Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Who is Zaid in this Aya??

Who is Zaid in this Aya??

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
65 Posts 15 Posters 1.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Samia
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Such examples have been used for other names also
    -Muhammad
    -Umar

    Where?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      Leoxyz
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      Where?

      Please pick up " " you will get many such examples.
      Reference same book as above for "primary schools ,part III ,page 151 under discussion of 'conjunctions (waw ul Ataf and waw ul maiyyah"
      Names used in examples are ;
      Muhammad
      Ahmad
      Hasan
      Ibrahim
      Khalid

      Page 161
      In two examples " Ali " is used

      Please also look into 'A grammar of Arabic language by W.Wright volume II page 255 Edition 2004

      the name "umar " is used in four examples.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Samia
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        hehehehe...

        That's not what I was talking about. I said "Arabs", meaning in classical dictionaries and old books of grammar (time-wise).

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Offline
          L Offline
          Leoxyz
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          hehehehe...

          That's not what I was talking about. I said "Arabs", meaning in classical dictionaries and old books of grammar (time-wise).

          So you want to say
          If some name is used in "examples" ,then it is a sure proof ,that any person of that name never existed as companion of the Holy Prophet ??
          brickwall brickwall

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Offline
            N Offline
            nadeem
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            Peace Sis Samia,

            So what you're saying is that Zaid is to Arabic as John Doe is to english?

            Nadeem

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Samia
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              Peace Sis Samia,

              So what you're saying is that Zaid is to Arabic as John Doe is to english?

              Nadeem

              Yes, it is (John Smith, I think)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                arnoldyasin
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                QXP

                3337 (In personal matters you may respectfully disagree with
                Muhammad in the capacity of a human being 379. As an example)
                Recall that you did tell the one to whom God had blessed and you had
                blessed, Hold on to your wife and be mindful of God. You seek to
                conceal within yourself what God intends to reveal. You fear people
                whereas it is more appropriate to fear God. But when he had observed
                all the rules and divorced her, We gave her to one of you in marriage, so
                that henceforth there may be no blame on the believers in respect of
                spouses of their adopted children when they have come to the
                dissolution of their union. The commandment of God must be fulfilled.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Samia
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  Thanks Yasin.

                  That was the reason why I suspect it to be a proper name. Much more important personalities were not mentioned by name in the qur'aan.

                  So it is John Doe not John Smith? Maybe John Smith is the UK Zaid ;D

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Leoxyz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    QXP

                    3337 (In personal matters you may respectfully disagree with
                    Muhammad in the capacity of a human being 379. As an example)
                    Recall that you did tell the one to whom God had blessed and you had
                    blessed, ?Hold on to your wife and be mindful of God. You seek to
                    conceal within yourself what God intends to reveal. You fear people
                    whereas it is more appropriate to fear God.? But when he had observed
                    all the rules and divorced her, We gave her to one of you in marriage, so
                    that henceforth there may be no blame on the believers in respect of
                    spouses of their adopted children when they have come to the
                    dissolution of their union. The commandment of God must be fulfilled.

                    you are referring a person who cannot who translates the aya of
                    -wash the feet as "rub the feet".
                    Such persons can be a standarf for you or Samia not for me at least.
                    Quote some literate authority please.

                    Prove that Zayd Bin Harith did not exist at all.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #24

                      Prove that Zayd Bin Harith did not exist at all.

                      Thanks.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Leoxyz
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #25

                        Thanks.

                        Zayd ibn Harithah
                        From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
                        Jump to navigation, search
                        Zayd ibn Harithah (Zayd ibn Muhammad or Zaid mawla Muhammad) (c. 578-627 CE) was a prominent figure in the early Islamic community and the only one of sahaba whose name is spelled directly in Quran. As an adopted son of Muhammad, he was an early convert to Islam and later, a military leader. He died c. 627 CE at the Battle of Mu'tah.

                        http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zayd_ibn_Harithah

                        So Quranists have taken a new Turn that
                        -Quran is grammatically wrong
                        -Any person who is mentioned in the Quran did not exist at all
                        Is this not tampering of the Quran ???

