Asalamalaikum from Canada
-
Welcome to the forum Salman
Peace David,
How do you interpret 475-79, 2190-191, and 532-33?
Salaam,
It would be interesting to read his responses. As for me, I better get quiet, since the question wasn't directed to me. I'm inclined to be in agreement with what Brother David said previously p.
Salaam.
-
Salaam,
It would be interesting to read his responses. As for me, I better get quiet, since the question wasn't directed to me. I'm inclined to be in agreement with what Brother David said previously p.
Salaam.
Okay, let's try this again
Peace David, BornAgain, et al,
How do you interpret 475-79, 2190-191, and 532-33?Let's not forget this quote by Gandhi
?Fight violence with nonviolence if you can, and if you can?t do that, fight violence by any means, even if it means your utter extinction. But in no case should you leave your hearths and homes to be looted and burnt.?
"An eye for an eye" is often misinterpreted, IMO. To me, he was saying that it's not the best to fight fire with fire in every situation ("whole world" stands for all the time). If your house is getting burned down.. 'screaming peace' won't accomplish much. It's nice in theory (and believe me, I wish it were that easy), but it is very impractical.
-
?Fight violence with nonviolence if you can, and if you can?t do that, fight violence by any means, even if it means your utter extinction. But in no case should you leave your hearths and homes to be looted and burnt.?
"An eye for an eye" is often misinterpreted, IMO. To me, he was saying that it's not the best to fight fire with fire in every situation ("whole world" stands for all the time). If your house is getting burned down.. 'screaming peace' won't accomplish much. It's nice in theory (and believe me, I wish it were that easy), but it is very impractical.
I 100% agree. Tyrants don't just go away when you ask them to make peace, all throughout the great reading we see brave believers fighting tyranny to achieve enduring peace. Please these imperfect/unrefined proposals
http//free-minds.org/peacefulness
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9600414.msg246867#msg246867
-
I would like to connect with other like minded individuals on this awesome forum who are from Canada (Toronto).
Peace Salman,
I was born and raised in the TO area. If you want to keep clear of 19ers, you'll want to avoid Feroz Karmally, who was an original disciple of Rashad Khalifa. He's still puttering around up there with about 20+/- followers. Like Yuksel, he thinks he's better than the people at submission.org because of a few tweaks in the Sunnah that Khalifa copied and pasted into his message.
http//free-minds.org/ayman19
http//free-minds.org/debate19
So, they're calling themselves "God Alone" or whatever, but it's basically just a Sunnah group with a twist of 19.
Peace,
-David
-
Salaam Brother Jack,
Well I?ll try to answer your question. But just bear in mind, my lack of knowledge of the Arabic language, hence my interpretation relies heavily on the English translation(s) (I mostly use Yusuf Ali and Marmaduke Pickthall). One more thing, I hope you do not misunderstand me. My original post in this thread is about not using offensive speeches while talking to those who hold different spiritual beliefs from us, regardless they speak kindly to us or not.
Anyway, my take of the verses that you posted is that they are about physical self-defense. We are commanded to physically defend ourselves when the others wage physical wars against us first. Of course I will not idly sit while I am oppressed, I will definitely defend myself and my belief systems within Qur?anic boundaries, that is I will fight on equal terms, and I will not start the war first and I will stop fighting when they declare peace.
My argument in my previous posts regards fighting verbally, and not physically. I advised that someone should use humble speech when being confronted, and not use speak harshly even though the other party may not speak to us kindly. My current understanding right now yes, we are told to fight those who declare physical war on us ? this self-defense will ensure our safety and other Believers. However, in the case of ?verbal? war, I believe that the ?an-eye-for-an-eye? does not apply. Even though the other party insults us for what we believe, we should not throw an insult back to them, but instead, respond in humble speech or withdraw from the conversation and continue walking towards the Path. My current understanding is derived from 2563, 2855, 2043-44, 7042, 1597-99.
