WHY IBLIS CANNOT BE AN ANGEL...
-
I cant recall how this thread turned out, but my current view is
iblees (~ego) is a malaika (controlling force) that is jinn/hidden.
iblees was designed to respond exactly as "he" did, i.e. disobey, thus did not break the rule that malaika do as commanded.
-
i think just like us, biological ceatures, there's humans, snimals, fish, birds, maybe there many kinds of angels, that why allah spoke to the angles (all of them) they all bow down except the jinn, maybe a jinn is wat is called in other culture a fallen angel, i believe also that gabriel is not an angel, and also michael, Jibril = jabar allah , mean the mighty in power, shadid al kiwa, the force of allah, allah named him that way, the holy spirit is the holy spirit, the one who brings revelation, the one who ic called also the spirit of truth, or simply the spirit, the one whom wllah used to blow from him into adam and into jesus, allah created the holy spirit , allah is the lord of the holy spirit and gabriel and michael and the angels ans mankind, the reason i believe we don't have a part of god in us as our spirit, but we have a part of the spirit that allah created, allah is not a spirit, spirits are created by allah, we're the last of creation, well, that"s what i understand, i could be wrong , but it doesn't matter, that's the world of the unseen and we cannot really comprehend, only those of us guys who are blessed in the hearafter that might have the knowlege of all these questions, some of us from this forum might be there, hopefully all of us, but for sure not me, for I will burn in hell and never know what gabriel is or the holy spirit is, and don't tell me know, i'm sure about it, and i know i deserve to go to hell, if allah puts me in paradise i don't see any justice there, ciao, peace, let me have my bear and enjoy for it is too late for me, ciao
-
Peace brother Wakas,
I cant recall how this thread turned out, but my current view is
iblees (~ego) is a malaika (controlling force) that is jinn/hidden.
iblees was designed to respond exactly as "he" did, i.e. disobey, thus did not break the rule that malaika do as commanded.Is being a "controlling force" something intrinsic or is it something given and can be taken away?
Peace,
Ayman
-
Peace Bro Ayman,
God could take it away. I'm not 100% sure what you mean though.
Also, I should clarify my previous statement, I meant
iblees was designed to respond exactly as "he" did, i.e. not SJD, thus did not break the rule that malaika do as commanded. -
Peace brother Wakas,
God could take it away. I'm not 100% sure what you mean though.
Since "mlk/control" is given by the god and could be taken away, then the "controlling forces" are not a certain specie but it is a status that the god gives and could take away.
So like all "controlling forces", Iblis was given control. However, when he disobeyed, it was taken away from him. He was always a "jinn", before and after control was taken away from him. If any "controlling force" disobeys the god then he would cease to be a "controlling force".
Also, I should clarify my previous statement, I meant
iblees was designed to respond exactly as "he" did, i.e. not SJD, thus did not break the rule that malaika do as commanded.This would contradict the fact that all humans and "jinn" were designed to serve the god
Peace,
Ayman
-
Peace,
I cant recall how this thread turned out, but my current view is
iblees (~ego) is a malaika (controlling force) that is jinn/hidden.
iblees was designed to respond exactly as "he" did, i.e. disobey, thus did not break the rule that malaika do as commanded.
It's contradiction to be programmed or hardwired to disobey the program.
Circular deadlock IF command = obey THEN command = disobey
-
Peace Bro Ayman,
Can you clarify where you get these statements from
However, when he disobeyed, it was taken away from him.
If any "controlling force" disobeys the god then he would cease to be a "controlling force".
This would contradict the fact that all humans and "jinn" were designed to serve the god
They should serve God, whether they do or not is a different matter, but as I said, "iblees" was designed not to SJD, thus did exactly as designed to do.
-
Peace Wakas,
Hence my later clarification, i.e. "iblees" was designed not to SJD (mankind).
That's the contradiction; God's command was clearly given to submit and cannot assume opposite was programmed.
The logical conclusion is that iblees like humans was given autonomy or choice to agree/disagree with the command.
-
Peace Noon,
I fail to see the contradiction
We said to the malaika SJD to/for adam/mankind, but iblees did not SJD.
The above strongly implies iblees was of the malaika, but as we know, malaika do as ordered. So how do we resolve this contradiction? This was discussed in this thread.
IF iblees was designed not to SJD to/for mankind, where is the contradiction?
If Canon design a voice-activated printer, which always does as requested, then its engineer says to it "laminate a document" and it does not laminate, where is the contradiction? To me, it needs clarified. It would only be a contradiction if it was said to it "print a document" and it did not print.
To determine whether it is a contradiction or not we have to know what it was designed to do.
I just realised, in AQ it seems to suggest specific malaika for specific tasks, they have a remit, they have control over a certain thing, which would also make sense with the above.
If a better answer can be given, I am all ears.
-
Peace Wakas,
I fail to see the contradiction
We said to the malaika SJD to/for adam/mankind, but iblees did not SJD.
The above strongly implies iblees was of the malaika, but as we know, malaika do as ordered. So how do we resolve this contradiction? This was discussed in this thread.
IF iblees was designed not to SJD to/for mankind, where is the contradiction?
If Canon design a voice-activated printer, which always does as requested, then its engineer says to it "laminate a document" and it does not laminate, where is the contradiction? To me, it needs clarified. It would only be a contradiction if it was said to it "print a document" and it did not print.
To determine whether it is a contradiction or not we have to know what it was designed to do.
I just realised, in AQ it seems to suggest specific malaika for specific tasks, they have a remit, they have control over a certain thing, which would also make sense with the above.
If a better answer can be given, I am all ears.
