Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Praise Be to Muhammad rasool Allah

Praise Be to Muhammad rasool Allah

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
556 Posts 41 Posters 48.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Ayisha
    wrote on last edited by
    #321

    Taking advantage of your quote, Raaajah, let me further clarify what is in the paretheses, which may help some to understand how would he act as "the Witness-Shaidan"

    http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/007.%20Al%20Airaaf/Temp%2001%207.006.gif
    Then/for reason indeed We will ask those people towards whom the Messenger was sent;

    those people to whom the messenger was sent, those who were there during his lifetime

    http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/007.%20Al%20Airaaf/Temp%2001%207.006a.gif
    and indeed We will ask about those people from the Messengers.
    those people, the ones who were there when the messenger was alive

    http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/007.%20Al%20Airaaf/Temp%2001%207.007.gif
    Then/in response to their answer We will narrate/show to them complete detail with knowledge,
    because only Allah knows the complete detail even though the messengers were there with those people in their lifetimes

    http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/007.%20Al%20Airaaf/Temp%2001%207.007a.gif
    since We were not absent .
    As Allah was there, here and everywhere and not absent like the messengers were after their death

    Surat Al Airaaf-7

    amazing you cant even see it in your own translation

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #322

      To hafeez Kazi and other Munkareen-e- Shaane Muhammad

      Remember when Allah took a covenant from the prophets, saying, "I will give you the scripture and wisdom. Afterwards, a messenger will come to confirm all existing scriptures. You shall believe in him and support him." He said, "Do you agree with this, and pledge to fulfill this covenant?" They said, "We agree." He said, "You have thus borne witness, and I bear witness along with you."

      Allah;s Messengers are bearing witness on something they have not yet seen. This also confirms the Elevated status of Muhammad Peace is upon him in eyes of Allah.

      Allah Ho Akbar, that is how Allah exposes the Falsehood.

      One who understands and accepts the Most Elevated stature and position of Muhammad he starts living in the entire temporal realm from the first moment of its beginning.

      Look with open eyes and mind the "the covenant/oath" taken by all the Chosen and Elevated Allegiants of Allah and administered by none else but Allah. People might have seen the oath taking ceremonies of their respective presidents and Ministers. One administers the oath and others take the oath. After oath, the oath takers put their witness by signing the oath document and the one who administers oath also puts his witness on it.

      The oath taken is about their future conduct not past. They are undertaking that they will believe in the Messenger who will come much after in time. They accepted it meaning thereby they have since believed in him, now it is only to demonstrate their belief/acceptance in future when that Messenger comes, and it is possible only if they are living. If they are dead before his arrival, they died with the belief in that Messenger.

      In time and space, the entire humanity-since the Chosen and Elevated Allegiants of Allah-represent various segments-nationalities of human race- was under an obligation to believe, at a point in time in future, in the Messenger who will first certify and affirm all that was given to all the Chosen and Elevated Allegiants of Allah representing the whole human race.

      Whosoever accepted this oath he in fact believed in all the Messengers of Allah ending Muhammad knowing or without knowing names of many who were to come in the future of him.

      And from the point in time Muhammad appeared for the people, the order of believing stands reversed, from present to past- Muhammad backwards to all the Messengers whether we know the names or not, exactly in the manner of past people who knew or did not know the names of Messengers who were to come in their future time.

      In this way we get connected in belief to the first man who believed in Messenger of his time and all the Messengers who were to come afterwards, and thus believers live in the entire temporal realm.

      Except blindness of heart there is nothing which may not let people see the Greatness and the Most Elevated stature and possition granted by Allah to His Messenger Muhammad .

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        Ayisha
        wrote on last edited by
        #323

        He was for all mankind, for all worlds. and Allah tells us in following Ayat

        And We have raised your remembrance

        Why RAISE the remembrance of a DEAD person? of what use is IT?

        huh? what verse is this?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          Ayisha
          wrote on last edited by
          #324

          One who understands and accepts the Most Elevated stature and position of Muhammad he starts living in the entire temporal realm from the first moment of its beginning.