                        1781
                        (1781) And declare, "The Truth has come and falsehood has vanished for falsehood is a thing that must by its nature vanish.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #26

                          IF Zayd Bin Harith didn't exist then who was the ex husband of Huzoor? 's wife zainab? and who was the father of Osama Bin Zayd? yay Now lemme see how these quranists say Zayd Bin Harith didn't exist.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jack
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #27

                            Prove that Zayd Bin Harith did not exist at all.

                            Prove Muhammad didn't exist at all.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Leoxyz
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #28

                              Prove Muhammad didn't exist at all.

                              It not we who are saying Zaid did not exist.
                              It the Quranist progeny which is claiming so .

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                afridi220
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #29

                                "Zaid" is an imaginary name to "anybody". The verse is applied to anyone, not necessarily those named "Zaid". Otherwise, we make the verse very specific.

                                Arabs say 3amr, Zaid for individuals, when giving examples, as in Daaraba zaidun 3amra example for subject and direct object; or Zaid and 3ubaid for a group as in I do not care for zaid or 3ubaid I care for no one.

                                peace

                                Samia is right zaid and baker is use in urdu also when giving example.

                                peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Leoxyz
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #30

                                  peace

                                  Samia is right zaid and baker is use in urdu also when giving example.

                                  peace

                                  Only such type of argument is expected from a Quranist.After all to be rational one needs
                                  -Brain
                                  -knowledge

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    afridi220
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #31

                                    [After all to be rational one needs
                                    -Brain
                                    -knowledge

                                    You are right its apply to you also voodoo

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      siki
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #32

                                      Come on guys! what is wrong with accepting Zaid as prophet Mohammad's(pbuh) son? If God did not want to take his name, could he not use the term, " When his adopted son was through with,,,,"

                                      If the name is there in Quran, and it is being confirmed/verified through history as well , why are we insisting upon this being fictitious? and provide a chance to a very rational person (leoxyz) to be skeptical ?

                                      siki

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #33

                                        Come on guys! what is wrong with accepting Zaid as prophet Mohammad's(pbuh) son? If God did not want to take his name, could he not use the term, " When his adopted son was through with,,,,"

                                        If the name is there in Quran, and it is being confirmed/verified through history as well , why are we insisting upon this being fictitious? and provide a chance to a very rational person (leoxyz) to be skeptical ?

                                        siki

                                        Who is saying it is fictitious?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mazhar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #34

                                          Quote from Leoxyz on August 29, 2007, 052758 PM
                                          Please anyone from Quranic source which is fully detailed.
                                          I think you have just exposed the quranists. IF quran is fully detailed as falsely claimed by quranists then where is the biography of Zaid in quran??? {RasulHamza}

                                          Quote from RasulHamsa on August 29, 2007, 060459 PM
                                          He was a messenger not a cook! please don't ask such question we have no answer for!
                                          Dear
                                          Deen = Quran + Sunna

                                          To destroy sunna = Mock the Prophet + Reject his teachings

                                          To Eliminate the Quran = Tamper its meanings so simple modus operandi{Leoxyz}

                                          Neither the Grand Quran is inexplicit nor Deen is equivalent to the sum total of Quran +Sunna {here it is meant what is stated by a number of non Arab historians/collections of hearsays etc}. Quran has defined Deen as Millat Ibrahim, which the Last Messenger was advised to follow. The "Sunna" of the Last Messenger is the one recorded in Quran.

                                          The Grand Quran {not the hadith quoted by someone} has unambiguously stated that Sydena Zaid was the adopted son {a son not born of him but known as son since by the utterance of his mouth he called him as his son}

                                          ?And We have not made whom you call with your tongues sons as your sons? {Refer 33{04}

                                          The purpose of instructions to the Last Messenger to marry the divorced wife of Syedena Zahid whom he called as son has been explained in the verse

                                          It has been the practice in time and space to adopt sons of others as sons. The Aziz of Misr had also told her wife about Yousaf alaihis Salam that we will make him our son. And then an incident has been quoted to bring home that calling the sons of others as your sons and placing them at home runs the risk/possibility of insult to the sanctity of relationships.

                                          This time honoured practice could have been halted in the newly emerging muslim society only by the action of the Last Messenger.
                                          Let us thank to Allah for this blessing and act of kindness.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users