Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Did the word Qur'an exist before the Glorious Qur'an

Did the word Qur'an exist before the Glorious Qur'an

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
42 Posts 13 Posters 429 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Soof
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    RE People of the Book. They were mainly Jews, Christians & Sabians, as God mentions them, no? Therefore they had their Torah, or Peshitta (I'm not testifying to its validity, only stating what they may have had) and whatever scripture the Sabians had. Remember the Qur'an has geographic relevance and historic relevance even though it is for all time so it is likely God refers to these religions because they were known to the African Peninsula at that time. If the Qur'an was recited to them in Arabic, and they heard it, understood it, and reacted in they way stated in the Qur'an then they were Arabic speakers. The Qur'an was recited in Quraysh Arabic, the dialect of the Prophet. If he recited it to them in this language AND they understood the words...then they understood Arabic.

    RE Arabic root.

    And if We had appointed it a Lecture in a foreign tongue they would assuredly have said If only its verses were expounded? What! A foreign tongue and an Arab? - Say unto them (O Muhammad) For those who believe it is a guidance and a healing; and as for those who disbelieve, there is a deafness in their ears, and it is blindness for them. Such are called to from afar.
    4144

    The language Arabic existed and it may have had the name Arabic. It was a language the people of Arabia RECOGNISED. Which is why God gives a counterargument What! A foreign tongue and an Arab? Inferring that the tongue Muhammad is preaching in is indeed the language of his people not an adjective or a verb, but a noun, being possessive ie belonging to the people of Arabia.

    It is most probable the name of their language and their nationality is derived from the root you mentioned. God is simply reiterating the point that it is sent in Arabic to a people who had no previous knowledge, ie who's forefathers were far from the straight path. And from that point on it is also the revelation for all people, for all time, which is why it was revealed in such a pragmatic, literal language at a place that was essentially the centre of the World. There should be revelations for every community before the Qur'an. In many different languages. If we look at the Bhagavad Gita we can infer that possibly there is revelation in those Sanskrit Scriptures, but that is open to interpretation. But thanks for informing me about the Root of Arabic, its something I never knew before handshake

    When referring to Arabia I am referring to the African Peninsula that encompassed Jerusalem, Mecca, Medina and was separated from India by the Arabic Sea and from Africa by the Red Sea. When the Revelation came to Muhammad he was always in Arabia, references are made to where he is throughout the Qur'an. God even swears by the City Muhammad is in and calls him a resident. Indeed if anyone came to him and heard the revelation they were in Arabia at the time. They may not have lived there but if they understood what he was preaching then clearly they spoke Arabic.

    We agree on several levels, and I have learnt a few things from you so Peace.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      ayman
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      Peace sister Samia,

      The word you translate as (in Arabic &#1610 is actually an adjective, meaning clear, self explanatory, expressive. From this root are derived the verbs 3araba, a3raba and 3arraba, which mean speak for, express, explain, clarify..
      ( &#1577
      . . " ".
      " . " .
      .
      . " .
      This verb is used in hadith literature, and is used in linguistics to mean grammatical analysis.

      It would be interesting to find out how the term came to mean "grammatical analysis" before Arabic "grammatical analysis" was invented by Sibaweh. Therefore, I don't think it means that.

      In the great reading the form "A3RAB" is used to denote people of the wilderness in contrast to people of the city. The term is also used to mean "untouched/virgin". So it seems to have to do with wild and virgin. This is in line with your observation about the language being a layman language, i.e. an informal street language.

      Ironically, Lisan Al-3arab also says the following about the meaning

      . .

      So it means "talking rudely". This meaning is not aligned with "clear, self explanatory, expressive" but it is aligned with "wild/untamed/untouched" and with the usage in the great reading for describing "people of the wilderness". I think that the relationship between A3RAB and 3RBY is the same as with all the forms of AF3AL and F3LY. For example, ANBAT (Nabataeans) NBTY (having to do with Nabataeans), AWThAN (idols) WThNY (having to do with idols), etc. So 3RBY would mean "having to do with the people of the wilderness". So it is the untamed and unrefined language of the people of the wilderness. It is an informal street language and not a formal language of civilization, religion, and literature.

