Still nothing on youtube
-
I have recently visited youtube to get video from Koranists. Yet unless you know the person intended such as Edip Yuksel(all turkish by the way) or Mohamed Shaikh, nothing comes in searches if you type quranist, koranist, quranites etc except sunni bashing Koranists.
Why can't anyone post Koranist lectures and leave searches like Quranist, etc so people can know how to search
-
http//ourbeacon.com/index.php?p=29368
-
http//ourbeacon.com/index.php?p=29368
See unless you know Dr Shabbir, you can't find them in any searches. Just calling ourselves Muslims simply mean the Koranic message will never be known as it can not be distinguised. The youtube videos must be easy to find and the only way is through searches.
-
That is not true. If some of us westerners can come to the Qur'an when we have not grown up knowing Islam in our culture. Anyone can. If people are interested in the meaning of the word Muslim, they will come to the Qur'an. All it takes is an inquiring mind.
-
Peace again,
Also have you noticed how "muslims" send out spam mails to each other? Why shoudlnt we do the same. Sent out attrative sopam mails which people will open and then those interested will open and read them. There are many software which enable to send 50,000 or more spam mails PER HOUR. GOD Bless! -
I have recently visited youtube to get video from Koranists. Yet unless you know the person intended such as Edip Yuksel(all turkish by the way) or Mohamed Shaikh, nothing comes in searches if you type quranist, koranist, quranites etc except sunni bashing Koranists.
Why can't anyone post Koranist lectures and leave searches like Quranist, etc so people can know how to search
peace
Here is a youtube,
http//www.youtube.com/anthonywallace7
What does Quranist mean?
-
http//uk.youtube.com/user/foralgerian
It's in Algerian / French
-
At most it is Koran aloners and at least it is those who do not accept any obligation that can be placed on humanity not found specifically in the Koran.
Does it mean that you only believe in the Quran alone and not the other books? Or does it mean that the Quran must confirm anything before or after it ( as you said, those who dont accept any obligation that can be placed on humanity that is not found in Quran)?
-
Does it mean that you only believe in the Quran alone and not the other books? Or does it mean that the Quran must confirm anything before or after it ( as you said, those who dont accept any obligation that can be placed on humanity that is not found in Quran)?
I think what I meant is that the term Koranist or Koran aloners means that either they only accept the Koran as the teachings of Muhammad, which then includes accepting the previous scriptures as having authority since Koran states that but accepting that in different levels. Meaning some accept the previous books completely and others partially. OR you accept other authority such as the rituals(eid, haj, 5 salat etc) along the Koran but do not believe its the only way to practice them. You can't be a Koranist if you are not between these two boundaries. If you take a position as Ahmed Subhi Mansour did(http//www.ahl-alquran.com/arabic/main.php) which is not accepting those who wish to only follow the Koran in everything, then you will discount more than 75% of the people in this forum who are Koran aloners and accept nothing outside the Koran.
I guess what I am trying to say is the Koran did not lay out any detailed specific ways to perform the obligatory rituals such as fasting and praying and pilgrimage, and there is nothing anyone can do about that. Either you accept that every individual practice them they way he interprets the verses OR you simply follow how the traditions practice them even if its not elaborated as such in the Koran. Other than that the Koranist have no disagreements as far as I can see.
As far as me I believe that these two boundaries are sufficient since the Koran aloners are in constant disagreement about the rituals and the Koranist who accept rituals practiced by other Muslims are not able to bring forth their evidence from the Koran. So its equal. And if each accepts the other than its cool.
-
No need to use "specific terms" such as quranist or whatever
just take the concern, circomcision, stoning, whatever else, and explain it in the video
it will catch enough attention
those who don't care, whatever
and for those who won't be able to reach the videos you can't reach everyone, we are humans
-
Let's not call ourselves "Quranists" or "Quran-Alone Muslims". We're simply Muslims if we believe in God and just the Quran.
Peace,
Respectfully.True that.
I agree, i think an dbelieve we should call ourselves Muslims.
We were always called Muslims, since the time of prophet Abraham.Peace.
-
Quran alone muslim, seems like a good description to me.
Muslim however is not noun. I don't see the point in refering to oneself as Muslim. After all the Koran also uses Mu'min much more than Muslims. It will only spread confusion and make us less visible more than we already are.