Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Quran Translation Project

Quran Translation Project

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
28 Posts 8 Posters 524 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WakasW Offline
    WakasW Offline
    Wakas
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    peace be upon you Layth,

    Firstly, I will re-paste the Qs not answered

    Did you put the changes of 56 and 443 in? To me, these are obvious.

    In 2196 it states "whoever enjoys in the visit until/to/ila al HJJ". I just noticed this. This makes the following highly unlikely "whoever enjoys in the visit until the pilgrimmage" because the word "visit" implies they are already there, thus what further pilgrimage is this?

    There were others, but they were all linked to the way in which you and I are understanding the word 'pilgrimage', so I will try and clarify. I am using the dictionary.com definition

    1. A journey to a sacred place or shrine.
    2. A long journey or search, especially one of exalted purpose or moral significance.

    In your view, does it involve journeying or not? Because it seems to me you are mixing this aspect up, or at least you have not addressed this properly. Is it 'journeying to the sacred place', or is it 'being at the sacred place'? Or is it both 'journeying and ending up there at the sacred place'? Please pick one, so I can understand your view and examine it properly.

    That the pilgrimage is to a destination goes without saying...There is no hajj if you are staying in your home oe in your town...the journey must be made by all to Bakka...Thus it is correct to be translated as 'pilgrimage' and not 'conference'.

    Circular argument

    Unsound reasoning in which it is argued both that A is the case on the grounds that B is the case and that B is the case on the grounds that A is the case. (Consider ?That there is a god is reliably stated in our holy book, and we can be sure the holy book is reliable because it?s divinely inspired.?) Compare BEGGING THE QUESTION.

    www.abdn.ac.uk/philosophy/guide/glossary.shtml

    The traditional use of the phrase 'Begging the question' describes a type of logical fallacy (also called 'petitio principii') in which the evidence given for a proposition is as much in need of proof as the proposition itself. A common form of begging the question is a circular argument, circulus in probando, vicious circle or circular reasoning in which the proposition to be proved is contained in one of the premises. As a concept in logic the first known definition in the West is by the Gre

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_argument

    Please give me the specific evidence which proves it is to al bayt, if there is any.

    2227 shows HJJ is a vehicle/medium to call out with. This is unlikely (impossible?) for a 'pilgrimage'.

    If you are using HJJ=pilgrimage, then how do you conclude that one of the core activities of pilgrimage is debate/conference? What specific signs or words are you using here?

    Because we are told by God that the people (al-naas) will witness benefits for them.

    You went from the general wording 'witness benefits' to a specific core event of conference/debate? I would expect an explicit reference if this was the case, because 'benefits' could be many things.

    Finally, it is important to note that the purpose of Hajj is not only to meet and debate/discuss, but is to thank God for His blessing of livestock upon us...Changing the word will change the purpose.

    No it would not. Holding an event such as a conference/symposium would require provision (e.g. food/drink) for its participants & visitors. This is done in many conferences today.

    Wakas

    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Salaamun alaikum brother Layth,

      Following are some of the errors in translation that I have spotted in "The Message". I would appreciate if you can go through the following and all the specified links and correct the meanings in the pm translation of Al-Qur'aan

      1. 518 By the sky that is clear.

      Should be

      518 By the sky that is weaved/woven

      The arabic word is "hubuk" which means "weaved" or "interwoven" and not "clear"

      That is proof of the "string theory" of subatomic particles. Following reference you will find intresting on this (under "the woven sky")

      http//members.aol.com/silence004/

      1. 2143 And as such, We have made you a balanced nation so that you may be witness over the people, and that the messenger may be witness over you. And We did not make the focal point that you became on except to know who follows the messenger from those who will turn on their heels. It was a great thing indeed except for those whom God had guided; God was not to waste your belief. God is Merciful and Compassionate over the people.

      Should be

      2143 And as such, We have made you a balanced nation so that you may be witness over the people, and that the messenger may be witness over you. And We did not make the focal point that you became on except to distinguish who follows the messenger from those who will turn on their heels. It was a great thing indeed except for those whom God had guided; God was not to waste your belief. God is Merciful and Compassionate over the people.

      Similarly

      3143 Or did you think that you would enter Paradise without God knowing those who would strive amongst you and knowing those who are patient?

      Should be

      3143 Or did you think that you would enter Paradise without God distinguishing those who would strive amongst you and knowing those who are patient?