      So when we hear about the great reading being "3rby mbin" we are not hearing about it being "clear and clear". We are hearing about it being "wild/informal and clear". This is why we hear in the great reading about people at the time asking for it to be in a foreign (A3GMY) language. The formal prestige languages of religion and literature were all foreign languages at the time, Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic. However, the god sends his message in the language of the people of the messenger. The messenger was from the UMIYIN (the common people) in contrast to the people of the book who know the foreign language of the previous books. This is not a religious distinction. It is a social one of the common people against the religious and political elite. You would have the same exact situation today if the messenger came to the people of Egypt. The god would send his message in Egyptian colloquial street language and not in Classical Arabic. However, people would ask for it to be in Classical Arabic because this is perceived as the proper language of religious prestige.

      The quran create
      I am not contesting this...but what kind of language? It was a layman language, not a highly developped one. The quran DID create a beautiful, rich language from a marginal, underdvelopped language.

      This is what is amazing about the great reading. The god takes a mundane, imperfect, inconsistent and uncivilized human language and composes this beautiful, rich, consistent and powerful message. This is in itself a very powerful philosophical paradigm.

      I had a discussion with Anwar about the Arabic language in this thread

      http//reflekterselv.com/freemind/index.php?topic=9596565.msg168098#msg168098

      It would be great if you can help Anwar out. I want to make sure that my arguments are solid by having people poke at them and try to demolish them from different angles.

      Peace,

      Ayman

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Samia
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        Salaam Ayman

        According to maqaayeesul lugha , the root "3RB" has three meanings; you chose one and I chose another. Whatever is chosen leads to the fact that the word "3rabi" is a translatable word and does not mean the language we know now.

        So when we hear about the great reading being "3rby mbin" we are not hearing about it being "clear and clear".

        The pattern of "mubeen MuF3IL" is an active participle of the verb "abaan clarified". It does not mean "clear" but "clarifier", so it's clear and clarifier clear words (already known) and they clarify others (unknown before). It's also the explanation of "3arabi and a3jami" clear and alien.

        It would be great if you can help Anwar out. I want to make sure that my arguments are solid by having people poke at them and try to demolish them from different angles.

        I did have a similar discussion with Anwar

        http//reflekterselv.com/freemind/index.php?topic=14531.msg152846#msg152846

        (The beginning of our discussion is from page 6)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          ayman
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          Peace Samia,

          According to maqaayeesul lugha , the root "3RB" has three meanings; you chose one and I chose another. Whatever is chosen leads to the fact that the word "3rabi" is a translatable word and does not mean the language we know now.

          I agree. However, the use of the various forms of the root "3RB" in the great reading points to "wild/untamed/natural". Even in 1337, from the passages around it, we can see it is most likely referring to natural law.

          The pattern of "mubeen MuF3IL" is an active participle of the verb "abaan clarified". It does not mean "clear" but "clarifier", so it's clear and clarifier clear words (already known) and they clarify others (unknown before).

          Clear doesn't necessarily imply "already known". Something new can be clear too. I agree with "MuBIN", meaning clarifier or clarifying. Of course, "BaYiN" means clear.

          It's also the explanation of "3arabi and a3jami" clear and alien.

          I disagree. Alien or foreign is not the opposite of clear. We are having this discussion in a foreign/alien language since our native/natural language is Arabic. Yet, this discussion is clear. Notice how even in English, "AL-A3RAB", the wild/natural people are described as "the natives".

          I did have a similar discussion with Anwar
          http//reflekterselv.com/freemind/index.php?topic=14531.msg152846#msg152846
          (The beginning of our discussion is from page 6)

          Sister, could you update the link because this link to the temporary URL during the forum transition is now gone.

