Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Free-Minds.org is another Sect...like Suni and Shia Sects.

Free-Minds.org is another Sect...like Suni and Shia Sects.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
552 Posts 35 Posters 41.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    noble
    wrote on last edited by
    #252

    Peace belH,
    I won't be so sure, where did you pick this statistic, from the air, or from an electrical impulse in your brain?
    besides, after the first few millions, people do not really need more money, it is indeed a disease anyway, but encouraged by
    a crazy system...
    you know very well who end up being punished, it is always the poor...
    this time seems an exception, but in fact if you look deep it was not...
    Mr Medoff as you call him did what he had to do >D

    Peace Nabster,

    99% of today thieves steal because they want to get richer...Do you think a psychological treatment is the proper punishment? Do you think that is how Medoff (the one who stole 50 Billion dollar) should have been punished?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      belH
      wrote on last edited by
      #253

      Mr Medoff as you call him did what he had to do >D

      What is the proper punishment for him if you are the judge whom uses the Quran laws?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        noble
        wrote on last edited by
        #254

        Not applicable, speculative, he did not operate in a muslim country, there is no muslim state, and he is not a muslim...
        the law applicable on him has been applied...

        What is the proper punishment for him if you are the judge who uses the Quran laws?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          belH
          wrote on last edited by
          #255

          Not applicable, speculative, he did not operate in a muslim country, there is no muslim state, and he is not a muslim...
          the law applicable on him has been applied...

          Peace,
          Well, you do not have to answer if you choose to, however, your answer will help us to reach to our Lord's truth.
          peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            Samia
            wrote on last edited by
            #256

            Belal, now the problem is with the meaning of "outcome"!

            The point is, let's focus on the verse in question.
            Why would they ask about the outcome of the lost cup? What does it mean?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              noble
              wrote on last edited by
              #257

              Peace belH

              You can answer for me, I trust you will love that ;D
              but you have no jurisdiction on him, and neither do I...

              Peace,
              Well you do not have to answer if you choose to, however, your answer will help us to reach to our Lord's truth.
              peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                noble
                wrote on last edited by
                #258

                Peace Samia,
                don't waste your time getting any help towards proving the ayah meaning anything else but chopping hands off... chop chop chop, belH is into the maiming, mutilating chopping carving business >D and he loves it the sanguinary brute...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Offline
                  B Offline
                  belH
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #259

                  Belal, now the problem is with the meaning of "outcome"!

                  The point is, let's focus on the verse in question.
                  Why would they ask about the outcome of the lost cup? What does it mean?

                  Samia, if you think the word "Outcome" is not the best word (which I might agree), then what is the best English word that can fit in the Following

                  29-5

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    belH
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #260

                    Peace Samia,
                    don't waste your time getting any help towards proving the ayah meaning anything else but chopping hands off... chop chop chop, belH is into the maiming, mutilating chopping carving business >D and he loves it the sanguinary brute...

                    If you were Medoff who stole the 50 billion dollar, would you rather choose to be jailed for 128 years (His actual jail time) or would you choose to get your hands cut off?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      noble
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #261

                      since i was naughty with you, i will be funny with you...
                      if they keep my two hands in a bucket of ice for me, i will accept to have them both amputated (because then i can get them re-attached by a plastic surgeon with the millions i hid outside ;D )

                      still you are not convincing me bro... Allah is wiser than us all...

                      If you were Medoff who stole the 50 billion dollar, would you rather choose to be jailed for 128 years (His actual jail time) or would you choose to get your hand cut off?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        noble
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #262

                        Peace belH
                        and by the way,
                        even if you cut one hand only, with the advance in medicine, with a proper donor, you can get a graft hand re-attached too by the way, so the rich will always win, even in an islamic system... that is unless science development gets forbidden brickwall ...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          belH
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #263

                          since i was naughty with you, i will be funny with you...
                          if they keep my two hands in a bucket of ice for me, i will accept to have them both amputated (because then i can get them re-attached by a plastic surgeon with the millions i hid outside ;D )

                          still you are not convincing me bro... Allah is wiser than us all...

