59:7 - Explain.
-
Salaam all,
Wow. Well, the prophet was also the messenger. The two are designations for one person. God did not make him messenger one day and prophet another so that he can be rejected. That is in some dreams of people in this forum who claim messengership or who claim that so and so are messengers. A claim that they use to make themselves be followed, because otherwise, they have no chance.Another point. One can change the name easily to Ahadeeth Rasooliyyah and no one in Sunni Islam will be bothered by it.
Take care all and have a great day.
Hussein
Do you mean on your CV you mention your favorite dish and how you deal with your wife?
Prophet and messenger are not the same and are not used interchangeably, that's why we have many of "Obey the messenger", because the message is alive, and none of "Obey the prophet", because the prophet is dead. God chooses His words very carefully. It would be meaningless to be asked to obey a dead man.
And the fact is that they did not call it ahaadith rasuuliyya and they dare not, even now. They would go to any length..call it divine revelation...call it abrogators of the qur'aan but would not dare call it rasuuliyya.
-
Wrong. There is no proof that it is only Qur'an. Also, God promised to protect the message. The message can encompass the Qur'an and more, or it can be the Qur'an with the authentic hadeeth encompassed within it. Of course you will say but how can we authenticate it? The answer is that authentic hadeeth is present in that collection and it is the job of the person to look for it. It is not the job of the regular person to do it, but the regular person cannot reject it, at least not in principle.
To say that statement is wrong when we ALL agree that the Quran itself is protected regardless of anything else and that all the sayings of the messenger in the Quran are part and parcel (of the Quran as we all know it) which is protected... is very strange. That remains true/correct regardless of what else one might wish to add into the "The Quran's Encompassing Protected Message Inclusive Of Other Stuff Also".
So, to clarify your statement above, are you saying that there is more to the Quran than what we all know is already there? Or is it that only the "authentic sayings of the prophet or as Samia kindly contributed (thanks sis), the "authentic" ahadeeth nabawiyya make up the extended Quran? Which btw, individuals have the choice to accept or reject based on subjectivity/differing circumstances? Which individuals have to hunt for and and then verify (and then accept/reject/be neutral on, based on differing circumstances) taking up much of their time/effort for something that might well be totally useless and futile depending on the narration in question instead of following what is already present, already authenticated and without a shadow of a doubt i.e the Quran as we know it?
I can understand doing it for research or interest but to claim that it is binding, incumbent and a divine duty/order in addition to what we all already know i.e. the Quran is really reaching, since the cans and mights are theories that uptil now have not been verified with any solid/direct proof/evidence and are instead contradicted by many verses posted here alone, in which one has direct evidence and inferences that the Quran is all we really need for our spiritual success.
Basically I look at this as an effort to make the "prophetic sayings" outside the quran divinely protected and a divine order to follow by saying it's part of the Quran. Of course we first must find them and verify them which is going to be every man and woman's duty and will differ from person to person. The others label it as sunna/prophetic sayings seperate from the Quran but must be followed and this goes a step ahead, throws that label away and wants to make it into the Quran! Full marks for doing away with traditional fetters I must say, this is just as (dare I say it) shockingly radical as the "God Alone Movement".
Truth or authentic "hadeeth" span time and/or cultures/boundaries, thus leading back to my previous quote as to how everything must be examined and then accepted/rejected et al. There is no binding on we "must accept/reject it all" if it doesn't contradict the Quran or is not proven wrong. The difference once again is, we accept the whole Quran, not bits and pieces, but we can accept bits and pieces of other stuff making it relative, subjective and dependent hence non-binding...extraneous to our spiritual success especially when one is following the Quran.
P.S. I wish I knew how to tm my phrases with that little copyright icon...
-
Peace all
Verses like 332 are open to interpretation. "Obey the messenger" does not mean follow separate religious laws/Muhammad's 7th century Arab traditions. It is open to ther interpretations. For example, what sister Nadia explained. This verse is mutashabihat or multi meaning, and people twist it fit their pre-conceived notions (37).
However, verses like 6114 (below) are mukhamat or firm/clear in meaning (again referring back to 37). Let's look at 6114
6114 "Shall I seek other than God as a judge when He has sent down to you this Scripture mufassalan/clearly explained?" Those to whom We have given the Scripture know it is sent down from your Lord with truth; so do not be of those who have doubt.
6114 uses "mufassalan" as you an see, which means clearly explained. This is not open to interpretation. It means just that it's clearly explained. So with this in mind, what need is there for ahadith to explain the Quran? None, because a clearly explained scripture does not need an outside source to explain it.