          Thanks and peace,

          Ayman

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            Samia
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            Salaam Ayman

            Her's the link

            http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=14531.75

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              maxq
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              A slight digression so I apologize in advance - mods, if you want to fork (branch) this discussion, please do so,

              Judging by the terminology used in this thread, I am guessing this discussion may have triggered around some elements in the Text of the Poets (surat-ush-shu'araa)? What I would want to know is why does the mention of poets pop out all of a sudden in the chapter? Any insight would be appreciated by both bro Ayman and sis Samia.

              PS to bro Ayman I understand the "decent of the 'devils' upon fabricators" symbolism in comparison to the "revelation", but is the Quran somehow alleging that it is the divine/supernatural counterpart of human poetry? And why would the poets be followed by the deceived... is poetry a bad thing? If it were poetry in those times, was it being composed in the nomadic language (lisaan il-3rab) which is very likely, such as what we know from the hymn of Qaniya. Perhaps folks in the pagan/sabian population may have known it at that time...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Offline
                B Offline
                bkanwar2
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                Word AL-Qur'an as A proper noun, that we know today could not have exsisted at that time. Based on Jezm/Sukoon concept this is a phrase meaning

                Al="the"

                Qur, is next word, not Qura as there is Jezm on Ra= One establish(usually used for one with authority)

                http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume7/00000027.pdf

                Aan= I

                Hence meaning of phrase should "The one I established".

                Badar Kanwar MD., FCCP.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  ayman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  Peace Badar,

                  Word AL-Qur'an as A proper noun, that we know today could not have exsisted at that time. Based on Jezm/Sukoon concept this is a phrase meaning
                  Al="the"
                  Qur, is next word, not Qura as there is Jezm on Ra= One establish(usually used for one with authority)
                  http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume7/00000027.pdf
                  Aan= I
                  Hence meaning of phrase should "The one I established".

                  The form QuR'AN is of the form Fu3LAN, which is a fairly common form in the Arabic language. The Q, R and the Hamza are the strong letters of the root. Its root is not QRR or QUR (I don't even think that such root exists), otherwise it would have been the non-existent words QuRRAN or QaWRAN without a Hamza. It is an intensified noun form like, for example, SuLTAN (intense authority). So the word QuR'AN means intense reading. The Arabic for I is ANA not AAN, although some vernaculars particularly in rural Egypt have it as AANI and it is never attached to another word (exactly like the English "I" is never attached to another word).

                  1778 and many other passages make it clear that the word "QuR'AN" is a common noun that simply means something like "intense reading/recitation"

                  017.078
                  YUSUFALI Establish regular prayers - at the sun's decline till the darkness of the night, and the morning prayer and reading for the prayer and reading in the morning carry their testimony.
                  PICKTHAL Establish worship at the going down of the sun until the dark of night, and (the recital of) the Qur'an at dawn. Lo! (the recital of) the Qur'an at dawn is ever witnessed.
                  SHAKIR Keep up prayer from the declining of the sun till the darkness of the night and the morning recitation; surely the morning recitation is witnessed.
                  KHALIFA You shall observe the Contact Prayer (Salat) when the sun declines from its highest point at noon, as it moves towards sunset. You shall also observe (the recitation of) the Quran at dawn. (Reciting) the Quran at dawn is witnessed.

                  Out of the above translations, Shakir's is the most accurate. This is why he didn't have to put anything in parentheses. Other translators had to put "recital/recitation" in parentheses because "Quran at dawn" is meaningless nonsense.

