Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Translations - Another dangerous form of Hadith

Translations - Another dangerous form of Hadith

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
85 Posts 13 Posters 2.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    idriss_III
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Peace and blessings Ayman,

    Allow me to wonder, 9128-129 seem two pretty inconspicuous verses.
    Surely adding these does not corrupt the Message either way.
    Corruption worth talking about would be if ayahs were indeed removed from the original, and accepting that
    this did not happen is a leap of faith, this is where Belief comes into force, because after all we need to take
    Allah's word for it.
    I do because of accepting the Message as really being the Word of Allah, and hopefully being a Believer, but how about others?
    Another intriguing thing about belief is when you look at other faiths, for instance many Christians and Jews
    will swear that their parts of the Bible constitute the unadulterated and infallible words of God despite the contradictions therein
    (we know where these come from).
    That explains how the Muslims who cling to Hadith justify their Beliefs too.. and it is very hard to shift such mind frames...
    What do you think?

    Peace Idriss.III,

    I think that you have it the other way around. Khalifa removed the 2 verses as a result of the Hadiths. He merely used numerology to justify this preconception from Hadiths. Had the Hadiths mentioned different verses then he would have applied his numerology to these.

    Peace,

    Ayman

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      Ahmad_Bilal
      wrote on last edited by
      #40

      Peace Ayman,

      Khalifa removed the 2 verses as a result of the Hadiths. He merely used numerology to justify this preconception from Hadiths. Had the Hadiths mentioned different verses then he would have applied his numerology to these.

      Is there any proof for this? OF COURSE NOT! Rashad Khalifa openly rejected the hadiyths, even writing a book on why everyone should reject them.

      "Quran, Hadith, and Islam" (http//www.submission.org/qhi.html)

      Also, he plainly stated in his research that he believed in the corruption (fabrication) of those verses, based on his mathematical calculations, BEFORE he realized the hadiyth concerning them. What you're stating is speculation, not fact.

      Peace,

      Ahmad

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Offline
        I Offline
        idriss_III
        wrote on last edited by
        #41

        Peace
        Rashad Khalifa if he were a Messenger as he claimed he were, would not have needed to do research to prove anything.
        As a Messenger, Allah would have told him what to say, what to do, and how and where.
        Messengers are not Scholars, they do not conduct research, they are Leaders of men, by Action, Character, and Purpose...
        It is only when they have finished their task, that they retire and can do what Allah pleases for them to do
        (example Shuaib visited by Moses in Midian, or Joseph after his task of bringing his family was complete).
        Now there is a big if about the possibility of a Messenger coming after Muhammad, I believe there will be one, but not everyone agrees...
        but there is an ayah in the Quran that RK used that makes that clear I think..., but he used it for himself...
        RK's interpretation of the Quran is one of the first that tried not to rely on Hadith, but in my view, ruling out all Hadith is a mistake...
        of course the legal aspect of hadith leaves a lot to be desired, and only the Quran should be taken into account, as this is obvious if the Quran is read with an open heart...
        There are some things we are missing that happened between Ali and the other Sahabas, and with the destruction of Baghdad by the Mongols, and the burning of all the Muslim literature of the time, that information might be completely lost, or maybe it isn't, maybe there are some people who bothered to write about the first civil war and what it was all about.
        The answer to that will give us many clues about who really Muhammad was, where he came from, to whom was he preaching, who opposed him, and most importantly who helped him...
        Another source of information that is neglected is the Ottoman Arabicised Script Literature (I wonder how many still bother to look into these), there might be some interesting writings that were neglected there that will shed some light on early Islamic history salvaged from Uammayads/Abassids dynasties.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Q Offline
          Q Offline
          Q_student
          wrote on last edited by
          #42

          Peace Ayman,

          Is there any proof for this? OF COURSE NOT! Rashad Khalifa openly rejected the hadiyths, even writing a book on why everyone should reject them.

