Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. All religions are okay?

All religions are okay?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
109 Posts 11 Posters 3.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    Peace, Simple!

    Umm, the poll got me caught.

    Are all and any religion okay so long as ............. ('OK, i'm gonna fill this first! So, what's meant with "okay"? Mmmm, let's ask the author first...&#039
    ('...huh?...&#039
    Yes
    No
    Other
    ('..."Yes", "No", "Other" to what? wasn't there a condition already? So, am i meant to answer to my own condition? ??? &#039

    Oh, there you go,That's what you got when you don't pay attention to the first post...

    Now, let's get to your terms 1. Peaceful 2. Truthful 3. Kind

    I would have to ask what is your definition (i know, boring...) of "Peaceful", "Truthful" (oh, this one is straightforward, leave it), and "Kind".

    If "Kind" is defined as those who do "Albirr" in 2177

    Not that "Albirr" is you turn your faces toward the east or the west,
    but "Albirr" is
    those who believe in
    God, and
    the Last Day, and
    the angels, and
    the Book, and
    the prophets; and
    give wealth, in spite of love for it, to
    the families, and
    the orphans, and
    the poors, and
    the wayfarers, and
    the beggars, and to
    free slaves; and
    establishes AlSalaat and
    pays Alzakaat; and
    fulfill their promise when they promise; and
    are perseverant (AlSabiriyn) in poverty and hardship and during battle.
    Those are the ones who have been true, and it is those who are the Reverends (Almuttaquwn).

    (Take "Salaat" as their way to contact God, and as for "zakaat"--well, the "known amount", 2.5% is easily bearable.)

    Then "Yes".

    That, or the definition of Ihsan or those of "AlmuHsiniyn" throughout the Book.
    Such as, they would quickly repent to their God if they did wrong.
    Saying the best of words to their parents.
    Taking the best of words to decide on.

    On the other hand, one could easily claim "Oh she's a kind person--she gave me cookies this morning!"
    (OK, that would still be part right if you are of her family, or you are an orphan, or you are a poor, or you are... ah--just read 2177 yourself)

    So that's why i say it entirely depends on the definition of your terms. Definitions or descriptions of "Kindness" in the Book are by far the best ones i know. Elegant, comprehensive, actionable and testing at once. I would gladly refer to 2177 as 'the perfect antithesis to all the useless hypocritical theories on Kindness'.

    If you see someone that prefers to dwell in any activity so obsessively that he thought it is more important than the actions of 2177, then... uh, just don't be like him. (I'm running out of words and must have breakfast soon)

    Simple, Peace!

    Different sects define these things differently but all are okay so long as they don't lose sight of the foundation envisaged which is the same for all.

    1. Peaceful,
    2. Truthful,
    3. Kind.

    of course the way you have defined the ayah above is your religion peace

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #46

      Ok simple, let me ask you this way

      When your religion says 'God has a son', can that religion still be 'ok'?

      And do you think maybe this time you can provide some evidence?

      002.062
      YUSUFALI Those who believe (in the Qur'an), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.

      Although the last day should be something else-but we will leave this as it stands -X

      peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        abdalquran
        wrote on last edited by
        #47

        3 things

        1. Why do you leave the word 'nasara' as Christians? Why not analyse it and perhaps you won't think it's christians either?

        2. What makes you think this means ALL nasara? Have a look at 9/30
          The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them how they are deluded away from the Truth

        Does this sound people who have no 'fear' nor 'grief' ?

        1. On the question God's having a 'son'. Have a look at this

        They say "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!"
        Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!
        At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down in utter ruin,
        That they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious
        For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son.

        So I really cannot understand how you're saying it's ONLY about love, peace, kindness or whatever. I'm sure God won't judge someone unless he consciously rejects the one God but ideologies which preach that God has a 'son' is definitely kufr and not 'ok'. I await your evidence to the contrary.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          san
          wrote on last edited by
          #48

          Different sects define these things differently but all are okay so long as they don't lose sight of the foundation envisaged which is the same for all.

          1. Peaceful,
          2. Truthful,
          3. Kind.

          of course the way you have defined the ayah above is your religion peace

          Yeah, Thanks God that is my way For you your way, and for us, ours.

          Now, give us your definition of "Peaceful" and "Kind", so we may discuss about it.

          And "Truthful" as well, since apparently we might have very different idea about it.

          And also abdalquran made a critical point. What's your take on it?

          In addition, can one stay being Peaceful, Truthful and Kind, all throughout his life following such system of lies?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #49

            3 things

            1. Why do you leave the word 'nasara' as Christians? Why not analyse it and perhaps you won't think it's christians either?

            The following ayah's make it clearer that it is the christians;

            002.062
            YUSUFALI Those who believe (in the Qur'an), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Nasaara and the Sabians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.