                  Peace,

                  Ayman

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    ayman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    Peace Maxq,

                    A slight digression so I apologize in advance - mods, if you want to fork (branch) this discussion, please do so,
                    Judging by the terminology used in this thread, I am guessing this discussion may have triggered around some elements in the Text of the Poets (surat-ush-shu'araa)? What I would want to know is why does the mention of poets pop out all of a sudden in the chapter? Any insight would be appreciated by both bro Ayman and sis Samia.
                    PS to bro Ayman I understand the "decent of the 'devils' upon fabricators" symbolism in comparison to the "revelation", but is the Quran somehow alleging that it is the divine/supernatural counterpart of human poetry? And why would the poets be followed by the deceived... is poetry a bad thing? If it were poetry in those times, was it being composed in the nomadic language (lisaan il-3rab) which is very likely, such as what we know from the hymn of Qaniya. Perhaps folks in the pagan/sabian population may have known it at that time...

                    I think that you need to ask what faculty or part of the human psyche poets use to compose poems? You will find the clear answer there. This has nothing to do with the particular time, language or style that they compose it in.

                    Peace,

                    Ayman

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      Salam,

                      The word qara is used in Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic and means the SAME thing in all languages to call out/recite/proclaim....etc etc.

                      Yes, the word EXISTED before Muhammad received the "Quran."

                      Salam,
                      Arnab

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Soof
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        Salam,

                        The word qara is used in Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic and means the SAME thing in all languages to call out/recite/proclaim....etc etc.

                        Yes, the word EXISTED before Muhammad received the "Quran."

                        Salam,
                        Arnab

                        No I asked did the word Qur'an exist not qara. For example did people have their own qur'ans (recitiations) about anything, before the Qur'an? Do you have any Hebrew, Aramaic or Arabic books called the Qur'an by title that predate the Qur'an? My understanding is they did but when God's Qur'an came, it became THE Qur'an, the defining recitation.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          No I asked did the word Qur'an exist not qara. For example did people have their own qur'ans (recitiations) about anything, before the Qur'an? Do you have any Hebrew, Aramaic or Arabic books called the Qur'an by title that predate the Qur'an? My understanding is they did but when God's Qur'an came, it became THE Qur'an, the defining recitation.

                          Salam,

                          The root of the word QURAN is Qaf-Ra-Alif. Which is why I stated what I did.

                          This is from project Root list http//www.studyquran.co.uk/PRLonline.htm

                          Qaf-Ra-Alif = to recite/read, compilation, collection, reading, recitation, explanation, study, investigation.

                          But here is the root Qaf-Ra-Nun (also from PRL) in case you are interested.

                          Qaf-Ra-Nun = to join one thing with another, couple. qarnin/qarnan - generation, century. qarn (dual qarnani, oblique qaraini, plu. qurun) - horn, trumpet. Often used to symbolise strength/power/glory. qarunun (pl. qurana) - mate, comrade, intimate companion. muqarranin - bound together. muqrinina - capable of subduing. muqtarinin - those formed in serried ranks, accompanying ones.
                          Dzu al Qarnain (Zulqarnain/dhul-qarnayn) - the two horned one, one belonging to two century, or two generation, master of two states/kingdoms. The surname of Cyrus (Darius 1) the ruler of Media and Persia which were combined into a single kingdom under him.
                          Qarun (Korah) - he was fabulously rich and stood high in favour of Pharaohs.

                          Both roots mean EXACTLY the same in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Arabic.

                          Salam,
                          Arnab

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Al_Araf
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            Salam soof. The root of the word Quran is Iqra/Qar'a. The first record of the root is in the Taurah.

                            In the first chapter of the Taurah, Bereishit/Genesis, it says "Va iqra Elohim.." in multiple verses.

                            Allah raises man by stages.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Soof
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #30

                              Cool but I am not asking for the root word, It's been shown several times in this thread. Was the word Qur'an used in literature before THE Qur'an. I asked for examples of Hebrew, Aramaic or Arabic books before the Qur'an that were also called the Qur'an. So to be more specific, was the word Qur'an used as a title for a book or any recitation before the Qur'an. Or is the Qur'an the only "book" with such a title?

                              Peace

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Al_Araf
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                Salaam soof. There is a reason why the root word is being referred to in many replies. Allow me to explain.

