Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Mohsannat? A new understanding(very imp)

Mohsannat? A new understanding(very imp)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
156 Posts 13 Posters 7.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    warner
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    Peace Siki

    Your explanation on the contradiction of Mohsanat between 424 and 425 is incomplete. (How is it NOT ALLOWED to marry chaste among women but ALLOWED
    To marry chaste among muminat.)

    You omitted a WA/AND in 425.

    Your second solution was to have the WA/AND but connect 425 to an unrelated part of 424.

    I think you missed the Mohsanat in ?half the punishment as for a Mohsanat? in 425 also.

    I wish you post your clear understanding on 424 and 425 and ask someone fluent in Arabic here to check whether your opinion is correct. I remember Samia refuted
    the grammar in your construction.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      siki
      wrote on last edited by
      #101

      Peace Siki

      You omitted a WA/AND in 425.

      which WA/AND in 4-25 you are talking about?

      siki

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        siki
        wrote on last edited by
        #102

        Peace Siki

        I think you missed the Mohsanat in half the punishment as for a Mohsanat in 425 also.

        NO i did not , please see my quote down below in Red

        Dear ALL

        to continue with the analysis , i shall discuss 4-25'

        4-25 , if you can not afford to marry a believing mohsinnat , then from MME a fatayat of believing category, nikah them with the permission of their masters,,,,

        if due to any reason one is unable to marry a believing mohsinnat , then God is prescribing the next best option, and that is , marry a Mohsinnat who is a maiden and believing out of MME.

        and she is to be a maiden , not a widow or divorcee from MME category of MOhsinnats.

        After she is bonded ( a mean has been provided with the help of which she can stay chaste/righteous) and even then if , she commits Fahisha , punishment for this sub category of mohsinnats would be half , of what is prescribed for a regular MOHSINNA.
        i shall continue

        peace

        siki

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          siki
          wrote on last edited by
          #103

          Peace Siki

          Your second solution was to have the WA/AND but connect 425 to an unrelated part of 424.

          i cant get you, where , how and when , have i connected 4-25 with 4-24 ?

          siki

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            siki
            wrote on last edited by
            #104

            Peace Siki

            Your explanation on the contradiction of Mohsanat between 424 and 425 is incomplete. (How is it NOT ALLOWED to marry chaste among women but ALLOWED To marry chaste among muminat.)

            o I did not say that , i am dazed hypno, how casually you have been treating my posts/ explanations.

            This wrong interpretation , and its resultant contradiction with all the other verses in Quran, was "The Reason " which prompted me to start this thread, and look for alternate solutions to reach/ correct/improve this anomaly.

            peace

            siki

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              siki
              wrote on last edited by
              #105

              Peace Siki

              I wish you post your clear understanding on 424 and 425 and ask someone fluent in Arabic here to check whether your opinion is correct. I remember Samia refuted
              the grammar in your construction.

              I don't disrespect my Arabic fluent friends, they are good and helpful, but i humbly submit , that sometimes , the solutions can be reached without their expertise, with a little use of common sense.
              Had this been the criteria , we would not have so many good translations by non Arabic speakers. And all of we here ,would not brickwall , trying to sort out a simple WA.

              peace

              siki

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W Offline
                W Offline
                warner
                wrote on last edited by
                #106

                Peace Siki

                I made a mistake with the verse numbers.

                It is the Wa/And in 424

                Also I meant connecting 423 and 424.

                Siki marry a Mohsinnat who is a maiden and believing out of MME

                This part of the verse does not say Mohsanat

                Please explain ?sub category of mohsinnat? and ?regular MOHSINNA?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W Offline
                  W Offline
                  warner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #107

                  Peace Siki

                  I agree that we can not find all answers to Quran solely on Arabic knowledge.

                  But dropping a WA from the Quranic verse defy all common sense.

                  As far as Quran is concerned and particularly with this verse Wa is of primary importance.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    siki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #108

                    Peace Siki

                    siki wrote, Marry a Mohsinnat who is a maiden and believing out of MME

                    This part of the verse does not say Mohsanat

                    I agree , that this part of the verse does not contain the word Mohsinna, but remember i am not quoting a verse word by word here , i am elaborating and writing my own words to explain what God meant to convey.

                    i justify my understanding of Mohsinnat in this particular case because of 4-23, when it says,

                    4-23 And the Mohsinnats except MME,,, ( Wal Mohsinnati illa MA malakat emnakum---)

                    it means "And the mohsinnats except the mohsinnats who belong to MME---

                    if MME were not mohsinnats,and were a different category,there was no need to insert this important" ILLA MME "

                    peace

                    siki

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      siki
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #109

                      Peace Siki

                      Please explain ?sub category of mohsinnat? and ?regular MOHSINNA?

