Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. ٱلْخَبِيثُ وَٱلطَّيِّبُ : Junk, scud vs. sustainable, meaningful.

ٱلْخَبِيثُ وَٱلطَّيِّبُ : Junk, scud vs. sustainable, meaningful.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
18 Posts 2 Posters 22 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Leoxyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    In almost all what have been termed ?Mothers of Tafseer?, has been translated as and then some stated . But is never .

    /

    Dear
    It is another "Batkaa"
    Can you prove that "sahaab" is never white ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      Dear Leoxyz,

      Never pick up a word from the whole text and then start strange sort of remarks not common in the ordinary parlance.

      These are middle clouds. These are clouds composed of water droplets and ranging in altitude from about 3 to 6 km (about 2 to 4 mi) above the earth. Two principal genera are included in the family. Altostratus clouds appear as a thick, gray or bluish veil, through which the sun or moon may be seen only diffusely, as through a frosted glass. Altocumulus clouds have the appearance of dense, fleecy balls or puffs somewhat larger than cirrocumulus. The sun or moon shining through altocumulus clouds may produce a corona, or colored ring, markedly smaller in diameter than a halo.

      And if you have little time see the Ayat about . Clouds are visible to the naked eye. If history leaves you for a while then please keep seeing the sky you will notice the difference in the clouds. Don't equate four different words of Quran to mean one and same thing.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Offline
        L Offline
        Leoxyz
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Dear Leoxyz,

        Never pick up a word from the whole text and then start strange sort of remarks not common in the ordinary parlance.

        And if you have little time see the Ayat about . Clouds are visible to the naked eye. If history leaves you for a while then please keep seeing the sky you will notice the difference in the clouds. Don't equate four different words of Quran to mean one and same thing.

        Dear Mahar ;
        I did not pick up a single word rather I picked up your claim You said

        In almost all what have been termed ?Mothers of Tafseer?, has been translated as and then some stated . But is never
        .
        Give the evidence that "sahaab' can never be "white"

        Either accept that your claim is wrong or provide the evidence.Othewise it will be put as "PEARL AND DIAMOND" in my Archive.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          These are middle clouds. These are clouds composed of water droplets and any cloud that contains water droplets is never white and shiny like Almuzan the very mening of which is white and shiny since it contains ice not water droplets. From man has developed technology to artificial rain. But Quran has made claim that you can make water from Almuzan to fall on the ground. Bukhari and other learned scholars of the past did not know about Atlas of clouds therefore it is difficult not only for me but even NASA will not be able to make you understand that is never whilte and shiny. But Quran has used four different words for different clouds, Almuzan cannot be therefore cannot be white as Almuzan is. It is a simple thing not diamond. By the why do you know what in reality a diamond is?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Offline
            L Offline
            Leoxyz
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            These are middle clouds. These are clouds composed of water droplets and any cloud that contains water droplets is never white and shiny like Almuzan the very mening of which is white and shiny since it contains ice not water droplets. From man has developed technology to artificial rain. But Quran has made claim that you can make water from Almuzan to fall on the ground. Bukhari and other learned scholars of the past did not know about Atlas of clouds therefore it is difficult not only for me but even NASA will not be able to make you understand that is never whilte and shiny. But Quran has used four different words for different clouds, Almuzan cannot be therefore cannot be white as Almuzan is. It is a simple thing not diamond. By the why do you know what in reality a diamond is?

