Salam, please can you state a contexte, or verse dealing with وما انأ? Litteraly it is the negation of oneself "and I am not "
Thanks

Salam, please can you state a contexte, or verse dealing with وما انأ?
Thanks

Quote
"Sana=Lunar Month

The argument is based on verse 29-14 where it said that Noah is still between his people 1000 sana less 50 aam (years). Understanding of Sana=lunar month leads to a tota duration of 33 years while understanding of sana year or equivalent (12 lunar month) leads to a duration of 950 years.

We have same problem with verse 18-25 where people of cavern stayed 309 sana, which is exactly 25 solar years instead of the classical understanding of 309 years."

Salam to all and welcome

I agree with NOON WALQALAM that it does not the translation of "sana" as lunar month because in this case the verse 4616 will be sensless to mean that we are responsible for our self at the age of 3 AAM = Solar years! 3=40X25/309!
Siwto

Salam;

Do never forget this lady upcoming Hillary Clinton; so is her husbanfor Somalia
Add FRENCH SARKOZY; Hollande, but remove ASSAD and Ahamadinedjad

peace

Thank you Layth for updating the text and sharing your reasoning for doing so. )

Would you happen to have any idea when the print versions will reflect the current translation?

Here we read that the Salat prohibits immorality and vice, yet, we all know people who pray that cheat, lie, and steal - obviously the prayer aspect did not help. However, when we think of Salat as "knowing the law" then we can see that this knowledge "education-process" will stop people from immorality and vice - an attribute that God gives himself directly

Salam Layth

Thank you for your continuous effort here to help us understand more the world oh God;
My questions are

1. do you think that the education/knowledge will let people stop from wrong doing on earth, to consider it/them as the significance of the SALAT matter.

2. How then we should comprehend SALAT ALFAJR, or SALAT AL ICHAA.

Peace
Siwto

May The Almighty bless him,

Please will you share a link, if any,of his translated
Urdu books, as The Quran Language Encyclopedia,
Salam.

Siwto

Thx brother WAKAS, may you provide any link handshake
Siwto

Peace be upon you all,

Interesting ChandRasdjid, i will discover your finding. bravo
I am cameroonian more involved in autodidacting

What i am concerned with in that case is that the theory on the physical nature of LIGHT.
It is known as wave & particle. In my opinion it is not correct. Einstein was concerned (but himself was not very sure same as Louis De Broglie) who worked out this theory & others at the beginning of the late century.For long time ago light was considered either particle (NEWTON) or wave nature (DESCARTES) exclusively. Basing on the discovries of PLANK and others on quantum phenomenon, it was concluded that light is one thing and the other in the unified above theories.

I felt challenged and around 1995-97 was able to manuscrit something on that.

I found that there exist what could be named PARADOX OF LIGHT, e.g.
CARRYING IMMATERIAL NATURE BUT FROM MATTER, and that the SPEED OF LIGHT will have no fundamental sens as it is.

Personnal works are done but are not yet published, as i am busy of everyday life.

Siwto

Salam,

I just discover a city "Hajjah" in the western Yemen. My question is could be that city place related to hajj rituals, both of the terms having the same root.
Should you please clue us thereon.

Salam

siwto

quote from AL-amiyr y=mx+L,

Salam Al-amiyr
May you please help understand if your equation quoted above is very significant and how to use it when following you in your threads.

Thanks a lot

Siwto

quote

The H in the Book (al-kitaab) means 'the whole of' like Huwa meaning He and Hiya meaning She; it signifies that which is between the two ends.

salam al-amiyr,
On our previous post the 11th, i did no understand the introduction of the letter H at the end of the word ALLAH, when you talked of houa and hiya to say that they are the whole, please will you be more explainful

thank you
siwto

Dear Brother Pazuzu,

1. Your translation might be right, but don't you see that it was the very action of Moses on the bahr that made it separated (the fa of the verb infalaqa is consecutive of an early action) in two parts both as high as a great hill. Whereas your opinion on that matter is showing that Moses and others just follow a situation created by rain to escape.
   You stated "...and walked on an elevated ground with two giant streams of water on either side of them". But they had to cross at least one stream first before reaching any elevated valley. My very question is how did they cross that body of water presumably perpendicular to their way?
   Anyway i think we must be veru careful on this very important passage even if we are not coming back on the idea of MISR not being in the actual egypt.