                                Let us take the word "run" and the word "runner" One is a verb the other is a noun. The noun runner is derived from the verb run.

                                Obviously there were runners before, if people had run previously

                                Let us take the word "qara" and the word "Quran" One is a verb the other is a noun. The noun Quran is derived from the verb qara.

                                Obviously there was Quran before, if people had made qara previously.

                                Let me say this another way, obviously there were recitations before, because people were reciting previously.

                                If all the seas were ink, the seas would be exhausted, and the word of your Lord would not be complete.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  bkanwar2
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #32

                                  Peace, unless we realise the proper root of the word based on The Concept of Jezm and Sukoon we will continue to go in circles like this.

                                  There is a Jezm on Ra after Qaf with Dhamma, hence Teshdeed of Ra is not written. Jezm here indicates last letter of the word.

                                  http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume7/00000027.pdf

                                  Hence, QafRaRa becomes QafRa due Jezm meaning "established by someone with authority"

                                  Alif with Medda and Nun with Fetha = "I"

                                  http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume1/00000148.pdf

                                  See lane above for meaning of Aana = I

                                  Hence meaning one "I established".

                                  Badar Kanwar

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Soof
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #33

                                    Ok thanks. peace

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      maxq
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #34

                                      Badar Saahab and Sis Arnab
                                      I do not think you are correct in your respective analyses. With the shaddah (which has magically disappeared right before a hamzah) for the supposed QRR root, or for the root QRN it would again have to contend with the hamzah, since the word reads Qur'aan.

                                      I contend that it is leading back to QRY, form which the work Iqra' is derived. Even if you were to take it from an Aramaic perspective (where a religious document would be called Quryaan) the Yaa turns into a glottal stop in Arabic to take into account the Faa-Oyn-Laam form FuOLaan...

                                      This word is non-Classical Arabic IMO, meaning it is from before the time Arabic was standardized, and may very well have been naturalized into the spoken/wild/untamed/NOMADIC language (al-Arabiyyah) through Nabataean A close cousin of Assyrian Aramaic.

                                      Regards,
                                      maxq

                                      Peace, unless we realise the proper root of the word based on The Concept of Jezm and Sukoon we will continue to go in circles like this.

                                      There is a Jezm on Ra after Qaf with Dhamma, hence Teshdeed of Ra is not written. Jezm here indicates last letter of the word.

                                      http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume7/00000027.pdf

                                      Hence, QafRaRa becomes QafRa due Jezm meaning "established by someone with authority"

                                      Alif with Medda and Nun with Fetha = "I"

                                      http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume1/00000148.pdf

                                      See lane above for meaning of Aana = I

                                      Hence meaning one "I established".

                                      Badar Kanwar

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        huruf
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #35

                                        When I have learned Arabic my understanding all along is that the sukoon is not there to signal the end of a word but to signal that there is no short vowel on the letter, which can hapen anywhere in the word.

                                        Also indeed Qura'an is Q-R-hamzaalif, which is in no way the same as merely alif, since hamza represents a consonant sound and the alif is merely supporting it, so the root Q-R-R doesn't seem to be warranted.

                                        Salaam

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #36

                                          Badar Saahab and Sis Arnab
                                          I do not think you are correct in your respective analyses. With the shaddah (which has magically disappeared right before a hamzah) for the supposed QRR root, or for the root QRN it would again have to contend with the hamzah, since the word reads Qur'aan.

                                          Salam maxq,

                                          There are no diacritics in the ancient written forms of the Quran that the world has in its possession.

                                          I contend that it is leading back to QRY, form which the work Iqra' is derived. Even if you were to take it from an Aramaic perspective (where a religious document would be called Quryaan) the Yaa turns into a glottal stop in Arabic to take into account the Faa-Oyn-Laam form FuOLaan...

                                          The root of the word is Q-R-A and the root has retained the same meaning through out the Semitic languages.

                                          Salam,
                                          Arnab

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users