Salaam Sarah, all,
The mathematical analogy provided has 3 logical fallacies, and is thus not a valid analogy but a fallacious argument. I will call it the FALLACY OF FALSE ANALOGY !
- First premise is made based on absolute verifiable facts, and then a second premise is made based partly on unverifiable info, and then the two are considered analogous.
For example, in the first equation
S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ..... N, (N+1), (N+2), .... (any addital numbers u come up with)}
The set of numbers highlighted in red comprise absolutely verifiable and definable numbers, but in the second equation
Quran = {Rule 1, Rule 2, ....... Rule N, (prophets practices and lessons applicable from them)}
How does one know whether what are termed "prophet's practices" are actually prophet's practices ? Thus the set of practices or rules highlighted in red above are not absolutely verifiable and definable, but based on UNVERIFIABLE HEARSAY AND UNVERIFIABLE DEEDS. The analogy therefore is a FALSE ANALOGY.
- Let us consider the first equation again
S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ..... N, (N+1), (N+2), .... (any addital numbers u come up with)}
The set of numbers in blue is clearly NOT COMPLETE, as it DOES NOT INCLUDE the set of numbers in red; however in the second equation
Quran = {Rule 1, Rule 2, ....... Rule N, (prophets practices and lessons applicable from them)}
Because of the usage of the word "Quran", the set of rules in blue is clearly COMPLETE relevant to our guidance by definition, and thus automatically INCLUDES the set in red. (Quran is fully detailed and complete, includes every example, and is a clear explanation of everything relevant to our guidance, and is enough for our guidance, and the prophet followed only the Quran, AND THUS THE RED PART IS ALREADY INCLUDED IN THE BLUE PART).
Again, the analogy is a FALSE ANALOGY.
- "S" in the first equation consists of INFINITE numbers, whereas "Quran" in the second equation consists of FINITE rules.
Again, the analogy is a FALSE ANALOGY.
The mathematical analogy indicates faulty/poor logic and/or ignorance of some facts !!
Criticism of my analysis and any mistakes in my reasoning is welcome.
I am more of a reader on this site but I had to post here. Couldnt go past the logic stuff on an islamic site. lol...The logic provided in sarahs post isnt that bad actually.
Tanveer... I understand you are a very wise man since you were able to grasp enough of the logical analogy that u so finely claim to be false.
I should remind you there is nothing wrong with such analogies, Allah himself uses analogies in the Quran to help us understand certain statements He makes. And since you are so aware of the Quran that you claim so COMPLETE, I am sure you wont need to be reminded of any single such analogy from it.
I dont know where you came up with the logical cut n paste sarah, but it could certainly be worded more appripriately to account for some of the week spots tanveer is raising. But surely enough the arguements shown in the set theory isnt that bad, I am impressed. we need more muslim mathematicians.
Tanveer, I draw your attention to the point (3) that you state you indeed admit, Quran in the second equation consists of FINITE rules. and taking these rules one by one (not including the red part highlighted), you claim these are the FINITE rules that make the book COMPLETE in this such diverse life (with INFINITE choices and problems) we live in, today, in 21st centory?
I see some great truths in the arguments mentioned in those set theories. I do see some weekness in the wordings, but I think I can mend that. But I am not going to. its not worth it seeing how stupid some ppl here have been.
Your point (2) ... again your claims are quite falacious. Quran by definition (if only BLUE rules are considered) is not complete. Re my above points.
Prophet indeed followed the Quran. Did he also find the way to perform prayer in the Quran? Is that why he did it the way we do it now? I wont even bother mentioning other examples.
I would take heed to what someone wrote here "if sea was the ink, then it would run out before Allahs words could be finished with it". indeed Quran is a cut down, compact for me dos n donts. absolute bare minimum to keep the faith. it is pretty much as the above set described. A collection of FINITE RULES, and with the INCLUSION of one important "property" (u cud say rule) of allowance of "take heed from prophets practices".
Yes you could be right what we call prophets practices, how do we know if they r realy his practices. Well then i cud ask, what you call Quran, how do you know if its realy is EXACTLY what Allah ment to send down?
Talking about sending stuff down, for those who think the prophets job was only to note down the message, I would say, well if that was the case then Quran would have been sent down within 1 min. I am sure you Allah could excercise his 'ability' to do things lightning fast. But NO! it was sent down over years! 23 years is it? correct me perhaps??? why??? so we cud follow it word by word? I dont think so.
A sane explanation would be, to memorise it, understand it, and watch how it was practiced by the prophet. A good analogy I could give is Quran is like a skeleton, and prophets practices would be the meat covering it, giving it an example of "HOW" it could look like in the end product. It is VERY IMPORTANT to stress that prophets practices would NOT be the ONLY way to cover up (Mesh around) the skeleton. Just as there are different looks from one human to another human (resulting from varying formation of meat on the skeleton), there would be surely more than one way of doing things, and not just blind following every single practices the prophet did. Indeed the prophet stressed this very point also.
Having said that... for those who want to be on the 'safe side' or 'i dono he did it this way, so i thought it was the right way', we can take prophets practices as the 'model' and work on it.
The Verse
?O you who believe, obey God and obey the messenger, and those in authority amongst you. But if you dispute in any matter, then you shall refer it to God and His messenger if you believe in God and the Last Day. That is better and more suitable for knowing.? (459)
I think this verse is an enough clue to represent the argument showed in the set theory posted by Sarah. For those seeming wise out here, I would like to ask, why cudnt Allah say "Obay Allah" only??? are you saying Obeying the messenger same as obeying Allah? if so why didnt Allah say Obey Allah and then Obey Allah again! I thought Allah was wise enough to use words very efficiently SPECIALY when Quran claims to be an art of devine poetry. Such imperfect art it would be then ay? sigh
For those who are wise and humble, I am sure they will see Allahs reason for chosing the words correctly. And wait Allah mentions again, hence stressing the point, follow those in authority, but if u r in dispute then follow Allah AND his messenger.
Anyway... I am not able to finish off here as I wanted to because of timing constraint. But I believe there are two issues 1) Believing prophets practices are a good way to understand Quran. 2) SOME hadiths are indeed what was practiced in prophets time.
I would say ppl start with 1) first. then once that is in place he/she should move onto 2). if u cant have a firm ground on 1) then I suggest you make your own religion. and if you cant have a firm ground on 2) then I say you might as well not hav faith in the way Quran was preserved.