Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. JALABIB in the context of v33:59

JALABIB in the context of v33:59

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
47 Posts 7 Posters 350 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Q Offline
    Q Offline
    Q_student
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Dear Herbman, how much space you suggest is needed to separate words? Dear, it was a hand written script. However, now what all we have preserved language, on one hand, in lexicons and grammar books. On the other hand, we have ready made tafaseers, based on hearsay. We have to choose between one or the other for understanding of the message. Every one who claims to understand can not explain these discrepancies between supposed understanding of words and inability to find these words in lexicons or lack of grammatical explanations. Question, are we willing to have a fresh start for the sake of our Rubb?

    Badar

    Peace Brother
    Breaking words into "pieces" as a butcher cuts the animal into pieces does not give you any sense.
    What will happen if I break up "bkanwar " into
    -b-
    -Kan
    -war
    -2
    What will it mean ?
    Regards

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Offline
      H Offline
      herbman
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      Separation is often only indicative of writing technique utilized in different script formats. If you look at the Gold Quran script from Johns Hopkins library of archives, recently posted by you, you will see extensive use of separating the letters. If we look at different scripts of the word in question, can the firsr root be Jiim Lam Lam, followed by another word starting with Ba?

      Peace Kn,
      You have very good memory

      I have a question for u and Dr Bkanwar,

      The Chii support their faith refering to the Quran stating that we should follow "ahl ul bayt"
      The suni support their faith refering to the Quran stating "what ever Mohamed give you, you should follow"
      The submitters support their faith refering to Quran "there is 19 over it"

      Can you give any argument found in the Quran that support your way of "tafsir".

      Thanks

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        kn
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Peace Brother
        Breaking words into "pieces" as a butcher cuts the animal into pieces does not give you any sense.
        What will happen if I break up "bkanwar " into
        -b-
        -Kan
        -war
        -2
        What will it mean ?
        Regards

        Peace
        Herbman ! Do you want to say that" jilbaab" means a gunman acting as a guard ?
        Regards

        I personally will not make fun or get upset at other peoples attempt at understanding. Trust me we all are trying to be as close to the message as we possibly can. More over we cannot cut the words just for the sake of cutting it, but only if the script technique, grammar rules, lexical concept and the context in the message allows us to do so. May Allah give us all more understanding so we could be closer to his message more and more

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          bkanwar2
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          Dear Herbman,

          122

          1992

          20113

          3928

          4458

          Badar

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Q Offline
            Q Offline
            Q_student
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            Brother we should not make fun or get upset at other peoples understanding. Trust me we all are trying to be as close to the message as we possibly can. More over we cannot cut the words just for the sake of cutting it, but only if the script technique, grammar rules, lexical concept and the context in the message allows us to do so. May Allah give us all more understanding so we could be closer to his message more and more

            Peace
            There is no question of making fun.
            If one word can be "dissected " why not other words ? These home made methods are only for Quranic words ? Do you have any support/evidence for this methodology ?
            Honestly ,it is the most horrible way to play with Quranic words ,I have ever seen.
            Regards

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              bkanwar2
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              Peace
              There is no question of making fun.
              If one word can be "dissected " why not other words ? These home made methods are only for Quranic words ? Do you have any support/evidence for this methodology ?
              Honestly ,it is the most horrible way to play with Quranic words ,I have ever seen.
              Regards

              Dear Brother, method is presented here, again and again, is there any body willing to pay attention to it?

              Badar

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H Offline
                H Offline
                herbman
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Dear Bkanwar,

                I agree sometimes this method is used for some words in certain cases well known in arabic BUT I don't think it has to be used on all the words.

                e.g. it is not + this makes no sense.

                regards

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kn
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  Dear Bkanwar,

                  I agree sometimes this method is used for some words in certain cases well known in arabic BUT I don't think it has to be used on all the words.

                  e.g. it is not + this makes no sense.

                  regards

                  Dear Brother, method is presented here, again and again, is there any body willing to pay attention to it?

                  Badar

                  Peace
                  There is no question of making fun.
                  If one word can be "dissected " why not other words ? These home made methods are only for Quranic words ? Do you have any support/evidence for this methodology ?
                  Honestly ,it is the most horrible way to play with Quranic words ,I have ever seen.
                  Regards

                  We all pray to Allah to grant us the wisdom to understand his message, the way Prophet(S) and his companions(R) understood it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Q Offline
                    Q Offline
                    Q_student
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    Dear Bkanwar,

                    I agree sometimes this method is used for some words in certain cases well known in arabic BUT I don't think it has to be used on all the words.

                    e.g. it is not + this makes no sense.

                    regards

                    Peace
                    This method cannot be anywhere unless the word under consideration is really combination of two obvious words like " " .It is a combination of two words.
                    Any long word in any language has "syllables" . One cannot break up these syllables in peaces and establish their meanings and then join them together as was done with "Muttaqeen".
                    Quran was revealed in Arabic Language which was existing before revelation of the Quran.We should learn that language first then we will be able to comment something about the language.
                    It is another thing that people think that they have right to criticize the language without knowing it.
                    Regards
                    Regards

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Offline
                      B Offline
                      bkanwar2
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      Peace
                      This method cannot be anywhere unless the word under consideration is really combination of two obvious words like " " .It is a combination of two words.
                      Any long word in any language has "syllables" . One cannot break up these syllables in peaces and establish their meanings and then join them together as was done with "Muttaqeen".
                      Quran was revealed in Arabic Language which was existing before revelation of the Quran.We should learn that language first then we will be able to comment something about the language.
                      It is another thing that people think that they have right to criticize the language without knowing it.
                      Regards
                      Regards

                      Dear brother let me ask you this very humbly, what is the method of learning a language, that is no more spoken anywhere.

