Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Defenition of marriage suggests sex before marriage permitted?!

Defenition of marriage suggests sex before marriage permitted?!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
577 Posts 28 Posters 36.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rami
    wrote on last edited by
    #557

    Can this also be valid
    MMA are slave boys. He is not a slave per se but he is something like "adopted", the burden is actuALLY ON YOU! If you accept a gift from them and got their families permission, they are still called MMA. Actually this also solves a lot of the problems of problems an societies!

    Yeah but dont take a gift from more than one man at a time.

    &

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Samia
      wrote on last edited by
      #558

      Yeah but dont take a gift from more than one man at a time.

      &

      How many girls are you going to give gifts to? Wil these girls be in addition to a wife? Then I am afraid, same here ;D
      Just tell me where to find these "boys" and "girls" eat

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        Rami
        wrote on last edited by
        #559

        How many girls are you going to give gifts to? Wil these girls be in addition to a wife? Then I am afraid, same here ;D
        Just tell me where to find these "boys" and "girls" eat

        I can have multiple wives, you can have one husband. If you had more than one husband, to whom ur children will belong??

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Samia
          wrote on last edited by
          #560

          I can have multiple wives, you can have one husband. If you had more than one husband, to whom ur children will belong??

          What if I am sterile? Too old to have more children, but young enough to have many husbands? Can have children and will choose my husbands from different races? Know the father of my child by intuition? Distribute them as I like and the husbands wont know? Arrange it in any other way...?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Offline
            R Offline
            Rami
            wrote on last edited by
            #561

            What if I am sterile? Too old to have more children, but young enough to have many husbands? Can have children and will choose my husbands from different races? Know the father of my child by intuition? Distribute them as I like and the husbands wont know? Arrange it in any other way...?

            Thats whoredom. Sorry. Forbidden.

            Thus saith the Lord! angel

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Samia
              wrote on last edited by
              #562

              Thus saith the Lord! angel

              Where?
              I mean where saith the Lord it is whoredom for me and a right for you?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                nsws1988
                wrote on last edited by
                #563

                I can have multiple wives, you can have one husband. If you had more than one husband, to whom ur children will belong??

                He will be her MMA not her husband

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rami
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #564

                  Where?
                  I mean where saith the Lord it is whoredom for me and a right for you?

                  The Mohasanat from the women are forbidden.

                  There is no such thing as Mohasan men.

                  Peace? whatever

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Samia
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #565

                    The Mohasanat from the women are forbidden.

                    There is no such thing as Mohasan men.

                    Peace? whatever

                    424

                    425

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Rami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #566

                      424

                      425

                      Ohh come on Samia, you are under-estimating my Arabic.

                      fe3l = tahsseen
                      fa3el = mohassen - male
                      maf3ool behe = mohassana - female

                      hmm

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Samia
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #567

                        Ohh come on Samia, you are under-estimating my Arabic.

                        fe3l = tahsseen
                        fa3el = mohassen - male
                        maf3ool behe = mohassana - female

                        hmm

                        First tahseen is not the pattern of fe3l. fe3l hesn; hasuna fa3ula.
                        Why is the feminine "maf3uul behi/ agent" and the male is "fa3el/ actor"? What's your proof? You understand it in a way, then write whatever diacritical signs to support your understanding. The qur'aan was not revealed with these diacritical signs; so unless you have a logical reason, you cannot use them as evidence.
                        And I can tell you that yours are wrong diacritical signs, and God knew some will manipulate them, this is why he put the second part , or are you going to say they are different too, and that one is "maf3uul behi" and the other is "fa3el"?!

                        Secondly, why can't a male be "muhsan"?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #568

                          First tahseen is not the pattern of fe3l. fe3l hesn; hasuna fa3ula.
                          Why is the feminine "maf3uul behi/ agent" and the male is "fa3el/ actor"? What's your proof? You understand it in a way, then write whatever diacritical signs to support your understanding. The qur'aan was not revealed with these diacritical signs; so unless you have a logical reason, you cannot use them as evidence.
                          And I can tell you that yours are wrong diacritical signs, and God knew some will manipulate them, this is why he put the second part , or are you going to say they are different too, and that one is "maf3uul behi" and the other is "fa3el"?!

