Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Who are the people of the book?

Who are the people of the book?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
303 Posts 23 Posters 16.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jonny_k
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    Peace "arnab",
    Heres the evidence that the OT is anything but accurate
    http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_criticism#Old_Testament
    http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_the_Bible#Torah
    LAST BUT NOT LEAST http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tgdQM9MO5s (1st part)
    http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTSjGNEdcPQ&feature=related (2nd part)
    http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pVRavPUz9s (3rd Part)
    Notice in particular GOD supposedly killing every FIRST BORN in Egypt instead of the actual criminals. This cruelty and absurdity is not mentioned in the Quran. In the 3rd part Michael Shermer explains the inaccuracy of the "Gospels" of Jesus. GOD Bless!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Soof
      wrote on last edited by
      #93

      The Quran does say that God sent the Tawrah and the Tawrah is the Torah. However, Torah in Hebrew literally means Law/Instruction. And Israelists (Jews) have been known to use this word even for the Talmud. But what is always meant by it is Mosaic Law/Instruction. And because they believe that those first five books came from Moses as well as the Talmud they will say that these are the Torah. But the Torah is only the teachings found in Moses' actual words in these books. So the Torah can only be found in the quoted words of Moses in these books and none of the other words. Deutoronomy has most of Moses' actual quotes.

      The same is with the Injeel. It is the Gospel but some Biblical trinitarians and unitarians believe that all of the New Testament is an extension of Jesus' teachings so they call it all the Gospel. The 4 accounts of the Gospel are just that accounts of the Gospel. The Gospel, which is the Injeel, is only found in Jesus' actual words (usually found in red in most Bibles discounting Revelations). So Jesus' teachings found in his own words are the Gospel and nothing else.

      The Quran does say that the Gospel and the Torah were revealed and are intact but we need to define these terms and not get caught up in misleading Judeo-Christian doctrine. None of the five books of Moses claim to be from Moses, although some of those books quote him. And none of the books in the New Testament claim to be from Jesus or to be his gospel, but some of them quote him and his gospel. Only the quotes of these two prophets of God (God bless them) should interest us in understanding the Quran's claims. We should also be conscious of alternate meanings in the Greek and Aramaic versions for certain things that are said. For instance in John, Jesus claims to be God's only begotten son or his only son. But both are wrong when we read the whole Bible and see that its books claim many sons of God. The greek word is monogenes and can mean only son OR unique son. But mistaken Christians have and will continue to prefer the obviously incorrect meaning despite what the rest of their books indicate. Jacob in the Old testament is given the name Israel and named the FIRSTBORN of God. Just to give a clear example.

      Godbless,
      Anwar

      Very well put, peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #94

        Salam, Arnab,

        So, Is what I am quoting underneath revealed? If it is revealed, who revealed it to whom?

        Genesis 6 (King James Version)

        King James Version (KJV)
        Public Domain

        "Genesis 6

        1And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,

        2That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

        3And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

        4There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

        5And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

        6And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart."

        Salaam

        This is from the Torah...the Five books of Moses.

        Salam,
        Arnab

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #95

          Peace "arnab",
          JK- OH REALLY? Show me that arch evidence for that.

          Did you forget to read THIS from the SAME PAGE as the link you provided (which I was already familiar with by the way)

          The oldest known preserved fragment of a Torah text is a good luck charm inscribed with a text close to, although not identical with, the Priestly Blessing found in Num 624?27, dated to approximately 600 BC (Dever, p. 180). The oldest complete or nearly complete texts are the Dead Sea Scrolls from the middle of the 2nd century BC to the 1st century AD. The DSS contain almost all the books of the Tanakh, although not all are complete.

          source http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_the_Bible#Oldest_manuscripts

          The Masoretic Text, written in Hebrew, became the standard authorized Hebrew text around 100 AD. It existed prior to the writings of the New Testament, confirmed by the Dead Sea Scrolls as early as 168 B.C., and was used as the official Hebrew Old Testament at the time the biblical canon was established.
          source http//www.allabouttruth.org/oldest-bible-version-faq.htm

          BRITISH MUSEUM MAKES IMPORTANT BREAKTHROUGH IN BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
          Rare cuniform tablet
          source http//www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/ixbin/hix?IXFIRST=4&IXSS=IXFIRST%3d1%26_IXmode%3dgfx_en%26%2524%2528news%2bor%2bexhibition%2529%2bin%2bart_section%2bindex%2btext_wp2%3d%252e%26_IXSESSION_%3drEQJ_SMJtWB%26%257bSIMPLE%257d%257band%257d%2524%253f%253a%2524%3dbritish%2bmuseum%2bbiblical%26%2524sort%2b%2540descending%2bart_publish_date%3d%252e&_IXmode=gfx_en&IXMAXHITS=1&IXSR=aVL74SBjZQw&IXSPFX=search/full_gfx/&IXSESSION=rEQJ_SMJtWB&submit-button=summary