      Similarly

      917 Or did you think that you would be left alone? God will come to know those of you who strived and did not take other than God and His messenger and the believers as helpers. God is Expert in what you do.

      Should be

      917 Or did you think that you would be left alone? God will come to distinguish those of you who strived and did not take other than God and His messenger and the believers as helpers. God is Expert in what you do.

      Similarly

      293 While We had tested those before them, so that God would know those who are truthful and so that He would know the liars.

      Should be

      293 While We had tested those before them, so that God would distinguish those who are truthful and so that He would distinguish the liars.

      Otherwise the implication is that The God does not know??? whereas He is Allknowing.

      Please see the following for details

      http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=45181&highlight=#45181

      1. 44 And if you fear that you cannot be just to the orphans, then marry those whom you see fit from their mothers, two, and three, and four. But if you fear you will not be fair, then only one, or whom you are already betrothed to. This is best that you do not face financial hardship.

      Should be

      44 And if you fear you can?t do justice to the orphans, then marry off the women (orphans/widows) who have agreed with you to by twos, by threes and by fours. But if you fear that you will be unfair then by one or what your oath possessed as this is better than getting into hardship.

      See following for full details

      http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=46738&highlight=#46738
      http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3533
      http//www.geocities.com/yaseen_q/polygamy.html

      1. 96 So when the restricted months have passed, then you may kill those who have set up partners wherever you find them, and take them, and surround them, and stand against them at every point. If they repent, and uphold the contact-method, and contribute towards betterment, then you shall leave them alone. God is Forgiving, Merciful.
        912 If they repent, and they uphold the contact-method, and they contribute towards betterment, then they are your brothers in the system. We explain the revelations for a people who know.

      Should be

      96 So when the restricted months have passed, then you may kill those who have set up partners wherever you find them, and take them, and surround them, and stand against them at every point. If they repent, and uphold the bond, and contribute towards betterment, then you shall leave them alone. God is Forgiving, Merciful.
      912 If they repent, and they uphold the bond, and they contribute towards betterment, then they are your brothers in the system. We explain the revelations for a people who know.

      Please see following link for details

      http//mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/think-786/disproved_salatequalsprayer.htm

      1. 2185 A month in early autumn, in which the Quran was sent down as a guide to the people and a clarification of the guidance and the criterion. Therefore, whoever of you can observe the season, then let him fast therein. And whoever is ill or traveling, then the same number from different days. God wants to bring you ease and not to bring you hardship; and so that you may complete the count, and glorify God for what He has guided you, that you may be thankful.

      Should be

      2185 Full moon of scorching heat, in which the Quran was sent down as a guide to the people and a clarification of the guidance and the criterion. Therefore, whoever of you witnesses the full moon, then let him abstain it. And whoever is ill or traveling, then the same number from different days. God wants to bring you ease and not to bring you hardship; and so that you may complete the count, and glorify God for what He has guided you, that you may be thankful.

      See following for details

      http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2757&highlight=full+moon

      1. 416 And the two women who commit lewdness, you shall bring four witnesses over them from amongst you; if they bear witness, then you shall restrict them in the homes until death takes them, or God makes for them a way out.

      Should be

      416 And those of your women who commit lewdness, you shall bring four witnesses over them from amongst you; if they bear witness, then you shall restrict them in the homes until death takes them, or God makes for them a way out.

      1. 5556 In them are attendants with a splendid look, unknown before by any human or Jinn.

      Should be

      5556 In them are best of fruits close by, untouched before by any human or Jinn.

      5570 In them is what is good and beautiful.

      Should be

      5570 In them is goodness/benefits most excellent

      5572 Companions, inside grand pavilions.

      Should be

      5572 Pure, confined in tents

      5626 And wonderful companions

      Should be

      5626 And pure/clear springs

      4452 So it is, and We coupled them with wonderful companions.

      Should be

      4452 So it is, and We granted/gave them pure springs

      5219 They recline on arranged furnishings, and We coupled them with wonderful companions.

      Should be

      5219 They recline on arranged furnishings, and We granted/gave them pure springs

      3852 And with them are attendants with a splendid look and of equal age.

      Should be

      3852 And with them are best of fruits close by and matching

      3749 And with them are attendants with wide eyes and a splendid look.

      Should be

      3749 And with them are springs, close by/within close proximity

      3750 They are like fragile eggs.

      Should be

      3750 Like crystal white, carefully guarded

      For in depth explanation of the above translations from #7 onwards please check out the following link

      http//www.geocities.com/yaseen_q/hur-article.htm

      If you do not agree with any of the above mentioned corrected translations then I would appreciate if you can give me a detailed explanation of why you think they are wrong.

