Bakkah
-
-
Dear Ayman
Do not avoid these two questions.
What is your source which says that
Macca = Destruction
Secondly ,it is being used as Diptote in the Quran.What is the reason for this use ?
{I hope this time you know what the diptote is }
Regardswe also hope you use your own brian this time instead of relying on authorities. welcome back welcome
-
-
whatever
I guess you knew that!
-
Perhaps it is vague about location because the specific location is irrelevant?
Just a thought.
Peace
So you are of the opinion that Quran is "Vague" about location ?
Very strange statement about the book which claims to be "Tibyaanan likulli shaian" and "Kitaabun mufassalun"
Mecca is on the surface of the earth ,a historical city. If you do not know it does not mean the Quran is vague.Regards
-
QS,
Does The Quran tell us how to brush our teeth? If you answer no, can I then say this is strange for a book that calls itself "Tibyaanan likulli shaian" and "Kitaabun mufassalun"? Of course, any person capable of using their logic will know The Quran saying it is clear or distinguishing/detailed means almost nothing unless we know with regard to what. Once we know with regard to what, then we can contemplate on your point to see if it has any relevance. So tell us QS, if The Quran says it is "Tibyaanan likulli shaian" and "Kitaabun mufassalun", what is it with regard to?
-
QS,
Does The Quran tell us how to brush our teeth? If you answer no, can I then say this is strange for a book that calls itself "Tibyaanan likulli shaian" and "Kitaabun mufassalun"? Of course, any person capable of using their logic will know The Quran saying it is clear or distinguishing/detailed means almost nothing unless we know with regard to what. Once we know with regard to what, then we can contemplate on your point to see if it has any relevance. So tell us QS, if The Quran says it is "Tibyaanan likulli shaian" and "Kitaabun mufassalun", what is it with regard to?
Peace Brother
Wrong /absolutely Wrong example.
Did Quran mention about brushing of teeth ?
But Quran has definitely talked about Mecca ?
How can you compare" mentioned " and "unmentioned " facts .It is just like comparing mangoes with Horses.
Mecca is a well known historical city.Quran did not need to tell its location.It is not a book of Geography.
"9/11 terrorism occured in USA ." Does this statement need to tell where and what USA is ?
The Al-Quran is not vague but our minds which are vague.But we put the blame of our lack of understanding on the Quran.
Unfortunately common sense is very uncommon.
Regards -
Ahh, it seems that according to you everything it mentions it details is this your position?
So if it mentions slaughtering of animals, it provides all the how and what with etc? If you answer no, then is your position it provides extra info to the extent that is necessary to fulfil the goal/objective?
Thus, I'd assume you would argue Mecca (as in the place), since it allegedly mentions it, that is enough to fulfil all that is involved with it?
-
Ahh, it seems that according to you everything it mentions it details is this your position?
So if it mentions slaughtering of animals, it provides all the how and what with etc? If you answer no, then is your position it provides extra info to the extent that is necessary to fulfil the goal/objective?
Thus, I'd assume you would argue Mecca (as in the place), since it allegedly mentions it, that is enough to fulfil all that is involved with it?
Peace Brother
Instead of putting question first decide "Is Mecca not existant on the surface of the Earth ?
Do not circumvent the basic issue please
Regards -
Ahh, so it is I who is circumventing?
For sake of argument, let me answer your question yes, there exists a place called Mecca on the surface of the earth.
So, now answer my question, when Al Quran claims it is "Tibyaanan likulli shaian" and "Kitaabun mufassalun" (according to you), what is it with regard to?
-
Ahh, so it is I who is circumventing?
For sake of argument, let me answer your question yes, there exists a place called Mecca on the surface of the earth.
So, now answer my question, when Al Quran claims it is "Tibyaanan likulli shaian" and "Kitaabun mufassalun" (according to you), what is it with regard to?
Peace
You admitted that Mecca exists on the surface of the Earth.It means Quran is not Vague as you are claiming.
And it is the answer to your Question.Its lack of vagueness is "Tibyaanun li kulli Shain".
So please stop blaming the Quran.
Regards -
QS statement 1 You admitted that Mecca exists on the surface of the Earth.
QS statement 2 It means Quran is not Vague as you are claiming.Statement 1 is not necessarily related to statement 2. Please establish the connection first before drawing a conclusion.
And you did not answer my question, which I will re-quote
When Al Quran claims it is "Tibyaanan likulli shaian" and "Kitaabun mufassalun" (according to you), what is it with regard to?My question is relatively simple, yet you avoid it. If you do not answer, I will assume you have no answer.