Peace
-
Salaam all,
Well, sister Samia, Rasool and Nabi are not the same designations. However, The prophet Muhammad was called Rasool and Nabi by God. So, if we call them Ahadeeth Nabawiyya, then they came from the messenger. God never assigned designations on when Muhammad was Rasool and when he was Nabi.
As for My CV, I put in it what matters to my job description. A rasool's job is giving people instructions to how to live their lives. So, he put in it that helps them live their life.
Sister Nadia, there is more to the Qur'an than what you read. So, yes you will get more insight on it from some people than others and the hadeeth helps you get that insight.
Is there in the hadeeth something that is not alluded to in the Qur'an? The answer of the scholars of hadeeth is no, but they pointed nuances and sensitive points that will not come to the attention to the person who reads it superficially. That is how I characterize the reading of the Qur'an on this site.
Open Mind, I am glad that you bring up the mutashabihat. It applies to many cases. For example when people limit the meaning of a statement to suit their bias. It can apply on you or me. However, it is the one who narrows the meaning when it is not needed that is blamed in there. That is the meaning of Taweel. As for the messenger, he did not create a new set of laws. They are linked.
The mufassalan is the book, which is not limited to the Qur'an. This is from the Qur'an itself.
Take care all.
Hussein
-
Open Mind, I am glad that you bring up the mutashabihat. It applies to many cases. For example when people limit the meaning of a statement to suit their bias. It can apply on you or me. However, it is the one who narrows the meaning when it is not needed that is blamed in there. That is the meaning of Taweel. As for the messenger, he did not create a new set of laws. They are linked.
It applies to verses that are open to interpretation. People use these verses and only use on interpretation to fit a whole set of doctrine. Yes, anyone can do this. The hadith as we know it creates news laws. For example, shaving the beard is a sin. This is not in the Quran. To say the hadith do not add laws is absurd.
The mufassalan is the book, which is not limited to the Qur'an. This is from the Qur'an itself.
The Book and The Message is always used in the Quran to refer to the Quran or God's Message. This is why you see "the Book/the Message" being used to refer to Moses' prophecies, Jesus' prophecies, etc. It is all one message. In no way can this be referring to emulating every little thing Muhammad does, 7th century Arab traditions.
Peace
-
Salaam open mind,
It applies to verses that are open to interpretation. People use these verses and only use on interpretation to fit a whole set of doctrine. Yes, anyone can do this. The hadith as we know it creates news laws. For example, shaving the beard is a sin. This is not in the Quran. To say the hadith do not add laws is absurd.
For example "obey the messenger" has to mean "obey only the Qur'an". That is a great example. As for the beard, no you do not have to have one.
As for the book. I advise you to read it again, because there is more to "the book" than the mentioned books.
Hussein
-
Salaam open mind,
For example "obey the messenger" has to mean "obey only the Qur'an". That is a great example. As for the beard, no you do not have to have one.As for the book. I advise you to read it again, because there is more to "the book" than the mentioned books.
Hussein
No, try to see logic. No one here says obey the messenger HAS TO mean obey the Quran. You use verses like this that are open to interpretation to say obey the messenger HAS TO mean follow hadith. We use verses like 6114 which only have one meaning to show that you do not need hadith. Do you see how you are at a logical disadvantage?
6114 says Quran is clearly explained, please tell me why you need outside source to explain it then?
Elaborate, please? How can you say the Message/the Book is referring to anything but the Quran?
Peace
-
6114 says that Al Kitab that Muhammad received is completely detailed. That is not necesarily synoymous with Qur'an. The Qur'an is included in it, but whether it is only Qur'an or Qur'an and more, or details of issues that are in the Qur'an but not detailed. That is all open to interpretations and you again limit it to only Qur'an. Not only that, but only the words of the Qur'an without leaving room for the messenger to explain it. Who is less logical now?
You are also wrong. I say obey the messenger means obey the Qur'an and obey the messenger as well outside of the Qur'an. I have the wider understanding than you do. That is why you are placing limitations on the meaning that is uncalled for. This is the group that God blamed in 37.
You also have to be honest with yourself. Why do you not like hadeeth? Because there are things in it that you do not like. May be it is time to question your taste in things, instead of putting all your energy on a theology that the Qur'an does not support.
As for Al kitab, it is Qur'an and more. It points to God's words. God's words will not finish while the seas will run dry if they were ink. Kitab is very wide.
Take care and have a good evening.
