peace Ahmed,
(you don't need to reply to this right away as you are very busy, so do it whenever you are ready.)
If the Quran is His message then how come you sperate the two, God is not a symbol bro
I know God's not a symbol, but i don't believe that it is necessary to believe in the quran to believe in God. God, and his guidance, is not limited to that one book. God is everywhere.
You are ignoring the billions of people who have never read the quran in their life yet live life according to it. How is that possible? How do people believe in one God even when they live in around people who are against Islam and whatever is associated with it. I'm sure you've met a christian, or a jew, or an athiest, who is just as good of a person as you are. This is what my example was about as well. My view is entirely based upon my own experience.
One does not need the quran in order to believe in the Truth.
and I am truly sorry for assuming something about you. I guess that point didn't work.
But I think your believing in the quran proves my point. You found some reason to believe that the quran is the word of God. You found in it some guidance that you just knew was divine. That means there was a period in which you looked at it critically, examining it, trying to find in it some guidance. Am I right?
If not, you would be the only person that believes a book is from God just because it says so. Which is impossible.
We all need to understand the quran to believe in it.
And I don't think I can go any further than that until the issue with 37 is resolved.
Excuse me bro, this is actually another Quran challenge, because in 1400 years no one done that
There are many people who do that. They say stuff (or write it down) and claim that it is true. There are many examples of that. And I bet (the $20 my mom gave me today) that there have been some people who have tried some trick to make them seem truthful.
No one would take that "challenge" seriously as it is ridiculous.
"My book is divine. It contains facts, and other statements that are not clear and no one can know their true meaning"
Dan Brown can claim that The Da Vinci Code is divine using that method. It certainly contains some undeniable, established facts. And then there is the other "made up" stuff that he can easily claim is allegorical. And trying to figure out the meaning is futile because you will never know the answer.
See what I'm getting at? Hope i'm making myself clear.
I'm sorry to say my case hasn't been slam dunked yet, brother.
peace
