Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Community Needs
  3. Islamic Calendar & Ramadhan.
  4. Hot/"ramadan" Answer

Hot/"ramadan" Answer

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Islamic Calendar & Ramadhan.
2.6k Posts 145 Posters 394.9k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    farida
    wrote on last edited by
    #130

    Peace Farida,

    The god clearly said in 2185 that fasting is for "whoever witnesses from amongst you". So a blind person would be exempt from fasting. Now they can still fast if they wanted to but they don't have to. If you or I don't witness the "shahr" because we were locked in a room or whatever then we are exempt from fasting too. Does this mean that I am discriminating against us? But again we can fast anyway if we wanted to. It is just not compulsory.

    In fact, if you didn't witness the scorching full moon last July then you are exempt from fasting. What you and others such as Belal are doing right now is instead fasting a completely random lunar month. You can do this if you want but don't claim that the god ordered you to fast what is in fact a completely random month without any authority from him.

    Peace,

    Ayman

    Salaam Ayman,

    So in your opinion a blind person is not allowed to give witness?

    This sounds similar to the case of ?Blind Justice in The Land Of Pure? where ex-president of Pakistan Zia ul Haqq under ?hudood law? locked away a blind girl for fornication.
    I can only recall from a extract of a novel ?A case of exploding mangoes? about this true case. I believe death by stoning was passed to punish this girl named Zainab who was actually raped. Since she was required to recognise all five culprits in the court, but her testimony was not acceptable as she was not able to witness the act or the person in who committed this horrible crime.

    peace

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      afridi220
      wrote on last edited by
      #131

      Salaam Ayman,

      So in your opinion a blind person is not allowed to give witness?

      This sounds similar to the case of ?Blind Justice in The Land Of Pure? where ex-president of Pakistan Zia ul Haqq under ?hudood law? locked away a blind girl for fornication.
      I can only recall from a extract of a novel ?A case of exploding mangoes? about this true case. I believe death by stoning was passed to punish this girl named Zainab who was actually raped. Since she was required to recognise all five culprits in the court, but her testimony was not acceptable as she was not able to witness the act or the person in who committed this horrible crime.

      peace

      Peace Farida

      Be aware of another blind person Qazi Husain Ahmed he is still mourning hadood law. (

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        farida
        wrote on last edited by
        #132

        Peace Farida

        Be aware of another blind person Qazi Husain Ahmed he is still mourning hadood law.

        Salaam Afridi

        I am not aware of that one, but do send a link or details, even of this case of Zainab I remembered from this novel and I am waiting to see how much rigid interpratation of Quran will result in yet more discrimination.
        peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          ayman
          wrote on last edited by
          #133

          Peace Prissy,

          I think it is not "whoever witnesses" but "whoever was present" (note the verse is in past tense).

          Yes thank you for correcting me. The verb is in the past tense. So it is better translated as "whoever amongst you witnessed". However, I disagree that it simply means "was present". One can be present during an event but not witness it. Also, The passage clearly says "whoever amongst you witnessed". This means that there are some "amongst you" who would witness and others would not. Since all are present, being present is not enough.

          Also, please remember that the passage clearly said "whoever witnessed" not "whoever was told by someone who witnessed".

          Even if the English word used is 'witness', it does not necessarily mean "by sight" only.

          I agree. How one witnesses is dependent on what is witnessed. There is nothing to witness about a "month". For example, there is nothing to witness about December. It is simply the arbitrary period that some people agreed upon would be called December. Similarly, there is nothing to witness about Shaaban. It is simply the arbitrary period that some people agreed upon to be called Shaaban. On the other hand, one can witness cosmic phenomenon with his or her eyes or witness a musical recitation with his or her ears.

          Blind, deaf and dumb are all subjected to fasting and the exception eased on the sickly, travelers and the destitute provided they complete the favor in due course.

          No, even 100% healthy people are not obligated to fast if they can't witness. Thus, people amongst us here who don't even know what "shahr ramadan" means let alone how to witness it, would be exempted from fasting.

          The question begs where in the Quran is the clear command that prohibits from eating and drinking? The word 'fasting' itself is undefined.