          "Quran, Hadith, and Islam" (http//www.submission.org/qhi.html)

          Also, he plainly stated in his research that he believed in the corruption (fabrication) of those verses, based on his mathematical calculations, BEFORE he realized the hadiyth concerning them. What you're stating is speculation, not fact.

          Peace,

          Ahmad

          Contradiction is the outstanding features of LIARS .This is what RK did.
          May I ask you what was his source of sequence /numbering of Quranic Chapters i.e Suras???
          Regards

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Ahmad_Bilal
            wrote on last edited by
            #43

            Peace Idriss,

            Rashad Khalifa if he were a Messenger as he claimed he were, would not have needed to do research to prove anything.
            As a Messenger, Allah would have told him what to say, what to do, and how and where.
            Messengers are not Scholars, they do not conduct research, they are Leaders of men, by Action, Character, and Purpose...

            This is totally false. There is no evidence that the messengers of God don't have to study and do research to reach certain conclusions. I think that everything happens in a certain order, and knowledge doesn't just pop into someone's head; they have to actually think and use reason, to analyze things for themselves. In fact, the Qur'aan instructs them, and everyone else, to study the world around them, so that they (and we) can find the truth of God's word... This is my viewpoint...

            Peace,

            Ahmad

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              Ahmad_Bilal
              wrote on last edited by
              #44

              Contradiction is the outstanding features of LIARS .This is what RK did.
              May I ask you what was his source of sequence /numbering of Quranic Chapters i.e Suras???

              Don't be a hypocrite. What's your reason for focusing your discussion of translations on Rashad Khalifa? Was he the only person who wrote a Qur'aanic translation?! I sure don't see you criticizing Yusuf Ali, Pickthal, Shakir, Muhammad Ali, Hilali/Khan, Muhammad Asad, or any of the other many translator.Why are you focusing all your attention on Dr. Khalifa? This is called IDOLIZATION...

              For the record, Rashad Khalifa numbered the chapters of the Qur'aan the same way they're numbered in the traditional Islaamic texts ("surah 1 al faatiha" to "surah 114 al naas&quot... What's your point?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Q Offline
                Q Offline
                Q_student
                wrote on last edited by
                #45

                Don't be a hypocrite. What's your reason for focusing your discussion of translations on Rashad Khalifa? Was he the only person who wrote a Qur'aanic translation?! I sure don't see you criticizing Yusuf Ali, Pickthal, Shakir, Muhammad Ali, Hilali/Khan, Muhammad Asad, or any of the other many translator.Why are you focusing all your attention on Dr. Khalifa? This is called IDOLIZATION...

                For the record, Rashad Khalifa numbered the chapters of the Qur'aan the same way they're numbered in the traditional Islaamic texts ("surah 1 al faatiha" to "surah 114 al naas&quot... What's your point?

                RK is fulfilling Satanic Agenda.He put the blame of Lying on Allah as well as on the Quran. He brought Code 19 at par with Allah. Allah revealed the Quran Code 19 changed it. A Clear Shirk.

                Rest of Translater are ignorant but non of them was intentionally fulfilling Satanic Agenda.

                Rk was against Hadith. Why did he believe in them in "sequence of Revelation of Chapters". Another Contradiciton which is a clear sign of being a "LIAR".

                (click on the sura's English name to
                jump to a particular sura)

                Initialed Sura
                No. Order
                Of
                Revelation Verses English Arabic
                1 5 7 The Key Al-Fatehah