          Isaiah scroll, written by a Judean scribe around 120 B.C.,
          http//www.newsvine.com/_news/2008/05/13/1485989-israel-museum-puts-dead-sea-scroll-on-rare-display

          In 1947, seven ancient scrolls were found in pottery urns in caves in the Judean Desert. The scrolls reached antiquities dealers in Bethlehem, and after many vicissitudes they were gathered in Jerusalem and exhibited at the Shrine of the Book in the Israel Museum. One of the first scrolls to be discovered was a full copy of the Book of Isaiah, which provides important evidence for the text of the Bible that was common in Eretz-Israel at the end of the Second Temple period. In time, more and more fragments of scrolls were discovered, some in caves at Nahal Qumran, some at Masada, and some in other places of the Judean Desert. Scholars believe that the most ancient of these scrolls were written around 250 BCE, whereas the latest ones were written in the early second century CE (after the destruction of the Second Temple and the repression of the Bar-Kokhba Rebellion).
          source http//aleppocodex.org/links/7.html

          The Dead Sea Scrolls date from 250 BCE to 68 CE and are our bridge to a period that laid the foundation of western traditions, beliefs and practices throughout the past two millennia.
          source http//www.naturalsciences.org/wnew/2008-02-19_deadseascrolls.html

          There is your Archeological evidence. They PRE DATE both Muhammad and Isa.

          jonny_k I'm surprised you even believe in the Quran. Have you read all the people who claim that it is not authentic and that it has been tampered with etc etc? I could post pages of links where people claim they can prove the Quran is a fraud.

          The fact is you are either min al muminoon or min al kafiroon.

          Why don't you go read about that for a while.

          Salam,
          Arnab

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Offline
            H Offline
            huruf
            wrote on last edited by
            #96

            This is from the Torah...the Five books of Moses.

            Salam,
            Arnab

            Salaam, Arnab
            Yes, following your previous posts as far as that I can get. But this particularl extract according to your consideration is it revealed? If so by who to whom?

            Salaam

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #97

              Peace "arnab",

              JK- You yourself indirectly agreed that GOD did allow/suggest/command the death penlaty for apostates/blasphemers once. This is enough to know that it cannot be the true Word of GOD. If such were to be the commands/suggestions/laws of GOD then the hadith can also be the inspirations of GOD. The CONTENT plays a VITAL ROLE in deciding whether some scripture is the Word of GOD or not as well. A Book of GOD cannot contain statements which defy all logic and common sense and/or independent verified observations.

              There are many different adultery related crimes and the punishment is usually muwt ta-muwt and sometimes stoning is specified (as in Deut 2223-24)

              Muwt ta-muwt is used often in the Torah?.it is used after many transgressions as a punishment.

              Adam was told he would mout-ta-mout on the day that he ate of the tree in the garden and he did not die until hundreds of years later.(Genesis 217).

              Often times the concept of death is turning away from God by transgressing or sinning. Whereas turning back to God and asking for forgiveness, correcting ones ways etc is metaphorically called ?life.?

              Eze 1831 Cast away from you all your transgressions, wherein ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
              Eze 1832 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD; wherefore turn yourselves, and live.

              Psa 11516 The heavens are the heavens of the LORD; but the earth hath He given to the children of men.

              Psa 11517 The dead praise not the LORD, neither any that go down into silence;

              Psa 64 (65) Return, O LORD, deliver my soul; save me for Thy mercy's sake.

              Psa 65 (66) For in death there is no remembrance of Thee; in the nether-world who will give Thee thanks?

              Life is connected with the keeping of God?s law and appoints death for the transgression of it

              Lev 185 Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments which if a man do, he shall live in them I am the LORD.

              Deu 3019 I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live

              Deu 3020 That thou mayest love the LORD thy God, and that thou mayest obey his voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto him for he is thy life, and the length of thy days that thou mayest dwell in the land which the LORD swore unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.

              Deu 83 And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.

              Muwt/death is used in as many ways in the Bible as it is used in the Quran. Death can be the death of the body, or spiritual death of being removed from God.

              The harsh punishment of physical death (muwt ta-muwt) for adultery or other crimes in the OT was a physical punishment that beni Isreal could enforce, but only after a judicial process.

              The punishment could be carried out if they took the matter before one of their judges and were found guilty of the crime.

              There was a process of

              1. accusing someone,
              2. going before a judge (who heard both sides of the stories),
              3. presenting witnesses
              4. the judge issuing a sentence
              5. and the punishment being carried out,

              This is much like many judicial systems today.

              One could not just arbitrarily start throwing stones at someone based on a suspected crime. LOL

              What many forget is that There are chapters and verses on sin offerings and atonement sacrafices that could be made after someone sinned. And then the sin was forgiven and the person could go on with life.