For example, if someone insults me, ?Go to hell, kaffir!? , I won?t respong, ?No! You?re the kafir #$^&%&( ZOMG!!oneoneone!?. Instead, I will argue in the best manner possible without name-calling, and once I have raised my views, I will withdraw from the conversation if the person insists on his/her belief being the right one. I guess I will say that we have different views, and that we should strive for what we believe in, peacefully.
Oh, I do not tend to take the term ?an-eye-for-an-eye? too literally. I mean, if someone hits me on my face, I will not demand punishment where I hit him on the face where I exert equal force. Instead, I will demand compensation that will cover the damage that has been incurred. That?s just me and my understanding anyway. Feel free to disagree =).
Salaam.
-
Peace David,
How do you interpret 475-79, 2190-191, and 532-33?
Peace Jack )
475 tells us to fight in self defence, but that we should not aggress (cross the boundaries by hurting those who hurt us more than necessary).
I think 475 is relevant to 545. 545 tells us we should wound those who wound us in a similar way; an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth etc. And if we don't fight back ( by for example forgiving them), some of our mistakes/wrongdoings will be canceled.476 tells us to fight in the cause of god (fight for justice/good), and that those who fight by doing wrong, for example by supporting a tyrant and oppressing the people are fighting in the cause of evil. Another example is if a coluntry declares war on another country to take its natural resources and oppress and kill the civillians etc. If the imperialist country does such harm then the people of that country should fight against the powers of evil.
477 tells us that there are people who are muslims and study quran and islam, but when it comes to fighting/self defence, they were afraid of those who they needed to fight agains/defend themselves against and they did not want to fight (they liked islam when it was theorethical but not when it was practical and fight was needed). They wanted to delay the fight for another time (which is an excuse to not fight). But they are adviced to fight because the enjoyment of this life is little (which means that they should not attach themselves to this life). This life is short, maximum 120 years while the hereafter is everlasting. For those who are aware the award of their fight will be granted in the hereafter.
478 tells us that people can not escape from death, death will find them wherever they hide, even in fortified towers. Fortified towers can be safe from armies, but it can not be safe from traitors, spies, or diseases. For example a king that is hiding in a fortified tower may think he is safe from death, but then he might suddenly be infected by a disease and die from the disease. Or a chef of king might poison his food. So as we can see, no one can escape from death.This verse is relevant to the verse above by the way. So if people hide from death by not fighting in self-defence (since they think they would die), this is a wrong belief. Because no one knows when they are going to die. But people calculate that they can escape death by not joining in the war by fighting in self-defence. For example a man may not join to fight for self defence and stay in his house instead. But then an earthquake may kill him instead. But if he had joined the war, maybe he would have been safe and not been killed from the earthquake because an earthquake is more dangerous when you are inside a house than when you are outside. So the man thought he was clever by not joining to fight in self-defence because he calculated that if he join the war he will die in the battlefield. But life is unpredictable and human beings do not know the future. So if he had joined the war, he may have been alive after the war was finished. Believers should put their trust in God.
479 tells us that the good that happens to us is from God, for example the creation of God is All good. The creation of the heavens and earth is perfect. There are no flaws in it. God gave human beings everything good, but evil acts are acts which human beings do eachother. But due to lack of knowledge, human beings think that they are not responsible for their life and environment. It is the humans that are responsible for oppressing and killing eachother. It's are own kind that our kind that our doing all the killing. If everything good comes from God then some people might ask, what about natural disasters? I think natural disasters happen because of human beings breaking the laws of nature (without being aware of them). If everything good comes from God, then some people might ask, then what about diseases? Diseases are man-made. Human beings are guilty. Animals from natural places like amazon are not infected with diseases. When animals that live in natural places are not infected with diseases, then it is logical that if human beings live in natural environmens they will not be infected with diseases neither. For example in the past in china, and especially in the natural places in that country, obesity and other diseases did not exist in the past. But when china introduced western ways of diet and lifestyle, then different diseases started to appear. It's easy to see that human beings are responsible for diseases. If everything good comes from God, then some people might ask, then what about animals that attack human beings? If the human beings studied animals and learned their nature they could probably prevent all or almost all attacks. This is a topic which will take too much time to write about in detail but i can give one example. For example people that live in a city are more safe from animal attacks than people that live in a country or in a village. Science and technology has enabled us to be more safe than ever from things which were almost totally outside our countrol in the past.
