Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Is Maryam from the NCRI/MEK a Quran only leader/Imam?

Is Maryam from the NCRI/MEK a Quran only leader/Imam?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
70 Posts 10 Posters 445 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Leoxyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    Peace,

    Of course I do know that I can choose whatever i want to dress, but that isn't the case. As a believer in God and Quran I want to follow what it says in Quran. And according my understanding Quran advice us to be modest and it goes for both gender. But advices like lenghten and guard your modesty and low down your gaze is very wide in its practise.

    But it seems like you have come here to challenge us God Alone Quran alone followers, because I have noticed that in other threads as well.

    But you and sis Samia has a debate here so I will not interrupt in your discussions regarding khimar, I only wanted to made my opinion heard.

    Peace Majidah

    Dear sister.
    I have not come to challenge anyone.Not a correct perception.I am a learner.While browsing, saw this site and thought I may get something good regarding Deen.
    But unfortunately there is plethora of

    1Wrong reference /No references at all
    2Lack of repect for Prophet (PBUH)
    3Try to change the meaning of the Quran in the name of research and moderinsm (Thought/Research is not bad but it should be backed by Proper references)
    I am sorry if you felt something bad.
    This actually irritated me a lot.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      SwedenMajidah
      wrote on last edited by
      #54

      Dear Brother,

      So you mean if there aren't any references we shall leave it?

      But then again we will follow what we find according our own understandings anyway yeah

      Peace
      Majidah

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Offline
        L Offline
        Leoxyz
        wrote on last edited by
        #55

        Dear Brother,

        So you mean if there aren't any references we shall leave it?

        But then again we will follow what we find according our own understandings anyway yeah

        Peace
        Majidah

        Dear
        I am sorry again to disagree with you.Quran needs a lot of thought ,it is the order of the Quran to think /think/think over it.
        If a person asks you that you should practice medicine ,then does it mean that you start practicing without proper knowledge/degree.
        When Quran orders to think over it ,it means it is our obligation to fulfill all requirements to think over it ,rather start dragging meanings according to wish and label it as "Research".

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          SwedenMajidah
          wrote on last edited by
          #56

          Peace,

          Ok, but I haven't said that I will not ponder the meanings. I always do that. But my understandings is that Quran is for everyone who actually can read( well I know I can listen to it also) so if I read it then I will understand it as it comes into my mind. If I don't understand it I have options like I can wait and read it again another time and maybe then I will understand it or I can ask someone else of their understandings. But the second options are perhaps not enough for me and yes I need some lexicon for that matters. But as we see also the lexicon can make us disagree of the actual meanings hmm so it's not that easy all time.

          Therefore I have many times wondering if Quran is individual in some instances. That we shall take the base, the basic and then the rest of it is for our own to decide how to practise.

          Peace
          Majidah

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Offline
            L Offline
            Leoxyz
            wrote on last edited by
            #57

            Peace,

            Ok, but I haven't said that I will not ponder the meanings. I always do that. But my understandings is that Quran is for everyone who actually can read( well I know I can listen to it also) so if I read it then I will understand it as it comes into my mind. If I don't understand it I have options like I can wait and read it again another time and maybe then I will understand it or I can ask someone else of their understandings. But the second options are perhaps not enough for me and yes I need some lexicon for that matters. But as we see also the lexicon can make us disagree of the actual meanings hmm so it's not that easy all time.

            Therefore I have many times wondering if Quran is individual in some instances. That we shall take the base, the basic and then the rest of it is for our own to decide how to practise.

            Peace
            Majidah

            Dear sister
            That is very much true.You feel the need of "someone learned" to help you when you do not know.
            The Holy Quran says

            217

            If you (O objectors,) have no knowledge of this, you may ask the people of the Book.