            930
            The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Nasaara call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them how they are deluded away from the Truth

            1. What makes you think this means ALL nasara? Have a look at 9/30
              The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them how they are deluded away from the Truth

            Does this sound people who have no 'fear' nor 'grief' ?

            Allah cursed the unbelievers of old , not the christians (who are believers) who are being admonished by an example.

            1. On the question God's having a 'son'. Have a look at this

            They say "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!"
            Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!
            At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down in utter ruin,
            That they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious
            For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son.

            So I really cannot understand how you're saying it's ONLY about love, peace, kindness or whatever. I'm sure God won't judge someone unless he consciously rejects the one God but ideologies which preach that God has a 'son' is definitely kufr and not 'ok'. I await your evidence to the contrary.

            God won't judge a person to hell simply because he likes to pinch womens behinds when he can ( )- he will be judged according to his overall conduct in life.

            peace

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              abdalquran
              wrote on last edited by
              #50

              The following ayah's make it clearer that it is the christians;

              Ok for arguments sake, lets take that its Christians. My point still remains. 2/62 and 9/30 shows that 'christians' are not a single group.

              Allah cursed the unbelievers of old , not the christians (who are believers) who are being admonished by an example.

              Wow, so God cursed unbelievers OF THE PAST but is ok with people called 'Christians' doing the EXACT same thing? 9/30 clearly says they COPY the saying of the UNBELIEVERS of old yet they're let off? Come on...

              Lets not forget that passage either please, Simple. 19/88-91. That's clear proof of the severity of this act.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                san
                wrote on last edited by
                #51

                Peace,

                Simple, can you please analyze each word in the original Arabic script and present to us your result? If you would not or could not that's OK. As you might already be very aware that it is really easy to derive incorrect meanings from translations.

                God won't judge a person to hell simply because he likes to pinch womens behinds when he can ( )- he will be judged according to his overall conduct in life.

                By the way, i'm surprised at how simple (as in simply insensible) your judgements 'on behalf of God' are. You used "he likes to pinch women behind when he can" and "according to his overall conduct in his life". If you used "he used to like to pinch women behind and then repented" that would be more in harmony with the "according to his overall conduct in his life" part. You see, repentance is a very often repeated theme in the Quran. God loves the repenting (returning) people.

                And of course God knows best. Please refrain from assumptions about God, we have very limited knowledge.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rev_John
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #52

                  Ok for arguments sake, lets take that its Christians. My point still remains. 2/62 and 9/30 shows that 'christians' are not a single group.

                  Wow, so God cursed unbelievers OF THE PAST but is ok with people called 'Christians' doing the EXACT same thing? 9/30 clearly says they COPY the saying of the UNBELIEVERS of old yet they're let off? Come on...

                  Lets not forget that passage either please, Simple. 19/88-91. That's clear proof of the severity of this act.

                  Christians are certainly NOT a single group. The beliefs of the Southern Baptists and the beliefs of God-alone Christians are as far apart as Roman Catholics are from fundamental Judaism.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #53

                    Ok for arguments sake, lets take that its Christians. My point still remains. 2/62 and 9/30 shows that 'christians' are not a single group.

                    peace

                    They may not be a single group but for the majority of them their overal teachings are basically the same.

                    Wow, so God cursed unbelievers OF THE PAST but is ok with people called 'Christians' doing the EXACT same thing? 9/30 clearly says they COPY the saying of the UNBELIEVERS of old yet they're let off? Come on...

                    They were cursed for being unbeliever's not for that act, and the unbelievers are cursed throughout the quran-check it.

                    hypno

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #54

                      Peace,

                      Simple, can you please analyze each word in the original Arabic script and present to us your result? If you would not or could not that's OK. As you might already be very aware that it is really easy to derive incorrect meanings from translations.

                      Okay -one a these days.

                      peace

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #55

                        Christians are certainly NOT a single group. The beliefs of the Southern Baptists and the beliefs of God-alone Christians are as far apart as Roman Catholics are from fundamental Judaism.

                        Hi Rev,

                        Well certainly they have called him a son of God , or God since before the quran .

                        peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          abdalquran
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #56

                          They were cursed for being unbeliever's not for that act, and the unbelievers are cursed throughout the quran-check it.

                          Simple, have you actually read 9/30. Let me translate it for you step by step
                          Waqalati alyahoodu And says the 'jews' (for arguments sake, lets say its jews)
                          AAuzayrun ibnu Allahi Uzair is the son of God
                          waqalati alnnasara and said the 'christians' (for arguments sake, lets say its christians)
                          almaseehu ibnu Allahi the messiah is son of God
                          thalika qawluhum bi-afwahihim That is their saying by their mouths
                          yudahi-oona they imitate
                          qawla allatheena kafaroo sayings of those who REJECT
                          min qablu from before
                          qatalahumu Allahu anna yu/fakoona Allah cursed them for their lying.