              This happened many times with the WHOLE COMMUNITY of beni Isreal. Where Aaron made atonement for their sins (where by full extent of the laws given they could have ALL been stoned to death).

              So when people who are unfamiliar with the Torah and pick out a verse without understanding the Torah they become very distressed (like some of our friends here on free-minds). Because they do not understand the system.

              The Torah is not written like the Quran. The Quran is more poetically written (like psalms) gives a few verses on a subject and moves on. The Torah has chapters and verses dedicated to a subject and reads like a modern day book. You have to read it from the beginning to end to understand what is going on.

              It?s also a book of laws. If one looks at a modern day law book one will see that it is written much the same way as the laws in Leviticus. Yet most judges understand that the punishment is the extreme point that they can go to. Same was true in the Torah.

              In fact, there are even laws that read?and if the people do not kill him?.God will set his face against the man and cut him off?.etc etc. (This is not the only verse like this). God was always telling the Isrealites that they should fear him and not the people. And to turn to him and walk in his ways and he would forgive them their inequities.

              Lev 201 And the LORD spoke unto Moses, saying,

              Lev 202 Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death the people of the land shall stone him with stones.

              Lev 203 And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name.

              Lev 204 And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not

              Lev 205 Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people.

              As for the punishment of adultery In the Injeel

              Joh 84 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.

              Joh 85 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned but what sayest thou?

              Joh 86 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.

              Joh 87 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

              Joh 88 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

              Joh 89 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

              Joh 810 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?

              Joh 811 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee go, and sin no more.

              Mat 527 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery

              Mat 528 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

              Mat 529 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

              Mat 530 And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

              Mat 531 It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement

              Mat 532 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

              Isa urged the Isrealites not to be so quick to issue a judgement that was to an extreme. And also urged the people not to be so quick to commit the crime. His admonishment was to both the judges and the transgressors.

              Jesus went back to ORIGINAL TORAH and urged transgressors to ADMIT their sins?.ask forgiveness?.and go give the sin offering?.thanking God for his mercy?..INSTEAD of issuing the Punishment that was allowable (not demanded by God but allowed by God).

              IF the person went through the repentence/atonement process they could not be punished because they were FORGIVEN.

              The judges were not observing the Torah laws because they automatically resorted to violence instead of mercy and not giving the people the option for repentence and the like.

              The Quran that tells us that we don?t HAVE to judge (as Isa said judge not lest ye be judged).

              The Quran says IF you judge?..judge between them with equity. We can forego judgement and that is better. Because man can only see what is apparent but God sees what is without and within?.therefore man can be deceived and wrong in his judgement?.and man could punish another unfairly (due to not knowing all the facts)

              (They are) listeners of a lie, devourers of what is forbidden; therefore if they come to you, judge between them or turn aside from them, and if you turn aside from them, they shall not harm you in any way; and if you judge, judge between them with equity; surely Allah loves those who judge equitably.

              JK- Actually i dont beleive that the scripture has been distorted AND THIS IS YOUR FALLACY OF UNDERSTANDING ME. I just say that JUST BECAUSE CERTAIN RELIGIOUS GROUPS NAME THEIR BOOKS TORAH, INJEEL, ETC DOESNT MEAN THAT THEY REALLY ARE. Get it?

              You are wrong. Full stop.

              (but of course you would rather argue with me....someone who KNOWS rather than use your BRAIN and discover I am right....LOL)

              There is carbon dating and discoveries of texts that pre-date both Muhammad and Isa and are the same texts that we have with us today. This is scientific evidence.

              Like I said before, your either min al muminoon aw min al kafiroon.

              Salam,
              Arnab

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                jonny_k
                wrote on last edited by
                #98

                Peace "arnab",

                Did you forget to read THIS from the SAME PAGE as the link you provided (which I was already familiar with by the way)

                The oldest known preserved fragment of a Torah text is a good luck charm inscribed with a text close to, although not identical with, the Priestly Blessing found in Num 624?27, dated to approximately 600 BC (Dever, p. 180). The oldest complete or nearly complete texts are the Dead Sea Scrolls from the middle of the 2nd century BC to the 1st century AD. The DSS contain almost all the books of the Tanakh, although not all are complete.

                source http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_the_Bible#Oldest_manuscripts

                The Masoretic Text, written in Hebrew, became the standard authorized Hebrew text around 100 AD. It existed prior to the writings of the New Testament, confirmed by the Dead Sea Scrolls as early as 168 B.C., and was used as the official Hebrew Old Testament at the time the biblical canon was established.
                source http//www.allabouttruth.org/oldest-bible-version-faq.htm