            This is the point where some group bashes the scholars who have spent their lives to understand the teachings of Quran and Sunna.Why? I do not know.
            The usual modes operandi is
            1ick up a few points no matter whether those are of some importance or not and base whole of theories on it.Make believe the people that this group of clergy is an evil group.
            2Target the sacred people so that no one listens to them.Depreciate the importance and the Role of Prophet and let people believe that his job was simply to hand over the book nothing else.(Allah had to send so many messengers 'just to hand over a book??).Ayaas which describe his role ,manipulate them so that people are not aware of the role of the Holy Prophet and then mold the Holy Quran according to one's wishes in the name of research.
            Anyway this is my impression.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Samia
              wrote on last edited by
              #58

              Again not correct
              Khumur is not plural of any thing except Khimaar.You are depending on Tanveer's post.I do not know his source;
              I am copy pasting whole discussion of Lisan ul Arab

              Salaam Leoxyz

              If you have patiently paid attention while reading the previous posts, you would have realized that the link was neither provided by brother Tanweer nor was it from Lisanul 3arab, and you wouldn't have bothered to copy all this from Lisaanul 3arab

              The source was also mentioned.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Offline
                L Offline
                Leoxyz
                wrote on last edited by
                #59

                Salaam Leoxyz

                If you have patiently paid attention while reading the previous posts, you would have realized that the link was neither provided by brother Tanweer nor was it from Lisanul 3arab, and you wouldn't have bothered to copy all this from Lisaanul 3arab

                The source was also mentioned.

                Dear sister
                Then give me the source of your information please.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  SwedenMajidah
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #60

                  Peace,

                  Yes, sure but to trust lets say a scolar is not a safe solutions because we all must stand for our own deeds on the Day of Judgment right!?

                  So I cannot point finger on anyone and say, well it was his idea or his understanding hypno We must figure it out ourself and not hide behind someone else.

                  I have since long time back since I left sectarians approach a very simple life.

                  I do search for knowledge as much I can by being openminded and listen to people and read stuff and ponder about Al Quran as well.

                  I try my best to be a goodhearted person by being fair to both my own needs and other peoples needs. Try to be modest in both mind and appearence. Help the poor and needy if I'm able.

                  This I find very important as a believer in God and Quran and maybe there are people who don't think about these simple things I have mentioned.

                  But when we approach a kind and fair attitude for our surroundings it will make a big deal and hopefully the surroundings will adopt it and a positive frame of mind will be ruling.

                  Peace
                  Majidah

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Samia
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #61

                    Dear sister
                    Then give me the source of your information please.

                    Dear Brother

                    Go back a few posts from where you quoted my post and you will find it. Then you can ask the poster if you still can't find the source.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Leoxyz
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #62

                      Dear Brother

                      Go back a few posts from where you quoted my post and you will find it. Then you can ask the poster if you still can't find the source.

                      LOL
                      Sorry disappointed badly

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        SwedenMajidah
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #63

                        Peace,

                        Brother But why she must re-post it over and over again? we mustn't be so lazy so we can't go back and check again, right!?

                        Majidah

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Leoxyz
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #64

                          Peace,

                          Brother But why she must re-post it over and over again? we mustn't be so lazy so we can't go back and check again, right!?

                          Majidah

                          Sorry to sorry there was only one reference from Lisan ul Arab which was wrong.Read through the thread.I copy pasted every thing.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Samia
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #65

                            Sorry to sorry there was only one reference from Lisan ul Arab which was wrong.Read through the thread.I copy pasted every thing.

                            This is because you read what you have in mind, not what you have in front of you. You quoted me as saying "This is what I understood from the link".

                            First You presumed that was what I think, not what I understood.

                            Secondly You did not bother to open the link and see what reference said that. And you blame me for not bringing the link at your table, open it for you, and spoon-feed you? Then you say there is no other plate but lisanul 3arab, and it is not good?

                            And just let's presume I did not bring other than lisanul 3arab. Is it not sufficient for you? Did I claim, e.g, that "ALL dictionaries support such view", so you are triggered to ask me for more references?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Leoxyz
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #66

                              This is because you read what you have in mind, not what you have in front of you. You quoted me as saying "This is what I understood from the link".

                              First You presumed that was what I think, not what I understood.