-
On the other hand, the common noun "hajj" has nothing to do with the above and was first used by the people of the book to mean "feast". Please see the following discussion on this matter
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597976.0
So essentially, like Christians who continued their pagan traditions under new Christianized names such as Christmas, Muslims too continued their pagan traditions by borrowing common nouns from the great reading to name their pagan idols and rituals.
Ayman, I agree with you on the last statement, and it is actually not a big deal..
For every nations/people (arabicUmmat) We have appointed them rites (arabicmansakh) which they shall perform.
Do not dispute with them concerning the matter. Instead invite them to your Lord; surely, you are upon a Straight Path.
If they argue with you, say 'God knows best all that you do.
On the Day of Resurrection, God will judge between you concerning that in which you vary.
-- Quran, Al-Hajj, 67-69Perhaps; Muhammad is following the verse shown above. Instead of 'abolishing' the arab pagan/native practices, he just changes the meanings of it. Thus no longer pay homage to idols housed within cubicle structure in mecca but pay homage to the one true God, but still in mecca. The christians also does the same thing in europe, rather abolishing the pagan practices, they just changes the meanings of it..
The arabs can continue their rites in mekka, just like the jews in jerusalem, the japanese in mt fuji, the indians in himalayas/gangga river and so forth.. Thus it is said Hajj / thanks giving feast to God is within months well known by each people.. (although it is not necessarily the same time and place for every people).
Do not dispute with them concerning the rites, but invite them to the one true God, The Maintainer Of All Universes.
Salam / Peace
-
Works for me.
Ayman, I agree with you on the last statement, and it is actually not a big deal..
For every nations/people (arabicUmmat) We have appointed them rites (arabicmansakh) which they shall perform.
Do not dispute with them concerning the matter. Instead invite them to your Lord; surely, you are upon a Straight Path.
If they argue with you, say 'God knows best all that you do.
On the Day of Resurrection, God will judge between you concerning that in which you vary.
-- Quran, Al-Hajj, 67-69Perhaps; Muhammad is following the verse shown above. Instead of 'abolishing' the arab pagan/native practices, he just changes the meanings of it. Thus no longer pay homage to idols housed within cubicle structure in mecca but pay homage to the one true God, but still in mecca. The christians also does the same thing in europe, rather abolishing the pagan practices, they just changes the meanings of it..
The arabs can continue their rites in mekka, just like the jews in jerusalem, the japanese in mt fuji, the indians in himalayas/gangga river and so forth.. Thus it is said Hajj / thanks giving feast to God is within months well known by each people.. (although it is not necessarily the same time and place for every people).
Do not dispute with them concerning the rites, but invite them to the one true God, The Maintainer Of All Universes.
Salam / Peace
-
Peace Jafar,
Ayman, I agree with you on the last statement, and it is actually not a big deal..
For every nations/people (arabicUmmat) We have appointed them rites (arabicmansakh) which they shall perform.
Do not dispute with them concerning the matter. Instead invite them to your Lord; surely, you are upon a Straight Path.
If they argue with you, say 'God knows best all that you do.
On the Day of Resurrection, God will judge between you concerning that in which you vary.
-- Quran, Al-Hajj, 67-69
Perhaps; Muhammad is following the verse shown above. Instead of 'abolishing' the arab pagan/native practices, he just changes the meanings of it. Thus no longer pay homage to idols housed within cubicle structure in mecca but pay homage to the one true God, but still in mecca. The christians also does the same thing in europe, rather abolishing the pagan practices, they just changes the meanings of it..
The arabs can continue their rites in mekka, just like the jews in jerusalem, the japanese in mt fuji, the indians in himalayas/gangga river and so forth.. Thus it is said Hajj / thanks giving feast to God is within months well known by each people.. (although it is not necessarily the same time and place for every people).
Do not dispute with them concerning the rites, but invite them to the one true God, The Maintainer Of All Universes.I think you got it the other way around. The pagan Arabs couldn't change the great reading to justify their pagan practices so they hijacked terms from the great reading and used them to describe their pagan practices. This is what I am pointing out so that people don't get fooled. If someone as knoweldgeable and enlightened as you can be fooled into saying something such as "still in Mecca" then we really need to show people the truth. The word "mecca"/destruction is precisely such word that has been hijacked and turned into the name of a town but it is clearly used as a common noun in the great reading. Here is the Yusufali translation
- And it is He Who has restrained their hands from you and your hands from them in the midst of Mecca after that He gave you the victory over them. And Allah sees well all that ye do.