                BRITISH MUSEUM MAKES IMPORTANT BREAKTHROUGH IN BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
                Rare cuniform tablet
                source http//www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/ixbin/hix?IXFIRST=4&IXSS=IXFIRST%3d1%26_IXmode%3dgfx_en%26%2524%2528news%2bor%2bexhibition%2529%2bin%2bart_section%2bindex%2btext_wp2%3d%252e%26_IXSESSION_%3drEQJ_SMJtWB%26%257bSIMPLE%257d%257band%257d%2524%253f%253a%2524%3dbritish%2bmuseum%2bbiblical%26%2524sort%2b%2540descending%2bart_publish_date%3d%252e&_IXmode=gfx_en&IXMAXHITS=1&IXSR=aVL74SBjZQw&IXSPFX=search/full_gfx/&IXSESSION=rEQJ_SMJtWB&submit-button=summary

                Isaiah scroll, written by a Judean scribe around 120 B.C.,
                http//www.newsvine.com/_news/2008/05/13/1485989-israel-museum-puts-dead-sea-scroll-on-rare-display

                In 1947, seven ancient scrolls were found in pottery urns in caves in the Judean Desert. The scrolls reached antiquities dealers in Bethlehem, and after many vicissitudes they were gathered in Jerusalem and exhibited at the Shrine of the Book in the Israel Museum. One of the first scrolls to be discovered was a full copy of the Book of Isaiah, which provides important evidence for the text of the Bible that was common in Eretz-Israel at the end of the Second Temple period. In time, more and more fragments of scrolls were discovered, some in caves at Nahal Qumran, some at Masada, and some in other places of the Judean Desert. Scholars believe that the most ancient of these scrolls were written around 250 BCE, whereas the latest ones were written in the early second century CE (after the destruction of the Second Temple and the repression of the Bar-Kokhba Rebellion).
                source http//aleppocodex.org/links/7.html

                The Dead Sea Scrolls date from 250 BCE to 68 CE and are our bridge to a period that laid the foundation of western traditions, beliefs and practices throughout the past two millennia.
                source http//www.naturalsciences.org/wnew/2008-02-19_deadseascrolls.html

                There is your Archeological evidence. They PRE DATE both Muhammad and Isa.

                jonny_k I'm surprised you even believe in the Quran. Have you read all the people who claim that it is not authentic and that it has been tampered with etc etc? I could post pages of links where people claim they can prove the Quran is a fraud.

                The fact is you are either min al muminoon or min al kafiroon.

                Why don't you go read about that for a while.

                Salam,
                Arnab

                JK- 1st just because they predate both Isa and Muhammad does not mean theyre linked to Moses WHOSE VERY EXISTENCE YET REMAINS TO BE PROVEN. 2ndly the DSS are not exactly similar to the masocretic Hebrew manuscripts
                http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_scrolls#Significance
                "Although a few of the biblical manuscripts found at Qumran differ significantly from the Masoretic text, most do not."
                So there goes the argument of preservation of these manuscripts. As i said the only reasonable way for GOD to protect a scripture is via a numerical structure and in regards to the Bible ive only seen Gen 11 and John 11 exhibiting a signficant enough pattern to be from GOD
                http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=13465.0
                Last but not least i admit that even the entire Quran has NOT been revealed to us as yet. To claim it has would be living in denial. GOD Bless!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jonny_k
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #99

                  Peace "arnab",

                  There are many different adultery related crimes and the punishment is usually muwt ta-muwt and sometimes stoning is specified (as in Deut 2223-24)

                  JK- WELL thats it! The very specification of stoning allegedly by GOD makes it impossible for the scripture to be from Him. GOD does not prescribe a punishment which is entirely unjust and illogical or do you say adultery is ever a greater crime than murder ore even rape? BUT that is not all. GOD in the OT also allegedly prescribes stoning/burning to death FOR APOSTATES/BLASPHEMERS and it is impossible to justify this as ive explained.

                  Muwt ta-muwt is used often in the Torah?.it is used after many transgressions as a punishment.

                  Adam was told he would mout-ta-mout on the day that he ate of the tree in the garden and he did not die until hundreds of years later.(Genesis 217).

                  Often times the concept of death is turning away from God by transgressing or sinning. Whereas turning back to God and asking for forgiveness, correcting ones ways etc is metaphorically called ?life.?

                  JK- In case of stoning the prescription is clear and does not refer to allegorical death and that is enough to prove this document is not from GOD.

                  The harsh punishment of physical death (muwt ta-muwt) for adultery or other crimes in the OT was a physical punishment that beni Isreal could enforce, but only after a judicial process.

                  JK- This is exactly what im disputing. GOD would never prescribe such penalties for ANY NATION on the planet. Rather hHe would send a message abolishing such vile man made laws. And your forgetting the worse law of stoning/burning blasphemers.

                  The punishment could be carried out if they took the matter before one of their judges and were found guilty of the crime.

                  There was a process of

                  1. accusing someone,
                  2. going before a judge (who heard both sides of the stories),
                  3. presenting witnesses
                  4. the judge issuing a sentence
                  5. and the punishment being carried out,

                  This is much like many judicial systems today.