          Look with open eyes and mind the "the covenant/oath" taken by all the Chosen and Elevated Allegiants of Allah and administered by none else but Allah. People might have seen the oath taking ceremonies of their respective presidents and Ministers. One administers the oath and others take the oath. After oath, the oath takers put their witness by signing the oath document and the one who administers oath also puts his witness on it.

          The oath taken is about their future conduct not past. They are undertaking that they will believe in the Messenger who will come much after in time. They accepted it meaning thereby they have since believed in him, now it is only to demonstrate their belief/acceptance in future when that Messenger comes, and it is possible only if they are living. If they are dead before his arrival, they died with the belief in that Messenger.

          In time and space, the entire humanity-since the Chosen and Elevated Allegiants of Allah-represent various segments-nationalities of human race- was under an obligation to believe, at a point in time in future, in the Messenger who will first certify and affirm all that was given to all the Chosen and Elevated Allegiants of Allah representing the whole human race.

          Whosoever accepted this oath he in fact believed in all the Messengers of Allah ending Muhammad knowing or without knowing names of many who were to come in the future of him.

          And from the point in time Muhammad appeared for the people, the order of believing stands reversed, from present to past- Muhammad backwards to all the Messengers whether we know the names or not, exactly in the manner of past people who knew or did not know the names of Messengers who were to come in their future time.

          In this way we get connected in belief to the first man who believed in Messenger of his time and all the Messengers who were to come afterwards, and thus believers live in the entire temporal realm.

          Except blindness of heart there is nothing which may not let people see the Greatness and the Most Elevated stature and possition granted by Allah to His Messenger Muhammad .

          aww you were doing really well in having all messengers as equals, until the last bit where again you raise your idol above all others. The verses do not say you are to do that.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Ayisha
            wrote on last edited by
            #325

            In English one might presume a feminine equivalent to masculine, but in Arabic it is NOT possible, since it is the languae of fact and reality. Ayat is feminine and Book is masculine. And a feminine is never like the masculine.

            ah so there are no ayat (f) in the Book (m) laugh

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #326

              aww you were doing really well in having all messengers as equals, until the last bit where again you raise your idol above all others. The verses do not say you are to do that.

              I simplify the question which you avoid to responde.

              "All the Messengers of Allah are elevated over and above the ordinary men of past, present and future and none is equal to any of the Messengers in status, respect, honour and position". Do you accept this or have reservations about this also?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                Ayisha
                wrote on last edited by
                #327

                I simplify the question which you avoid to responde.

                "All the Messengers of Allah are elevated over and above the ordinary men of past, present and future and none is equal to any of the Messengers in status, respect, honour and position". Do you accept this or have reservations about this also?

                that has never been the issue and i have said this more than once and you know it, the thing you are avoiding is to do with raising ONE above the OTHERS, nothing to do with 'ordinary people' now lets not please go round in circles Mazhar, your post was doing really well but you still HAVE to raise one above the rest even though the verses, even YOUR verse, say they were ALL elevated and chosen.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #328

                  that has never been the issue and i have said this more than once and you know it, the thing you are avoiding is to do with raising ONE above the OTHERS, nothing to do with 'ordinary people' now lets not please go round in circles Mazhar, your post was doing really well but you still HAVE to raise one above the rest even though the verses, even YOUR verse, say they were ALL elevated and chosen.

                  But in the question I have not raised one Messenger over the other. What is the reservation in accepting or rejecting a simple statement?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #329

                    Quote from Mazhar on Today at 061111 PM
                    In English one might presume a feminine equivalent to masculine, but in Arabic it is NOT possible, since it is the languae of fact and reality. Ayat is feminine and Book is masculine. And a feminine is never like the masculine.

                    ah so there are no ayat (f) in the Book (m)

                    Ayisha,

                    When you do not understand the difference or accept the difference between a female and male, what is the point in becomming funny about that. He equated Ayat with the Book. I told him Ayat is feminine and Book is masculine, therefore, they can't be one and the same thing and can never be used interchangably.