                      Come on brother! who could be better than you , to appreciate the difference between a regular Mohsinna and someone who is MME ,

                      who could be a person more appropriate than you, to elaborate on adverse situation of a "Mohsinna coming through MME" channel, and reasons for the concession in punishments in case she committs Fahisha now.

                      peace

                      siki

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        siki
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #110

                        Peace Siki

                        But dropping a WA from the Quranic verse defy all common sense.

                        I did not , in all of my posts except the first, which i did by mistake , and when Brother Tanveer pointed out, i corrected it. Here it is in one of my later posts

                        Dear Warner and Samia.
                        and now 4-24

                        "AND MOHSANNAT OUT OF NISA EXCEPT MMA GOD?S BOOK IS OVER YOU AND LAWFUL FOR YOU BESIDES THOSE THAT YOU SEEK WITH YOUR WEALTH IN A FAIR RELATIONSHIP NOT MUSAAFIHEEN THEN WHAT BENEFIT YOU DERIVE WITH IT FROM THEM THEN GIVE THEM THEIR DOWERS AS APPOINTED AND NO BLAME UPON YOU WHAT YOU MUTTALLY AGREE WITH"

                        And we will sort this out too, when you are satisfied with other minor issues regarding the subject word mohsninnat and its usages,

                        So tell me when you are satisfied and left with no more queries other than this WA.
                        peace

                        siki

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W Offline
                          W Offline
                          warner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #111

                          Siki 4-23 And the Mohsinnats except MME,,, ( Wal Mohsinnati illa MA malakat emnakum---)

                          it means "And the mohsinnats except the mohsinnats who belong to MME---

                          if MME were not mohsinnats,and were a different category,there was no need to insert this important" ILLA MME "

                          Salaam Brother

                          You made an error on the verse number above.

                          Wal muhsana_tu minan nisa_'i illa_ ma_ malakat aima_nukum???..424

                          My problem is it is not Mohsanat in 424 it is ?muhsana_tu minan nisa_?

                          I am sorry for emphasizing the Wa/And on 424 after you have withdrawn that point.

                          But still I do not get how you solved the contradiction between 424 and 425.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            siki
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #112

                            I am sorry for emphasizing the Wa/And on 424 after you have withdrawn that point.

                            But still I do not get how you solved the contradiction between 424 and 425.

                            i have not withdrawn but pended it till i sort out other inquiries.

                            Wal muhsana_tu minan nisa_'i illa_ ma_ malakat aima_nukum..424

                            My problem is it is not Mohsanat in 424 it is muhsana_tu minan nisa_

                            And the chaste ones out of women excluding the ones belonging to MME --
                            what exactly is the problem , can you elaborate?

                            peace

                            siki

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • W Offline
                              W Offline
                              warner
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #113

                              Peace Siki

                              You have to explain "Why is it prohibited to marry the chaste ones out of women"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                siki
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #114

                                peace warner

                                That is precisely the contradiction , and the issue of WA , which i have pended till you are satisfied with rest of the stuff.

                                so, do you require any clarifications regarding any occurrence , other than this?

                                Are you satisfied with my explanations regarding the use of word MOhsinnat and/or its root HSN in all verses of Quran except this one?

                                If not, and you still have some queries left, please tell me now.

                                siki

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #115

                                  Peace Warner, Siki, all,

                                  Translation of "mohsanaat" as "chaste" creates a huge contradiction in 425.

                                  In 425, "mohsanaat" is used IN CONTRAST with "MMA from believing fatayat". If "mohsanaat" is translated as "chaste" here, then we are being told that if we cannot marry the chaste women then marry MMA from believing fatayat, thus making MMA from believing fatayat UNCHASTE and also making believing fatayat UNCHASTE ! o

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    siki
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #116

                                    Tanveer!

                                    If you can't find a pack of " regular salted chips" to eat , you may eat " salt and vinegar" flavored pack of Lays

                                    siki

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #117

                                      Salaam bro siki,

                                      There is no such thing as "regular" chaste versus "irregular" chaste P

                                      "Salted chips" would be a better analogy, then "salt and vinegar flavored" would be included in the "salted", not a different category ! P

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        siki
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #118

                                        well that was just an off the cuff shot , you may improve upon/perfect it but i hope , you got what i meant to convey

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #119

                                          Salaam bro siki,

                                          well that was just an off the cuff shot , you may improve upon/perfect it but i hope , you got what i meant to convey

                                          It still doesn't solve the contradiction created by translating "mohsanaat" as "chaste" in 425. Then if one cannot marry a chaste woman then he can marry the "MMA from believing fatayat"; this would make "MMA from believing fatayat" not included in the category of "chaste", thus making them UNCHASTE o

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users