                  One could not just arbitrarily start throwing stones at someone based on a suspected crime. LOL

                  JK- You dont need to mention court procedures. Even "muslims" have court procedures and shariah doesnt allow just arbitrary stoning. THE VERY PUNISHMENT IS UNACEPTABLE. Thats the point you ned to get INTO YOUR HEAD.

                  What many forget is that There are chapters and verses on sin offerings and atonement sacrafices that could be made after someone sinned. And then the sin was forgiven and the person could go on with life.

                  This happened many times with the WHOLE COMMUNITY of beni Isreal. Where Aaron made atonement for their sins (where by full extent of the laws given they could have ALL been stoned to death).

                  So when people who are unfamiliar with the Torah and pick out a verse without understanding the Torah they become very distressed (like some of our friends here on free-minds). Because they do not understand the system.

                  The Torah is not written like the Quran. The Quran is more poetically written (like psalms) gives a few verses on a subject and moves on. The Torah has chapters and verses dedicated to a subject and reads like a modern day book. You have to read it from the beginning to end to understand what is going on.

                  JK- As i said the very fact that the OT even allows or suggests such a punishment is enough to say that it is not Divinely inspired.

                  It?s also a book of laws. If one looks at a modern day law book one will see that it is written much the same way as the laws in Leviticus. Yet most judges understand that the punishment is the extreme point that they can go to. Same was true in the Torah.

                  JK- You dont need to educate me on all this since im very well aware of this and your not getting my point. Do we see in any modern law book, except shariah which is considered outdated and barabric, a punishment of stoning/burning for aduleters or worse yet blasphemy or apostasy? Such punishments MUST NOT EVEN EXIST IN DIVINE LAW ESPECIALLY NOT FOR SOMETHING AS RELATIVE AS BLASPHEMY. Get this now?

                  In fact, there are even laws that read?and if the people do not kill him?.God will set his face against the man and cut him off?.etc etc. (This is not the only verse like this). God was always telling the Isrealites that they should fear him and not the people. And to turn to him and walk in his ways and he would forgive them their inequities.

                  JK- YET the OT suggests a law for killing/stoning blasphemers/apostates. As i said the very suggestion of these is enough to prove the sccripture NOT divine for such LAWS ARE NEVER RIGHT NEVER!

                  As for the punishment of adultery In the Injeel

                  Isa urged the Isrealites not to be so quick to issue a judgement that was to an extreme. And also urged the people not to be so quick to commit the crime. His admonishment was to both the judges and the transgressors.

                  Jesus went back to ORIGINAL TORAH and urged transgressors to ADMIT their sins?.ask forgiveness?.and go give the sin offering?.thanking God for his mercy?..INSTEAD of issuing the Punishment that was allowable (not demanded by God but allowed by God).

                  IF the person went through the repentence/atonement process they could not be punished because they were FORGIVEN.

                  JK- Again i said the very existence of the law of stoning is enough to prove the scripture undivine. 2ndly the so called gospels of Jesus are very inconsistent and have been written years after Jesus. This is INDISPUTABLE amongst the scientific community and has been discussed in the 3rd part of the video above by Michael Schermer.

                  The judges were not observing the Torah laws because they automatically resorted to violence instead of mercy and not giving the people the option for repentence and the like.

                  The Quran that tells us that we don?t HAVE to judge (as Isa said judge not lest ye be judged).

                  The Quran says IF you judge?..judge between them with equity. We can forego judgement and that is better. Because man can only see what is apparent but God sees what is without and within?.therefore man can be deceived and wrong in his judgement?.and man could punish another unfairly (due to not knowing all the facts)

                  JK- The Quran NEVER states any law or so much as a suggestion from GOD that apostates should be killed. If it did i would never have accepted it as the Word of GOD as ive explained to you many times now.

                  You are wrong. Full stop.

                  (but of course you would rather argue with me....someone who KNOWS rather than use your BRAIN and discover I am right....LOL)

                  There is carbon dating and discoveries of texts that pre-date both Muhammad and Isa and are the same texts that we have with us today. This is scientific evidence.

                  JK- As i mentioned earlier just because manuscripts are older than Isa and Muhammad does not mean they belong to the person who is claimed to have originally received them i.e. Moses in this case. There is NO arch evidence for the very existence of Moses till today so how can you say those are the original manuscripts? Yes part of those scriptures maybe correct and the Jews and Christians were asked to realize Muhammad saying the truth via that small truthful part which the people of the book still possessed. that was enough for them at that time because they knew Muhammad could not possibly have known even that.

                  Like I said before, your either min al muminoon aw min al kafiroon.