                              Secondly You did not bother to open the link and see what reference said that. And you blame me for not bringing the link at your table, open it for you, and spoon-feed you? Then you say there is no other plate but lisanul 3arab, and it is not good?

                              And just let's presume I did not bring other than lisanul 3arab. Is it not sufficient for you? Did I claim, e.g, that "ALL dictionaries support such view", so you are triggered to ask me for more references?

                              Dear sister
                              How can you say that you gave the correct referece
                              you said

                              However, I think I understand what you mean. Is verse 55; 629 something you are looking for?

                              Men headcover.

                              Lisaanul3arab says under "khimaar

                              For men cover of the head; for women it is called "naSeef".

                              You made clearly distinction quoting Lisaanularab.
                              For males = khimaar
                              For women = naseef
                              Is this not so?
                              In fact according to lisanularb the word khimaar is used for head cover of males as well as females.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Samia
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #67

                                Dear sister
                                How can you say that you gave the correct referece
                                you said
                                You made clearly distinction quoting Lisaanularab.
                                For males = khimaar
                                For women = naseef
                                Is this not so?
                                In fact according to lisanularb the word khimaar is used for head cover of males as well as females.

                                Then if I was talking about lisanul 3arab, why should I give another reference? And how it is not a correct reference?!
                                In fact it was a second reference regarding the dialogue I had with other members.

                                According to Lisanul 3arab, it does not say khimar is head cover for women, it says it is said that it is a head cover for women, and gives no further proof; not even verse 2431. However, it gives a hadith as proof of khimar being a head cover for men.
                                Why do I have to repeat this many times?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Leoxyz
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #68

                                  Then if I was talking about lisanul 3arab, why should I give another reference? And how it is not a correct reference?!
                                  In fact it was a second reference regarding the dialogue I had with other members.

                                  According to Lisanul 3arab, it does not say khimar is head cover for women, it says it is said that it is a head cover for women, and gives no further proof; not even verse 2431. However, it gives a hadith as proof of khimar being a head cover for men.
                                  Why do I have to repeat this many times?

                                  Dear sister
                                  Ok ,leave previous debate
                                  What is your opinion.If "ataf " is on Preposition does "ma3toof" has different i3raab than "ma3toof alai"
                                  What does your knowledge say.
                                  Are you are in line with "Zamakhshari" of the present day?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Samia
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #69

                                    Who is zamakhshari of the present day?
                                    But in principle, I am not with anybody, frankly speaking.

                                    In classical and modern standard arabic, the rule is that ma3touf and ma3touf 3alaihi have the same (underlying) case ending. A preposition is linked to a verb (or equational sentence). The ma3touf and ma3touf 3alaihi should share the same verb (or equational sentence) like

                                    inna 3alaa altaawila kitaaban wa qalaman

                                    There are a book and a pen on the table.

                                    I istened to a story and a piece of news.

                                    Once you change the verb, you no more have a ma3touf and ma3touf 3alihi

                                    I listened to a story and read a book

                                    There is a thread for those who want to learn arabic to pose their questions

                                    http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=12841.0

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Leoxyz
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #70

                                      Who is zamakhshari of the present day?
                                      But in principle, I am not with anybody, frankly speaking.

                                      In classical and modern standard arabic, the rule is that ma3touf and ma3touf 3alaihi have the same (underlying) case ending. A preposition is linked to a verb (or equational sentence). The ma3touf and ma3touf 3alaihi should share the same verb (or equational sentence) like

                                      inna 3alaa altaawila kitaaban wa qalaman

                                      There are a book and a pen on the table.

                                      I istened to a story and a piece of news.

                                      Once you change the verb, you no more have a ma3touf and ma3touf 3alihi

                                      I listened to a story and read a book

                                      There is a thread for those who want to learn arabic to pose their questions

                                      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=12841.0

                                      Dear sister.
                                      Thanks a lot for the reply.
                                      As far as Zamakhshari/Seebawah/Khalil are concerned ,these are born in every era but different names and motives.
                                      Anway thanks again.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Users