Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. More (gasp!) Women In Hell?

More (gasp!) Women In Hell?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
44 Posts 13 Posters 986 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    aynur
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    I think some out there don't believe in this exact meaning though.

    I like her take on it http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYoNDgB-jDU (lol my comment owns amirite?)

    And her's http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEcNaVkQUx4

    And...his?! o http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxWVkhLIBi8

    Actually, I think the general sunni consenus is that they aren't...dumb....or less intelligent. However the general consensus that they are the majority in hell is still funny. So it's easier to go to hell for not being thankful enough to your husband than it is for cleansing Europe of Jews via torture camps and driving planes into buildings killing hundreds of unsuspecting people.

    I guess that being ungrateful to your husband causes them to drive planes into buildings. D
    Yeah I don't get that .... if because a woman is not thankful to her husband that she goes to hell, that would put her husband in a position between her and God. At least, that's the way I see it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #33

      Peace aynur,

      Aren't those verses referring specifically to what the Jews said/say?

      No, read context which talks about Al-Kitab/The Book no mention of Jews.

      Also the answer given each time is a definite no regardless who said/says it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        aynur
        wrote on last edited by
        #34

        Peace aynur,

        No, read context which talks about Al-Kitab/The Book no mention of Jews.

        Also the answer given each time is a definite no regardless who said/says it.

        Peace.
        Okay, I had to look it up in my translation to refresh my memory.

        My footnote for 280 says "According to popular Jewish belief, even the sinners from among the children of Israel will suffer only very limited punishment in the life to come, and will be quickly reprieved by virtue of their belonging to 'the chosen people' a belief which the Qur'an rejects."

        The footnote for 324 says refer to 280 & the corresponding footnote.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          nerspi
          wrote on last edited by
          #35

          regarding eternal hell... it has been discussed many times on this forum, just do the search

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Meteora
            wrote on last edited by
            #36

            Peace.
            Okay, I had to look it up in my translation to refresh my memory. )

            My footnote for 280 says "According to popular Jewish belief, even the sinners from among the children of Israel will suffer only very limited punishment in the life to come, and will be quickly reprieved by virtue of their belonging to 'the chosen people' a belief which the Qur'an rejects."

            The footnote for 324 says refer to 280 & the corresponding footnote.

            Can't spell Jewish without "ew" P

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Offline
              R Offline
              Recluse
              wrote on last edited by
              #37

              What about Margaret Thatcher?

              She was a warmonger like Sarah Palin, wasn't she? Hillary Clinton is no different either. I think this is enough evidence of the fact that women are just as evil as men )

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Offline
                R Offline
                Rev_John
                wrote on last edited by
                #38

                She was a warmonger like Sarah Palin, wasn't she? Hillary Clinton is no different either. I think this is enough evidence of the fact that women are just as evil as men )

                No, why would you think that? The only war Margaret Thatcher was involved in was the Falklands war, defending and liberating a British island after it was invaded by Argentina. She was probably one of the best Prime Ministers the UK had seen in many lifetimes, turned the country around from being almost bankrupt to being the richest and most respected in Europe. It was her and Reagan that convinced the Russians to withdraw from East Germany. Great lady

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Offline
                  H Offline
                  hope4
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #39

                  No, why would you think that? The only war Margaret Thatcher was involved in was the Falklands war, defending and liberating a British island after it was invaded by Argentina. She was probably one of the best Prime Ministers the UK had seen in many lifetimes, turned the country around from being almost bankrupt to being the richest and most respected in Europe. It was her and Reagan that convinced the Russians to withdraw from East Germany. Great lady

                  Defending a British Island? The Island is practically on Argentina's door step. As for a great lady, she privatised everything and I havent even mentioned the poll tax she come up with, remember the riots? Anyways I am sure there was some good she did but overall I did not like her.

                  Peace

                  Hope

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Rev_John
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #40

                    Defending a British Island? The Island is practically on Argentina's door step. As for a great lady, she privatised everything and I havent even mentioned the poll tax she come up with, remember the riots? Anyways I am sure there was some good she did but overall I did not like her.

                    Peace

                    Hope

                    Yes a British island where every one on the island is British and speaks only English and is entitled to the full protection of Britain just as any other part of Britain is. She privatised a lot, yes she did, taking many big organisations from massive debt into profit. The so called "Poll-tax" was called the community Charge, originally a very fair way of taxation to replace the very unfair "rates" system. the riots were caused by people that had got away with not paying the old rates for many years. The system that is now in place called the "Council tax" is almost identical to the Community charge or so called poll-tax.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      MUNZIR_ALI
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #41

                      Defending a British Island? The Island is practically on Argentina's door step. As for a great lady, she privatised everything and I havent even mentioned the poll tax she come up with, remember the riots? Anyways I am sure there was some good she did but overall I did not like her.

                      Peace

                      Hope

                      She only waged war in self defence.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H Offline
                        H Offline
                        hope4
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #42

                        Yes a British island where every one on the island is British and speaks only English and is entitled to the full protection of Britain just as any other part of Britain is. She privatised a lot, yes she did, taking many big organisations from massive debt into profit. The so called "Poll-tax" was called the community Charge, originally a very fair way of taxation to replace the very unfair "rates" system. the riots were caused by people that had got away with not paying the old rates for many years. The system that is now in place called the "Council tax" is almost identical to the Community charge or so called poll-tax.

                        Peace Rev.John

                        Since their discovery, the Falkland Islands have had a complex history. France, Britain, Spain, and Argentina have all claimed possession at some time, and have established and abandoned settlements on the islands. So its hard to see who really owns it.
                        Poll tax was a fixed amount per individual. Council tax is a tax paid per property. So if you lived in a house with you your wife and 2 kids over 18 all 4 of you had to pay poll tax and it does not matter if you was a rich family or poor, all paid the same. I dont believe this to be fair. However, council tax is paid by each house owner and depending on the area and house their is different bands, so the rich pay more than the poor. A much fairer system in my opinion. Under Thatcher the rich became richer and the poor became poorer. Eventually she lost the backing of her cabinate and she resigned. No more Iron lady.

                        Peace

                        Hope

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rev_John
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #43

                          Peace Rev.John

                          Since their discovery, the Falkland Islands have had a complex history. France, Britain, Spain, and Argentina have all claimed possession at some time, and have established and abandoned settlements on the islands. So its hard to see who really owns it.
                          Poll tax was a fixed amount per individual. Council tax is a tax paid per property. So if you lived in a house with you your wife and 2 kids over 18 all 4 of you had to pay poll tax and it does not matter if you was a rich family or poor, all paid the same. I dont believe this to be fair. However, council tax is paid by each house owner and depending on the area and house their is different bands, so the rich pay more than the poor. A much fairer system in my opinion. Under Thatcher the rich became richer and the poor became poorer. Eventually she lost the backing of her cabinate and she resigned. No more Iron lady.

                          Peace

                          Hope

                          I understand what you are saying, but the idea was that if, as you say, 4 people were living in the house, then they use 4 times the services than one person in the house, which sounds fair to me. But your opinion and mine was the reason for the whole argument about it. I'm not sure it can be resolved into right or wrong, which is why it grew into riots. Both sides had their point.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • H Offline
                            H Offline
                            hope4
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #44

                            I understand what you are saying, but the idea was that if, as you say, 4 people were living in the house, then they use 4 times the services than one person in the house, which sounds fair to me. But your opinion and mine was the reason for the whole argument about it. I'm not sure it can be resolved into right or wrong, which is why it grew into riots. Both sides had their point.

                            Well I feel the rich should pay more, they have more to give.

                            Peace

                            Hope

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Users