, to translate it only with 'judgment' or 'requital' cuts out the other meanings
                    of Deen and Malik. Thus all definitions must be given to have the correct understanding of this verse and
                    the wide meanings it creates through the combinations of these 3 definitions.

                    39 Page 77-78 under the root Taba. Dictionary of the Holy Quran by Abdul Mannar Omar, 2006 4th
                    edition. To return; repent; turn one's self in a repentant manner (with ila or without it), turn with mercy
                    (with ala), adapt And page 84-87. Exposition of the Quran, Mafhum Al-Quran by G.A. Parwez. 1990.
                    Page 358 Volume 1. Arabic-English Lexicon by Edward William Lane, based on Taj-Ul-Roos, 2003 2nd
                    reprint. It gives To return to obedience to God.

                    40 Page 206-208 Volume 2, Arabic-English Lexicon by Edward William Lane, based on Taj-Ul-Roos, 2003
                    2nd reprint. Make good, seem good/beautiful/comely/pleasing, be excellent, make or render a thing good
                    or goodly, to beautify/embellish/adorn a thing, strive or compete in goodness, to do good or act well, act or
                    behave with goodness or in a pleasing manner towards a person, confer a benefit or benefits upon a
                    person, act graciously with a person.

                    The system of compensation is fair, practical and clear. Your further progress of
                    evolution is not based on rituals or belief, but on your actions to benefit mankind. Al-
                    Hassanat can only be done towards other humans, not to God. And Al-Sayyi can only be
                    done to other humans, not to God. The concept of sin is not present in the Quran. Words
                    as Ithm, although many times translated as sin in the majority of Quran translations, have
                    a far more clearer meaning. Ithm , for example, refers to being weak and slow, to be the
                    last camel in the caravan42. It gives an idea that persons committing Ithm do not commit
                    a sin towards God, but harm themselves and their environment, so that it becomes
                    weak. It describes that harmful deeds can weaken the persons position within the cosmic
                    evolutionary scale as the person has done things which has not contributed society, but
                    even weakened its potential and slows its progress. If the damage done to ones Self or
                    their environment is not compensated, the compensation, the requital of the damage will
                    be experienced in this life or in the next phase of the universe. One way or another, if
                    man doesnt compensate the damage he may have done, then the universe will
                    compensate it with you.

                    The word Ghafara has also been presented in a very wrong way. Ghafara means to
                    protect against dirt or harm43, it does not mean forgiveness in the Qur'an, as 996-7 and
                    2147 clearly point out is not present in the universal system. But this doesnt mean God
                    has not created any ease or exceptions within this system of compensation. God is also
                    called Al-Afaa, Afaa means to remit previous deeds, it also means the surplus of
                    something (see 2219). It is used around 7 times for God who remitted those that upheld
                    their present life above the better one. He is Al-Afaa because people are given time to
                    remit their wrongdoing and because He gives more (surplus) for every good deed
                    (6160)44. In the Quran, forgiveness stands for giving room to compensate for wrong
                    deeds done. The Quran An Encyclopedia says Forgiveness involves a change of heart
                    that may advocate that the wrongdoer receives punishment or be considered accountable
                    for redressing the wrong. 45

                    Footnotes
                    41Page 181-183 Volume 4, Arabic-English Lexicon by Edward William Lane, based on Taj-Ul-Roos, 2003
                    2nd reprint. To treat badly, do evil to disgrace, be evil/wicked/vicious, ill, anything that makes a person
                    sad and sorrowful, bad action, mischief and corruption

                    42 Page 58-59 Volume 1 under the root Athima. Arabic-English Lexicon by Edward William Lane, based on
                    Taj-Ul-Roos, 2003 2nd reprint. It explains on page 59 she-camel, (S,) and she-camels, slow, or tardy;
                    meary, fatigued, or jaded. That is slack, or ldo, in pace, or going.

                    43 Page 405-406 under the root Ghafara. Dictionary of the Holy Quran by Abdul Mannar Omar, 2006 4th
                    edition.It says To give protect, to cover over, shield, suppress the defect, set the affairs right. Ghafar al-
                    Mataa means He put the goods in the bag and covered and protected them. Mighafar is a shield and
                    helmet. Ghafr means covering with that which protects a thing from dirt. Ghafour, name of God The
                    Protector. Page 15-16, Exposition of the Quran, Mafhum Al-Quran by G.A. Parwez. 1990. Page 57-59
                    Volume 6, Arabic-English Lexicon by Edward William Lane, based on Taj-Ul-Roos, 2003 2nd reprint.

                    44 Page 379-380 under the root Afa. Dictionary of the Holy Quran by Abdul Mannar Omar, 2006 4th
                    edition

                    45 Page 213-216 under Forgiveness,by Bahar Davary. The Quran An Encyclopedia edited by Oliver
                    Leaman, 2008 Paperback.