Hussein
-
6114 says that Al Kitab that Muhammad received is completely detailed. That is not necesarily synoymous with Qur'an. The Qur'an is included in it, but whether it is only Qur'an or Qur'an and more, or details of issues that are in the Qur'an but not detailed. That is all open to interpretations and you again limit it to only Qur'an. Not only that, but only the words of the Qur'an without leaving room for the messenger to explain it. Who is less logical now?
6114 says it is clearply explained. Al Kitab refers to the Message of God, the Quran. How can Al Kitab mean the Quran and Muhammad's hadith when it is used to refer to other prophets' prophecies?
You are also wrong. I say obey the messenger means obey the Qur'an and obey the messenger as well outside of the Qur'an. I have the wider understanding than you do. That is why you are placing limitations on the meaning that is uncalled for. This is the group that God blamed in 37.
You are still not understanding logic brother
"obey the messenger" does not necessarily mean obey the Quran AND obey additional laws/traditions of him. You are forcing one interpretation on a verse to fit your belief in hadith. I am using verses that are mukhamat and clear. Here are more
Have they not looked at the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all the things GOD has created? Does it ever occur to them that the end of their life may be near? Which Hadith, beside this, do they believe in?
Which Hadith, other than this, do they uphold?
A scripture whose verses provide the complete details, in an Arabic Quran, for people who know.
In their history, there is a lesson for those who possess intelligence. This is not fabricated Hadith; this (Quran) confirms all previous scriptures, <B>provides the details of everything</b>, and is a beacon and mercy for those who believe.
Why the need of outside sources to explain the Quran?
You also have to be honest with yourself. Why do you not like hadeeth? Because there are things in it that you do not like. May be it is time to question your taste in things, instead of putting all your energy on a theology that the Qur'an does not support.
No need to answer for me brother. I do not follow hadith because of above verses and because there are ahadith that go against each other, and the Quran.
As for Al kitab, it is Qur'an and more. It points to God's words. God's words will not finish while the seas will run dry if they were ink. Kitab is very wide.
Can you show me a verse where it says Al Kitab is the Quran and more?
Peace
-
Peace hlatif,
I have the wider understanding than you do...
As for Al kitab, it is Qur'an and more.
These and numerous verses say otherwise?
Wama kana hatha alquranu an yuftara min dooni Allahi walakin tasdeeqa allathee bayna yadayhi watafseela alkitabi la rayba feehi min rabbi alAAalameena
1037 This QUR'AN is not such as can be produced by other than Allah. on the contrary it is a confirmation of (revelations) that went before it, and a fuller explanation of the Book - wherein there is no doubt - from the Lord of the worlds.Taseen tilka ayatu alqurani wakitabin mubeenin
271 These are verses of the Qur'an,-a book that makes (things) clear;Waalqurani alhakeemi
362 By the Qur'an, full of Wisdom,-Kitabun fussilat ayatuhu quranan AAarabiyyan liqawmin yaAAlamoona
413 A Book, whereof the verses are explained in detail;- a Qur'an in Arabic, for people who understand;-Can you show me a verse where it says Al Kitab is the Quran and more?
Al Kitab = Qur'an
Peace
-
As Salaamu Alaikum,
I see much has ensued since I been gone. Don't really know where to start. But since I was accused of not responding to one post, I will attempt to start there. But before I do, I would like to say that a friend of mine, OPF responded to at least two post after I left a rebuttal for him to respond to, and I have not seen anything about it.