2191 tells us that we should fight against those who fight us, but we should not cross the limits by attacking them more than necessary. Our creator do not loved aggression.
2192 tells us that we can kill those who oppress us and have started an offensive war against us. Why can those who oppress be killed? Because oppression is worse than murder. By other words, if we are oppressed we are allowed to kill our oppressors. For example a tyrant (evil ruler) in a country can be killed. The supporters of the tyrant can be murdered as well. Sometimes a murdering the tyrant and his supporter is the only method which works against them. The only way for the people to get their rights (freedom, justice, peace and equality) is to get rid of the tyrant and its supporters. The tyrant and his supporters will not listed to logic, reason, rationality, truth and justice. They don't care about that. They only care about power, greed and money. If the oppressed people do not murder the tyrant and his evil supporters, they will enslave them, take away their rights and maybe even torture them for plenty of years. It is better for a victim to kill his oppressor than to be a political prisoner with no right and become physically abused in the prison for many years. It is important to uphold justice at all cost.
532 tells us that that human beings are allowed to punish a human being (murder him) if a human being has commited murder (for example murdered someone innocent) or if a human being has done corruption in the land (for example taking taking the money of the people and their natural resources and leaved them in poverty so that they are hungry and inflicted by diseases). Murder as a punishment is therefore only allowed to those who have murdered innocent people or those who have done corruption in the land. These two are the only excepsions were murder is allowed. Since human beings are interconnected (one), killing one person is like killing all humanity. Because the person that were killed benefited the whole humanity through his work, contributions etc. Saving one person is like saving the whole humanity. Because the person that is saved will benefit the whole humanity through his works, contributions etc. These laws have not only been given to Muhammed. These laws have been given to other messengers as well. But many of the people do not follow these laws. This is my current understanding of 532.
533 tells us that that those who fight God and his messenger and make corruption in the land should be killed or crucified, or that their hands and feet be cut of from alternate sides or that they get banished from the land/country. As far as i know 533 refers to when Muhammed lived. And i am not if the translation of 533 is correct.
From my interpretation and understanding of the laws of God, we should only fight in self-defence. We should never start a fight/war. All the verses are talking about physical fights and attack, not verbal fights or verbal discussions. For verbal fights and discussions Quran has other rules and principles which i am going to talk about in my next post.
-
My interpretations also rely on different english translations of the Quran. I want to do a scholarly study of Quran in the future, if god wills. I don't think anyone need to know arabic to understand the Quran. Many sunnis know arabic very well but rely on outdated tafsirs and use hadith etc. to interpret the Quran. From my study of the Quran, to understand it we need to have 1) a pure heart 2) knowledge.
We can not win a verbal discussion with force or through mocking someone. Imagine forcing someone to reject hadith and mocking him if he follow hadiths. Will it work? Almost never. If you want to win a verbal discussion and want to make a person to accept your ideas you have to win through argument. Never trough force or by making fun of the person.