      Regards,

      Tanveer

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • WakasW Offline
        WakasW Offline
        Wakas
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=49208#49208

        "...secure, with your heads releived and restrained/relinquished, having no fear..."

        http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=48647#48647

        "...and do not relieve your head (of this duty)..."

        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Salaamun alaikukm Layth,

          2364 And We do not burden a soul except with what it can bare. And We have a record that speaks with the truth, they will not be wronged.

          It should be "bear" and not "bare"

          2364 And We do not burden a soul except with what it can bear. And We have a record that speaks with the truth, they will not be wronged.

          Regards,

          Tanveer

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Offline
            WakasW Offline
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            AAlameena (plural, e.g. 12) = beings/creations

            Please see the following signs which clearly demonstrate the meaning of AAalameena 780, 1570, 2623, 26165, 296, 2910, 2928, 4432

            some examples

            And We have chosen them, knowingly/knowledgeably (AAilmin), over the creations/beings (AAalameena).

            Do you approach the males of the creations/beings (AAalameena)?

            Pharaoh said "And what is the Lord of the creations/beings (AAalameena)?"
            He said "The Lord of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them, if you are aware"

            Like all suggested changes, a reason should be given IF not implementing the suggested change.

            Wakas

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • WakasW Offline
              WakasW Offline
              Wakas
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              it cannot be Abu Lahab in 1111

              see
              http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=52323&highlight=#52323

              Wakas

              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                Jaxal
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                SaLaM

                And the counter argument to Wakas's notion of "Abu Lahab" not being a name.

                see
                http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=52332#52332

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • WakasW Offline
                  WakasW Offline
                  Wakas
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Please see brother Ayman's article on so-called proper names

                  http//www.free-minds.org/articles/gods_system/name.htm

                  The original FM/PM translation had 'abu lahab' as 'father of flames', no reason was given for its change as far as I'm aware.

                  Wakas

                  All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jaxal
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    SaLaM Wakas

                    Seen it, read it and understood it. And it changes nothing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • WakasW Offline
                      WakasW Offline
                      Wakas
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      peace Layth, all,

                      I cant recall where the other thread is for revisions but this one will do.

                      Before I post another, I would like to highlight some of the others above have not been implemented, meaning they are still present in 'The Message' and still incorrect (in my opinion).

                      In 3510

                      The suffixed pronoun in (yarfa3uhu it/he) is ambiguous because it can refer to either the righteous deed or "whoever" in the beginning of the verse. Thus I believe the possibilities are

                      "Whoever desires honour, power and glory then to Allah belong all honour, power and glory. To Him ascend the goodly words and the righteous deed raise him......"

                      "Whoever desires honour, power and glory then to Allah belong all honour, power and glory. To Him ascend the goodly words and the righteous deed He raises it....."

                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • LaythL Offline
                        LaythL Offline
                        Layth
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        Salam,

                        Here is The Message translation

                        Whosoever is seeking pride, then know that to God belongs all Pride. To Him ascend the good words, and they are exalted by the good deeds. And as for those who scheme evil, they will have a painful retribution, and their scheming will fail. (3510)

                        I find it more accurate when looking through the Arabic with regards to what the good works/deeds are doing.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • WakasW Offline
                          WakasW Offline
                          Wakas
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          peace,

                          I find it more accurate when looking through the Arabic with regards to what the good works/deeds are doing.

                          Is 'the righteous deed' singular or not?

                          Does "yarfa3uhu" refer to a singular thing or not?

                          Answering these will allow us to see what is more accurate.

                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • LaythL Offline
                            LaythL Offline
                            Layth
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            Peace,

                            I see the point you are making.

                            The rightous deed is singular. The raising (yarfa3uhu) is done by God to the good work/deed.

                            "Whosoever is seeking pride, then know that to God belongs all Pride. To Him ascend the words that are good, and the good deed, it is made better by Him. And as for those who scheme evil, they will have a painful retribution, and their scheming will fail. (3510)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • WakasW Offline
                              WakasW Offline
                              Wakas
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              peace,

                              Yes, that was the point I was trying to make. )

                              Also yarfa3uhu is imperfect, i.e. an action in the process of being done.