Quote from OPF
DO YOU BELIEVE THE QURAN CAN BE VERIFIED AS THE WORD OF GOD TODAY AS IT IS?Yes, that is easy, but it is not simply by stating that the Qur'an said it. To do so is arguing from your belief, not from facts. And believe is not always substantial in proving anything. Proving FACTS, entail the useage of external agents to assure so, like history, congruity with known scientific realities (though not always a method in establishing such) and the like. As for the Qur'an, proving its veracity is contingent upon at the least these two factors. Lets take a look; History, which is first, because if you can't authenticate that something is from the source of claim, how can you even believe it in the first place. So before we even consider whether or not the Qur'an is from ALLAH or not is indifferent to the first fact of proving that this is the Qur'an that ALLAH is talking about! And that cannot be done from within the Qur'an alone. There has to be an external element to prove this, and if this is proved false, the whole thing is the same. Now, when looking at history, as it relates to the Qur'an, then there are two many factors, the Islamic method of preserving history and the non-Islamic way of preserving history. As for the non-Islamic way of preserving history, then it is basically through the method of examining and using respective contemporary sources that noted their history about given events. Some are reliable, some are not. So, already this type of approach can not be considered conclusive! Now, as for the Islamic way of preserving history, in particular of religious texts, then, ITS MAIN FACTOR IS THROUGH THE ISNAD SYSTEM. THIS IS JUST A FACT OF ISLAMIC HISTORY, THAT STRETCHES BACK OVER 14 CENTURIES AND WHICH INCLUDES THE HISTORY OF THE QUR'AN, HADITH AND VARIOUS RELIGIOUS TEXT OF STUDY. About this science of Isnad, it is a well proven thorough system of assuring the highest veracity of anything transmitted through the passage of time. And as it relates to the Qur'an it is even more essential, since the Qur'an must be completely accurate in not only its meanings, but its syntax. And anyone who has studied the science of Tajweed knows how serious an affair this is. A stretching of a vowel at the wrong time can completely alter the meaning. A slip in putting on the vowel marks can cause the same. AND WHEN THE QUR'AN WAS TRANSMITTED, IT WAS NOT THROUGH SCRIPT, IT WAS THROUGH THE ORAL RECITIATION THEREOF. AND PLEASE HERE THIS, IF ONE RECITED THE QUR'AN IN ITS ENTIRETY FROM MEMORY (AFTER HAVING LEARNED IT HIMSELF FROM A BOOK), BUT COULD NOT VERIFY A TEACHER THAT HE TOOK THAT FROM, HE WOULD BE DISMISSED AS A VALID QUR'AN PRESERVER (HAFITH). Why? Because without a teacher, you have no connection to anyone, and that means you cannot be traced back to the Messenger of ALLAH through an UNBROKEN CHAIN OF TRANSMITTERS THROUGH EVERY GENERATION BACK TO THE MESSENGER (S), BACK TO ANGEL JIBRIL (A), BACK TO THE LORD OF THE WORLDS, ALLAH, EXALTED IS HE! And at this point, after I have VERIFIED its historical authenticity, and is certain that the Qur'an that was revealed to the Prophet (S), is still in tact and is the same copy that I hold in my hand, now I can go and use the internal factors of the Qur'an to substantiate its Divine Authority!!! And I would encourage all of you to study the science of Tajweed. And anyone who says that this is not important, really is just waisting his time.
Next point, OPF you stated; God tells us not to accept baseless ahadeeth. God tells us to ensure all our information can be verified. God tells us 'do not say "we have faith", rather say "we submit to the lord of the worlds" and allow faith then to enter your hearts'. Obey the messenger does not mean obeying baseless hadeeth. Obeying the messenger does not mean obeying easily tamperable chains of transmission. Here is something that ALLAH said, please, explain, what does this mean to you.
ALLAH said "BUT NO, BY YOUR LORD, THEY CANNOT (TRULY) BELIEVE, UNTIL THEY MAKE YOU, ( O MUHAMMAD), JUDGE CONCERNING OVER WHICH THEY DISPUTE AMONGST THEMSELVES AND THEN FIND WITHIN THEMSELVES NO DISCOMFORT FROM WHAT YOU HAVE JUDGED AND SUBMIT IN (FULL, WILLING) SUBMISSION." (465)
ALLAH said ("IT IS NOT FOR FOR A BELIEVING MAN OR BELIEVING WOMAN, WHEN ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER HAVE DECIDED A MATTER, THAT THEY SHOULD (THEREAFTER) HAVE ANY CHOICE ABOUT THEIR AFFAIR. AND WHOEVER DISOBEYS ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER HAS CERTAINLY STRAYED INTO CLEAR ERROR". (3336)
AND ALLAH SAID; "MAKE NOT THE CALLING OF THE MESSENGER AMONG YOU AS YOUR CALLING OF ONE ANOTHER. ALLAH KNOWS OF YOU WHO SLIP AWAY UNDER SHELTER. AND LET THOSE WHO OPPOSE THE MESSENGER'S COMMANDMENTS BEWARE, LEST SOME TRIAL BEFALL THEM OR A PAINFUL TORMENT BE INFLICTED ON THEM". (2463)
AND ALLAH SAID "AND WHEN IT IS SAID TO THEM, COME TO WHAT ALLAH HAS REVEALED AND TO THE MESSENGER, YOU SEE THE HYPOCRITES TURNING AWAY FROM YOU IN AVERSION". (461)
By ALLAH, I can bring dozens more, literally, but these should suffice. What I wanted everyone to see in these Ayat is that the distinction that ALLAH made between HIS word and command and that of the Messenger (S), please just read it, it is clear. So, one cannot absurdly claim that to obey the Messenger means follow the Qur'an. That makes absolutely no sense. For ALLAH has already told us to Obey ALLAH, then why to repeat it with and follow the Qur'an? In Ayah 460, this is even more clear, because ALLAH says "AND WHEN IT IS SAID TO THEM, COME TO WHAT ALLAH HAS REVEALED" Now does it make sense to state right after that and follow the Qur'an? It would read like this is it was together. AND WHEN IT IS SAID TO THEM, COME TO WHAT ALLAH HAS REVEALED AND FOLLOW THE QUR'AN. THE QUR'AN IS WHAT ALLAH REVEALED!!! So then what is the meaning of the second part; "AND TO THE MESSENGER"? Please answer that. Come to the Messenger (wa ila Ar-Rasul). This does not mean follow the Qur'an! It means exactly what it says, come to the Messenger, His way, His commands, His Sunnah, and all of this is found in the Authentic Hadith.