If you want to make a person accept your friendship and follow your belief system, 4134 tells us an important lesson. Even dough the person tell us something bad or mocks us verbally, we should still respond in a good way. By following this method he/she may accept our friendship and follow our belief system
Quran, 4134
Not equal are the good and the bad response. You shall resort to the one which is better. Thus, the one who used to be your enemy, may become your best friend.If a person for example mocks us verbally or tells us something which makes us angry, we should repress our anger by not verbally attacking him/her back. We should pardon him/her instead
Quran, 3134
The ones who spend in prosperity and adversity, and who repress anger, and who pardon the people; God loves the good doers.If a person for example makes a verbal assault on us while we are walking down the street or tries to start a fight, we should say peace to that person. By other words if a person verbally attacks a muslim to start a verbal fight or physical fight, the muslim should be the most civilized one. So when the person starts a war, the muslim should should make peace
Quran, 2563
And the servants of the Almighty who walk on the earth in humility and if the ignorant speak to them, they say Peace.If a person for example uses false arguments and logical fallacies when they discuss with us, and if the discussion leads to nowhere and the person still have the same belief system and opinions after we have showed him/her lots of evidence the he/she is wrong, we should leave the discussion since life is short and our time is valuable
Quran, 2855
And if they come across vain talk, they disregard it and say To us are our deeds, and to you are your deeds. Peace be upon you. We do not seek the ignorant. -
Peace David, BA, et al,
Thanks for explaining your views You need not be an Arabic scholar to understand the message of the Quran... It's a life-long process. Heck, even in war situations we are to leave people behind to study (9122). All that matters is that you aspire to learn/grow/evolve (zakat)
Regarding a physical confrontation, you'll find me in complete agreement that we are not to be aggressors and always fight in self-defense.
When it comes to the jawing of words, I'd have to disagree.
Let's start with 604
There is a good example set for you by Abraham and those with him. They said to their people "We disown you and the idols that you worship besides God. We reject you, and you will see nothing from us except animosity and hatred until you believe in God alone." Except for the saying of Abraham to his father "I will pray for your forgiveness, even though I possess no power to protect you from God." "Our Lord, we trust in You, and we turn to You; to You is the final destiny."
And this passage
2157 And by God, I will plan against your statues after you have gone away and given your backs.
2158 So he broke them into pieces except for the biggest of them, so that they may turn to him.
2159 They said Who has done this to our gods? He is surely one of the wicked.
2160 They said We heard a young man mentioning them. He was called Abraham.
2161 They said Bring him before the eyes of the people so that they may be witness.
2162 They said Did you do this to our gods O Abraham?
2163 He said It was the biggest one of them here who did it, so ask them, if they do speak!Please note that at this point in the story Abraham hasn't been threatened in any way. Yet he uses sarcasm and mockery here to make a point. We are to stand up for The Truth (remember God is al haqq/the truth). And Abraham is a good example to follow (604) and the leader of men (2124).
Now you may ask yourself why would God instruct us to resort to conduct our speech in the nicest possible manner and then show us these examples?
3118 O you who believe do not take as an inner-circle any from besides yourselves; they will only disrupt you greatly. They wish that you deviate; the hatred is apparent out of their mouths and what their chests conceal is even greater! We have made clear for you the signs if you comprehend.
3119 Here you love them while they do not love you, and you believe in the entire Book. And if they meet you they say We believe, and if they are alone they bite their fingers out of frustration at you. Say Die in your frustration, God is aware of what is in the chests.Yes, we should try the nice-guy-routine first, but if that breeds hatred, indifference is not something the Quran suggests.
2563 and 2855 speak of 'jahiloon' (translated as ignorant). These are people who lack mental faculty or make dumb decisions, If you cross reference carefully.
-
Peace Jack
I'm glad that you agree with me and Sister BornAgain that we should not be agressors and that we should only fight in self defence when it comes to physical confrontations )
And i fully agree that we are to stand up for the truth, that we should follow the system of Abraham (monotheism), etc.
I like your interpretation of the story of Abraham and the idols getting crushed. However, i think the story of Abraham is not about a verbal confrontation. Yes, it seems that he used sarcasm. But in my opinion the lesson of the story is that we should crush idols/falsehood in the society through argument not trough mockery. But i am willing to consider new ideas and change my approach. But first i need to study the story and the other verses before i can change my approach when it comes to verbal confrontation.Thanks for your answers.
