Thanks for clarifying. For me, the simplified "1 in 2" chance does not give enough credit to the quality/content of the info/claim. The figure of 1 in 262144 implies many today could come out with that type of info AND get nothing wrong, when I would say it would be difficult to find just one person. In fact, has there been any scientist in history who has acheived similar to this? Second part - even if these people said anything about the quran, it lends no weight to the quran itself. Let the book stand up on its own (which it does quite well). For it to stand up on its own, people have to read it first! I did not write the article to prove The Quran, although I can see how one might think that. It was primarily written to offer a unique/interesting approach to The Quran, to gain a foothold in the reader's mind, to make them think "hmm, this book might be interesting, maybe I should read it".