As for your statement; "Why is it nonsense? Archaeology says that the cube is an old pagan practice". Well my friend OPF, forget about what they say, what do you say? And then lets read what ALLAH says
"THEN LET THEM END THEIR UNTIDINESS AND FULFILL THEIR VOWS AND PERFORM TAWAF (CIRCUMMAMBALTION) AROUND THE ANCIENT HOUSE". (2229)I didn't do point for point, as my Brother Hlatif done a good job in bagging a lot of the other hot air you let out. But please, would you now respond to this. I have brought up your arguments, and dealt with them. The floor is now yours, and I will try to be a bit more structured and prompt, but I do have a lot of work to do on my end.
-
Salaam
My buddy Nun, back again with the same old stuff. What are you having fun? Because you sure not making any sense. Why are you still regurgitating your robotic responses? No one is arguing against what the Qur'an say, rather Hlatif and myself are just bringing you all alternative Ayat that clarify and particularize those very general ones that you are keep citing. You want to see some Ayat, then look at the refutation of OPF in my last post. Deal with those Ayat. And stop just pasting Ayat on the post that has no impact to the discussion, since we all already agree to those Ayat. Man, you are like the energizer bunny, you just keep beating the same old drum, on and on and on...
As for you open-minded, first and foremost, you need to go back and re-read your book on usool-at-tafsir or wherever you got your definitions from. Because the definition for mutashabihat is not verses that have more than one meaning, this is a gross error, and again indicative of your ignorance of Qur'an. Mutashabihat means ambiguous, unclear, meaning, we don't really know what the meaning is, and we should delve into it. That is the meaning of mutashabihat. Thus to claim an Ayah as you stated is Mutashabi, is just non-sense. Unless it is mutashabi only to you, and that may well be the case, because it obvious you don't know what it mean. And too state that 6114 is Muhkam, then maybe you just learned some terminology and was anxious to use it. That ayah has a context, and you cannot generalize it like that because look what ALLAH says in 465. To Make the Prophet (S) the judge. So is this a contradiction? Is the Qur'an contradicting itself? No, not at all, you people are contradicting it. You people want to you general Ayat against specific and vise versa and then claim how clear it is. Extremely strange, especially when you never deal with the Ayat that are posted to show you that your understanding of the Ayat that you have employed in incorrect. Please, respond to these Ayat! You can't, rather you press your automated button or responses using the same exact Ayat, and the same lines. People get with reality!!!
-
As for you open-minded, first and foremost, you need to go back and re-read your book on usool-at-tafsir or wherever you got your definitions from. Because the definition for mutashabihat is not verses that have more than one meaning, this is a gross error, and again indicative of your ignorance of Qur'an. Mutashabihat means ambiguous, unclear, meaning, we don't really know what the meaning is, and we should delve into it. That is the meaning of mutashabihat.
That is ultimately my point. It is ambiguous and essentially open to different interpretations, as I said. Further, the verse goes on to say no one but God knows the true "interpretation" or meaning.
Thus to claim an Ayah as you stated is Mutashabi, is just non-sense. Unless it is mutashabi only to you, and that may well be the case, because it obvious you don't know what it mean. And too state that 6114 is Muhkam, then maybe you just learned some terminology and was anxious to use it. That ayah has a context, and you cannot generalize it like that because look what ALLAH says in 465. To Make the Prophet (S) the judge.
6114 is clear. Tell me how the context goes against it being perfectly clear.