                    Let him respond, then I will tell him how much wrong is he in interpreting the same looking words everywhere to mean the same thing. Had he realized that feminine is never like a masculine, he would have clearly understood the meanings everywhere. There is no confusion or no two meanings could be assigned to an Arabic word placed in a sentence since it is tied not only with the previous word but also with the next word. There is a thread discussing only this Root.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      szuberi
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #330

                      You guys are arguing for no reason.

                      Those who want to continue to believe in four books ONLY can continue with their belief. 2213 and 683-89 tell us otherwise.

                      Quran has no support of these four books only.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        szuberi
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #331

                        I accept the Word of Allah and not what I believe to be your misconceived idea of the Word of Allah. In Quran Allah tells me to think and reflect on its verses, that is done using some common sense, which is called common sense as we are all given some, its common. I have seen you here telling someone to NOT use common sense when thinking about an ayat, which is against what Allah said.

                        I have believed for a while now, and same as szuberi have come to the conclusion that The Quran, or at the very least the Mother of the Book, is comprised of ALL Allah's words that have been given to man and just like as afridi said, its like a super computer and Allah has the hard drive, so when Allah says 'no one can change the words of Allah' He aint kidding, Hes got the hard drive, the whole copy.

                        People of the book are all of us that listen to Allahs words, not just Christians or Jews, and those verses apply to us all. To imply that The Book is Quran and only Quran IMO is wrong as that is not what Allah says when you look at the whole wood instead of inspecting the bark of the trees individually. That is why this FINAL message is for ALL mankind and confirms what came before it are from Allah are part of this message and that is why they are in this message.

                        You may be well versed in the Arabic language but your manner and the way you pass that information on is not in any way how you have been told to 'teach' and is not following any prophet that i have heard of. You call people ignorant, stupid, munafiq , claim an Arabic teacher would slap the face of one not getting it and have even claimed that learning Arabic is easy for those who dont have veils on their hearts. this is not for YOU to decide who has a veil on his/her heart or not and you too may very well have one over yours which your apparent arrogance shines through. With a little humility and a bucket of patience you could teach many many people how to understand the Arabic language but instead you have tantrums and call names and fail to have a productive discussion or debate. In your mind you are right and everyone else is wrong and you are not in the least bit 'pliable' nor will you even think for one minute that someone else may have a good point, which many have here.

                        Arabic script and language is very similar to your own mother tongue, so learning this is much easier for you than someone like me, but I do think that as I said above, you cannot see the wood for the trees.

                        Excellent Sister

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Ayisha
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #332

                          But in the question I have not raised one Messenger over the other. What is the reservation in accepting or rejecting a simple statement?

                          Mazhar, how many times does the same thing have to be repeated for you to get it? Now YOU are doing worse than any here who don't 'grasp' the Arabic.

                          The ISSUE is that of raising ONE messenger, namely Muhammed in this case, above all other messengers. that is the issue in here and has been the issue. There has NEVER been an issue that ALL messengers were chosen over ordinary people..blah blah see previous posts on the same subject )

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            szuberi
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #333

                            Ayisha,

                            When you do not understand the difference or accept the difference between a female and male, what is the point in becomming funny about that. He equated Ayat with the Book. I told him Ayat is feminine and Book is masculine, therefore, they can't be one and the same thing and can never be used interchangably.

                            Let him respond, then I will tell him how much wrong is he in interpreting the same looking words everywhere to mean the same thing. Had he realized that feminine is never like a masculine, he would have clearly understood the meanings everywhere. There is no confusion or no two meanings could be assigned to an Arabic word placed in a sentence since it is tied not only with the previous word but also with the next word. There is a thread discussing only this Root.

                            Dude your attitude sucks big time.

                            It appears that you are just sitting there...waiting to prove anyone or anything wrong so you can score some points.

                            The Quran clearly says that the messenger reads pages that are purified and in these pages there are books. So whether ayahs or surahs are books or not doesnt matter. Whatever division is there within THE BOOK is the Kutub being referred to here. Just like the Bible...it means a Library of Books.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              szuberi
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #334

                              I dont get why people who know Arabic tend to think they have better grip over the understanding of the Quran.