-
Hello friends
My name is Salman and i am a relatively newer "God Alone" revert. I immigrated to Canada in 2001 from Pakistan. I am from a typical "sheep mentality" sunni family where i blindly believed everything i was told about Islam. About two years ago, i picked up the Quran myself and first time in my short 33 year lifespan, i started to read it myself. It was not long before i finally realized that how wrong were the so many concepts, stories and beliefs that i held to myself about Islam. As i moved along reading the Quran, so many questions that i had kept on getting answered one by one.
I have also read the Bible and i sometimes do dawah to christians too and i find them much more willing and open to listen to criticism. I have given a few lectures on islam at a few churches locally here as well. It is my daily schedule to read and research the Quran and tell the truth to all others who are willing to listen. I think it is more important for us muslims to do dawah to our fellow muslims since so many of us are blindly following every other book but the Quran.
I thank Allah for guiding me to the right direction i.e. "God Alone" since on the day of judgement, it will be just me and him. No Bukhari, Muslim, Muhammad, Jesus or any other prophet or imam.
I would like to connect with other like minded individuals on this awesome forum who are from Canada (Toronto).
Also, i am looking for Edip Yuskel's translation locally in Toronto but cant seem to find a copy in local book stores. I will appreciate if someone can help me find it.
Thanks and Wasalam
Salman Zuberi
Peace be upon you,
with all due Respect.welcome welcome to the forum, brother and i must say my story is pretty much the same.
I am also grateful to God The Most High for guiding me the Right Way.I'm working on several projects regarding spreading the truth, maybe we can work together.
God knows best.Peace.
-
Hello friends
My name is Salman and i am a relatively newer "God Alone" revert. I immigrated to Canada in 2001 from Pakistan. I am from a typical "sheep mentality" sunni family where i blindly believed everything i was told about Islam. About two years ago, i picked up the Quran myself and first time in my short 33 year lifespan, i started to read it myself. It was not long before i finally realized that how wrong were the so many concepts, stories and beliefs that i held to myself about Islam. As i moved along reading the Quran, so many questions that i had kept on getting answered one by one.
I have also read the Bible and i sometimes do dawah to christians too and i find them much more willing and open to listen to criticism. I have given a few lectures on islam at a few churches locally here as well. It is my daily schedule to read and research the Quran and tell the truth to all others who are willing to listen. I think it is more important for us muslims to do dawah to our fellow muslims since so many of us are blindly following every other book but the Quran.
I thank Allah for guiding me to the right direction i.e. "God Alone" since on the day of judgement, it will be just me and him. No Bukhari, Muslim, Muhammad, Jesus or any other prophet or imam.
I would like to connect with other like minded individuals on this awesome forum who are from Canada (Toronto).
Also, i am looking for Edip Yuskel's translation locally in Toronto but cant seem to find a copy in local book stores. I will appreciate if someone can help me find it.
Thanks and Wasalam
Salman Zuberi
Salaam Salman
David Aitken would want you not to talk to people and see for yourself so he is bad mouthing me. I know David very well, and my daughter was in school with him for 4 years and introduced him to submission. His teachers knew that he would come up with the craziest ideas, insist he is right and could never be wrong. He craves attention, likes to create disruption and in his own words, 'created a terrible chaos' when he was with the Toronto community of submitters. He tried to bring in his distorted version of Rashad Khalifa tapes, the ones he is now bashing, to corrupt the zakat and salat instead of following the clear Quran. According to him, zakat was to be only paid on what you get via paychecks, then he kept adjusting this formula to include business income and interest. According to him, if you said 'Al lazeena' instead of 'Al-ladheena' your salat was nullfied and a waste of time. I challenged him on the basis of Quran and that is why he does not like me. Either you agree with his distorted understanding of Quran or he bad mouths you and considers you a follow of Rashad, or an idol worshipper. He is exactly like Edip Yuksel but the two hate each other.
You can judge me, and the wonderful community of submitters we have here, after meeting us, not after listening to David's rants and ravings, jealousy and bias.
Feroz -
His teachers knew that he would come up with the craziest ideas, insist he is right and could never be wrong. He craves attention, likes to create disruption and in his own words, 'created a terrible chaos' when he was with the Toronto community of submitters.