Here is the translation of 4824 using Classical Arabic dictionaries and the context of war from the passage to translate the common description "mecca"
- And it is He Who has restrained their hands from you and your hands from them in the midst of destruction after that He gave you the victory over them. And Allah sees well all that ye do.
This is an amazing observation. Besides discrediting paganism, it means that we can be 100% sure that the great reading is the preserved word of the god. The pagans couldn't even insert one word or change it to name the location of the pagan shrine they established. They were forced to hijack a clear common noun.
Peace,
Ayman
-
Peace Ayman,
The word "mecca"/destruction is precisely such word that has been hijacked and turned into the name of a town but it is clearly used as a common noun in the great reading. Here is the Yusufali translation
- And it is He Who has restrained their hands from you and your hands from them in the midst of Mecca after that He gave you the victory over them. And Allah sees well all that ye do.
Here is the translation of 4824 using Classical Arabic dictionaries and the context of war from the passage to translate the common description "mecca"
- And it is He Who has restrained their hands from you and your hands from them in the midst of destruction after that He gave you the victory over them. And Allah sees well all that ye do.
This is an amazing observation. Besides discrediting paganism, it means that we can be 100% sure that the great reading is the preserved word of the god. The pagans couldn't even insert one word or change it to name the location of the pagan shrine they established. They were forced to hijack a clear common noun.
This is a very good observation. The root of the common noun "mekka" actually means failure or destruction. So, it makes perfect sense if the passage in 4824 is speaking about impending failure rather than a physical location. It's saying that even in the midst of failure or defeat, Allah still gave his people the victory over the disbelievers... Very good observation. I'm definately going to look more into this. This is certainly an eye-opener, especially in terms of traditional Islaam...
bravo bravo bravo
Peace,
Ahmad
-
How common was the word Mecca, though? It never occurs elsewhere as a word used for destruction.
That doesn't mean to say that validates it as a holy location. Might still be a pun and it certainly isn't a statement of reverence.
I hate to sound like Cook & Crone, but do any of the whiny Christian sources from the time of the conquest of Jerusalem mention from where those dread Saraceans hail?
-
Peace Ayman,
This is a very good observation. The root of the common noun "mekka" actually means failure or destruction. bravo bravo bravo
Peace,
Ahmad
Peace Brother
You and Ayman are trying to BEFOOL the readers .
1Bring out the PRoof for that word MECCA ( ) 's Root meaning is "DESTRUCTION". (Do not quote to me PRL ,Only Classical Arabic dicitionaries please)
2Secondly Mecca has been used in the Quran as a Proper Noun as Ibrahim ,Fir3oun" Ramadhan' etc.It cannot be translated.
Both of you need to provide the Evidence for your assertion.
If you think that Meem,Kaaf ,Kaaf are the root letters then its basic meanings are- ( 5 / 274)
(ك
To extract the bone marrow from the bone
Where does it come the "destruction"???
Please Provide ther proof in the same way as I have done.Please do not try to set an example "the blind follow the blind". We should use our own research and common sense also.
Regards
- ( 5 / 274)
-
Peace Cushan,
How common was the word Mecca, though? It never occurs elsewhere as a word used for destruction.
There are many words in the great reading that only occur once. Its common meaning was still known at the time Classical Arabic dictionaries were developed. Its of the form "F3LH" like words such as "NKBH"/disaster.
That doesn't mean to say that validates it as a holy location. Might still be a pun and it certainly isn't a statement of reverence.
It has nothing to do with any location, holy or otherwise.
I hate to sound like Cook & Crone, but do any of the whiny Christian sources from the time of the conquest of Jerusalem mention from where those dread Saraceans hail?
I recommend reading Hoyland's book "Seeing Islam as Others Saw it". In there the Romans complain that they were invaded by a coalition of Jews, heretic Christians, and a group called Muhagareye (probably Muhajireen). There is never any mention of Muslims. They say that the invaders came from the region of Hira in Northwestern Arabia.
There is more. The Romans also give dates that conflict with the traditional dates. They say that this new kingdom was formed and started attacking the Roman empire borders when Heraclius, king of the Romans, was in his eleventh year (this translates to 620-21CE). This is over ten years prior to the traditional dating of the beginning of Islamic raids on the Romans. According to traditions, at that time the prophet hasn't even emigrated yet!
Peace,
Ayman