                              "That book has guidance for those who know Arabic"

                              doesnt exist in the Quran.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #335

                                I dont get why people who know Arabic tend to think they have better grip over the understanding of the Quran.

                                "That book has guidance for those who know Arabic"

                                doesnt exist in the Quran.

                                http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/012.%20Yusuf%20alahissalam/12.02.gif
                                Indeed We have sent that Book as Written Book/Qur'aan in Arabic language/clear, perspicuous, eloquent, distinct, free from admixture, void of indistinctness, apparent like the daybreak and divested of the froth

                                And listen the reason!

                                http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/012.%20Yusuf%20alahissalam/12.02a.gif
                                so that you people may be able to save it in memory/reflect and differentiate

                                The basic job of brain/intellect is to differentiate between two things, see the difference between feminine and masculine. Intelligent people even make the signs of female and male evidently different from each other referring/showing physical realities.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #336

                                  The Quran clearly says that the messenger reads pages that are purified and in these pages there are books. So whether ayahs or surahs are books or not doesnt matter. Whatever division is there within THE BOOK is the Kutub being referred to here. Just like the Bible...it means a Library of Books.

                                  I don't know why some people on this forum, just for the sake of sticking to what they said once, do not hesitate to write such like things which even otherwise seem ridiculous.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mazhar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #337

                                    You guys are arguing for no reason.

                                    Those who want to continue to believe in four books ONLY can continue with their belief. 2213 and 683-89 tell us otherwise.

                                    Quran has no support of these four books only.

                                    Who said this, and where is his/her quote?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #338

                                      Mazhar, how many times does the same thing have to be repeated for you to get it? Now YOU are doing worse than any here who don't 'grasp' the Arabic.

                                      The ISSUE is that of raising ONE messenger, namely Muhammed in this case, above all other messengers.

                                      The first issue is always to make distinction between two things apparently similar looking but different in essence from each other, and then comes the question of determining the distinction between men of similar status. You are not even responding to the base question that whether you consider and accept the Messengers of Allah, without considering any distinction and difference between them, as being above the ordinary men of today and past, or relegate them to the level of ordinary men.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Ayisha
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #339

                                        The first issue is always to make distinction between two things apparently similar looking but different in essence from each other, and then comes the question of determining the distinction between men of similar status. You are not even responding to the base question that whether you consider and accept the Messengers of Allah, without considering any distinction and difference between them, as being above the ordinary men of today and past, or relegate them to the level of ordinary men.

                                        as i have repeated more times than I care to search for, this is NOT an issue! OF COURSE ALL MESSENGERS WERE ELEVATED ABOVE ORDINARY PEOPLE, they are CHOSEN to pass on ALLAH'S message!! That is NOT the issue and you KNOW that and I keep repeating it! Now stop avoiding the fact that you DO elevate ONE above the others in idolization of him!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          Ayisha
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #340

                                          http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/012.%20Yusuf%20alahissalam/12.02.gif
                                          Indeed We have sent that Book as Written Book/Qur'aan in Arabic language/clear, perspicuous, eloquent, distinct, free from admixture, void of indistinctness, apparent like the daybreak and divested of the froth

                                          And listen the reason!

                                          http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/012.%20Yusuf%20alahissalam/12.02a.gif
                                          so that you people may be able to save it in memory/reflect and differentiate

                                          The basic job of brain/intellect is to differentiate between two things, see the difference between feminine and masculine. Intelligent people even make the signs of female and male evidently different from each other referring/showing physical realities.

                                          of course it was in Arabic, it was sent to an Arabic speaker, no point in giving it him in Chinese is there? his audience were Arabic speakers, not Swahili

                                          Muhammed was not a linguist either and he would not have been delving into the grammatical structure of the sentences seeing which WORD meant Quran and which meant WORD, he took it as it was, he saw the WOODS perfectly well and he saw the TREES in that wood as well and he followed it perfectly!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users