In regards to 465, look at 548-50
548-50 And We have sent down to you the Scripture with truth, authenticating what is present of the Scripture and superseding it. So judge between them by what God has sent down, and do not follow their desires from what has come to you of the truth. For each of you We have made laws, and a structure; and had God willed, He would have made you all one nation, but He tests you with what He has given you; so strive to do good. To God you will return all of you, and He will inform you regarding that in which you dispute. And judge between them by what God has sent down, and do not follow their wishes, and beware lest they divert you away from some of what God has sent down to you. If they turn away, then know that God wants to inflict them with some of their sins; and most of the people are corrupt. Is it the judgment of the days of ignorance that they seek? Who is better than God as a judge for a people that comprehend?
So is this a contradiction? Is the Qur'an contradicting itself? No, not at all, you people are contradicting it. You people want to you general Ayat against specific and vise versa and then claim how clear it is. Extremely strange, especially when you never deal with the Ayat that are posted to show you that your understanding of the Ayat that you have employed in incorrect. Please, respond to these Ayat! You can't, rather you press your automated button or responses using the same exact Ayat, and the same lines. People get with reality!!!
Nope, no contradiction at all. Read the verses above.
Peace
-
My buddy Nun, back again with the same old stuff. What are you having fun? Because you sure not making any sense. Why are you still regurgitating your robotic responses? No one is arguing against what the Qur'an say, rather Hlatif and myself are just bringing you all alternative Ayat that clarify and particularize those very general ones that you are keep citing. You want to see some Ayat, then look at the refutation of OPF in my last post. Deal with those Ayat. And stop just pasting Ayat on the post that has no impact to the discussion, since we all already agree to those Ayat.
People get with reality!!!
My buddy Abu, back again contradicting Qur?an with illogical absurdness and sure OPF wouldn?t mind?
ALLAH said "BUT NO, BY YOUR LORD, THEY CANNOT (TRULY) BELIEVE, UNTIL THEY MAKE YOU, ( O MUHAMMAD), JUDGE CONCERNING OVER WHICH THEY DISPUTE AMONGST THEMSELVES AND THEN FIND WITHIN THEMSELVES NO DISCOMFORT FROM WHAT YOU HAVE JUDGED AND SUBMIT IN (FULL, WILLING) SUBMISSION." (465)
Continue reading (in context) to see?
- If We had ordered them to sacrifice their lives or to leave their homes, very few of them would have done it But if they had done what they were (actually) told, it would have been best for them, and would have gone farthest to strengthen their (faith);
ALLAH said ("IT IS NOT FOR FOR A BELIEVING MAN OR BELIEVING WOMAN, WHEN ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER HAVE DECIDED A MATTER, THAT THEY SHOULD (THEREAFTER) HAVE ANY CHOICE ABOUT THEIR AFFAIR. AND WHOEVER DISOBEYS ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER HAS CERTAINLY STRAYED INTO CLEAR ERROR". (3336)
Once again, continue reading (in context) to see the clear example?
- Behold! Thou didst say to one who had received the grace of Allah and thy favour "Retain thou (in wedlock) thy wife, and fear Allah." But thou didst hide in thy heart that which Allah was about to make manifest thou didst fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear Allah. Then when Zaid had dissolved (his marriage) with her, with the necessary (formality), We joined her in marriage to thee in order that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the Believers in (the matter of) marriage with the wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have dissolved with the necessary (formality) (their marriage) with them. And Allah.s command must be fulfilled.
AND ALLAH SAID; "MAKE NOT THE CALLING OF THE MESSENGER AMONG YOU AS YOUR CALLING OF ONE ANOTHER. ALLAH KNOWS OF YOU WHO SLIP AWAY UNDER SHELTER. AND LET THOSE WHO OPPOSE THE MESSENGER'S COMMANDMENTS BEWARE, LEST SOME TRIAL BEFALL THEM OR A PAINFUL TORMENT BE INFLICTED ON THEM". (2463)
Once again, read (in context; verse prior this time) to see necessary details are all there?
- Only those are believers, who believe in Allah and His Messenger. when they are with him on a matter requiring collective action, they do not depart until they have asked for his leave; those who ask for thy leave are those who believe in Allah and His Messenger. so when they ask for thy leave, for some business of theirs, give leave to those of them whom thou wilt, and ask Allah for their forgiveness for Allah is Oft- Forgiving, Most Merciful.