712
said "What prevented you that not you prostrate tasjuda when I commanded you?"
said "I am better than him. You created me from fire and You created him from clay."That is disobedience of a direct command thus designed with autonomy to agree/disagree.
-
Peace brother Wakas,
Can you clarify where you get these statements from
However, when he disobeyed, it was taken away from him.
If any "controlling force" disobeys the god then he would cease to be a "controlling force".I got them from your statement here
God could take it away.
You agreed that being a "controlling force" is something that can be given to any creature and taken away by the god from any creature. We know that "contolling forces" do not disobey the god. Since this is a status that can be given or taken away by the god then saying that "controlling forces do not disobey the god" as a general principle is like saying "good students do not get bad grades". The minute a good student gets bad grades, he stops being a "good student". This is exactly like the minute a "controlling force" disobeys the god he stops being a "controlling force".
They should serve God, whether they do or not is a different matter, but as I said, "iblees" was designed not to SJD, thus did exactly as designed to do.
One serves the god by obeying him. If one is not obeying the god than he is not serving him. The design of the god is for "jinn" to serve him, and thus obey him. Clearly, Iblis was given freedom of choice and this is why the god asked him about why he disobeyed his command. Otherwise, the question would be meaningless.
Also, please remember that everything in the heavens and the earth does "sujud" (obedience) to the god. The god doesn't say everything except "jinn".
Peace,
Ayman
-
peace Bro Ayman,
Thanks for the explanation.
I said "could" as I wasn't sure if it actually was taken away. The reason I still regard iblees as a controlling force is that I think iblees still has some remit of control, i.e. that part of our psyche that can be influenced by iblees. This seems to be clearly suggested in AQ, e.g. 716-17.
Also, you seem to be saying iblees is no longer a malaika, and is a jinn, but then you implied jinn serve/obey God, but in your view iblees does not. Can you clarify?
Clearly, Iblis was given freedom of choice and this is why the god asked him about why he disobeyed his command. Otherwise, the question would be meaningless.
It is interesting God asks "iblees" such a question, because obviously God is all-knowing. So I asked myself, why would God ask such a thing? To me, the answer was obvious, it is rhetorical, asked for our benefit, i.e. to tell the recipients of the narrative something.
Also, please remember that everything in the heavens and the earth does "sujud" (obedience) to the god. The god doesn't say everything except "jinn".
I have been studying this recently as it happens and my understanding is as follows. The above is also said of "aSLaMa", and "SaBiH". If there are other words/terms it says this for I'd be interested to know. To me, there is a difference between "aSLaMa" in the true sense, and the theoretical or superficial sense. For example, if someone submits to me and does what I tell them, it would be true to say they are in "submission" to me, BUT this does not tell us if they are doing it out of free choice, i.e. their own decision, or are just doing it for other reasons. Same can be said of SJD. If someone obeys me, they are in obedience to me, but this does not tell us if they are doing so because they out of free choice etc. That is why everything in universe SJD/SLM/SBH, it is only those who do so out of their own free choice will succeed.
I asked myself, what these terms have in common and I realised they are terms that have a power-relation paradigm, they have something inherent about them that is a subordination component. I would be interested to know if this observation holds for any other terms.
-
I said "could" as I wasn't sure if it actually was taken away. The reason I still regard iblees as a controlling force is that I think iblees still has some remit of control, i.e. that part of our psyche that can be influenced by iblees. This seems to be clearly suggested in AQ, e.g. 716-17. Wakas
http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/014.%20Ibrahim%20alahissalam/14.22b.gif
and there was nothing of authority for me upon you people except that I invited you people whereupon/for reason you people responded for me,
http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/014.%20Ibrahim%20alahissalam/14.22c.gif
therefore you people do not blame/objurgate me instead you blame/objurgate your selves.1422
-
u guys are talking about the unseen, before we say iblis is an angel or not, we fiest have to understand what angels really are, are they beigns with wings? like birds? wian is satan? is he a beign red colored with horns?
i believe there are many kinds of angels, and one of all that kinds was ibliss and his progeny or followers , angels are different from each other, probably satan had authaurity that he enjoyed willingly until the command came to him just like all other angels, his kind of angel was called the jinn, just like there a kind of angel called jibreel or mickel , and most others are called angeles , ibliss isn't didn't go out of the mercy of allah because of desobeidiance, but because of pride , but in the end ibliss obeis allah 100% just like the other angels, when allah casted him out of his mercy, and destuned him to hell, allah made him work on us as the evil one who show us the wrong way, just as angels show us the right way, so mankind can choose and be tested , actually ibliss is living hell for he's working with no rest, he's obeiying god unwillingly , that's how the story sounds to me , peace -
peace Mazhar,
Thanks for the verses, however, having control over something simply means they are in charge of a certain function, whatever that is. For example, the function of tempting/deluding/deviating but does not mean it is compulsory, only that they can do this function.
-
Okay, I was saying "the human being (ego) must battle with his jinn (id) to reach peace and submission (super-ego)".
For a moment, I thought that I was saying that the super-ego was God. But I've come to realize that by battling one's jinn, the human being isn't reaching the status of God, he's reaching the status of controller (in constant praise of God). He obeys God at all times, no matter what.
However, to reach this status is impossible, because the man (ego) is constantly in battle with his jinn (id). This is a universal truth. No human is perfect. He will continue to eat, drink, have sexual intercourse, etc. His basic desires will always be present. He can control them, but he can't get rid of them.
The super-ego is thus characterised by its desire to reach perfection. Even though it will never actually reaches perfection, this is where God's infinite Mercy kicks in. And ta-daaa! You're all forgiven.Have I completely strayed off topic, or am I making sense?
Peace,
interesting thoughts...did you try to link that with "sawm".
peace