                    The effects of their deeds on their own Self will be judged according to these factors
                    The persons is judged on intention (2225, 589).
                    Has no knowledge of the law or the Divine Law or doesnt understand it
                    correctly (6131).
                    Is minor or insane and not capable of understanding (1736).
                    Is forced to do a thing (16106).

                    The above mentioned factors that will determine the recompense of the persons deeds,
                    and these are also used in almost all courts of law in the world.
                    The system of compensation have been made in a merciful way, whereby the benefiting
                    deeds have more weight on the universal scale then the harming ones.

                    1. He who does a good deed will receive ten times its worth; and he who does evil will
                      be requited to an equal degree; and no one will be wronged.

                    4146 Whoever does good to others, does good to his own self, and whoever causes
                    imbalance in the lives of others, hurts his own self. Your Lord is never unjust to His
                    servants.

                    This system of compensation is thus not a religious one, but takes on the form of a
                    natural law that determines the fall and rise of nations and the development of human
                    personality.

                    Robert Briffault
                    In the natural scale, that action is good which contributes to the process of human
                    development, that act is evil which tends to impede, retard, oppose that process that
                    individual life is well deserving which is in the direct line of that evolution, that is futile
                    which lies outside the course of its advance; that is Condemned which endeavours to
                    oppose the current. That is the natural, the absolute and actual standard of moral values.
                    Nature does not value the most saintly and charitable life which brings no contribution to
                    human growth, as much as a single act which permanently promotes the evolution of the
                    race. The only measure of worth of which nature takes any account by perpetuating it
                    is the contribution offered towards the building tip of a higher humanity. 46

                    Footnote
                    46 Page 352. The Making of Humanity by Robert Briffault, 1919.

                    As we can see in the above verses it is clear not one
                    single deed will be ignored and forgotten. The Quran gives these laws which operate the
                    judgment system which will determine if a person is fit for further evolution

                    Every human action affects his own Self (6164). His deeds are recorded by the
                    Universal Forces, Malikah, constantly into the Umm Al-Kitaab, the Divine
                    datebase which is called the Quantum Field/Vacuum by scientists (2147, 997-6,
                    7829, 8210-12).
                    The Self is also affected by hidden and unfulfilled desires or intentions as these
                    are the foundations for further actions not committed (4019).
                    Only Allah knows how much credit or discredit is to be given to a particular act.
                    (5332), but the benefiting deeds outweigh the harmful ones by 10 to 1 (6160).
                    And Gods Rahma, all the resources for further development, is the reason for our
                    creation, and this will also weigh, He has created us for further development, this
                    is His driving thought behind our creation, and this will decide how His law of
                    judgment will work
                    11119 Save him on whom your Developer of all your stages of evolution has given
                    His Rahma, His continuous nourishment; and for that He did create them.
                    When the new universe is created, to determine the level of evolution (Jannah), or
                    non-evolution (Jahannam), all the actions will be weighed. Those whose balance
                    of good and constructive deeds are in the majority (is heavier) will evolve further,
                    but those whose balance goes against them (is lighter) are the ones who have
                    harmed themselves by their willful rejection of Allah's Message and will be in a
                    state of non-evolution (78-9).
                    As the system is fair and based on your personal development, no one would be
                    able to help any other, nor any intercession is allowed (2123).
                    No action would go un-recompensated (325).
                    Everyone will get the consequence of his own deeds. (7147, 5216, 3739,
                    452.
                    Absolute and full justice will be done, and no one will be dealt with unjustly, as
                    the selection is made by laws and not by emotions (16111, 4017, 3970).
                    No one will be able to transfer his good or bad deeds to others every person will
                    be judged on their own contributions or harm to ones Self or others (2286,
                    6105, 6165, 10108, 1317, 177, 1715, 2740, 2792, 296, 3112, 3518, 3941,
                    4515).

                    http//deenrc.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/quranic-cosmology-a-short-introduction-by-ay-mol-f.pdf

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      arnoldyasin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      The root rahm has had the same meanings through out the semitic languages.

                      1. The root is Rahima NOT rahma.
                      2. Arabic was created in a different enviroment and by a different culture.
                      3. The Qur'an is in a clear Arabic language, NOT in Hebrew or Aramaic.
                      4. Although the languages are related and it is always good to see how they display the roots they can NEVER stand above the Arabic meaning since they were formed in DIFFERENT enviroments and by different cultures.
                      5. Both Hebrew and Aramaic were languages created under monarchy rule. Arabic was created by a FREE nomadic people. This has a very different effect on the language.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        arnoldyasin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Salam,

                        When you will understand that Rahima stands for nourishment, protection and further development, then the verses are very clear

                        1. Noahs son replied I shall not accompany you but you need not worry about me. I will climb upon the mountain which shall protect me from the flood. Noah said None is saved this day from the decree of Allah except those who take refuge in His Rahmat, protection.