AND ALLAH SAID "AND WHEN IT IS SAID TO THEM, COME TO WHAT ALLAH HAS REVEALED AND TO THE MESSENGER, YOU SEE THE HYPOCRITES TURNING AWAY FROM YOU IN AVERSION". (461)
- Not possible to visit or go hang out with deceased people.
- We do have what was ?revealed? in Qur?an.
Oh, and I am having fun and really do like this sunnah?
'Honey is a remedy for every illness and the Qur'an is a remedy for all illness of the mind, therefore I recommend to you both remedies, the Qur'an and honey.' (Bukhari)
Suggest you try reading Qur?an (for the mind) and honey goes good while reading... peace
-
Open minded,
again my friend, you are trying to use the Qur'an against the Qur'an. If you do that, it will never work for you and you will never understand it. Trying using the Qur'an, for the Qur'an, not against it. Meaning use one Ayah to help you understand another, like Hlatif and myself have been trying to do for you people.
And ambiguous or unclear Ayat are Ayat that we should NOT delve into. Although people may attempt to do so, and by default there will be various opinions. But this meaning has nothing to do with 332. This Ayah is not mutashabi by a long shot. And for you to state that is proof of you ignorance, and that is the truth of the matter. There is nothing mutashabi about " Say, Obey ALLAH and HIS Messenger. But if they turn away - then indeed, ALLAH does not like the disbelievers." (332)
And you are still quoting 6114, this is just unbelievable!!! I guess you have not got an update on your automated responses yet, huh?
-
Nun, I challenge you to read from 460 to 465 and post that context. Show the people what the context is and what it says. And you citing the Ayat before and after what I cited did absolutely nothing to change the point of citing those Ayat.
And fun you must be having, because you sure are not learning anything, and moreover not helping anyone else learn. But you are entitled to be here like everyone else. We will just keep walking over you when we see you down there.
-
Open minded,
again my friend, you are trying to use the Qur'an against the Qur'an. If you do that, it will never work for you and you will never understand it. Trying using the Qur'an, for the Qur'an, not against it. Meaning use one Ayah to help you understand another, like Hlatif and myself have been trying to do for you people.
Oh ok
And ambiguous or unclear Ayat are Ayat that we should NOT delve into. Although people may attempt to do so, and by default there will be various opinions. But this meaning has nothing to do with 332. This Ayah is not mutashabi by a long shot. And for you to state that is proof of you ignorance, and that is the truth of the matter. There is nothing mutashabi about " Say, Obey ALLAH and HIS Messenger. But if they turn away - then indeed, ALLAH does not like the disbelievers." (332)
Obey the messenger does not automatically mean obey the separate laws of the hadith. Would you not agree? You have this pre-conceived notion and knowledge of the hadith, so you think it automatically means this. How can you accept religious laws from other than the Quran?
And you are still quoting 6114, this is just unbelievable!!! I guess you have not got an update on your automated responses yet, huh?
Can you actually respond with substance instead of yelling at me? What do you not understand about the Quran being clearly explained? And how does the context of 6114 go against the Quran being clearly explained?
Also, you seem to have just dodged 548-50 because it discredited your interpretation of 465. Verify all information before you rudely hurl verses at me to try to prove something.
-
Open-minded Salaams;
you said "Obey the messenger does not automatically mean obey the separate laws of the hadith. Would you not agree? You have this pre-conceived notion and knowledge of the hadith, so you think it automatically means this. How can you accept religious laws from other than the Quran?
My response;
Openminded do you follow all of the injuctions, commandments of the Qur'an. Especially the ones like the five pillars of Islam. After the Shahadah, prayer, zakah, fasting, and hajj? There are many more injunctions and "rules" but these will suffice for now. Ok, if you answer yes to this, then please tell me what Ayah in the Qur'an teaches us the DETAIL of the prayer, as performed by the Messenger (S)? What Ayah in the Qur'an teaches us how to pay zakah? Like when it is due and the percentage of money excess? Where? What Ayah? What Ayah teaches us about the hajj, in detail? As performed by the Messenger (S)? There are NONE!!! So how are we suppose to fulfill a command of ALLAH from the Qur'an if the knowledge of the means to fulfill it was never mentioned by ALLAH in the Qur'an? Please explain? So where is the detail of these acts of worship that ALLAH commanded us to do in the Qur'an? My friend, they don't exist in the Qur'an. Well, where can we find it, because it must be done, and ALLAH must have informed us about how, so where is it. I'll tell you. It is in the life of the Messenger (S), this is where we must look. And where is the life of the Messenger of ALLAH (S) to be explained in DETAIL, no not in the Qur'an but in the Authentic Hadith. That is clear, and I don't know what else I can say to you to make it clear. This is not preconceived ideas, this is fulfilling the commandment of my Lord upon my.