                • 2 87 286 The Heifer Al-Baqarah
                • 3 89 200 The Amramites Ali-'Imran
                  4 92 176 Women Al-Nesa'
                  5 112 120 The Feast Al-Ma'edah
                  6 55 165 Livestock Al-An'am
                • 7 39 206 The Purgatory Al-A'araf
                  8 88 75 Spoils of War Al-Anfal
                  9 113 127 Ultimatum Bara'ah
                • 10 51 109 Jonah Younus
                • 11 52 123 Hood Hud
                • 12 53 111 Joseph Yousuf
                • 13 96 43 The Thunder Al-Ra`ad
                • 14 72 52 Abraham Ibrahim
                • 15 54 99 Al-Hijr Valley Al-Hijr
                  16 70 128 The Bee Al-Nahl
                  17 50 111 The Children of Israel Bani Israel
                  18 69 110 The Cave Al-Kahf
                • 19 44 98 Mary Maryam
                • 20 45 135 Ta-Ha Ta Ha
                  21 73 112 The Prophets Al-Anbya'
                  22 103 78 The Pilgrimage Al-Hajj
                  23 74 118 The Believers Al-Mu'minun
                  24 102 64 Light Al-Noor
                  25 42 77 The Statute Book Al-Furqan
                • 26 47 227 The Poets Al-Shu`ara'
                • 27 48 93 The Ant Al-Naml
                • 28 49 88 History Al-Qasas
                • 29 85 69 The Spider Al-'Ankaboot
                • 30 84 60 The Romans Al-Room
                • 31 57 34 Luqman Luqman
                • 32 75 30 The Prostration Al-Sajdah
                  33 90 73 The Parties Al-Ahzab
                  34 58 54 Sheba Saba'
                  35 43 45 Initiator Faater
                • 36 41 83 Ya-Sin Ya Sin
                  37 56 182 The Arrangers Al-Saffat
                • 38 38 88 Sad Saad
                  39 59 75 The Throngs Al-Zumar
                • 40 60 85 Forgiver Ghafer
                • 41 61 54 Detailed Fussilat
                • 42 62 53 Consultation Al-Shoora
                • 43 63 89 Ornaments Al-Zukhruf
                • 44 64 59 Smoke Al-Dukhan
                • 45 65 37 Kneeling Al-Jatheyah
                • 46 66 35 The Dunes Al-Ahqaf
                  47 95 38 Muhammad Muhammad
                  48 111 29 Victory Al-Fatt-h
                  49 106 18 The Walls Al-Hujurat
                • 50 34 45 Q Qaf
                  51 67 60 Drivers of the Winds Al-Dhareyat
                  52 76 49 Mount Sinai Al-Toor
                  53 23 62 The Stars Al-Najm
                  54 37 55 The Moon Al-Qamar
                  55 97 78 Most Gracious Al-Rahmaan
                  56 46 96 The Inevitable Al-Waaqe'ah
                  57 94 29 Iron Al-Hadeed
                  58 105 22 The Debate Al-Mujaadalah
                  59 101 24 Exodus Al-Hashr
                  60 91 13 The Test Al-Mumtahanah
                  61 109 14 The Column Al-Suff
                  62 110 11 Friday Al-Jumu`ah
                  63 104 11 The Hypocrites Al-Munaafeqoon
                  64 108 18 Mutual Blaming Al-Taghaabun
                  65 99 12 Divorce Al-Talaaq
                  66 107 12 Prohibition Al-Tahreem
                  67 77 30 Kingship Al-Mulk
                • 68 2 52 The Pen Al-Qalam
                  69 78 52 Incontestable Al-Haaqqah
                  70 79 44 The Heights Al-Ma'aarej
                  71 71 28 Noah Noah
                  72 40 28 The Jinn Al-Jinn
                  73 3 20 Cloacked Al-Muzzammil
                  74 4 56 The Hidden secret Al-Muddath-thir
                  75 31 40 Resurrection Al-Qeyaamah
                  76 98 31 The Human Al-Insaan
                  77 33 50 Dispatched Al-Mursalaat
                  78 80 40 The Event Al-Naba'
                  79 81 46 The Snatchers Al-Naazeaat 80 24 42 He Frowned Abasa
                  81 7 29 The Rolling Al-Takweer
                  82 82 19 The Shattering Al-Infitaar
                  83 86 36 The Cheaters Al-Mutaffifeen
                  84 83 25 The Rupture Al-Inshiqaaq
                  85 27 22 The Galaxies Al-Burooj
                  86 36 17 The Bright Star Al-Taareq
                  87 8 19 The Most High Al-Aalaa 88 68 26 The Overwhelming Al-Ghaasheyah 89 10 30 The Dawn Al-Fajr 90 35 20 The Town Al-Balad 91 26 15 The Sun Al-Shams 92 9 21 The Night Al-Layl 93 11 11 The Forenoon Al-Duhaa 94 12 8 Cooling the Temper Al-Sharrhh 95 28 8 The Fig Al-Teen 96 1 19 The Embryo Al-Alaq
                  97 25 5 Destiny Al-Qadr
                  98 100 8 Proof Al-Bayyinah
                  99 93 8 The Quake Al-Zalzalah
                  100 14 11 The Gallopers Al-Aadeyaat 101 30 11 The Shocker Al-Qaareah
                  102 16 8 Hoarding Al-Takaathur
                  103 13 3 The Afternoon Al-Asr 104 32 9 The Backbiter Al-Humazah 105 19 5 The Elephant Al-Feel 106 29 4 Quraish Tribe Quraish 107 17 7 Charity Al-Maaoon
                  108 15 3 Bounty Al-Kawthar
                  109 18 6 The Disbelievers Al-Kaaferoon
                  110 114 3 Triumph Al-Naasr
                  111 6 5 Thorns Al-Masad
                  112 22 4 Absoluteness Al-Ikhlaas
                  113 20 5 The Daybreak Al-Falaq
                  114 21 6 People Al-Naas