                        God's Rahmat at that moment was that He had warned Noah to built the boat, and if the son had joined Noah in the boat, he would have fallen into God's protection.

                        And this is a closer rendition of the verse

                        407-9 Those who carry (yahmiluna) the Throne and those around it strive to (yusabbihuna=to strive/swim) manifest the Glory of their Rabb, Developer towards perfection; Have trust in Him (aminua= to have trust) ; and seek protection (yastaghfiruna=to protect as a helmet, mighfar=helmet) for those who acknowledge their trust(aminua)

                        "Our Rabb, Developer towards perfection! You encompass (wasi'ta) everything with your sustaining nourishment, protection (Rahmat) and Knowledge. Protect (faGhafir), then, those who turn back towards the right path (tabu=to return to obedience), and follow Your Way and protect (qi=to protect or guard) them from the obstacle (A3dhaba=obstacle/hindrance) of Jahim, state of receding (jahima, to stop or recede).

                        "Our Rabb, Developer towards perfection, that they enter the Gardens of Eternity, which You have promised to them, and to the ones who were righteous and good to society (salaha=to reform society) among their fathers, their spouses (wives or husbands) and their posterity!

                        For You are the Exalted in Might, Full of Wisdom. "And guard (qi=to guard/protect) them from oppression by other people (sayyi'at=to oppress, hurt other people); and any whom You protect (taqi=you protect/guard) against oppression (sayyi'at=oppression/harm) in that Period (yauwme=period/time/era) on them You you give constant nourishment and protection (rahmatahu) and that will be truly (for them) the highest Achievement.

                        The translation you presented mistranslated many Arabic defintions.

                        615-16 Say "I indeed am afraid (akhafu=to fear), if I rebelled against (asaytu=to rebell/defy/disobey) my Rabb, Developer towards perfection, the obstacle (A3budhu=obstacles/hindrance) in that Period (yauwme=period/era/time) would be immense (azim=big/immense/great etc.).

                        "From whoever it is diverted (yusrafu) that Period, that person has received Allah's protection and nourishment as that of a womb (Rahima); and that would be the succes (fawz=succes/triumph/victory), the most manifest (mubin=manifest/obvious).

                        3107-108 And as those whose faces became bright (abyaddat=to brighten up/shine) they will be in Allah's constant nourishment and protection (rahmati), They in there shall remain forever existing (khalidun=to live forever).

                        These are the evidences (ayat=evidence/sign) of Allah, We recite them out loud to you in truth and Allah does not have in mind (yuridu=intend/have in mind) to do injustice and displace (zulm=injustice/oppression/to displace something) to all creation (alamin=all beings and objects that point towards being created).

                        Rahima means to provide, nourish and protect a creation to develop it further as a womb does to a foetus.
                        Rizq comes from Razaqa which means to provide, supply and to bestow. This is thus PART of the Rahima, nourishment, it is only 1 part of Rahima, which is much more then just providing.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13
                          1. The root is Rahima NOT rahma.

                          Perhaps my transliteration was unclear...ra-ha-meem....and yes...we are speaking of the same root.

                          1. Arabic was created in a different enviroment and by a different culture.

                          This is absolutely untrue.

                          Arabic evolved from Aramaic/Hebrew. And, Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic are all dialects of the Semitic Language.

                          http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic#History

                          Modern Arabic is considered to be part of the Arabo-Canaanite sub-branch of the central group of West Semitic languages. While Arabic is not the oldest of the Semitic languages, it shares many features with the common ancestor for all Semitic languages in the Afro-Asiatic group of languages, Proto-Semitic whose phonological, morphological, and syntactic features have been determined by linguists. Many linguists consider Arabic to be the most conservative of the modern Semitic languages because of how completely it preserves the features of Proto-Semitic.

                          The earliest texts in Proto-Arabic, or Ancient North Arabian, are the Hasaean inscriptions of eastern Saudi Arabia, from the 8th century BC, written not in the modern Arabic alphabet, nor in its Nabataean ancestor, but in variants of the epigraphic South Arabian musnad. These are followed by 6th-century BC Lihyanite texts from southeastern Saudi Arabia and the Thamudic texts found throughout Arabia and the Sinai, and not actually connected with Thamud. Later come the Safaitic inscriptions beginning in the 1st century BC, and the many Arabic personal names attested in Nabataean inscriptions (which are, however, written in Aramaic). From about the 2nd century BC, a few inscriptions from Qaryat al-Faw (near Sulayyil) reveal a dialect which is no longer considered "Proto-Arabic", but Pre-Classical Arabic.