You said How can you accept religious laws from other than the Quran?
The question is really this. How can you seperate the Message of the Qur'an from the Messenger (S) who brought it to us and demonstrated the commands therein and explained them to us. This is the real question. You people have no connection to the Messenger (S). As far as you all are concerned, you can just do away with the Messenger (S, huh?
About 6114, I just covered some of that, and I am not yelling at you, but there is no need to cite that verse, I believe in the Qur'an, and I know that the Qur'an does, in places explains itself, but yet other times is does notand in these case what are we to do, just be ignorant about our Deen? No, we look to the one whom ALLAH sent with HIS Message, and learn from Him (S), because that is one of the reasons why ALLAH sent Him (S).
and no, I didn't just dodge 558-60, again this Ayah has a context in which it is in. And it is amazing how we talk about this idea of sontext and stuff, but we never apply it. If you look, it will clearly show you that ALLAH is addressing the Prophet Muhammad (S), about the people of the previous scriptures, and telling them to use their own book to judge, no the Qur'an, but telling the Prophet to judge by what ALLAH sent to him. Meaning don't think to use the books for judgement.
-
Nun, I challenge you to read from 460 to 465 and post that context. Show the people what the context is and what it says. And you citing the Ayat before and after what I cited did absolutely nothing to change the point of citing those Ayat.
And fun you must be having, because you sure are not learning anything, and moreover not helping anyone else learn. But you are entitled to be here like everyone else. We will just keep walking over you when we see you down there.
What?s the matter with reading 466-68 as well? Verses teach about behavior of hypocrites?
460 Did you not see those who claimed they believed in what was sent down to you and what was sent before you? They wanted to seek judgment using evil, while they were ordered to reject it. It is the devil who wants to lead them far astray.461 And if they are told "Come to what God has sent down and to the messenger," you see the hypocrites turning away from you strongly.462 Why then, when a tragedy befalls them for what their hands have brought forth do they come to you swearing by God that they only wanted to do good and reconcile?463 These are a people whom God knows what is in their hearts, so turn away from them and advise them, and speak to their souls with a clear saying.464 We do not send a messenger except to be obeyed by God's leave. And had they come to you when they had wronged themselves and sought God's forgiveness, and the messenger sought forgiveness for them, they would have then found God to be Pardoning, Merciful.465 No, by your Lord, they will not believe until they make you judge in what they dispute with each other, then they will not find in their souls any animosity for what you have decided, and they will comply completely.466 And had We decreed for them "Kill yourselves," or "Leave your land," they would not have done so except for a few of them. And if they had done what they were advised with, it would have been better for them and helped to strengthen them.467 Then We would have given them from Us a great reward.468 And We would have guided them to a Straight Path.
Reason YOU are not learning is YOUR ?attitude? causing blindness. In this thread YOU have skipped (walked over) the following LESSONS...
False claim agreed by abu contradicting Qur?an?
"As for Al kitab, it is Qur'an and more."Evidence
271 These are verses of the Qur'an,-a book that makes (things) clear;
413 A Book, whereof the verses are explained in detail;- a Qur'an in Arabic, for people who understand;-False claim by abu contradicting Qur?an?
"I asked you to tell me or provide me with an Ayah where ALLAH clearly states that HE revealed the Qur'an (by name) to Muhammad (S) (by name)."Evidence
3340 MUHAMMAD is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets and Allah has full knowledge of all things.472 But those who believe and work deeds of righteousness, and believe in the (Revelation) sent down to MUHAMMAD - for it is the Truth from their Lord,- ?.
Transitive Property of Equality if a = b and b = c, then a = c
False claim by abu contradicting Qur?an?
"THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN KNOW IT IS 100% UNCHANGED IS IF YOU WERE ACTUALLY THERE"Evidence
159 We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly GUARD IT (from corruption).False claim by abu contradicting Qur?an?
"The Qur'an says that He is to teach it, how can you come and now say that wisdom cannot be taught?"Evidence
599 The Messenger's duty is but to PROCLAIM (the message)?Wisdom (Wis"dom) (-ducr/m), n.
- The quality of being wise; knowledge, and the capacity to make due use of it
Unfortunately that last one cannot be taught -- perhaps Qur'an and honey. peace
Edit forgot to mention abu was asked to provide hadith which shows details of how to pray.
Evidence NONE provided.