                Source http//www.rashadkhalifa.org/translation.html

                Middle Figures are Order of Revelation. What was source of RK ?

                Regards

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • I Offline
                  I Offline
                  idriss_III
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #46

                  Peace
                  ... and you are perfectly entitled to your viewpoint 😉
                  but as far as I know, those before Muhammad did not have access to the Quran, which was revealed to Muhammad and those after him...
                  so unless the Taurah or Injeel say so... and regardless, Allah will not allow Messengers to err while delivering a Message, which is not the case of someone who does research as by definition research uses trial and error...

                  Peace Idriss,

                  This is totally false. There is no evidence that the messengers of God don't have to study and do research to reach certain conclusions. I think that everything happens in a certain order, and knowledge doesn't just pop into someone's head; they have to actually think and use reason, to analyze things for themselves. In fact, the Qur'aan instructs them, and everyone else, to study the world around them, so that they (and we) can find the truth of God's word... This is my viewpoint...

                  Peace,

                  Ahmad

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Offline
                    P Offline
                    Prince
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #47

                    RK is fulfilling Satanic Agenda.He put the blame of Lying on Allah as well as on the Quran. He brought Code 19 at par with Allah. Allah revealed the Quran Code 19 changed it. A Clear Shirk.

                    Rest of Translater are ignorant but non of them was intentionally fulfilling Satanic Agenda.

                    Rk was against Hadith. Why did he believe in them in "sequence of Revelation of Chapters". Another Contradiciton which is a clear sign of being a "LIAR".

                    Before I address your fallacy which I've highlighted I have to make it clear i'm not part of RK's group called submitters and neither do I agree with everything he states and neither do I judge him.

                    Now to your statement about translators not having intentions of fulfilling satanic agenda. How do you know this?? Intentions are only known by the person doing the act and The God.

                    Also your 2nd statement about RK contradicting himself which you say is a clear sign of being a liar. Again this comes down to intention because you could genuinely be ignorant whereas a liar knows with intent he/she is lying. It seems from your post you have alot of hatred for RK which you haven't justified with reason which I felt obliged to point out to you. I hope you take it on board constructively.

                    PEACE

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Q Offline
                      Q Offline
                      Q_student
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #48

                      Also your 2nd statement about RK contradicting himself which you say is a clear sign of being a liar. Again this comes down to intention because you could genuinely be ignorant whereas a liar knows with intent he/she is lying. It seems from your post you have alot of hatred for RK which you haven't justified with reason which I felt obliged to point out to you. I hope you take it on board constructively.