                          Another Wikipedia entry http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_alphabet#History

                          The Arabic alphabet can be traced back to the Nabatean alphabet used to write the Nabataean dialect of Aramaic. The first known text in the Arabic alphabet is a late fourth-century inscription from Jabal Ramm (50 km east of Aqaba), but the first dated one is a trilingual inscription at Zebed in Syria from 512. However, the epigraphic record is extremely sparse, with only five certainly pre-Islamic Arabic inscriptions surviving, though some others may be pre-Islamic. Later, dots were added above and below the letters to differentiate them (the Aramaic model had fewer phonemes than the Arabic, and some originally distinct Aramaic letters had become indistinguishable in shape, so in the early writings 15 distinct letter-shapes had to do duty for 28 sounds!) The first surviving document that definitely uses these dots is also the first surviving Arabic papyrus (PERF 55, dated April 643, although they did not become obligatory until much later. Important texts like the Qur?an were frequently memorized; this practice, which is still widespread among many Muslim communities today, probably arose partially from a desire to avoid the great ambiguity of the script.

                          Later still, vowel marks and the hamza were introduced, beginning some time in the latter half of the seventh century, preceedign the first invention of Syriac and Hebrew vocalization. Initially, this was done by a system of red dots, said to have been commissioned by an Umayyad governor of Iraq, Hajjaj ibn Yusuf a dot above = a, a dot below = i, a dot on the line = u, and doubled dots indicated nunation. However, this was cumbersome and easily confusable with the letter-distinguishing dots, so about 100 years later, the modern system was adopted. The system was finalized around 786 by al-Farahidi.

                          1. The Qur'an is in a clear Arabic language, NOT in Hebrew or Aramaic.

                          That is a subject of debate for another thread.....

                          1. Although the languages are related and it is always good to see how they display the roots they can NEVER stand above the Arabic meaning since they were formed in DIFFERENT enviroments and by different cultures.
                          2. Both Hebrew and Aramaic were languages created under monarchy rule. Arabic was created by a FREE nomadic people. This has a very different effect on the language.

                          see my above statements...

                          Salam,
                          Arnab

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            Salaam,

                            Quote from Arnab on Yesterday at 042046 PM
                            Are you sure you want to make this statement?

                            A 100%. The Qur'an does not uphold the concept of religious mercy as displayed in Christianity.

                            Your statement was in English "The concept of mercy is un-quranic." You did not say "The concept of mercy AS SEEN BY CHRISTIANS is un-quranic. You made an ABSOLUTE statement using the English language with out any qualifying remarks.

                            The Christian concept of Mercy (ie Jesus dying for their sins and thereby being merciful to all who simply believe in him) is not the ENGLISH definition of mercy.

                            You can come with the ENGLISH definition but this is NOT the Arabic defintion of Rahima.

                            I was not comparing the Arabic and English....You made a statement in English and I responded to that English statement.

                            As for the definition of rahm. I have posted referrences and evidence that indicates its definition.

                            Rahima means a womb, and so the "mercy" displayed by a womb is that of non-discriminating nourishment and protection until the foetus is completed into perfection.

                            Yes, that is one of the definitions of the root. But it cannot be limited to that definition.

                            This has nothing to do with sin or being "merciful" in judgement.

                            For example

                            Quote from Arnab on Yesterday at 042046 PM
                            mercy implies compassion that forbears punishing even when justice demands it <threw himself on the mercy of the court>.

                            996-8 On that Day will all people come forth as separate entities, to be shown their deeds.
                            Then whoever has done an atom's
                            weight of good, will see it. And whoever has done an atom's weight of evil, will see it.

                            2147 We will set up the scales of justice on the Day of Resurrection,
                            and no person will be wronged in the least. Though the good or evil be
                            of the weight of a mustard seed, We will bring it forth. We are Sufficient
                            for reckoning and none can take account as We do.

                            EVERY deed will have an effect on your evolution, the above verses are clear on this.

                            First of all you are taking just ONE of the examples of definitions of mercy out of the many definitions that are available in English. This is not an adequate evaluation of the word.

                            Second, Yes, I am familiar with the above verses....however, are you forgetting that one has a lifetime of God's mercy where we can repent and amend our ways and are forgiven if we walk the straight path?

                            With all due respect, you may want to consider ALL the verses and ALL the definitions and not try to limit them.

                            From "Qur'anic Cosmology a modern introduction"

                            Many religions use the word ?sin? for certain acts they claim are wrong and for
                            which you will be punished by their deity. The Qur?an is very clear, God cannot be
                            offended or harmed in any way.

