Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Book: Modern Muslim Intellectuals and The Quran

Book: Modern Muslim Intellectuals and The Quran

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
46 Posts 16 Posters 1.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    burhan
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    peace bro,

    I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on it too, once you've read it.

    I was surprised Fazlur Rahman was significantly anti-hadith and openly admitted gross distortions had taken place in the formulation of law, as he is considered one of the significant Islamic scholars of the 20th century, even by traditional Muslims. I am confident, the more we dig, the more we will see many have recognised the problems we are pointing out.

    There were a number of pakistan/india scholars from that era (british rule) who pretty much acknowledged quran above all and were critcal of hadith and blind acceptance of historians. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan is probably the earliest. These guys shaped the way most pakistanis thought .....but sadly no more.

    Even when you read the works of Mohammad Asad and Yusuf Ali, you can see they were not comfortable with direction Islam was taking
    and called people back to the Quran. I think it was Asad or Iqbal who called it "Alien Islam".

    Exteremisim in pk only took hold with Zia and the CIA pouring millions into their hands to fight the russians. It changed everything.
    All of a sudden these guys were everywhere - they destroyed what could have been a great country.

    What we need to do is carry on doing what we do, just keep applying the pressure and stick together.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Offline
      E Offline
      Edip_Yuksel
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      I find the so-called Historical approach to the Quran intellectually bankrupt, and theologically problematic.

      Those whose cultural upbringing is not comfortable with Quranic instructions or those who lack the right methodology or knowledge for the proper understanding of the meaning of verses and the rationale behind them, yes anyone who wishes to discard any instruction in the Quran that does not conform to his or her wishes, will reject/abrogate any divine instruction/statement by claiming, "These verses were about the past generations; not us!" This so-called "historic" opposition to the Quran is refuted by many verses, including 619.

      I do not consider Fazlurrahman and his followers as acknowledgers of the Quran, since they can reject ALL the verses of the Quran (including verses about prayer, charity and fasting, etc), except a few general statements, by using the same rationale "these are the stories of past!" Ironically, this excuse is mentioned in the Quran and attributed to mushriks.

      Peace,
      Edip

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        nadeem
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Peace Edip,

        I understand your point, but hasn't religion for the sake of religion itself been criticized by the Quran? (see 728-29)

        Nadeem

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          burhan
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Edip whether we use the "historical approach", "every thing is a metaphor approach"
          or "lets change the meaning of this word" approach we are all guilty of rejecting
          some part and accepting other parts of the Quran because of what we want to see in the Quran due to our cultural upbringing. This forum is living proof of this.

          So lets listen to all the words and follow the best.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Offline
            WakasW Offline
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            peace,

            Edip, your view may be valid for others perhaps trying to do what you said, but as far as I can see, FR isn't one of them. He is arguing for taking the ethics of AQ into account before and when formulating law, nothing about re-writing prayer/charity/fasting/etc.

            burhan, yeah I was aware of SAK, as he was mentioned a lot in the book 'Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought'.

            So lets listen to all the words and follow the best.

            I agree.

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              JAVED
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              salam
              The other interesting and rather original idea of Fazlur Rahman is the differentiation between the " Living Sunna" and "Written Sunna".He was sceptical of the latter.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Offline
                E Offline
                Edip_Yuksel
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Edip whether we use the "historical approach", "every thing is a metaphor approach"
                or "lets change the meaning of this word" approach we are all guilty of rejecting
                some part and accepting other parts of the Quran because of what we want to see in the Quran due to our cultural upbringing. This forum is living proof of this.

                So lets listen to all the words and follow the best.

                Your innuendo is a good one. However, there is categorical difference between the following methodologies

                1. The meaning of some words have been intentionally or unintentionally changed throughout centuries. We should use the language of the Quran to find the intended Quranic meaning. Some words might have multiple meanings and any such meanings that do not create contradiction within the ayas of the Quran and the ayas of nature are intended meanings.

                2. We should stop following some verses, EVEN IF THEY INSTRUCT ITS AUDIANCE TO DO SOMETHING, because of their historic nature.

                The second one, though might be a proper tool of understanding the Quran, it requires textual justification, and without a clear set of reasonable rules it is a slippery slope that might lead to rejection of all the instructions.

                Thus, I would appreciate those who are more familiar with Fazlurrahman's position, provide a list of verses that Fazl thinks are historic.

                Peace,
                Edip

                Peace,
                Edip

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W Offline
                  W Offline
                  wildguest1956
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Thus, I would appreciate those who are more familiar with Fazlurrahman's position, provide a list of verses that Fazl thinks are historic.

                  may be a good example of an historical verse, since today?s transactions may be more complex, and because of the new technologies for tracing a transaction.

                  Therefore, I think we should place the verse into its historical context, in order to separate the contextual circumstances from the wisdom behind God?s instructions, and then, reflect on how we can apply the lessons of this verse into our present historical context.

                  Peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    may be a good example of an historical verse, since today?s transactions may be more complex, and because of the new technologies for tracing a transaction.

                    Therefore, I think we should place the verse into its historical context, in order to separate the contextual contingencies from the wisdom behind God?s instructions, and then, reflect on how we can apply the lessons of this verse into our present historical context.