          The Arabic word "swm" simply means "abstaining from something". However, 2187 specifcally tells us that we can have sexual activity and eat and drink only during the night of the fast.

          Peace,

          Ayman

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            ayman
            wrote on last edited by
            #134

            Peace Farida,

            So in your opinion a blind person is not allowed to give witness?

            No. It depends on what they are witnessing. If they are witnessing that they heard a certain sound then of course they can witness. This would be the same situation if you or I were blind folded by a thief while we were asleep and he or she robbed us. We can't witness that we saw him or her but if he spoke then we can witness that we heard his voice. See my response above to Prissy for more info.

            This sounds similar to the case of ?Blind Justice in The Land Of Pure? where ex-president of Pakistan Zia ul Haqq under ?hudood law? locked away a blind girl for fornication. I can only recall from a extract of a novel ?A case of exploding mangoes? about this true case. I believe death by stoning was passed to punish this girl named Zainab who was actually raped. Since she was required to recognise all five culprits in the court, but her testimony was not acceptable as she was not able to witness the act or the person in who committed this horrible crime.

            I don't know the details of this case but certainly even if she was not raped and fornicated on purpose, she shouldn't be punished in any way. Unlike "zina" (pornography), fornication is a private matter.

            It doesn't matter if a blind girl was raped by five men or a blind man was raped by five girls. Either way if he or she can't identify the attackers then she is not a witness because what if he or she identify the wrong people. In this case some other witness must be used such as a chemist who can analyse DNA samples. So again, it depends on what is being witnessed as I mentioned above to Prissy. Back to 2185, witnessing is not just by sight but the person THEMSELVES must witness and not be told by someone who was told by some other guy, etc. This is why the passage says "whoever amongst you witnessed". Implied in this is that some amongst you would not witness this cosmic phenomenon but fasting is only obligated on those who did.

            Peace,

            Ayman

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Samia
              wrote on last edited by
              #135

              Salaam Ayman, all

              Does the verse say (only during the night)?
              If we drink and eat during the night, it means that we will have to sleep during the day. Doesn't this contradict the definiton of night and day in the qur'aan vis-vis living and sleeping (7811 and other verses)?

              Question 2 What is meant in the verse (2184) by "and for those who can afford it to feed a poor"?

              Question 3 2185 "...and whoever is ill or travelling, then a count of other days. God intends for you ease and He dos not want to make things difficult for you, and to complete the count..." Which count to complete?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                farida
                wrote on last edited by
                #136

                Peace Farida,

                No. It depends on what they are witnessing. If they are witnessing that they heard a certain sound then of course they can witness. This would be the same situation if you or I were blind folded by a thief while we were asleep and he or she robbed us. We can't witness that we saw him or her but if he spoke then we can witness that we heard his voice. See my response above to Prissy for more info.

                I don't know the details of this case but certainly even if she was not raped and fornicated on purpose, she shouldn't be punished in any way. Unlike "zina" (pornography), fornication is a private matter.

                It doesn't matter if a blind girl was raped by five men or a blind man was raped by five girls. Either way if he or she can't identify the attackers then she is not a witness because what if he or she identify the wrong people. In this case some other witness must be used such as a chemist who can analyse DNA samples. So again, it depends on what is being witnessed as I mentioned above to Prissy. Back to 2185, witnessing is not just by sight but the person THEMSELVES must witness and not be told by someone who was told by some other guy, etc. This is why the passage says "whoever amongst you witnessed". Implied in this is that some amongst you would not witness this cosmic phenomenon but fasting is only obligated on those who did.

                Peace,

                Ayman

                Salaam Ayman

                I myself have no details of Zainab's case but I think she knew the attackers and, as you know a blind person is compensated by having other senses to a higher standard than a normal person. The issue was not that she did not know the attackers but that, because she was blind, her evidence was not acceptable so even DNA testing would not be acceptable to those who apply a rigid interpretation of the Qur'an, just as you do not accept an online sighting of the moon.

                peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Offline
                  P Offline
                  progod
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #137

                  Soof Pax,

                  For fasting it is 30 and for pilgriamge it is 90. But one need only be present for 3 or 2 if rushed.