                          Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 128 years in jail?
                          Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 100 years in jail?
                          Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 50 years in jail?
                          Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 20 years in jail?
                          Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 15 years in jail?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Offline
                            N Offline
                            noble
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #264

                            belH, peace
                            For me I have no idea... for others I have no idea too...
                            to be honest, if there was a shadow of a doubt in my mind that it could make sense to amputate two hands
                            for theft and that there is logic into it, it will be like the zina directive which is very clear.
                            the theft directive is not clear, and left open to interpretation intentionally, there is wisdom into this.
                            if you do not understand the wisdom, then tough for you.
                            ahl al sunnah (sunna and shia) worked around it by still amputating but by diminishing the impact of taking
                            the meaning cutting off = chopping off, only they made the matters worse, because they had to invent other clauses
                            where they start chopping someone's body bit by bit!!!
                            I tell you what happened, in the first civil war of the muslims, most of the good muslims who knew the correct interpretation
                            of the Quran, including Ali, Hussein and Hassan were killed, so they had to invent a way to explain the Quran for the people,
                            and it was a golden opportunity for the enemies of God to invent something to justify any meaning they want to the Quran.
                            Imam Shafie gave that opportunity by making the Hadith the infallible words of the Prophet, then Bukhari, Muslim, and the other Collectors produced them...
                            That includes this disgusting interpretation of the punishment for the thief you want to cling to.
                            Do not get me wrong, I have no sympathy for thieves, and I am not weak in my decision making, but justice has to be
                            rational, logical, and not based on false unreliable information.
                            Allah knows best

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Offline
                              B Offline
                              belH
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #265

                              That includes this disgusting interpretation of the punishment for the thief you want to cling to.

                              Well, it still less harsh than 20 years in Jail...moreover, God's wisdom might be too hard for us to grasp, when thinking about cutting off hands (which I believe is too harsh to imagine), but, We only can say "We Hear and We Obey"

                              Moreover, now we do not practice this punishment anymore, however Humans practice it against Innocents.
                              Here is today's civilization that because of it you think the Quran Punishment is barbaric.

                              http//www.thewe.cc/thewei/_/images11/iraq_us_invasion/boy_hands_amputated.jpe

                              I hope your empathy for Meldoff is not the same for this innocent Kid

                              I'm done with this subject

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Q Offline
                                Q Offline
                                Q_student
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #266

                                Peace

                                the theft directive is not clear,

                                Quran says "I am Clear",you say that Quran says wrong it is not clear. Is this not a blame on the Quran??

                                Such a severe punishment cannot be left AMBIGUOUS.

                                the meaning cutting off = chopping off, only they made the matters worse, because they had to invent other clauses
                                where they start chopping someone's body bit by bit!!!

                                Provide the proof for this rubbish statement.
                                Regards

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  sarah2505
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #267

                                  Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 128 years in jail?
                                  Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 100 years in jail?
                                  Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 50 years in jail?
                                  Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 20 years in jail?
                                  Would you agree that cutting off the hands is less harsh than 15 years in jail?

                                  I think cutting off my hands would be exponentially more harsh than spending the rest of my life in prison

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Samia
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #268

                                    Well, it still less harsh than 20 years in Jail...moreover, God's wisdom might be too hard for us to grasp, when thinking about cutting off hands (which I believe is too harsh to imagine), but, We only can say "We Hear and We Obey"

                                    Why on earth would a thief be jailed for 20 years?

                                    And how can you "obey" if you do not understand?
                                    No one here says "we hear and disobey", so no need for this "holier than thou" way of discussion. We try to understand the "order", having God's attributes in our mind, as Most Wise, Most Merciful.
                                    "yad" in the qur'aan means anything from palm to elbow, or even up to the shoulder. Would God not tell up to where the hand should be cut, but bother to tell us up to where we should wash them for ablution? And leave this particle for our scholars to "choose" and decide? Is this God's way of "tafseel", and not "leaving any detail"?
                                    Read the quraan through the eyes of the author please, not the eyes of blodd-thirsty scholars; then you will understand what he wants you to "obey".
                                    "cut" and "hand" are two words that have many meanings in Arabic, and used in these different meanings in the quraan. Reflect, as God commands us, and choose the best meaning, again as He commands us.