                            The author is comparing punishment with harming God which is not a logical comparison. Just because one believes that he will be punished for his transgressions does not mean that he thinks that in transgressing he has harmed God.

                            Mankind has created several concepts on how to redeem its sins they believe they will be
                            punished for by the deity. It is a mythological concept of how their deeds effect their
                            environment and the universe.

                            This is completely untrue.
                            Are you saying that if person A murders person B that it does not affect the WHOLE environment that these people live in?

                            IF person A murders person B....it affects a whole group of people beyond the scope of comprehension.
                            Especially if such an incident were reported by the news.

                            Just as some limited brief examples that can help one understand how this crime would ripple through the environment....

                            person B's family and friends to be saddened which may result in

                            loosing time off work (affecting the bosses, workplace and by extention the community),
                            may cause extremes in emotion ie depression or anger or the like which can last for months or years....especially in close relatives (ie spouse, children, parents) which at the very least affects their performance in school or work activities

                            may cause anyone living in the area where the crime was committed to feel unsafe in their homes or workplace thereby shaping their concept of the world they live in.

                            Also affects the life of person A since this person would most likely end up in prison and person A's family in that they may experience shock, shame, or distrust.

                            The affects can go beyond imagination on this scenerio.
                            I would NOT say that the the deeds of a person affecting their environment/universe are merely Mythological.

                            The main concept man has created is the concept of
                            salvation. Salvation is based on the concept of pleasing or acknowledging a god or gods
                            through rituals, good deeds and/or faith and thus hope to have his sins forgiven by the
                            deity to be rewarded by a mythological paradise or easy rewards on earth.

                            Let's look at the word salvation

                            1
                            a deliverance from the power and effects of sin
                            b the agent or means that effects salvation cChristian Science the realization of the supremacy of infinite Mind over all bringing with it the destruction of the illusion of sin, sickness, and death
                            2 liberation from ignorance or illusion3
                            a preservation from destruction or failure
                            b deliverance from danger or difficulty

                            The Quran supports salvation (as defined by the English language and not by Christianity) in that if a person repents and ceases from commiting the transgression...and all other applicable Quranic responcibilities....that the person attains salvation. IE deliverance from the power of sin/transgression.

                            OR I have to ask these questions....

                            Are you saying that one who has sinned cannot repent and correct his ways and walk in the path of Allah?

                            Are you saying that you are WITHOUT any transgression whatsoever? IF you are not..then by your definition you will not be given Allah's forgiveness and achieve life in the hereafter.

                            Are you calling the hereafter mythological?

                            The Qur?an
                            breaks away this man-made belief by saying not even a deed smaller than an atom will be
                            neglected (997- and thus completely rejecting the concept of salvation.

                            996-8 On that Day will all people come forth as separate entities, to be shown their deeds.
                            Then whoever has done an atom's
                            weight of good, will see it. And whoever has done an atom's weight of evil, will see it.

                            When one dies....yes. But when one is ALIVE we are granted the chance to amend our ways and we are granted forgiveness if we walk away from these transgressions.

                            When a person has done a deed which has hurt his fellow men, or when a person has
                            done deeds which corrupts its own character, the Qur?an gives a simple solution.

                            I would say that when a transgression has occured the Quran gives different solutions depending on the transgression.

                            The concept of sin is not present in the Qur?an.

                            It would seem that the problem is that you or the author is using Christianity as a dictionary....What I mean by this is you seem to be using the Christian concept of words such as mercy and sin to define their meaning. This is not helpful. Their are clear cut ENGLISH definitions for the words you are using. I would suggest clarifying statements...

                            Instead of saying...
                            "The concept of sin is not present in the Quran."
                            Clarify it as such...
                            "The Christian concept of sin is not present in the Quran."

                            Please keep in mind that in defining the English terms you are using in your English statements I am not referring to your translations of Arabic words. We'll save that for another post.
                            When explaining something in English one must give the English words the same respect as the Arabic words. Why do I say this? Because one can come away with misunderstandings if the use of the English word is not true to its definition.

                            The word sin simply means....(from Merrium Websters Online Dictionary http//www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sin)
                            1
                            a an offense against religious or moral law
                            b an action that is or is felt to be highly reprehensible <it's a sin to waste food>
                            c an often serious shortcoming fault
                            2
                            a transgression of the law of God
                            b a vitiated state of human nature in which the self is estranged from God

                            The word sin IS NOT just a Christian word. This is a misconception. Yes, the word is used in Christianity but its not exclusively a Christian religious word.