                  Godbless,
                  Anwar

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    ayman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #138

                    Peace Samia,

                    Thank you for your questions.

                    Does the verse say (only during the night)?
                    If we drink and eat during the night, it means that we will have to sleep during the day. Doesn't this contradict the definiton of night and day in the qur'aan vis-vis living and sleeping (7811 and other verses)?

                    Whether at day or night if one is hungry and thirsty then not eating and drinking contradicts one's instincts. The same goes for not speaking to anyone for days since we are communicative by nature. So whatever abstinance mentioned in the great reading it is certainly an exception that goes against what one would normally do.

                    2187 says to eat and drink until dawn and then to complete the fast until the night. Had it said to eat and drink until night and then to complete the fast until the dawn then we would be fasting at night.

                    If fasting is not about sexual contact and eating and drinking then what is the point of mentioning those things in 2187?

                    Question 2 What is meant in the verse (2184) by "and for those who can afford it to feed a poor"?

                    But 2184 doesn't say "those who can afford it". It says "those who can do it with difficulty". So even if you can abstain from food and drink but with difficulty, you are OK to feed the poor instead.

                    Question 3 2185 "...and whoever is ill or travelling, then a count of other days. God intends for you ease and He dos not want to make things difficult for you, and to complete the count..." Which count to complete?

                    The count to complete is the count of a few days talked about immediately before in 2184. A few is 3-10 so completion of a few is reaching the maximum of 10.

                    I am of course open to better interpretations, if you would like to share them.

                    Peace,

                    Ayman

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Prissy
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #139

                      Brother ayman, in order for Muhammad to address what was revealed to him, people must have gathered/present to witness his call. The question of the blind, deaf and dumb to not (or cannot) "witness" does not arise (perhaps the word witness as translated seems either incorrect or misunderstood). The leverage of fasting set upon the sickly, travelers and the destitite is pretty much conditioned as per the Quran.

                      Samia makes a good first point in her previous post. Perhaps verse 2187 is grossly misunderstood. Doesn't the worse state that ".....until the white thread is distinct from the black thread, then complete the fast until 'fajar' (dawn)"? It then further goes on to state that "....do not approach your wives at night whilst (or IF) one decides/retreats to worship in mosques"? What's the point of eating and drinking all night long and not during daytime? Besides, was the quran revealed/addressed at night or during the day?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        ayman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #140

                        Peace Farida,

                        I myself have no details of Zainab's case but I think she knew the attackers and, as you know a blind person is compensated by having other senses to a higher standard than a normal person. The issue was not that she did not know the attackers but that, because she was blind, her evidence was not acceptable so even DNA testing would not be acceptable to those who apply a rigid interpretation of the Qur'an, just as you do not accept an online sighting of the moon.
                        peace

                        DNA is acceptable as evidence as witnessed by an expert on DNA. The blind girl didn't witness the DNA of the attackers so your analogy is irrelevant. If she knew her attackers and can identify them based on sound then this is another matter and her testimony based on sound can be accepted although any defense attorney would probably cast doubt on it.

                        As for an online sighting of the scorching full moon, look at my avatar on the left side of your screen.

                        If you are talking about the image that Belal posted and claimed to be the sighting of the new moon, he was lying and it was actually a doctored image.

                        Peace,

                        Ayman

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          farida
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #141

                          Peace Farida,

                          DNA is acceptable as evidence as witnessed by an expert on DNA. The blind girl didn't witness the DNA of the attackers so your analogy is irrelevant. If she knew her attackers and can identify them based on sound then this is another matter and her testimony based on sound can be accepted although any defense attorney would probably cast doubt on it.

                          As for an online sighting of the scorching full moon, look at my avatar on the left side of your screen.

                          Peace,

                          Ayman

                          Salaam Ayman,

                          I am talking about those who apply the verses of the Qur'an rigidly, (in the case of Ramadan you do it), and for them DNA does not matter nor that the girl could identify the culprits. This case made international headlines and left a terrible impression of Islam on the wider world so I am by no means trying to outdo you, but I am discussing what we read and what we should see as the essence of the message which you do on many occasions.

                          If you are talking about the image that Belal posted and claimed to be the sighting of the new moon, he was lying and it was actually a doctored image.

