Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Quran Translation Project

Quran Translation Project

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
28 Posts 8 Posters 526 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Salaamun alaikukm Layth,

    2364 And We do not burden a soul except with what it can bare. And We have a record that speaks with the truth, they will not be wronged.

    It should be "bear" and not "bare"

    2364 And We do not burden a soul except with what it can bear. And We have a record that speaks with the truth, they will not be wronged.

    Regards,

    Tanveer

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • WakasW Offline
      WakasW Offline
      Wakas
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      AAlameena (plural, e.g. 12) = beings/creations

      Please see the following signs which clearly demonstrate the meaning of AAalameena 780, 1570, 2623, 26165, 296, 2910, 2928, 4432

      some examples

      And We have chosen them, knowingly/knowledgeably (AAilmin), over the creations/beings (AAalameena).

      Do you approach the males of the creations/beings (AAalameena)?

      Pharaoh said "And what is the Lord of the creations/beings (AAalameena)?"
      He said "The Lord of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them, if you are aware"

      Like all suggested changes, a reason should be given IF not implementing the suggested change.

      Wakas

      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • WakasW Offline
        WakasW Offline
        Wakas
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        it cannot be Abu Lahab in 1111

        see
        http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=52323&highlight=#52323

        Wakas

        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          Jaxal
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          SaLaM

          And the counter argument to Wakas's notion of "Abu Lahab" not being a name.

          see
          http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=52332#52332

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Offline
            WakasW Offline
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Please see brother Ayman's article on so-called proper names

            http//www.free-minds.org/articles/gods_system/name.htm

            The original FM/PM translation had 'abu lahab' as 'father of flames', no reason was given for its change as far as I'm aware.

            Wakas

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              Jaxal
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              SaLaM Wakas

              Seen it, read it and understood it. And it changes nothing.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                peace Layth, all,

                I cant recall where the other thread is for revisions but this one will do.

                Before I post another, I would like to highlight some of the others above have not been implemented, meaning they are still present in 'The Message' and still incorrect (in my opinion).

                In 3510

                The suffixed pronoun in (yarfa3uhu it/he) is ambiguous because it can refer to either the righteous deed or "whoever" in the beginning of the verse. Thus I believe the possibilities are

                "Whoever desires honour, power and glory then to Allah belong all honour, power and glory. To Him ascend the goodly words and the righteous deed raise him......"

                "Whoever desires honour, power and glory then to Allah belong all honour, power and glory. To Him ascend the goodly words and the righteous deed He raises it....."

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • LaythL Offline
                  LaythL Offline
                  Layth
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Salam,

                  Here is The Message translation

                  Whosoever is seeking pride, then know that to God belongs all Pride. To Him ascend the good words, and they are exalted by the good deeds. And as for those who scheme evil, they will have a painful retribution, and their scheming will fail. (3510)

                  I find it more accurate when looking through the Arabic with regards to what the good works/deeds are doing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • WakasW Offline
                    WakasW Offline
                    Wakas
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    peace,

                    I find it more accurate when looking through the Arabic with regards to what the good works/deeds are doing.

                    Is 'the righteous deed' singular or not?

                    Does "yarfa3uhu" refer to a singular thing or not?

                    Answering these will allow us to see what is more accurate.

                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • LaythL Offline
                      LaythL Offline
                      Layth
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Peace,

                      I see the point you are making.

                      The rightous deed is singular. The raising (yarfa3uhu) is done by God to the good work/deed.

                      "Whosoever is seeking pride, then know that to God belongs all Pride. To Him ascend the words that are good, and the good deed, it is made better by Him. And as for those who scheme evil, they will have a painful retribution, and their scheming will fail. (3510)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • WakasW Offline
                        WakasW Offline
                        Wakas
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        peace,

                        Yes, that was the point I was trying to make. )

                        Also yarfa3uhu is imperfect, i.e. an action in the process of being done.

                        Rather than "To Him ascend the words that are good, and the good deed, it is made better by Him..." perhaps "To Him ascend the good words and He raises the good deed". It's just more concise.