                  Salam,
                  Arnab

                  JK- Another black and white classification of yours. There are many shades of grey and many levels of kufr and imaan. GOD Bless!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #100

                    Peace "arnab",

                    JK- 1st just because they predate both Isa and Muhammad does not mean theyre linked to Moses WHOSE VERY EXISTENCE YET REMAINS TO BE PROVEN.

                    So, you don't even believe in the Quran verses on Moses??

                    If you don't believe that he exists then what about THE HUGE number of verses in the Quran regarding MOSES?

                    2ndly the DSS are not exactly similar to the masocretic Hebrew manuscripts
                    http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_scrolls#Significance
                    "Although a few of the biblical manuscripts found at Qumran differ significantly from the Masoretic text, most do not."

                    Yes, there are books in the Dead Sea Scrolls that we were not previously aware of.

                    As i said the only reasonable way for GOD to protect a scripture is via a numerical structure and in regards to the Bible ive only seen Gen 11 and John 11 exhibiting a signficant enough pattern to be from GOD
                    http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=13465.0
                    Last but not least i admit that even the entire Quran has NOT been revealed to us as yet. To claim it has would be living in denial. GOD Bless!

                    rotfl

                    You should read what I wrote here http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=16727.0 ;D

                    Salam,
                    Arnab

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Joe_Betik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #101

                      salaam,

                      it depends on what you understand about 'kitab'.

                      'kitab' is (s) piece of writing, record, paper; letter, note, message; document, deed; contract (esp. in marriage); book.

                      my personal comprehension on 'kitab' is message'. thus, 'ahl al-kitab' in my comprehension is 'those given the message'.

                      interesting question
                      in what form was al-qur'an revealed to prophet muhammad? or those messages revealed to other prophets? for a clue, read the earlier surah (by revelation order). there are verses that indicate that the humans would like, or prefer to receive messages in printed sheets.

                      peace

                      jb

                      Salaam,

                      Tradionally we understood that this refers to jews and Christains but then it should have said "People of the books"
                      My question is, without referring to hadiths; who are people of the book?

                      peace
                      farida

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Offline
                        J Offline
                        jonny_k
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #102

                        Peace "arnab",

                        So, you don't even believe in the Quran verses on Moses??

                        If you don't believe that he exists then what about THE HUGE number of verses in the Quran regarding MOSES?

                        JK- Those quranic verses as i said ARE NUMERICALLY CONNECTED to other verses which shows that they belong to the Quran. Without this i wouldnt know whether those verses are Quranic or not. This is what ive been trying to explain to you before but you dont seem to get it. Besides this none of verses which even you accept as Quran contain any sort of illogical and absurd laws/suggestions/prescriptions as the OT Bible and the list of injustice in the OT is VERY LONG. Here http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9596928.msg174946#msg174946

                        Yes, there are books in the Dead Sea Scrolls that we were not previously aware of.

                        rotfl

                        You should read what I wrote here http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=16727.0 ;D

                        Salam,
                        Arnab

                        JK- Not only that but there are DISCREPANCIES with the masocretic manuscripts. The manuscripts which supposedly contain the Quran also contain differences even if not that much but i say if GOD says He'll protect a scripture Hed do it down tot he minimum possible which is the LETTER. GOD Bless!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #103

                          Peace "arnab",

                          JK- WELL thats it! The very specification of stoning allegedly by GOD makes it impossible for the scripture to be from Him. GOD does not prescribe a punishment which is entirely unjust and illogical or do you say adultery is ever a greater crime than murder ore even rape? BUT that is not all. GOD in the OT also allegedly prescribes stoning/burning to death FOR APOSTATES/BLASPHEMERS and it is impossible to justify this as ive explained.

                          JK- In case of stoning the prescription is clear and does not refer to allegorical death and that is enough to prove this document is not from GOD.

                          JK- This is exactly what im disputing. GOD would never prescribe such penalties for ANY NATION on the planet. Rather hHe would send a message abolishing such vile man made laws. And your forgetting the worse law of stoning/burning blasphemers.

                          JK- You dont need to mention court procedures. Even "muslims" have court procedures and shariah doesnt allow just arbitrary stoning. THE VERY PUNISHMENT IS UNACEPTABLE. Thats the point you ned to get INTO YOUR HEAD.

                          JK- As i said the very fact that the OT even allows or suggests such a punishment is enough to say that it is not Divinely inspired.

                          JK- You dont need to educate me on all this since im very well aware of this and your not getting my point. Do we see in any modern law book, except shariah which is considered outdated and barabric, a punishment of stoning/burning for aduleters or worse yet blasphemy or apostasy? Such punishments MUST NOT EVEN EXIST IN DIVINE LAW ESPECIALLY NOT FOR SOMETHING AS RELATIVE AS BLASPHEMY. Get this now?

                          JK- YET the OT suggests a law for killing/stoning blasphemers/apostates. As i said the very suggestion of these is enough to prove the sccripture NOT divine for such LAWS ARE NEVER RIGHT NEVER!