Sounds like a perfect description of Rashad Khalifa, just replace the "Toronto community of submitters" with Islam in general, as you even admit you are your own sect... But Rashad would take it a step further and say you will go to hell if you don't agree with his fabricated hadith and tafseer.
-
Salaam George,
Thank you for the reply. If you don't mind, kindly allow me to respond to some of your statements ).
While the verse that you posted, regards the followers of Muhammad, there are other verses that tell us to utter words of peace to the those who are ignorant.
The (faithful) slaves of the Beneficent are they who walk upon the earth modestly, and when the foolish ones address them answer Peace;
These will be given their reward twice over, because they are steadfast and repel evil with good, and spend of that wherewith We have provided them, And when they hear vanity they withdraw from it and say Unto us our works and unto you your works. Peace be unto you! We desire not the ignorant.
And remember what God told Musa to do, when he was about to face Fir'aun one of the worst offenders and transgressors in the eye of God.
Go, both of you, unto Pharaoh. Lo! he hath transgressed (the bounds). And speak unto him a gentle word, that peradventure he may heed or fear.
Yes, we are commanded to speak the truth. But to tell the truth, we do not need to include name calling or insults. We are encouraged to deliver the teaching of the Qur'an peacefully, and it is up to God to open their hearts. What I currently see as unnecessary is the name-calling and insults because I feel that nothing positive can be achieved by doing so.
Well, I too coped verbal abuses on a few occasions when people discovered my spiritual belief. So? It's part of the trial and we have to be patient in facing it. Rather than finger-pointing as to whose faults it is, I think the best way to improve the condition is taking actions and making changes.
Being a warner does not necessarily mean we use to use harsh and condescending words, right?
While I do not take the muhadithins' compilation of hadiths as religiously binding, I have to say that not all these hadiths are bad. There are some that are nice and inspirational, and I have no problem with that. Yes, there are many that I do not agree with because they are illogical and cruel, though I have to say I make that conclusion using modern perspectives. We may not agree with marrying a 9 year old girl, but at that period of time, it was normal for a girl to be married at such a young age. Heck, in my country of origin, there are still village girls who get married at the age of 10. We might think that the idea of owning slaves is a slander, but slavery did exist back then, and it was just recently abolished.
Anyway, the point that I am trying to make with Bukhari and other muhadithin is that we never know their true intentions. It might be purely political and corruption, but possibility remained that they were sincere in preserving the sayings and deeds of Muhammad. We cannot claim with certainty that they intended to slander Muhammad and God, because we are judging their literature using modern perspectives.
If we do not agree with the teachings of the hadiths, by all means do not practice it and try to warn the others. However, I advise that I advise that we refrain from using harsh words because it does nothing for us. Instead, it hurts our image and it hurts our soul.
Firstly, I am not a better muslim than you are. Only God knows.
Secondly, I too have been called kaffir by some people for not following the hadiths and I understand that it hurts. I believe, however, that we can 'fight' them by standing in dignity, and not lowering our standards to match theirs. I said previously that islam is about establishing peace, and there will be many trials to come. Satan will always be there to tempt us after we believe and we have to be careful not to fall into his trap. Don't let ourselves sink into hatred and contempt, after we have declared to maintain peace.
Whenever people trouble me with their words, I'll just keep in mind these verses
Well know We that thy bosom is times oppressed by what they say, But hymn the praise of thy Lord, and be of those who make prostration (unto Him). And serve thy Lord till the Inevitable cometh unto thee.
The verses work wonders D.
Yes, I understand that we should defend ourselves when confronted. However, in terms of debates and arguments, there are boundaries that we must adhere too. Verbally, we are required to defend our beliefs, through powerful and convincing words. However, I believe speaking powerful words can be achieved without resorting to harsh words at all. When they speak vain and rude words, it is best to withdraw from them I suppose.