                      PEACE

                      Hatred for him is genuine brother. Because he
                      -Puts blame on Allah that he Lied
                      -Puts blame on the Quran that it lied
                      -Puts Code 19 superior to Allah

                      All this he did in the name of islam and Quran.
                      Why not to hate such a LIAR
                      Regards

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Prince
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #49

                        Hatred for him is genuine brother. Because he
                        -Puts blame on Allah that he Lied
                        -Puts blame on the Quran that it lied
                        -Puts Code 19 superior to Allah

                        All this he did in the name of islam and Quran.
                        Why not to hate such a LIAR
                        Regards

                        I came from submitters site to free-minds many years ago and from his work that I've read RK does not state what you state. Maybe thats how you interpret his behaviour/literature which does not necessarily mean you are right in what you say unless you can bring a direct clear statement supporting your accusations. Actions are judged by intentions and hence its between him and The God on what he did in my opinion.

                        PEACE

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Q Offline
                          Q Offline
                          Q_student
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #50

                          I came from submitters site to free-minds many years ago and from his work that I've read RK does not state what you state. Maybe thats how you interpret his behaviour/literature which does not necessarily mean you are right in what you say unless you can bring a direct clear statement supporting your accusations. Actions are judged by intentions and hence its between him and The God on what he did in my opinion.

                          PEACE

                          Allah said - We have preserved the Quran
                          RK said .No it had been adulterated for 1400 years
                          Did Allah Lie ? Or Quran Lied ?
                          Allah said
                          No one can change His words

                          Rk Said
                          No ,code 19 can change the Quran.
                          Which is superior Allah or Code 19 ?
                          Use your common sense.
                          Regards

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • H Offline
                            H Offline
                            hope4
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #51

                            I came from submitters site to free-minds many years ago and from his work that I've read RK does not state what you state. Maybe thats how you interpret his behaviour/literature which does not necessarily mean you are right in what you say unless you can bring a direct clear statement supporting your accusations. Actions are judged by intentions and hence its between him and The God on what he did in my opinion.

                            PEACE

                            Selam Prince

                            Well said.

                            Peace

                            Hope

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Ahmad_Bilal
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #52

                              Allah said - We have preserved the Quran
                              RK said .No it had been adulterated for 1400 years
                              Did Allah Lie ? Or Quran Lied ?
                              Allah said
                              No one can change His words

                              Dude, what are you talking about? Where does the Qur'aan say that nobody can change it?! Stop making things up to mislead others... Yes, Rashad Khalifa said people have been misled in their interpretation of Islaam for around 1300 years. And...? This means absolutely nothing. It's already PROVEN that people have been misled for nearly 1300 years, and this is evident by the numerous inconsistent hadiyths throughout the Islaamic world. People have been practicing the wrong thing for centuries. If anything, Rashad Khalifa is the only person who actually tried to prove that the authentic Qur'aan has been preserved for 1400 years, unlike people like you, who choose to rely on blind faith, thinking that "the Qur'aan is preserved because it says it's preserved". This is BLIND BELIEF, and, according to the scripture, it's a sign of rejection and disbelief.

                              Rk Said
                              No ,code 19 can change the Quran.
                              Which is superior Allah or Code 19 ?
                              Use your common sense.

                              Please quote Rashad Khalifa on saying that "code 19 can change the Qur'aan". If you can't, then you're a LIAR and you have no credibility. You have already proven yourself to be a falsifier plenty of times on here, and you are only adding to this negative image. Please stop your foolishness...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • H Offline
                                H Offline
                                hope4
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #53

                                Just gets better laugh

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Q Offline
                                  Q Offline
                                  Q_student
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #54

                                  Dude, what are you talking about? Where does the Qur'aan say that nobody can change it?! Stop making things up to mislead others... Qur'aan has been preserved for 1400 years, unlike people like you, who choose to rely on blind faith, thinking that "the Qur'aan is preserved because it says it's preserved". This is BLIND BELIEF, and, according to the scripture, it's a sign of rejection and disbelief.