                          So why is 'those who reject' mentioned IN THIS CONTEXT and why is IMITATION mentioned here? Can you please read the ayah in full, Simple?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Rev_John
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #57

                            Hi Rev,

                            Well certainly they have called him a son of God , or God since before the quran .

                            peace

                            Yes, ever since the council of Nicea about 1500 years ago when the Roman Catholic church decided to "rewrite" everything. But not all Christians believe that Jesus was the "only" son of God but believe we are all children of God. Many Christians now are trying to get back to the beliefs of the early church with no trinity, no divinity of Jesus etc. Only a very few believe that Jesus was a god, they are in contravention of the first commandment of course.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #58

                              Simple, have you actually read 9/30. Let me translate it for you step by step
                              Waqalati alyahoodu And says the 'jews' (for arguments sake, lets say its jews)
                              AAuzayrun ibnu Allahi Uzair is the son of God
                              waqalati alnnasara and said the 'christians' (for arguments sake, lets say its christians)
                              almaseehu ibnu Allahi the messiah is son of God
                              thalika qawluhum bi-afwahihim That is their saying by their mouths
                              yudahi-oona they imitate
                              qawla allatheena kafaroo sayings of those who REJECT
                              min qablu from before
                              qatalahumu Allahu anna yu/fakoona Allah cursed them for their lying.

                              So why is 'those who reject' mentioned IN THIS CONTEXT and why is IMITATION mentioned here? Can you please read the ayah in full, Simple?

                              That is their saying by their mouths
                              they imitate
                              sayings of those who REJECT
                              from before
                              Allah cursed them for their lying.

                              They are only saying it with their mouths THEIR IS NO SUBSTANCE. sayings of kufar from before - Allah's curse be on them.

                              In times gone people used to be gods or sons of god and then act wrongly in the earth doing many a thing criminal- now that had substance,crimes for which they will burn.

                              But sayings from the mouth without any wrong doing has no substance, no crime for the burning.

                              hmm

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                abdalquran
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #59

                                That is their saying by their mouths
                                they imitate
                                sayings of those who REJECT
                                from before
                                Allah cursed them for their lying.

                                They are only saying it with their mouths THEIR IS NO SUBSTANCE. sayings of kufar from before - Allah's curse be on them.

                                In times gone people used to be gods or sons of god and then act wrongly in the earth doing many a thing criminal- now that had substance,crimes for which they will burn.

                                But sayings from the mouth without any wrong doing has no substance, no crime for the burning.

                                hmm

                                There is no 'only' there, Simple. And the 'qatalahum Allah' is for ANYONE who says this (anna yu'fakoon)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #60

                                  There is no 'only' there, Simple. And the 'qatalahum Allah' is for ANYONE who says this (anna yu'fakoon)

                                  Sorry Br, calling onself Allah or the son of Allah or Rabb like pharoah did isn't a crime in itself as much as calling yourself such and doing all the wrongs in the world like pharoah - his crimes are world famous

                                  here is an example of such.........

                                  002.258
                                  YUSUFALI Hast thou not Turned thy vision to one who disputed with Abraham About his Lord, because Allah had granted him power? Abraham said "My Lord is He Who Giveth life and death." He said "I give life and death". Said Abraham "But it is Allah that causeth the sun to rise from the east Do thou then cause him to rise from the West." Thus was he confounded who (in arrogance) rejected faith. Nor doth Allah Give guidance to a people unjust.

                                  peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    imfromjakarta
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #61

                                    Salamun 'alaikum,

                                    peace

                                    Are all religions okay so long as..........

                                    From my point of view, there's no such thing as religions. Religion is a term created by human to differentiate them self which is from my understanding is another act of polytheist as backup by ayaat below

                                    3031-32 Turn to Him, and be aware of Him, and hold the bond, and do not be of the polytheists. From those who have divided their system and become sects, each group is happy with what it has.

                                    4213 He has decreed for you the same system He ordained for Noah, and what We inspired to you, and what We ordained for Abraham, Moses, and Jesus "You shall uphold this system, and do not divide in it." Intolerable for the polytheists is what you invite them towards. God chooses for Himself whoever He wills; He guides to Himself those who repent.

                                    Allah introduce us through messenger to a system of life called dien.

                                    For a single individual a dien can be interpreted as a way of life
                                    For more than one person a dien can be interpreted as system of life that govern their life using Kitab as THE ONLY source of law.