                        You may wish to consider the other changes I've brought up

                        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rustum
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Quraan in its Revelation order did reveal a secret that the qURAAN itself is a collection of 7 individual books here are their names

                          al Zaboor
                          al Furqaan
                          Ayah Ki tab Mubeen
                          Al Musa al Ki tab
                          al Ki tab Hakeem
                          al Ebad Ki tab
                          al Ki tab la Rayba Feehi

                          each of these names was take from the Break in each section first Words of first mention of subject matter, i would hope that you all would look into this Finding as it has awaken my spirit and excited my soul because each of these books is paired with a set of the Letters that sit atop some of the suras and it matches the 7 books perfectly just like the Quraan says AL QURAAN and the 7 Pairs elhamdulillah.....

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            Quraan in its Revelation order did reveal a secret that the qURAAN itself is a collection of 7 individual books here are their names

                            al Zaboor
                            al Furqaan
                            Ayah Ki tab Mubeen
                            Al Musa al Ki tab
                            al Ki tab Hakeem
                            al Ebad Ki tab
                            al Ki tab la Rayba Feehi

                            each of these names was take from the Break in each section first Words of first mention of subject matter, i would hope that you all would look into this Finding as it has awaken my spirit and excited my soul because each of these books is paired with a set of the Letters that sit atop some of the suras and it matches the 7 books perfectly just like the Quraan says AL QURAAN and the 7 Pairs elhamdulillah.....

                            Care to expand on this? It makes much more sense than a few other explanations for the initials.

                            How do you divide them? And is it even reasonable to divide them? Anyway, your interpretation makes a lot of good sense in light of 1591 - there are 114 surahs here yet 1587 mentions 7 of "" - and then follows to reveal that the book has, or may be split up further.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              AlFajr
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              Care to expand on this? It makes much more sense than a few other explanations for the initials.

                              How do you divide them? And is it even reasonable to divide them? Anyway, your interpretation makes a lot of good sense in light of 1591 - there are 114 surahs here yet 1587 mentions 7 of "" - and then follows to reveal that the book has, or may be split up further.

                              Peace brother,
                              Doesn't it say we have "given" as in past tense. So how can it be talking about the Quran being in 7 parts?

                              Thanks!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Peace brother,
                                Doesn't it say we have "given" as in past tense. So how can it be talking about the Quran being in 7 parts?

                                Thanks!

                                But if you move onwards it talks about the quran being partitioned, in the past tense? I.e. see 1589-91. It depends on whether the "quran" being talked about in that verse is the same here. I don't get what those verses are implying either, is the quran supposed to be an undivided recital?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  Hati
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Surely thy Lord, He is the All-creator, the All-knowing.

                                  We have given thee seven of the oft-repeated, and the mighty Koran.

                                  Stretch not thine eyes to that We have given pairs of them to enjoy; and do not sorrow for them, and lower thy wing unto the believers,

                                  and say, 'Surely, I am the manifest warner.'

                                  So We sent it down to the partitioners,

                                  who have broken the Koran into fragments.

                                  Salam,

                                  I m curious on your discussions and the following questions come to mind

                                  In the above verses

                                  1. What are the seven pairs?
                                  2. Who are given these seven pairs?
                                  3. Are the one given seven pairs the partitioners?
                                  4. Have they broken the Quran into fragments?

                                  Hati

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • WakasW Offline
                                    WakasW Offline
                                    Wakas
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    With reference to my previous post in this thread
                                    http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9596520.msg9069#msg9069

                                    ...and when you are changing your clothes from/of (mina partitive) openess/visibility...

                                    I just thought of this today is there any significance to the the use of "mina"?

                                    I note no translator (that I checked) translates this word correctly. Is that because it weakens the common understanding of "noon"? (thus indirectly strengthening the above understanding*). Or is this just a normal way to say such a thing in Arabic? Seems a little unusual to me.

                                    *as it implies out of all the times of openess/visibility (i.e. when you are out in the open /visible), it is only the times that you change your clothes that are a private time for you.

                                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      personalquran
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      Dear all,

                                      Monotheist Group's translation is available in our website which makes it much more convenient to read and perform search against the translation. Furthermore, you can analyze word by word from the translation if you click/tap word by word from the translation. Last but not least, you can choose Monotheist Group's translation as starting point of your personal translation sun

                                      Peace,
                                      Personal Quran

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Users