                          JK- Again i said the very existence of the law of stoning is enough to prove the scripture undivine. 2ndly the so called gospels of Jesus are very inconsistent and have been written years after Jesus. This is INDISPUTABLE amongst the scientific community and has been discussed in the 3rd part of the video above by Michael Schermer.

                          JK- The Quran NEVER states any law or so much as a suggestion from GOD that apostates should be killed. If it did i would never have accepted it as the Word of GOD as ive explained to you many times now.

                          JK- As i mentioned earlier just because manuscripts are older than Isa and Muhammad does not mean they belong to the person who is claimed to have originally received them i.e. Moses in this case. There is NO arch evidence for the very existence of Moses till today so how can you say those are the original manuscripts? Yes part of those scriptures maybe correct and the Jews and Christians were asked to realize Muhammad saying the truth via that small truthful part which the people of the book still possessed. that was enough for them at that time because they knew Muhammad could not possibly have known even that.

                          JK- Another black and white classification of yours. There are many shades of grey and many levels of kufr and imaan. GOD Bless!

                          Ok, you don't believe...you've said that multiple times in this ONE post....is there anything NEW that you would like to add?

                          2171

                          The example of such disbelievers is that of

                          parrots who repeat what they hear of sounds and calls,

                          without understanding.

                          Deaf, dumb, and blind; they cannot understand.

                          Salam,
                          Arnab

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Offline
                            J Offline
                            jonny_k
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #104

                            Peace "arnab",

                            Ok, you don't believe...you've said that multiple times in this ONE post....is there anything NEW that you would like to add?

                            2171

                            The example of such disbelievers is that of

                            parrots who repeat what they hear of sounds and calls,

                            without understanding.

                            Deaf, dumb, and blind; they cannot understand.

                            Salam,
                            Arnab

                            JK- I think im anything than deaf , dumb and blind and neither are the scientific minded people whove lead us out of the dark ages where exactly the suggestions/laws of the OT Bible were applicable. You need a serious reality check. I dont just beleive anything is from GOD just because it says so. I use my GOD given senses and anlyse everything carefully and I do believe that the Quran is the Word of GOD and so are the Torah, Psalms and Injeel non of which have been fully revealed to us yet though and i also beleive ALL OF THEM are NUMERICALLY STRUCTURED and that will be the only way theyd be revealed to us fully GW. GOD Bless!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Ahmad_Bilal
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #105

                              I use my GOD given senses and anlyse everything carefully and I do believe that the Quran is the Word of GOD and so are the Torah, Psalms and Injeel non of which have been fully revealed to us yet though and i also beleive ALL OF THEM are NUMERICALLY STRUCTURED and that will be the only way theyd be revealed to us fully GW. GOD Bless!

                              Al-Qur'an teaches us that these books are inspired. However, it places specific emphasis on them, telling us to believe in them - this wouldn't be possible if they weren't revealed to us in entirety. You can't believe in books you've never seen, especially if you think they haven't even been revealed entirely, so obviously, these divinely-inspired books must be somewhere within our grasp, so we can study, understand, and believe in them alongside al-Qur'an... Plus, there is nowhere (that I've seen at least) in al-Qur'an that says that any one of these other books is numerically structured - that is an assumption, but it is not verified anywhere in the Scriptures...

                              Peace.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Offline
                                J Offline
                                jonny_k
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #106

                                Peace "ahmad bilal",

                                Al-Qur'an teaches us that these books are inspired. However, it places specific emphasis on them, telling us to believe in them - this wouldn't be possible if they weren't revealed to us in entirety. You can't believe in books you've never seen, especially if you think they haven't even been revealed entirely, so obviously, these divinely-inspired books must be somewhere within our grasp, so we can study, understand, and believe in them alongside al-Qur'an... Plus, there is nowhere (that I've seen at least) in al-Qur'an that says that any one of these other books is numerically structured - that is an assumption, but it is not verified anywhere in the Scriptures...

                                JK- NO they do not need to be immediately in our grasp. Ill give you an example why this argument is false. Consider the people who cant read or write? How can they even have access to the Quran? How about those people who dont know classical Arabic? They still need time to get access to the Quranic message dont they? How about the difference between hafs and warsh manuscripts and readings? We needed time to figure out which is the true Quran. Besides this there are many statements in the Quran like "7 heavens" etc which we dont yet understand. Thus it is enough if we see part of a book to beleive that theyr from GOD if theres enough evidence to support this. In regards to the numerical stucture that is BASED ON OBSERVATIONAL evidence applied on the scriptures as is the case with so many other things in science. Check out my link on the numerical structure of gen 11 and john 11 and itll be self evident to you that this is not a coincidental pattern
                                http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=13465.0
                                GOD Bless!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #107

                                  Al-Qur'an teaches us that these books are inspired. However, it places specific emphasis on them, telling us to believe in them - this wouldn't be possible if they weren't revealed to us in entirety. You can't believe in books you've never seen, especially if you think they haven't even been revealed entirely, so obviously, these divinely-inspired books must be somewhere within our grasp, so we can study, understand, and believe in them alongside al-Qur'an...