                                    When the women at the Aziz's house saw Yousuf, did they "cut" their hands or stopped whatever they were doing "stopped the conscious action of cutting"?
                                    Imagine a scenario where you are doing something (writing, e.g..I know you do not cook ;D), and something drew your attention would you continue writing on your paper comprehensible words as you were doing, or just leave your hand there, perhaps making a long line (so not moving in different directions, or to and fro, required for writing or "cutting&quot, or stop writing altogether, even drop the pen from your hand?
                                    Pealing fruit, or whatever, requires attention. If the attention is suddenly taken somewhere else, you stop what you are doing. Vey simple. Same with pouring coffee you may freeze your hand and so the coffee continue to pour...passively. In other words, you "stop" the conscious action of pouring.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      abdalquran
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #269

                                      I cannot understand how 'bima kasabaa' get ignored everytime BelH analyses the ayah. The punishment for sariqa MUST be reliant upon what the thieves EARN. How on earth can be chopping off HANDS then (unless they're in the hand-stealing business).

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        noble
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #270

                                        peace belH, q_student,
                                        drama queens again, why does it always have to turn into an emotional frenzy with us Arabs huh?
                                        Wisdom is not easy to grasp period, but wisdom is subtle not stupid.
                                        So think better, because this is the secret of how and where the Muslim civilization can again raise again from
                                        its ashes.

                                        Well, it still less harsh than 20 years in Jail...moreover, God's wisdom might be too hard for us to grasp, when thinking about cutting off hands (which I believe is too harsh to imagine), but, We only can say "We Hear and We Obey"

                                        Moreover, now we do not practice this punishment anymore, however Humans practice it against Innocents.
                                        Here is today's civilization that because of it you think the Quran Punishment is barbaric.

                                        http//www.thewe.cc/thewei/_/images11/iraq_us_invasion/boy_hands_amputated.jpe

                                        I hope your empathy for Meldoff is not the same for this innocent Kid

                                        I'm done with this subject

                                        Peace

                                        Quran says "I am Clear",you say that Quran says wrong it is not clear. Is this not a blame on the Quran??

                                        Such a severe punishment cannot be left AMBIGUOUS.Provide the proof for this rubbish statement.
                                        Regards

                                        No it is not a blame on the Quran, let alone one on Allah, there is a very good reason why it has been written this way...
                                        let us see if your neurones can fire up a bit, and put yourselves in the Hejaz / Madina back in the 7th century... enough hints...

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • WakasW Offline
                                          WakasW Offline
                                          Wakas
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #271

                                          peace BelH,

                                          I will be happy to answer your questions, but as you said, let's take things one at a time, as you haven't even answered my questions yet.

                                          Can you provide a reference from a Classical Arabic dictionary that means "punishment"?

                                          Re your translation of "huwa" as "it".
                                          After speaking with sister Samia, she said that "huwa" can theoretically mean "it", but she said

                                          according to its context in 1275, and thus the meaning, "huwa" can only mean "he" referring to man, which means "who" and is used for humans.

                                          Do you agree with the above? Yes/no?
                                          If not, then I would prefer you to provide another example in The Quran to prove your point where in a similar/same structure "huwa" means "it" (with a preceding "he/who" particle), so we can determine what is right.

                                          Who knew about the plot (i.e. how Joseph was going to keep his brother)?
                                          Joseph yes/no? (if you answer yes, please provide specific Quranic evidence)
                                          Joseph's helpers yes/no? (if you answer yes, please provide specific Quranic evidence)
                                          Joseph's brother yes/no? (if you answer yes, please provide specific Quranic evidence)
                                          sons of Jacob yes/no? (if you answer yes, please provide specific Quranic evidence)
                                          Jacob yes/no? (if you answer yes, please provide specific Quranic evidence)

                                          The above question is related to the illogical switching between plural/singular/plural by Joseph's helpers (a question which you seemingly did not understand). Once you clarify who knew (according to you), then we will apply some logic and see what happens.

                                          #########

                                          peace Samia,

                                          When the women at the Aziz's house saw Yousuf, did they "cut" their hands or stopped whatever they were doing "stopped the conscious action of cutting"?

                                          Interesting observation.

                                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users