                            Words
                            as Ithm, although many times translated as sin in the majority of Qur?an translations, have
                            a far more clearer meaning. Ithm , for example, refers to being weak and slow, to be the
                            last camel in the caravan42. It gives an idea that persons committing Ithm do not commit
                            a ?sin? towards God, but harm themselves and their environment, so that it becomes
                            weak. It describes that harmful deeds can weaken the person?s position within the cosmic
                            evolutionary scale as the person has done things which has not contributed society, but
                            even weakened its potential and slows its progress. If the damage done to one?s Self or
                            their environment is not compensated, the compensation, the requital of the damage will
                            be experienced in this life or in the next phase of the universe. One way or another, if
                            man doesn?t compensate the damage he may have done, then the universe will
                            compensate it with you.

                            The word Ghafara has also been presented in a very wrong way. Ghafara means to
                            protect against dirt or harm43, it does not mean forgiveness in the Qur'an, as 996-7 and
                            2147 clearly point out is not present in the universal system. But this doesn?t mean God
                            has not created any ease or exceptions within this system of compensation. God is also
                            called Al-Afaa, Afaa means to remit previous deeds, it also means the surplus of
                            something (see 2219). It is used around 7 times for God who remitted those that upheld
                            their present life above the better one. He is Al-Afaa because people are given time to
                            remit their wrongdoing and because He gives more (surplus) for every good deed
                            (6160)44. In the Qur?an, forgiveness stands for giving room to compensate for wrong
                            deeds done. The Quran An Encyclopedia says ?Forgiveness involves a change of heart
                            that may advocate that the wrongdoer receives punishment or be considered accountable
                            for redressing the wrong.? 45

                            Insha Allah, at some point we may study these words in depth. At this point I have no comment.
                            I want to clarify further....so that there is no misunderstanding.....my statement above about the English word "sin" was not in referrence to any Arabic word or translation. It is simply an assessment of the English definition and its usage.

                            Salam,
                            Arnab

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              arnoldyasin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Perhaps my transliteration was unclear...ra-ha-meem....and yes...we are speaking of the same root.

                              This is absolutely untrue.

                              Arabic evolved from Aramaic/Hebrew. And, Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic are all dialects of the Semitic Language.

                              http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic#History

                              Modern Arabic is considered to be part of the Arabo-Canaanite sub-branch of the central group of West Semitic languages. While Arabic is not the oldest of the Semitic languages, it shares many features with the common ancestor for all Semitic languages in the Afro-Asiatic group of languages, Proto-Semitic whose phonological, morphological, and syntactic features have been determined by linguists. Many linguists consider Arabic to be the most conservative of the modern Semitic languages because of how completely it preserves the features of Proto-Semitic.

                              The earliest texts in Proto-Arabic, or Ancient North Arabian, are the Hasaean inscriptions of eastern Saudi Arabia, from the 8th century BC, written not in the modern Arabic alphabet, nor in its Nabataean ancestor, but in variants of the epigraphic South Arabian musnad. These are followed by 6th-century BC Lihyanite texts from southeastern Saudi Arabia and the Thamudic texts found throughout Arabia and the Sinai, and not actually connected with Thamud. Later come the Safaitic inscriptions beginning in the 1st century BC, and the many Arabic personal names attested in Nabataean inscriptions (which are, however, written in Aramaic). From about the 2nd century BC, a few inscriptions from Qaryat al-Faw (near Sulayyil) reveal a dialect which is no longer considered "Proto-Arabic", but Pre-Classical Arabic.

                              Another Wikipedia entry http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_alphabet#History

                              The Arabic alphabet can be traced back to the Nabatean alphabet used to write the Nabataean dialect of Aramaic. The first known text in the Arabic alphabet is a late fourth-century inscription from Jabal Ramm (50 km east of Aqaba), but the first dated one is a trilingual inscription at Zebed in Syria from 512. However, the epigraphic record is extremely sparse, with only five certainly pre-Islamic Arabic inscriptions surviving, though some others may be pre-Islamic. Later, dots were added above and below the letters to differentiate them (the Aramaic model had fewer phonemes than the Arabic, and some originally distinct Aramaic letters had become indistinguishable in shape, so in the early writings 15 distinct letter-shapes had to do duty for 28 sounds!) The first surviving document that definitely uses these dots is also the first surviving Arabic papyrus (PERF 55, dated April 643, although they did not become obligatory until much later. Important texts like the Quran were frequently memorized; this practice, which is still widespread among many Muslim communities today, probably arose partially from a desire to avoid the great ambiguity of the script.

                              Later still, vowel marks and the hamza were introduced, beginning some time in the latter half of the seventh century, preceedign the first invention of Syriac and Hebrew vocalization. Initially, this was done by a system of red dots, said to have been commissioned by an Umayyad governor of Iraq, Hajjaj ibn Yusuf a dot above = a, a dot below = i, a dot on the line = u, and doubled dots indicated nunation. However, this was cumbersome and easily confusable with the letter-distinguishing dots, so about 100 years later, the modern system was adopted. The system was finalized around 786 by al-Farahidi.