                              Rather than "To Him ascend the words that are good, and the good deed, it is made better by Him..." perhaps "To Him ascend the good words and He raises the good deed". It's just more concise.

                              You may wish to consider the other changes I've brought up

                              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Rustum
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                Quraan in its Revelation order did reveal a secret that the qURAAN itself is a collection of 7 individual books here are their names

                                al Zaboor
                                al Furqaan
                                Ayah Ki tab Mubeen
                                Al Musa al Ki tab
                                al Ki tab Hakeem
                                al Ebad Ki tab
                                al Ki tab la Rayba Feehi

                                each of these names was take from the Break in each section first Words of first mention of subject matter, i would hope that you all would look into this Finding as it has awaken my spirit and excited my soul because each of these books is paired with a set of the Letters that sit atop some of the suras and it matches the 7 books perfectly just like the Quraan says AL QURAAN and the 7 Pairs elhamdulillah.....

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  Quraan in its Revelation order did reveal a secret that the qURAAN itself is a collection of 7 individual books here are their names

                                  al Zaboor
                                  al Furqaan
                                  Ayah Ki tab Mubeen
                                  Al Musa al Ki tab
                                  al Ki tab Hakeem
                                  al Ebad Ki tab
                                  al Ki tab la Rayba Feehi

                                  each of these names was take from the Break in each section first Words of first mention of subject matter, i would hope that you all would look into this Finding as it has awaken my spirit and excited my soul because each of these books is paired with a set of the Letters that sit atop some of the suras and it matches the 7 books perfectly just like the Quraan says AL QURAAN and the 7 Pairs elhamdulillah.....

                                  Care to expand on this? It makes much more sense than a few other explanations for the initials.

                                  How do you divide them? And is it even reasonable to divide them? Anyway, your interpretation makes a lot of good sense in light of 1591 - there are 114 surahs here yet 1587 mentions 7 of "" - and then follows to reveal that the book has, or may be split up further.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    AlFajr
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    Care to expand on this? It makes much more sense than a few other explanations for the initials.

                                    How do you divide them? And is it even reasonable to divide them? Anyway, your interpretation makes a lot of good sense in light of 1591 - there are 114 surahs here yet 1587 mentions 7 of "" - and then follows to reveal that the book has, or may be split up further.

                                    Peace brother,
                                    Doesn't it say we have "given" as in past tense. So how can it be talking about the Quran being in 7 parts?

                                    Thanks!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Peace brother,
                                      Doesn't it say we have "given" as in past tense. So how can it be talking about the Quran being in 7 parts?

                                      Thanks!

                                      But if you move onwards it talks about the quran being partitioned, in the past tense? I.e. see 1589-91. It depends on whether the "quran" being talked about in that verse is the same here. I don't get what those verses are implying either, is the quran supposed to be an undivided recital?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        Hati
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        Surely thy Lord, He is the All-creator, the All-knowing.

                                        We have given thee seven of the oft-repeated, and the mighty Koran.

                                        Stretch not thine eyes to that We have given pairs of them to enjoy; and do not sorrow for them, and lower thy wing unto the believers,

                                        and say, 'Surely, I am the manifest warner.'

                                        So We sent it down to the partitioners,

                                        who have broken the Koran into fragments.

                                        Salam,

                                        I m curious on your discussions and the following questions come to mind

                                        In the above verses

                                        1. What are the seven pairs?
                                        2. Who are given these seven pairs?
                                        3. Are the one given seven pairs the partitioners?
                                        4. Have they broken the Quran into fragments?

                                        Hati

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • WakasW Offline
                                          WakasW Offline
                                          Wakas
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          With reference to my previous post in this thread
                                          http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9596520.msg9069#msg9069

                                          ...and when you are changing your clothes from/of (mina partitive) openess/visibility...

                                          I just thought of this today is there any significance to the the use of "mina"?

                                          I note no translator (that I checked) translates this word correctly. Is that because it weakens the common understanding of "noon"? (thus indirectly strengthening the above understanding*). Or is this just a normal way to say such a thing in Arabic? Seems a little unusual to me.

                                          *as it implies out of all the times of openess/visibility (i.e. when you are out in the open /visible), it is only the times that you change your clothes that are a private time for you.

                                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users