Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. an adulterer can only marry adulteress or an idolatress

an adulterer can only marry adulteress or an idolatress

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
28 Posts 9 Posters 389 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brook
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Please allow me to disagree, Mazhar, but I am convinced that the translations you provide are definitely wrong. My conviction comes from the fact that no women, no matter how terribly old they are, stop hoping to marry or are past the prospect of marriage until the very last breath they are able to take. Hope is a human right that God has given to the women mentioned; and they have God's permission to marry without even the slightest prospect to have sexual intercourse with their spouses (423, 2236-237, 3349). So the translators had better aknowledge it.

    Peace,
    Hasan Akcay

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      siki
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Salam.

      Most of us here agree that Zina is not adultery , but public sex. When someone has been a proved zani , and has been labeled as such , then God is decreeing , "That NO believer should marry such a personality", And if no believer is ready to marry Zanis , then probably the only choice she/he (zanis) has, "is to marry some one who is not a believer of such rules/decrees/commandment".

      God is trying to stress upon the the severity of the crime Zina , if some one is proved as such, he/she is considered at par with an idol worshipper, and an other indirect decree probably is ,"That Believers are prohibited to marry idolworshippers".

      siki

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Samia
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        Salam.

        Most of us here agree that Zina is not adultery , but public sex. When someone has been a proved zani , and has been labeled as such , then God is decreeing , "That NO believer should marry such a personality", And if no believer is ready to marry Zanis , then probably the only choice she/he (zanis) has, "is to marry some one who is not a believer of such rules/decrees/commandment".

        God is trying to stress upon the the severity of the crime Zina , if some one is proved as such, he/she is considered at par with an idol worshipper, and an other indirect decree probably is ,"That Believers are prohibited to marry idolworshippers".

        siki

        Yes, this is also my understanding that this is a command, not a statement. Since "zina" is a public act, everyone knows, or can know the "zani/a" and so they should not marry them. The mention of "aw mushrikan/mushrika" brings up verse 2221 to our memory.

        The verse also brings further proof that "zina" is a public act, otherwise it will be useless whether considered as a command or a statement.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          Please allow me to disagree, Mazhar, but I am convinced that the translations you provide are definitely wrong. My conviction comes from the fact that no women, no matter how terribly old they are, stop hoping to marry or are past the prospect of marriage until the very last breath they are able to take. Hope is a human right that God has given to the women mentioned; and they have God's permission to marry without even the slightest prospect to have sexual intercourse with their spouses (423, 2236-237, 3349). So the translators had better aknowledge it.{Brook}

          I pasted five or six translations of various writers, giving their names. You have not given the name of the person who translated it. If it is your translation then please say that all other translators are wrong because of the above perception that you have about women. It is a tragedy that people pass verdicts about woman while the fact is that majority of men know very little about the actualities of women.

          Please pay a little attention to "La yarjuuna" as requested earlier.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            siki
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Please allow me to disagree, Mazhar, but I am convinced that the translations you provide are definitely wrong. My conviction comes from the fact that no women, no matter how terribly old they are, stop hoping to marry or are past the prospect of marriage until the very last breath they are able to take. Hope is a human right that God has given to the women mentioned; and they have God's permission to marry without even the slightest prospect to have sexual intercourse with their spouses (423, 2236-237, 3349). So the translators had better aknowledge it.

            Peace,
            Hasan Akcay

            peace Hasan

            Above is your perception, and to authenticate your perception, you are assinging a completely new meaning to the Arabic word Nikah, which can neither be confirmed from dictionaries nor the Great Reading it self.

            siki

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              brook
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              Please pay a little attention to "La yarjuuna" as requested earlier. (Mazhar)

              I did pay attention, dear Mazhar. All the six people whom you quote translate la yarjuuna corectly. There is nothing wrong with that.

              My objection is to the translation of nikahan as the prospect of marriage. Please note that according to the six tarnslators you quote,

              kawaid are the women who
              are past the prospect of marriage (Yusuf Ali)
              have no hope of marriage (Picthal, Mohammad Sarward)
              do not hope for a marriage (Shakir)
              do not seek to get married (Progressive Muslims)
              no longer expect to marry (T.B. Irving)

              So according to their rendering of nikah, God allows the kawaid to take off their clothes if they do not have hope to get married. But if they do? If they have hope of getting married, they are not allowed to take off their clothes.