                                  In fact for you RK is more reliable than Allah's Book. Look at the claims of the Great Book.
                                  RK believed in Entire lie .
                                  All this was done for his satanic agenda to declare him a messenger. Again a Fake Claim.
                                  Regards

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Ahmad_Bilal
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #55

                                    C'mon, guy. First of all, none of these say that nobody can change the Qur'aanic writings, which we have today. If it did, it would be stating that nobody can change the ORIGINAL Qur'aanic manuscripts, which the Sunnis even consider false. According to the hadiyths, the original Qur'aanic collection, written by Muhammad himself (or dictated to one of his scribes by him) was burned with fire during the time of Uthman.

                                    Secondly, not everyone here can read and write Arabic. Just because SOME people can understand the writings when you post things like this doesn't mean that EVERYBODY can. By repeatedly posting this, even after others have already told you about this issue, you are showing arrogance and rejection, implying that you believe the scripture to be for one group of people, those who understand Arabic language.

                                    In fact for you RK is more reliable than Allah's Book. Look at the claims of the Great Book.
                                    RK believed in Entire lie .
                                    All this was done for his satanic agenda to declare him a messenger. Again a Fake Claim.

                                    More lies from you, guy? Now you're saying that I believe that Rashad's appendices are more reliable than the Qur'aan?! Can you quote me on saying this? Please show us all where I said, or even implied, this... As I said, you have NO CREDIBILITY. Please stop spreading lies.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Q Offline
                                      Q Offline
                                      Q_student
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #56

                                      Secondly, not everyone here can read and write Arabic. Just because SOME people can understand the writings when you post things like this doesn't mean that EVERYBODY can. By repeatedly posting this, even after others have already told you about this issue, you are showing arrogance and rejection, implying that you believe the scripture to be for one group of people, those who understand Arabic language.

                                      These fully referenced . Please you translate for those guys who do not understand Arabic.

                                      More lies from you, guy? Now you're saying that I believe that Rashad's appendices are more reliable than the Qur'aan?! Can you quote me on saying this?

                                      If you are not defending RK ,then what are you doing ?
                                      You are defending persistantly because you think he was right ,while in fact he was a liar.

                                      you have NO CREDIBILITY. Please stop spreading lies.

                                      Credibility ??? I need Credibility from Allah only if He accepts. I do not need the desires of Satanic Progeny by defending them.
                                      It is mubaarak to those who are trying to defend the Liars putting aside the Quranic commandments.
                                      Regards

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Meteora
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #57

                                        Peace Q_student,

                                        But even native Arabic speakers "translate" in their minds. So for example, some hear the word " " and translate it in their minds to

                                        "The stone cube in Mecca built by the Saudis in 1996 and that has a vagina-shaped enclosure in one of its corners containing some small black stones (Tektites) glued together with epoxy and named the Black Stone."

                                        Other native Arabic speakers hear it and translate it in their mind as

                                        "A rock in Jerusalem".

                                        Yet they are all reading the same Arabic text. Those hidden differences in understanding are exposed when you ask them to translate to English or another language. If you have something against translation in general as a concept then by the same token you must abandon all understanding in general since willingly or unwillingly you translate Arabic words such as " " in your head to whatever meaning you think is right. So if you eliminate the translation in your head then what you are suggesting is not to understand and just read mindlessly as if the great reading is saying "bla bla bla".

                                        Peace,

                                        Ayman

                                        Nice. laugh

                                        Also I would say someone has shown this before in this thread, if not...here Q

                                        4144 And had We made it a non-Arabic Reading, they would have said If only its revelations were made clear! Non-Arabic and Arabic, say For those who believe, it is a guide and healing. As for those who disbelieve, there is deafness in their ears, and they are blind to it. These will be called from a place far away.

                                        Don't be one of them.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          MUNZIR_ALI
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #58

                                          Please provide a translation with the verses you've posted. Otherwise it would be no use to guide non arabic speakers. They will have to follow blind faith.

                                          Please please provide a translation

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users