                      Badar

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Q Offline
                        Q Offline
                        Q_student
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        Dear brother let me ask you this very humbly, what is the method of learning a language, that is no more spoken anywhere.

                        Badar

                        Peace
                        Exactly ,the way the people learn other languages which are nowadays are not spoken anywhere.Arabic is spoken but some advanced (Modern) form as is Old English and Modern English.Classical Hebrew and Modern Hebrew.

                        Regards

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          bkanwar2
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Dear Bkanwar,

                          I agree sometimes this method is used for some words in certain cases well known in arabic BUT I don't think it has to be used on all the words.

                          e.g. it is not + this makes no sense.

                          regards

                          Dear Herbman and Q-Student, not an appropriate example. Let me take another shot again with some example. Having compound words is not unusual in languages. Two independent words forming a new word. In English two words "Black" and "Bird". The can be written together to form a new word called a Blackbird for any bird of black color. In addition by an accent on BLACKbird one could imply, the bird that sings. You could note that this compound word does carry meanings of individual words so to call "roots". Same way are "LilMutaqeena" and "Jalabibhuna"

                          Peace.

                          Badar

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Q Offline
                            Q Offline
                            Q_student
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            Dear Herbman and Q-Student, not an appropriate example. Let me take another shot again with some example. Having compound words is not unusual in languages. Two independent words forming a new word. In English two words "Black" and "Bird". The can be written together to form a new word called a Blackbird for any bird of black color. In addition by an accent on BLACKbird one could imply, the bird that sings. You could note that this compound word does carry meanings of individual words so to call "roots". Same way are "LilMutaqeena" and "Jalabibhuna"

                            Peace.

                            Badar

                            Dear Brother
                            If one word is compound of two words ,then it is ok.But how can you decide that some word is a compound or single unless you know the language.
                            I give you an example.
                            There is an English word cupboard.Two syllables
                            Cup
                            Board
                            Both have different meanings individually but when they become compound they give absolutely a different meaning.
                            Exactly in the same way ,there are words in the classical arabic and these words are known as " " but we ourselves cannot decide .As per other languages we have to learn the language first in letter and spirit.
                            Regards

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • H Offline
                              H Offline
                              herbman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              Dear Bkanwar, Kn, all

                              Why don't you ask the FM Administrators to create a new section under General Issues, Project or wherever is the best dedicated to your method where you can centralise all your articles and posts so you have a central repository with all the informations related to your method. So will avoid repeting your point of view hundred times. Also people interested in your view know where to go straight forward and can either help/criticise/support or just read. This is just a suggestion.

                              Peace

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Offline
                                B Offline
                                bkanwar2
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                Dear Q-Student, again a wrong analogy. There is a branch of linguistics, a science of lnguage, called entomolgy, that traces the origin of words. Here is the entomolgy of word cupboard. It was meant to be what it includes. However it's meaning have changed just like Lilamutaqeena over time. This is a natural linguistic phenomenon, called sementic shift or change.

                                http//podictionary.com/?p=281Vitaliano Pancaldi Neck Tie

                                http//www.answers.com/topic/cupboard

                                It is this science of language, we need to use to understand the message, not the natural art of making sounds that a baby learns, in mothers lap while growing up.

                                Herbman thanks for suggestion. It is very good idea. I do not know who is the organizer/owner of this site? Do you?

                                Badar

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  herbman
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #25

                                  Salam,

                                  ask the moderators TheNabi, Wakas, Tay, savage_carrot, Nadeem, Samia.

                                  Also here is a video you can add in your database.

                                  http//www.youtube.com/user/JosephC38

                                  Peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    savage_carrot
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #26

                                    If one doesn't have a blog or something, you can create a thread in any appropriate section and list clearly and precisely what your views/methods etc are and link to it via your signature. Make the title clear as to what it contains as well and you can keep adding to it etc. It's relatively easy and imo, better than creating a separate section.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      bkanwar2
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #27

                                      If one doesn't have a blog or something, you can create a thread in any appropriate section and list clearly and precisely what your views/methods etc are and link to it via your signature. Make the title clear as to what it contains as well and you can keep adding to it etc. It's relatively easy and imo, better than creating a separate section.

                                      Thanks for your suggestion. But you did not answer my question. Who are patrons for this site? Who established it?

                                      Peace,

                                      Badar

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        savage_carrot
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #28

                                        Layth afaik.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          bkanwar2
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #29

                                          Layth afaik.

                                          Please elaborate, what is this? What it means?

                                          Badar

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users