                    Peace

                    I don't think so, today's transactions aren't very different. The modern day scribe is a solicitor/lawyer.

                    I don't think there are any such 'historical verses' in any case except for those in the past tense speaking directly to muhammad.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      adjwi
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Peace,

                      1. We should stop following some verses, EVEN IF THEY INSTRUCT ITS AUDIANCE TO DO SOMETHING, because of their historic nature.

                      Would you mind expanding on this idea? Do those verses with a ''historic nature'' take on the quality of Stop and Go, or is it Stop and No Go? Would those verses be of use later? Or is it that we have a historically outdated qur'an in part of it's content? Am I beginning to sense the need of a revelation? Or is it a message? Edip, would you perhaps be in the process of becoming a messenger yourself? Are we to be witness to something here?

                      adjwi

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • W Offline
                        W Offline
                        wildguest1956
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Peace,

                        Would you mind expanding on this idea? Do those verses with a ''historic nature'' take on the quality of Stop and Go, or is it Stop and No Go? Would those verses be of use later? Or is it that we have a historically outdated qur'an in part of it's content? Am I beginning to sense the need of a revelation? Or is it a message? Edip, would you perhaps be in the process of becoming a messenger yourself? Are we to be witness to something here?

                        adjwi

                        I think you have misunderstood Edip's post.
                        Please read it again, along with the previous posts of the topic.

                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          adjwi
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Peace,

                          I think you have misunderstood Edip's post.
                          Please read it again, along with the previous posts of the topic.

                          Peace

                          I was wrong, I'm sorry for that Edip, thanks JM.

                          adjwi

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Offline
                            B Offline
                            burhan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Your innuendo is a good one. However, there is categorical difference between the following methodologies

                            Relax bro, no innendo, I wasn't taking a pot shot at your new translation. My point was that any methodology is only as good as the person using it.
                            In order to prove your point you have given the best case scenario for 1. and worst case for 2.

                            Any approach that breaks free the Quran from a particular time-zone is a good one. Besides most of the Quran is about the praising God and accepting he is one.
                            Very little is about telling us what to do, but rather encouraging us to do what is we naturally know to be right. A reminder and a strength giver is what the Quran is to me.

                            Inshallah, I will post something on FR in due course.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • WakasW Offline
                              WakasW Offline
                              Wakas
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Peace Brother,

                              Thanks for keeping us posted. I received this book yesterday, ordering it right after you recommended it, from bookdepository.co.uk. Can't wait to read it!

                              Nadeem

                              Just wanted to clarify. Saying I have been reading a book, does not mean I recommended it. I forgot to say that earlier. Wish I did now, as I've been reading the rest of this book and it's quite poor. I would say why, but the reviews on amazon.com have plenty of info.

                              Once I'm finished it I will summarise.

                              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Offline
                                N Offline
                                nadeem
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                Peace Wakas,

                                I'm sorry for the assumption. I must say now, that the book has fallen considerably on my list of books to read next, but in time, I'll get to it. Inshallah.

                                I haven't read the reviews on Amazon in detail, but every reviewer has given it a five out five.

                                Nadeem

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  arnoldyasin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  Peace,

                                  I would recommend it just for the part on Dr.Mohammed Shahrour as his theories are the most interesting ones.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    nadeem
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    Thanks Yasin... it has now moved up a few places on the list... -)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      arnoldyasin
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      I also recommend

                                      http//ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51OBXnHF6TL.SS500.jpg

                                      Defenders of Reason In Islam Mu'tazilism and Rational Theology from Medieval School to Modern Symbol (Paperback)

                                      And

                                      http//ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51WCA6ADGCL.BO2,204,203,200_PIlitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_OU01_AA240_SH20.jpg

                                      Faith and Reason in Islam Averroes' Exposition of Religious Arguments (Great Islamic Writings) (Paperback)

                                      And

                                      http//ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/415RYX7JB5L.BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_OU01_AA240_SH20.jpg

                                      Liberal Islam A Sourcebook (Paperback)

                                      And if you like to share more bookideas I recommend to join me at

                                      http//www.shelfari.com/ArnoldYasinMol

                                      It is a very handy booksite where you can make a handy list of favorites, wishlist and so on.

                                      I have also formed a little discussion group there with Maxq and Edip and Samia.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        arnoldyasin
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        Also

                                        http//ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41V1TyPRmZL.AA240.jpg

                                        Islam Past, Present and Future (Hardcover)

                                        It is a very good book on Islam, the different theories, ideas and tries to understand early Islam more as a system that was later formed into a religion. Hans Kung was the main advisor on Islam for the Roman Catholic church but was kicked out, or rather being degraded, because he acknowledged the Quran being from God and that the Trinity was a man-made doctrine. He says the Quran presents the correct picture of the early Christians.

                                        It has everything from A-Z on Islam.

                                        Kung's words

                                        "There will be no peace among the nations without peace among the religions. There will be no peace among the religions without dialogue among the religions." - K?ng speaking on global ethic

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          arnoldyasin
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          http//ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41R1RKBV0RL.BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_OU01_AA240_SH20.jpg

                                          The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law (Themes in Islamic Law) (Paperback)

                                          very good also

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users