                          No I am talking about the moonsighting site I followedhttp//www.moonsighting.com/

                          peace

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            ayman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #142

                            Peace Prissy,

                            Brother ayman, in order for Muhammad to address what was revealed to him, people must have gathered/present to witness his call. The question of the blind, deaf and dumb to not (or cannot) "witness" does not arise (perhaps the word witness as translated seems either incorrect or misunderstood). The leverage of fasting set upon the sickly, travelers and the destitite is pretty much conditioned as per the Quran.

                            It depends on what is being witnessed. If your talking to a blind person then they can witness. If you are talking to a deaf person then they can witness by reading your lips. If your or my eyes are covered and our ears are plugged then you and I cannot witness. So in this case both the blind and deaf persons can witness while you and I can't (although we are present). As I asked you and you didn't answer, what is the point of saying "whoever amongst you"? Since in the context of time everyone is always "present" anyway then why not just command to abstain and that is it?

                            Samia makes a good first point in her previous post. Perhaps verse 2187 is grossly misunderstood. Doesn't the worse state that ".....until the white thread is distinct from the black thread, then complete the fast until 'fajar' (dawn)"? It then further goes on to state that "....do not approach your wives at night whilst (or IF) one decides/retreats to worship in mosques"? What's the point of eating and drinking all night long and not during daytime? Besides, was the quran revealed/addressed at night or during the day?

                            No it doesn't say ".....until the white thread is distinct from the black thread, then complete the fast until 'fajar' (dawn)". It says ".....until the white thread is distinct from the black thread of 'fajar' (dawn), then complete the fast until 'layl' (night)". So you objection is not valid.

                            Peace,

                            Ayman

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Offline
                              B Offline
                              belH
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #143

                              If you are talking about the image that Belal posted and claimed to be the sighting of the new moon, he was lying and it was actually a doctored image.

                              http//www.birding.in/images/Birds/golden_eagle.jpg

                              http//aa.usno.navy.mil/idltemp/current_moon.php

                              Instead of answering my Questions, you are making more new lies.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                ayman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #144

                                Peace Farida,

                                I am talking about those who apply the verses of the Qur'an rigidly, (in the case of Ramadan you do it), and for them DNA does not matter nor that the girl could identify the culprits. This case made international headlines and left a terrible impression of Islam on the wider world so I am by no means trying to outdo you, but I am discussing what we read and what we should see as the essence of the message which you do on many occasions.

                                Farida, do you have faith in the great reading? If so, do you really think that those who commit such terrible injustices are applying the great reading rigidly?

                                I would say quite the opposite. They are not applying the truth from our lord in the great reading rigidly. They don't even understand what the word "islam" means and they take it as a meaningless label that we are born with or achieved by mechanically uttering some words. You are not helping them and in fact you are contributing to the very problems that you are criticizing by not translating the language-independent universal concept of "islam" which was known even before Arabic was invented. If you want change, then let's start with ourselves first.

                                No I am talking about the moonsighting site I followedhttp//www.moonsighting.com/

                                I am afraid you are following another doctored image

                                We, at Moonsighting.com, calculate where the crescent moon sighting is possible for every lunar month. Visibility of the New Crescent Moon is calculated using the criteria, developed after decades of research by Khalid Shaukat, of Moonsighting Committee Worldwide (MCW).

                                Hmm... I don't remember 2185 saying anything about witnessing a doctored image, a committee, or even an image doctored by a committee.

                                Come on everyone, help Farida out. How hard can this be? We are in the digital age where everyone and their 4 year old son or daughter has a digital camera or a camera phone and yet no one of the billion so-called Muslims can witness the new moon and post a real image????????????!

                                How sad. But this is what the god does to even a billion people who ignore his clear command in 2185.

                                Peace,

                                Ayman

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  farida
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #145

                                  Peace Prissy,

                                  what is the point of saying "whoever amongst you"? Since in the context of time everyone is always "present" anyway then why not just command to abstain and that is it?