                              That is a subject of debate for another thread.....

                              see my above statements...

                              Salam,
                              Arnab

                              Salaam,

                              I know the development of the Arabic language, and still have the 3 languages a gap of enviromental and culture differences which have certain key effects on the language. This is why languages DEVELOP in writings, meanings and defintions. Just as you confessed above.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                Salam,

                                I know the development of the Arabic language, and still have the 3 languages a gap of enviromental and culture differences which have certain key effects on the language. This is why languages DEVELOP in writings, meanings and defintions. Just as you confessed above.

                                There are not differences in the three dialects of the Semitic languages in terms of their scriptural usage. This is plainly evident.
                                The only gaps are the one's created by MODERN interpretations of Arabic. And the everyday usage. This does not apply to scripture/God's laws and writings.

                                Which is why we differentiate between Modern and Classical Arabic.

                                Salam,
                                Arnab

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  arnoldyasin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Salaam,

                                  Your statement was IN ENGLISH "The concept of mercy is un-quranic." You did not say "The concept of mercy AS SEEN BY CHRISTIANS is un-quranic. You made an ABSOLUTE statement using the English language with out any qualifying remarks.

                                  Well, if you have paid attention you would have read it was Parwez's statement, but I agree with him. And he refers to the common religious understanding of sin.

                                  As for the definition of rahm. I have posted referrences and evidence that indicates its definition.

                                  I rather stick to the clear Arabic definition, although it is interested to see how the word has developed differently in details.

                                  Yes, that is one of the definitions of the root. But it cannot be limited to that definition.

                                  The key 1st meaning of the word is a womb. Thus the "mercy" must be understood in how a womb is "merciful" to a foetus. This is how Arabic roots work.

                                  First of all you are taking just ONE of the examples of definitions of mercy out of the many definitions that are available in English. This is not an adequate evaluation of the word.

                                  As said, it was ONE example. Mercy in english was an elite word, where a lord was merciful to its subjects by showing his power to punish or not to punish if it pleased him. God is not like this. And this definition is what people have mostly in mind when they read the word "mercy". And thus this is what I addressed.

                                  Second, Yes, I am familiar with the above verses....however, are you forgetting that one has a lifetime of God's mercy where we can repent and amend our ways and are forgiven if we walk the straight path?

                                  Yes, this is called Tauba, to return. The above verses refer to the Afterlife where no deed will be neglected, thus no "mercy". And we are not "forgiven", returning to the right path means to compensate for the wrong deeds (sayyi) you have done by doing good to society (hassanat), see 11114. And this falls under God's Afwa, to give room to His creation by always allowing a person to redress his behaviour during his lifetime. Because God has created us to develop further (11119), so it is not His "mercy", but His will to develop us further.

                                  I do see clear differences in defintions and idioms here.

                                  With all due respect, you may want to consider ALL the verses and ALL the definitions and not try to limit them.
                                  The author is comparing punishment with harming God which is not a logical comparison. Just because one believes that he will be punished for his transgressions does not mean that he thinks that in transgressing he has harmed God. This is completely untrue.

                                  I am the author, and this is not what is said. People view sins as offending God, making Him angry with you. They are more concerned with how God "feels" and by thus not understanding that their deeds determine their evolution. They view still as a tyrant king that can be "merciful" to you if it pleases Him just a human king would act. This is the main view the majority of religions have on God. This cannot be denied.

                                  Are you saying that if person A murders person B that it does not affect the WHOLE environment that these people live in?
                                  IF person A murders person B....it causes a whole group of person B's family and friends to be saddened which may result in
                                  loosing time off work (affecting the bosses, workplace and by extention the community),
                                  may cause extremes in emotion ie depression or anger or the like which can last for months or years....especially in close relatives (ie spouse, children, parents) which at the very least affects their performance in school or work activities
                                  may cause the community to feel unsafe in their homes or workplace thereby shaping their concept of the world they live in
                                  Also affects the life of person A and person A's family in that they may experience shock, shame, or distrust.
                                  The affects can go beyond imagination on this scenerio.
                                  I would NOT say that the the deeds of a person affecting their environment/universe are merely Mythological.

                                  Dear Arnab, please do not act ignorant of that fact that the majority of religious people on earth view the consequences of their deeds in a mythological way and not in the direct logical way as you have stated above. Your example above is also how I view it IF you have really read my article you would have know this.

                                  Are you saying that one who has sinned cannot repent and correct his ways and walk in the path of Allah?
                                  Are you saying that you are WITHOUT any transgression whatsoever?
                                  Are you calling the hereafter mythological?
                                  When one dies....yes. But when one is ALIVE we are granted the chance to amend our ways and we are granted forgiveness if we walk away from these transgressions.