                          Secondly, why can't a male be "muhsan"?

                          How did you reason that they played with the diactricial markings when a 'muhasan' male is actually a sunni idea!!! I guess it didn't go as planned. Ofcourse they said this to force a Torah law into the religion which is another story.

                          The word 'sefa7' is different I agree.

                          An angel just told me where in the Quran can you find a group of men called 'Mohasaneen'. peace

                          Peace,

                          Rami

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Offline
                            L Offline
                            liquiddharma
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #569

                            Thats whoredom. Sorry. Forbidden.

                            No, sorry, that's getting the English language completely mixed up.

                            In English, whoredom is when you have sex in return for money.

                            Having multiple, simultainious husbands is polyandry.

                            There's no english word to specifically describe women (as opposed to men) having multiple sex partners to whom they are not married.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Q Offline
                              Q Offline
                              Q_student
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #570

                              First tahseen is not the pattern of fe3l. fe3l hesn; hasuna fa3ula.
                              Why is the feminine "maf3uul behi/ agent" and the male is "fa3el/ actor"? What's your proof? You understand it in a way, then write whatever diacritical signs to support your understanding. The qur'aan was not revealed with these diacritical signs; so unless you have a logical reason, you cannot use them as evidence.
                              And I can tell you that yours are wrong diacritical signs, and God knew some will manipulate them, this is why he put the second part , or are you going to say they are different too, and that one is "maf3uul behi" and the other is "fa3el"?!

                              Secondly, why can't a male be "muhsan"?

                              Peace ;
                              Neither "tahseen" nor "hesna" are "Fe3l". Both of them are nouns i.e ismul masdar.
                              Regards

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Samia
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #571

                                Peace ;
                                Neither "tahseen" nor "hesna" are "Fe3l". Both of them are nouns i.e ismul masdar.
                                Regards

                                I am not talking about "fe3l" re its meaning, otherwise I would clearly say "verb". I am talking about its "pattern". Hell of a difference.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Q Offline
                                  Q Offline
                                  Q_student
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #572

                                  I am not talking about "fe3l" re its meaning, otherwise I would clearly say "verb". I am talking about its "pattern". Hell of a difference.

                                  Peace sister
                                  You said

                                  fe3l hesn; hasuna fa3ula

                                  What do you mean by first pair ?
                                  Regards

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Samia
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #573

                                    How did you reason that they played with the diactricial markings when a 'muhasan' male is actually a sunni idea!!!

                                    Did I even mention "sunnis"? I am talking about YOU. I do not look at diacritical signs when I read the qur'aan, but you do and lay heavy weight on them.
                                    Muhsan is a word, not an idea, and it's in the qur'aan. I do not know if sunnis even acknowledge the word "muhsan" or not, but you are "legalising" the "idea" they have, by taking their dicritical signs as truth.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Samia
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #574

                                      Peace sister
                                      You said

                                      What do you mean by first pair ?
                                      Regards

                                      I mean that the word "hesn" has the pattern of the word "fe3l". This is the Arabic equivalent to CVCC where V is the short vowel "e". In Arabic we use the letters Faa 3ain Laam for consonants of a root, then the different patterns of this root will have to respect the sequence of these letters, this is why "C" for consonnat is unapplicable in Arabic. The word "fe3l" is a noun from the root Faa 3ain Laam, and "hesn" is a noun too of the root Haa Saad Nuun, having the same pattern.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        uq
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #575

                                        Peace all,

                                        Am I the only one to have noticed the paradoxical nature of the title of this thread?

                                        Whatever "marriage" is, however it is defined, then whatever the requirements for "marriage" are must have occurred for "marriage" to have taken place.

                                        As such, "sex before marriage" is theoretically impossible.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          Elke
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #576

                                          very good point !

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users