            This is your own version which I am ready to accept it.Bring evidence from classical Arabic.Because it is an arabic word.Repeating your own "paragraph" is no proof.You are not an authority.
            Either accept your fault or prove it.I am again asking you

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              This is an Arabic word, but a specific one; not nickname as say like Leoxyz which does not indicate the features of the thing someone believes it refers to; Arabic word refers a specific thing, and that specific thing has a shape, feature, dimensions, colour. Would you keep following Bukhari or Callasical Arabic Lexicons even if they did not know/had knowledge about something likew Assahab and Almuzn? Try to live in 21st century since you will not be raised with the people of 9th and 10 century.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Offline
                L Offline
                Leoxyz
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                This is an Arabic word, but a specific one; not nickname as say like Leoxyz which does not indicate the features of the thing someone believes it refers to; Arabic word refers a specific thing, and that specific thing has a shape, feature, dimensions, colour. Would you keep following Bukhari or Callasical Arabic Lexicons even if they did not know/had knowledge about something likew Assahab and Almuzn? Try to live in 21st century since you will not be raised with the people of 9th and 10 century.

                Bring evidence from ,9th century /10th century or 21st century arabic proof that "sahaab" cannot be "White".
                Two choices
                Either accept your fault or
                Provide evidence

                (No "Batkaas" please)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Are you colour blind? If not evidence is right before your eyes on the screen.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Leoxyz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Are you colour blind? If not evidence is right before your eyes on the screen.

                    Please do not shed "Batkaas"
                    Give me the evidence or admit your fault.
                    You are persistantly showing brainlessness.Are you a quranist ?
                    Waiting for your Evidence.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      I hope this will make people comprehend more comprehensively the meanings of "dance". God bless.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Leoxyz
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        I hope this will make people comprehend more comprehensively the meanings of "dance". God bless.

                        Please either give me the evidence or accept your fault

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mazhar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          If you read the posts the evidence is as strong as the shining sun. Remove the walls you have raised in front and back of you, dear Leoxyz.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Leoxyz
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            If you read the posts the evidence is as strong as the shining sun. Remove the walls you have raised in front and back of you, dear Leoxyz.

                            Please give me the evidence or apologize ;
                            I have already received "first warning from Wakas" to not to pick up "PEARLS "
                            Why do you people shed Pearls ?? I do not understand

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              Grand Quran has used four words to describe different types of clouds like
                              , and All these four words are different and distinct from each other. They describe some thing different from each other in nature, shape and coulour, dimensions.

                              Except for one Allah and Grand Quran has not made any claim that Allah is the One who sheds water from it and that it were not you who shed or could shed water from it. Had this claim been made in respect of , , , today someone could have challenged it that human beings are capable of shedding artificial rain.

                              But the Grand Quran is a proven fact for all times to come. is a proper noun since it is preceded by definite article "". It refers to a cloud which is white and shiny. It is amongst the high clouds, classified as Cirrostratus clouds which appear as a fine, whitish veil; they occasionally exhibit a fibrous structure and, when situated between the observer and the moon, produce halo phenomena. Cirrocumulus clouds form small, white, fleecy balls and wisps, arranged in groups or rows. Cirrus clouds are isolated, feathery, and threadlike, often with hooks or tufts, and are arranged in bands.
                              These are clouds composed of ice particles {not water droplets}. It is found at average levels of 8 km (5 mi) or more above the earth. These are called cirrus cloud.

                              These are middle clouds. These are clouds composed of water droplets and ranging in altitude from about 3 to 6 km (about 2 to 4 mi) above the earth. Two principal genera are included in the family. Altostratus clouds appear as a thick, gray or bluish veil, through which the sun or moon may be seen only diffusely, as through a frosted glass. Altocumulus clouds have the appearance of dense, fleecy balls or puffs somewhat larger than cirrocumulus. The sun or moon shining through altocumulus clouds may produce a corona, or colored ring, markedly smaller in diameter than a halo.

                              There are only four types of clouds. Since Learned Bukhari and other scholars of old did not have the know how about the clouds, therefore, if you think that evidence is only that which comes from the utterences of their mouths, I regret my inability to provide you such evidence.

                              If you really want to know that it is only which is white and shiny and none of other clouds are white, shiny, consult some met department or obtain information from NASA. Bukhari etc can't give you knowledge, rest assured.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                My friend Leoxyz is missing since 10th Sep. I hope he is okay and also hope he has not been banned.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Users