              However, hope is a never-ending human right. I repeat ALL HUMANS, including the kawaid, have the right to marry to the very last breath they are able to take, and it is God who gives them this right (2236-237, 423, 3349).

              Therefore what these six translators in actuality are saying is that the kawaid are never allowed to take off their clothes although God says they are.

              God says they are; the translators say they are not. That is what is wrong. No translator, no matter what great name he is, can abolish the kawaid?s God-given right to take off their clothes.

              The correct translation of nikahan in 2460 has to be the prospect or rather ability to have sexual intercourse. People do lose it at a certain old age, say at 90. But they still can marry for reasons other than sex.

              For example they can marry in order to feel a warm hand of a spouse to hold their hand, and God gives them this permission by announcing in 2236-237, 423, 3349 that marriage for purposes other than sex is halal.

              you are assinging a completely new meaning to the Arabic word Nikah, which can neither be confirmed from dictionaries nor the Great Reading it self. (the truth seeker)

              The Great Reading does. I referred to the relevant verses above. What is more, I am drawing on Muhammad Asad?s explanation in his footnote about 2460

              Although nikah, as well as the verb from which it is derived, is almost always used in the Qur?an in the sense of "marriage", there are undoubtedly exceptions from this general rule for instance, the manner in which the verbal form yankihu is used in verse 3 of this surah. These exceptions cofirm the view held by some philologists of great renown, e.g., Al-Jawhari or Al-Azhari (the latter quoted in Lisan al-?Arab), to the effect that "in the speech of the Arabs, the original meaning of nikah is sexual intercourse (al-wat).

              Peace,
              Hasan Akcay

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                siki
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Hassan!

                I agree there is a problem in conventional understanding of 24-60 , and you have valid arguments. let us thrash this verse a little more , a little deep.

                siki

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  I did pay attention, dear Mazhar. All the six people whom you quote translate la yarjuuna corectly. There is nothing wrong with that.{Brook}

                  And what is that correct translation of la yarjuuna?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    brook
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    And what is that correct translation of la yarjuuna?

                    are past the prospect of
                    have no hope of
                    do not hope for
                    do not seek to
                    no longer expect to

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Offline
                      B Offline
                      brook
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      (expect to have intercourse)
                      feel sexual desire -yarjuuna nikahen (2460)
                      expect God?s grace -yarc?na rahmatallah (221
                      expecting from God -tarjuuna minallah
                      what they cannot expect -ma la yarjuun (4104)
                      expect to meet Us ?yarjuuna lik?ena (107)

                      expect to receive the Book ?tarjuu an yulkaa ilayka?l kitab (2886)
                      thy Sustainer?s grace thou expect -rahmatin min rabbike tarjuuh? (172

                      We had hope in thee ?kunta feen? marcukan (1162)

                      hoping God?s command -murcavna li emrillah (9106)

                      expect the last day -yarcu?l yavma?l ahir (2936)
                      whoever expects to meet God -men k?na yarc? lik?allah (295, 18110)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        feel no sexual desire la yarjuuna nikahan

                        have no hope of
                        do not hope for
                        do not seek to
                        no longer expect to

                        But who? A particular woman feel no sexual desire or men do not have sexual desire in that woman, who do not hope/seek/longer expect to, men in that woman or that woman in men?? And also please correct the translations that no woman is being allowed to put off her dress. She is being allowed to put off the spare sheet put on the bosoms not her dress.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Y Offline
                          Y Offline
                          Yosemite
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          Salam.

                          Most of us here agree that Zina is not adultery , but public sex. When someone has been a proved zani , and has been labeled as such , then God is decreeing , "That NO believer should marry such a personality", And if no believer is ready to marry Zanis , then probably the only choice she/he (zanis) has, "is to marry some one who is not a believer of such rules/decrees/commandment".

                          God is trying to stress upon the the severity of the crime Zina , if some one is proved as such, he/she is considered at par with an idol worshipper, and an other indirect decree probably is ,"That Believers are prohibited to marry idolworshippers".

                          siki

                          public act, like on the streets on daylight or night? Like nudists or something?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            siki
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            public act, like on the streets on daylight or night? Like nudists or something?

                            what ever,, which entails witnessing of any such act by 4. Fornication, adultry is part of committing "Fahisha"

                            siki

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Users