                                  Ayman

                                  Salaam Ayman

                                  Sorry the question was directed at Prissy, but maybe it meant those who live in places near the North and South pole where, during a summer month, the sun never sets, so dawn does not happen and thus do not experience day and night as the rest of the world. Often its been debated in those parts of the world how they are supposed to fast in the absence of a clear division of day and night.
                                  Even in countries like the Uk and Sweden duirng summer months there is just twilight (no real darkness) and then the sun rises. I will be so happy if I am exempted from fasting in those months as days are really long and, in a few years Ramadan will fall in mid summer. wow

                                  peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    farida
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #146

                                    Peace Farida,

                                    Farida, do you have faith in the great reading? If so, do you really think that those who commit such terrible injustices are applying the great reading rigidly?

                                    Peace,

                                    Ayman

                                    Of course they are not following the Quran but if we insist on literal meanings of the Arabic than according to some a deaf person would not be able to divorce his wife as he can not utter world talaq.

                                    I am afraid you are following another doctored image

                                    I was not following any image just the calculation of moon cycle by new techonology/websites.

                                    Hmm... I don't remember 2185 saying anything about witnessing a doctored image, a committee, or even an image doctored by a committee.

                                    Come on everyone, help Farida out. How hard can this be? We are in the digital age where everyone and their 4 year old son or daughter has a digital camera or a camera phone and yet no one of the billion so-called Muslims can witness the new moon and post a real image????????????!

                                    How sad. But this is what the god does to even a billion people who ignore his clear command in 2185.

                                    Does the great reading mention an image by the digital camera or do we have a tug of war here who wins the arguments??????

                                    I have posted above my understanding of those "who witness/whoever amongst you" in an earlier post and would welcome your comments.

                                    peace

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Samia
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #147

                                      But 2184 doesn't say "those who can afford it". It says "those who can do it with difficulty". So even if you can abstain from food and drink but with difficulty, you are OK to feed the poor instead.

                                      Salaam Ayman
                                      Thanks for your response

                                      Why is it (with difficulty)? What's the meaning of (Taaqa , the verbal noun of yuteeq) in these verses
                                      2249 "They say We have no power this day against Goliath". In other words, we cannot afford fighting Goliath, not we cannot afford with difficulty fighting Goliath;
                                      2286 "Our lord, ....and do not put upon us a burden greater than we have strength to bear..." in other words, greater than we are able to, than we can afford.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        ayman
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #148

                                        Peace Farida,

                                        Sorry the question was directed at Prissy, but maybe it meant those who live in places near the North and South pole where, during a summer month, the sun never sets, so dawn does not happen and thus do not experience day and night as the rest of the world. Often its been debated in those parts of the world how they are supposed to fast in the absence of a clear division of day and night.
                                        Even in countries like the Uk and Sweden duirng summer months there is just twilight (no real darkness) and then the sun rises. I will be so happy if I am exempted from fasting in those months as days are really long and, in a few years Ramadan will fall in mid summer. wow

                                        Those who find hardship in fasting regardless of the reason can feed a poor person according to 2185.

                                        The question was about Prissy saying that "shahad" doesn't mean "witness" but simply means being "pesent". Your answer doesn't address the question since people in Sweden or anywhere on earth are also "present".

                                        Peace,

                                        Ayman

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          belH
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #149

                                          Peace Every one'

                                          The word "Shahed" means Testify, according to the Quran;

                                          An Example of Shahada or Shada in Quran

                                          (&#1640

                                          Allah Testifies (Shahed) that there is no god but He, and angels and those endued with knowledge, standing firm on justice There is no god but He, the Exalted in Power, the Wise. (3-1

                                          I testify (Ashadu) that there is No God But Allah, without Seeing Him.

                                          (&#65279

                                          Say "What thing is most weighty in evidence?" Say "Allah is Witness between me and you this Qur'an hath been revealed to me by inspiration That I may warn you and all whom it reaches. Can ye possibly bear witness that besides Allah there are other gods?" Say "Nay! I cannot bear witness!" Say "But in truth He is the One God and I truly am innocent of (your blasphemy of) joining others with Him. (6-19)

                                          Now Why Ayman insisting that ones must SEE The MOON if they Want To Fast.
                                          According to God, Shahad means testify or witness by true knowledge.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users