                                    religion, democracy, secularism, communism, capitalism, liberalism, Vox populi, vox dei (The voice of the people the voice of God) etc are OPPOSITE of dien

                                    Just a little bit of OOT

                                    I like this quote

                                    Nec audiendi qui solent dicere, Vox populi, vox Dei, quum tumultuositas vulgi semper insaniae proxima sit

                                    And those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voice of the people is the voice of God, since the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness

                                    is a similar like this ayaat below

                                    6116 And if you obey most of those on the earth they will lead you away from the path of God; that is because they follow conjecture, and that is because they only guess.

                                    the people are

                                    1. Peaceful,
                                    2. Truthful,
                                    3. Kind.

                                    hmm

                                    You do not need religion to achieve peacefulness, truthfulness, and kindness for single individual but you certainly need dien to achive those if you want apply it into a nation.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #62

                                      Salamun 'alaikum,

                                      From my point of view, there's no such thing as religions. Religion is a term created by human to differentiate them self which is from my understanding is another act of polytheist as backup by ayaat below

                                      3031-32 Turn to Him, and be aware of Him, and hold the bond, and do not be of the polytheists. From those who have divided their system and become sects, each group is happy with what it has.

                                      4213 He has decreed for you the same system He ordained for Noah, and what We inspired to you, and what We ordained for Abraham, Moses, and Jesus "You shall uphold this system, and do not divide in it." Intolerable for the polytheists is what you invite them towards. God chooses for Himself whoever He wills; He guides to Himself those who repent.

                                      Allah introduce us through messenger to a system of life called dien.

                                      For a single individual a dien can be interpreted as a way of life
                                      For more than one person a dien can be interpreted as system of life that govern their life using Kitab as THE ONLY source of law.

                                      religion, democracy, secularism, communism, capitalism, liberalism, Vox populi, vox dei (The voice of the people the voice of God) etc are OPPOSITE of dien

                                      Just a little bit of OOT

                                      I like this quote

                                      Nec audiendi qui solent dicere, Vox populi, vox Dei, quum tumultuositas vulgi semper insaniae proxima sit

                                      And those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voice of the people is the voice of God, since the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness

                                      is a similar like this ayaat below

                                      6116 And if you obey most of those on the earth they will lead you away from the path of God; that is because they follow conjecture, and that is because they only guess.

                                      You do not need religion to achieve peacefulness, truthfulness, and kindness for single individual but you certainly need dien to achive those if you want apply it into a nation.

                                      According to the quran

                                      1. There those who serve Allah(adopt peacful, truthful and a helpful ways) by choosing to serve humanity.
                                      2. Those who don't serve Allah(don't adopt the peaceful,truthful, and a helpful way) but choose to serve the select few(because of their ill ways). They are kufar and when they start to practice their ill ways they are classed as Mushriks(they are their to harm humanity but serve a select few).

                                      I haven't checked but i doubt you will find any verse in the quran where it says "The Kufar and the Mushriks" check it.

                                      Deen is simply fulfillment of your obligations to men.

                                      Religions exist although they may not provide any benefits to anyone but as long as those people are fulfilling their obligations to humanity then there can't be any harm although there is no benefit neither.

                                      peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        abdalquran
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #63

                                        Simple, its very sad that because you want to hold a particular view, you pay little attention to what Quran says. 19/88-91 tells you the total anger of God to whomever says He has a son.

                                        Can you find ANY OTHER crime which has statements like seas with burst forth, mountains falling to utter ruin etc? I highly doubt it. But its there in 19/88-91 for saying Allah has taken a son.

                                        So i leave you with your views.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #64

                                          Simple, its very sad that because you want to hold a particular view, you pay little attention to what Quran says. 19/88-91 tells you the total anger of God to whomever says He has a son.

                                          Gods anger descends on men when they call themselves god or sons of god and bahave wickidly - like pharoeh did, but jesus isn't here to show such wickidness, so people can say foolish things.

                                          I have heard of Muslims Alims say things about Their prophet, so what ! It doesn't change the good things he did, for God knows.

                                          Can you find ANY OTHER crime which has statements like seas with burst forth, mountains falling to utter ruin etc? I highly doubt it. But its there in 19/88-91 for saying Allah has taken a son.

                                          So i leave you with your views.

                                          you are welcome, but be careful of the things you are following they may not be what they seem to be.

                                          using lanes/qd;

                                          1988
                                          They say "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!"
                                          1989
                                          Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!

                                          1990
                                          It is a wicked quality bursting in it and cleaving a sunder the disposition and causing to fall down the great/ stubborn to ruin.

                                          1991
                                          That they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious.

                                          1992
                                          For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son

                                          1993
                                          Not one of the beings in quality and disposition but must come to (Allah) Most Gracious as a servant.

                                          peace

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users