2. If you choosed to pease to sunni way of behaviour to attract them it is not so bad but if you do think that we are somehow obliged to add anything we mentionning the Messengers or prophet as a "respect" it is problematic...

3. let me invite you on this page of brother Edip Yuksel(or go to his site 19.org)
   "4. What was the name of the last prophet Muhammad or Muhammed?
   All the derivatives of the root word H8M40D4 (read HaMaDa) occurs 68 times in the Quran
   o yuHaMmaDu (to be praised by others) occurs once in a NEGATIVE context in verse 3188
   o HaMD (praise, noun) occurs 38 times and all for GOD 12; 61; 645; 743; 1010; 1439; 1598; 1675; 17111; 181; 20130; 2328; 2715; 2759; 2793; 2870; 2963; 3018; 3125; 3215; 341; 341; 351; 3534; 37182; 3929; 3974; 3975; 3975; 407; 4055; 4065; 425; 4536; 5039; 5248; 641; 1103.
   o HaMDika (your praise) occurs once for GOD in verse 230
   o biHaMDihi (with His praise) occurs 4 times all for GOD 1313; 1744; 1752; 2558.
   o HaMiDun (those who praise) occurs once for praising GOD 9112.
   o HaMyD (the One who is praised) is used 17 times, and all for GOD 2267; 4131; 1173; 141; 148; 2224; 2264; 3112; 3126; 346; 3515; 4142; 4228; 5724; 606; 646; 858.
   o maHMuD (the praised position) occurs once as the description of the POSITION promised for the prophet 1779.
   o aHMaD (the one who praises more/most; it is not a proper name but an adjective made of a verb) occurs once in verse 616
   o muHaMMed (the one who praises frequently) occurs in 4 verses 3144; 3340; 472; 4829.
   The picture must be clear now. As Satan distorted the monotheistic message of Jesus by turning unity to trinity, similarly Muslims fabricated many different idols by creating partners in religious sources, by adhering the sharia laws made by their clergymen (4221), and by glorifying the name of a human-messenger more than his Lord and Creator, by adding his name to the name of God in the Statement of Unity thereby transforming it to the Statement of Duality.
   The one who was prophecised by Jesus was described as ahmad, that is ?the one who praises more?, similar to the linguistic form a?lam (the one who knows more) or arham (the one who cares more).
   616 When Jesus, son of Mary, said, ?O children of Israel, I am God?s messenger to you, authenticating what is present with me of the Torah and bringing good news of a messenger to come after me whose attribute will be ?the most praising.?? But when he showed them the clear proofs, they said, ?This is clearly magic.?
   Ironically, though the prophesized description is pronounced as AHMAD, (the one who praises more or the most) it is commonly translated as YUHMAD or HAMYD or HUMIDA (the one who was praised more or the most).
   Some Sunnis might attempt to abuse verse 1779, in order to maintain the Orthodox reading. ?If he was not praised which is denoted by his name Muhammad, how could his position be praised?? This objection initially appears to be a fair one, but with little scrutiny it falls apart. Here is the problem with this reasoning.
   A person might be appointed and raised to a praised position by the frequently praised Lord and that person would still not be a ?frequently praised person.? The position is the one which is praised, not the person who might be blessed by God to reach such a position, which is returning to God, the Praise-worthy.
   If I am given a miraculous sign, I do not become miraculous myself. If one is promised high heaven, he does not become high himself. If one is blessed with abundance, she does not become abundant herself.
   In fact, God provides us with the best mathal, the best tafsyr in verse 2658 by using similar words. In verse 2658 we are informed that pharaoh and his followers lost their ?treasures and honorable positions (maqamun karym)? However we know that neither Pharaoh nor his close friends were honorable (karym), but they had honorable position (maqamun karym) in Egypt!
   After the departure of the prophet Muhammad, like most heroes the hypocrites started carving an idol around his name, which later was extended to his family members, to his monotheist friends, and even to the hypocrite friends. Unlike what the sunni sources claim, the word sahaba is not a holy word in the Quran; to the contrary, it is mostly used to describe the hypocrites and mushriks around Muhammad. When the Umayyad and Abbasid tyrants betrayed the Quranic principle of democratic election, they distorted the meaning of the word jizya (war reparation) as an extra taxation on Christians and Jews (See Quran a Reformist Translation for detailed discussion on this and similar issues).
   This anti-islamic imperialistic policy forced many Christians and Jews to convert to Sunni or Shiite sects. Those unhappy converts found it easy to replace their previous idols with new ones; this time with Muhammed and many others. Knowing the depth and breadth of alteration performed by the Sunni and Shiite clergymen, especially, considering their intolerance to and aggression against those who adhered to the monotheistic principles, gradually changing the pronunciation of the word Muhammed to Muhammad would not be a difficult task. (I highly recommend my colleagues Prof. Aisha Musa?s and Ahmad Kassim?s books on this subject Hadith as Scripture Discussions on the Authority of Prophetic Traditions in Islam; and Islamic Renaissance a New Era has Started, respectively.)
   In summary, according to the teaching of the Quran, the name of the last prophet was most likely not MuhammAd, but was MuhammEd, similar to the linguistic form of Muallem (teacher) or Musawer (designer). HMD is true praise and implies magnifying, honoring and admiration. The person who engages in HMD, declares his or humility and submission. Thus, HaMD exclusively applies to Allah (the god), our Lord, the One, the Initiator, the Designer, the Compassionate, the Living, the Eternal, the Almighty, and the Omniscient God. Praise is to the Lord of the Universe."