                                  Oh my God! Do you really only read 2 words or something? The above article clearly states we must COMPENSATE our wrong deeds by doing good. This thus clearly state that as long as we live we can create a good result in the Hereafter. Please read things like 4 times before responding...

                                  It would seem that the problem is that you or the author is using Christianity as a dictionary....What I mean by this is you seem to be using the Christian concept of words such as mercy and sin to define their meaning. This is not helpful. Their are clear cut ENGLISH definitions for the words you are using. I would suggest clarifying statements...

                                  People ARE using the Christian defintions when reading these words in English, please do not make a fool of yourself by stating otherwise. Also the english definitions still differ completely from the Arabic definitions.

                                  Instead of saying...
                                  "The concept of sin is not present in the Quran."
                                  Clarify it as such...
                                  "The Christian concept of sin is not present in the Quran."

                                  The concept of religious sin is not present in the Qur'an. As even the English definitions refers to the religious understanding of it. The Qur'an addresses that you harm your evolution be doing bad to others, this is a more scientifical view on cause and effect your personality then the religious words as sin which can give a very deceptive misunderstanding of the meanings. It is good you try to seperate the English definitions from the Christian ones, but the majority do not do this, plus I believe the English definitions do not really define the Arabci definitions.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    arnoldyasin
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Salam,

                                    There are not differences in the three dialects of the Semitic languages in terms of their scriptural usage. This is plainly evident.
                                    The only gaps are the one's created by MODERN interpretations of Arabic. And the everyday usage. This does not apply to scripture/God's laws and writings.

                                    Which is why we differentiate between Modern and Classical Arabic.

                                    Salam,

                                    I disagree as I see clear differences in development of the details of the languages. I have given already some key points why. If we disagree then let's do so.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      I am the author, and this is not what is said. People view sins as offending God, making Him angry with you. They are more concerned with how God "feels" and by thus not understanding that their deeds determine their evolution. They view still as a tyrant king that can be "merciful" to you if it pleases Him just a human king would act. This is the main view the majority of religions have on God. This cannot be denied.

                                      Actually, I have not found this to be a common belief in most religions especially modern ones....Unless one is speaking of Greek Mythology or Ancient Egyptian beliefs or some other ancient belief system.

                                      Oh my God! Do you really only read 2 words or something? The above article clearly states we must COMPENSATE our wrong deeds by doing good. This thus clearly state that as long as we live we can create a good result in the Hereafter. Please read things like 4 times before responding...

                                      Arnold, you have a habit of making ABSOLUTE statements that contradict each other. To your mind, they may compliment each other.
                                      But the fact is you say one thing IS THIS and ONLY THIS
                                      and then in another paragraph you say something is ABSOLUTELY THUS and ONLY THUS...

                                      Have you considered the possibility that the error may not be on the part of the reader but may in fact be on the part of the author?

                                      People ARE using the Christian defintions when reading these words in English, please do not make a fool of yourself by stating otherwise.

                                      Relax Arnold. One does not make a fool of one's self by disagreeing especially when the one disagreeing is basing their statements on fact. ;D

                                      This statement you made is a matter of your opinion.

                                      My disagreement is due to the fact that a good number of the English speaking population is

                                      either

                                      A. Not Christian

                                      or

                                      B. Considers themselves Christian but they are not religious and therefore they don't use Christian definitions.

                                      and

                                      C. We have an English Dictionary not a Christian Dictionary

                                      The concept of religious sin is not present in the Qur'an. As even the English definitions refers to the religious understanding of it.

                                      If you are using the English definition of sin, then I would say that the concept of sin is definitely in the Quran.

                                      Salam,
                                      Arnab

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        Salam,

                                        I disagree as I see clear differences in development of the details of the languages. I have given already some key points why. If we disagree then let's do so.

                                        Salam,

                                        Fair enough. peace

                                        Salam,
                                        Arnab

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          belH
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Salam,

                                          When you will understand that Rahima stands for nourishment, protection and further development, then the verses are very clear

                                          Rahima means to provide, nourish and protect a creation to develop it further as a womb does to a foetus.
                                          Rizq comes from Razaqa which means to provide, supply and to bestow. This is thus PART of the Rahima, nourishment, it is only 1 part of Rahima, which is much more then just providing.

                                          Then, is forgiving the sin (Gafer) would be part of Rahama?

                                          (&#1638

                                          Allah forgiveth not (the sin of) to associate with him (lies), but He forgiveth whom He pleaseth other sins than this; one who associate with Allah (lies), hath strayed far, far away (from the Right). (4-116)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users