                                  Salam,

                                  Well said. peace

                                  Plus, there is nowhere (that I've seen at least) in al-Qur'an that says that any one of these other books is numerically structured - that is an assumption, but it is not verified anywhere in the Scriptures...

                                  The numerical code is a fabrication revolving around mathematical apophenia.

                                  Salam,
                                  Arnab

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    unknownuser
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #108

                                    Salam, Arnab,

                                    So, Is what I am quoting underneath revealed? If it is revealed, who revealed it to whom?

                                    Genesis 6 (King James Version)

                                    King James Version (KJV)
                                    Public Domain

                                    "Genesis 6

                                    1And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,

                                    2That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

                                    3And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

                                    4There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

                                    5And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

                                    6And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart."

                                    Salaam

                                    Salam Huruf,

                                    It was revealed to Moses.

                                    We know that there was an oral tradition that was passed down through out the generations before Moses.
                                    We know that for generations God's laws were observed by some including Abraham.
                                    We know that Abraham was a muslim, upright and an example for all generations.
                                    This was before the Torah was written down.

                                    So the question is did Moses recieve this previous revelation (history that happened before he was born)

                                    because it was revelation given to Abraham or Noah or another prophet from God and Moses recieved it via oral tradition?

                                    or was it revelation direct from God at the time of the Torah?

                                    I don't know the answer to that.

                                    Salam,
                                    Arnab

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      belH
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #109

                                      Peace "arnab",

                                      GOD does not prescribe a punishment which is entirely unjust and illogical or do you say adultery is ever a greater crime than murder ore even rape? BUT that is not all. GOD in the OT also allegedly prescribes stoning/burning to death FOR APOSTATES/BLASPHEMERS and it is impossible to justify this as ive explained.

                                      Moses said, in the Quran, that God prescribed death for Israiles Blasphemers

                                      (&#65279
                                      And Moses said to his people "O my people! Verily, you have wronged yourselves by worshipping the calf. So turn in repentance to your Creator and kill yourselves, that will be better for you with your Creator." Then He accepted your repentance. Truly, He is the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful. (2-54)

                                      JK!! Please Think before answering, PLEASE pr

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Ahmad_Bilal
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #110

                                        Moses said, in the Quran, that God prescribed death for Israiles Blasphemers

                                        (&#65279
                                        And Moses said to his people "O my people! Verily, you have wronged yourselves by worshipping the calf. So turn in repentance to your Creator and kill yourselves, that will be better for you with your Creator." Then He accepted your repentance. Truly, He is the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful. (2-54)

                                        JK!! Please Think before answering, PLEASE pr

                                        Peace belalhammad, and everyone.

                                        The focus of this Scripture tells exactly what the context is. It says

                                        "And Moses said to his people 'O my people! Verily, you have wronged yourselves by worshipping the calf. So turn in repentance to your Creator and kill yourselves, that will be better for you with your Creator.'"

                                        According to this text, Mousa was saying that the Israelites would be demonstrating their repentence by 'killing themselves', and this would lead to their being forgiven by God. However, after that, it says

                                        "Then He accepted your repentance. Truly, He is the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful."

                                        Now, in that Scripture, it doesn't say anything about them literally killing themselves and being raised up again as a sign of God's mercy - it simply says that they were forgiven, and God accepted their repentence. This implies that God wasn't speaking of them LITERALLY killing themselves, physically committing suicide. He was speaking of them killing their "egos" and their "pride", which is literally a form of repentence. We aren't instructed by God to actually kill ourselves - suicide is condemned in al-Qur'an...

                                        Peace.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Soof
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #111

                                          Peace belalhammad, and everyone.

                                          The focus of this Scripture tells exactly what the context is. It says

                                          "And Moses said to his people 'O my people! Verily, you have wronged yourselves by worshipping the calf. So turn in repentance to your Creator and kill yourselves, that will be better for you with your Creator.'"

                                          According to this text, Mousa was saying that the Israelites would be demonstrating their repentence by 'killing themselves', and this would lead to their being forgiven by God. However, after that, it says

                                          "Then He accepted your repentance. Truly, He is the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful."

                                          Now, in that Scripture, it doesn't say anything about them literally killing themselves and being raised up again as a sign of God's mercy - it simply says that they were forgiven, and God accepted their repentence. This implies that God wasn't speaking of them LITERALLY killing themselves, physically committing suicide. He was speaking of them killing their "egos" and their "pride", which is literally a form of repentence. We aren't instructed by God to actually kill ourselves - suicide is condemned in al-Qur'an...

                                          Peace.

                                          exactly right peace

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users