Peace

siwto

Dear Pazuzu;

I am very thankful for the job & the logic you are using to bring more light in our deen, may ALLAH SW bless you and help you for the rest of your life in all your matters,

I must thank Lena here in the forum who helped me getting the document.

I swallowed the object once. It is well done but i stopped on only three points

1. It seems to me that you enntered deeply in everything concerning the issue of Pharaoh/Moses but only flee on the most important point e.g. the partition of water. How it happened is not clear in your text. The HQ stated that Moses must " ibrib be asaaka albahara"...wheras you just talked of "Strike forth towards the bar with conviction." Is that your own traduction Pazuzu?

2. Whenever you mention the Messengers you put (P). If you mean "peace up on them" like what is used with sunni, it happens that it is a form of glorification in my view but less than the one of traditionnalists, as for you all messengers are equal. On the other hand you seemly do not need any adduction when you mention The Creator ALLAH (?) >( ( -[ -[ brickwall. A single glorification formula like (SW) for Him worth something i think. What can you say for that dear Pazuzu?

3. The spelling of the last prophet's name was dicussed by the brother Yuksel, here on FM, stating that the right one must be Muhammid. Obviously he was right for me, but i see you still using Muhammad. Would you help understand better brother.

Thanks a lot

Saam.

Siwto

brickwall Sorry, Pazuzu, Huruf,..., there were an error on my email [email protected], would you kindly send the ebook on this updated email.

peace;

Siwto

Peace upon you all dear brothers,

Pazuzu, Huruf, would kindly send the ebook for me on this address [email protected].

Thank you

siwto

Peace Kaiokenred;

A part this subject on the vocable allah, i will really want to know the performance of your QM to explain phenomena, as it seems to me that Plank wrote on light has nothing to do with the reality...
IAnyway i hope that it is not getting you out of the way?

Peace

peace;

Please could you be more clear in "you can confirm it if you want by using Quantum Mechanics". Is Quantum mechanism another Quran?

Peace

Peace Kaiokenred;

As you stated "The word Allah means there is no God" how do you translate the expreession "LAA ILAAHA";

Brother Bigmo, likely our brother Kaiokenred is confusd?

Peace.

Peace Kaiokenred;

Are you missing something very important by sataing "No, Allah is a contraction between the words Allathi la Ilah, which means who is not God"?

The contraction is not due to the linear proximity of the words Allathi la Ilah, but rather to the expressivity of the ilah itself you ar free to woership anything you choose, but the wright choice is when you choose one able of everything, the allmight, be you arab, english,...

Pace

Peace Kaiokenred;
my former post was dirty please have this one

"If Allah was a god He would call Himself Ilah, but he's not."!!
How can you claim this when
1.He does confirm He is "ilahun waahidun"
2.The expression ALLLAH is a contraction between "the" definite article and the word "ilah".
3. Definitly, it is clear that within some infinite sets of ilahs, there is only one to be praise in order to be saved, "The Ilah" or Allah.

Peace