I do. I have experienced engaging in hot debates with some traditional muslims and the whole thing turned really really messy. It was then, that I decided to stop talking in confronting manners and withdrawing from them, that I could finally make peace between us, and within. Interestingly, some actually 'looked' for me after my withdrawal and asked me about what I am currently gaining from my current study.
Anyway, enough for my rambling. Whatever you do, I hope that is for the best, and that you'll gain peace ).
Salaam.
bravo bravo bravo bravo bravo
By the way, I agree completely with your later elaboration on hadith. You speak in a very careful, honest, clear and nuanced manner.
Some of these hadith are indeed inspirational, and touch the hearts of those who only seek the guidance of the Qu'ran, because they are merely paraphrasing what can already be found in the Qu'ran'Shall I not tell you whom the (Hell)
Fire is forbidden to touch? It is forbidden to touch a man who is
always accessible, having polite and tender nature.''Ok, the Prophet pbuh cannot guarantee salvation. However I think we can all agree that there is quite a good chance that hell fire cannot touch you if you display the above characteristics. We can deduce that those who are always accessible, having polite and tender nature, are patiently persevering because they are God fearing. The Qu'ran says the most honoured in God's sight are those who are God fearing. And that God is with those who patiently persevere.
Not equal are the good and the bad response. You shall resort the one which is better. Thus, the one who used to be your enemy, may become your best friend.
O mankind, We have created you male and female, and appointed you nations and tribes, that you may know one another. Surely the noblest among you in the sight of God is the most Godfearing of you. God is All-knowing, All-aware.
"Oh you who believe! Seek help with patient perseverance and prayer, for God is with those who patiently persevere."
-
Some of these hadith are indeed inspirational, and touch the hearts of those who only seek the guidance of the Qu'ran, because they are merely paraphrasing what can already be found in the Qu'ran
And if what is in these hadith can already be found in the Quran then shouldnt the Quran be inspiration enough ?.
We can deduce that those who are always accessible, having polite and tender nature, are patiently persevering because they are God fearing. The Qu'ran says the most honoured in God's sight are those who are God fearing. And that God is with those who patiently persevere.
But an hadith follower who is "polite" and "tender" is still an hadith follower and according to the Quran anyone who follows any other hadith (except the Quran )no matter how polite and tender they are obviously not GOD fearing enough and are is commiting a serious sin and I use the word serious becuase from what I have learnt from reading the Quran is anything that GOD tells us not to do repeatedly i.e. shirk, idolatry, hadith following e.t.c the he must consider it it very serious and if practised till death is punishable with the hellfire.
-
Some of these hadith are indeed inspirational, and touch the hearts of those who only seek the guidance of the Qu'ran, because they are merely paraphrasing what can already be found in the Qu'ran
And if what is in these hadith can already be found in the Quran then shouldnt the Quran be inspiration enough ?.
We can deduce that those who are always accessible, having polite and tender nature, are patiently persevering because they are God fearing. The Qu'ran says the most honoured in God's sight are those who are God fearing. And that God is with those who patiently persevere.
But an hadith follower who is "polite" and "tender" is still an hadith follower and according to the Quran anyone who follows any other hadith (except the Quran )no matter how polite and tender they are obviously not GOD fearing enough and are is commiting a serious sin and I use the word serious becuase from what I have learnt from reading the Quran is anything that GOD tells us not to do repeatedly i.e. shirk, idolatry, hadith following e.t.c the he must consider it it very serious and if practised till death is punishable with the hellfire.
Yes, I never implied that it is ok to follow hadith. I merely pointed out that even those hadith which are not depraved are actually saying what is already in the Qu'ran, therefore it not being necessary if one takes the time to read the Qu'ran and notice that these benevolent hadiths are already in the Qu'ran.
-
Yes, I never implied that it is ok to follow hadith. I merely pointed out that even those hadith which are not depraved are actually saying what is already in the Qu'ran, therefore it not being necessary if one takes the time to read the Qu'ran and notice that these benevolent hadiths are already in the Qu'ran.
Fair enough, Im just saying that the only hadith that is benevolent is the Quran.