Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Funny description of us - the hadith rejectors! :)

Funny description of us - the hadith rejectors! :)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
112 Posts 21 Posters 4.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Raaajah
    wrote on last edited by
    #65

    aymen
    As you take your time to answer what Mazhar Sahib has brought up, I may comment on your remaining post

    In fact in every occurrence of the word ?allah? in the great reading the common noun ?the god? fits perfectly. Take for example, 63 where "al-ilah" (the god) is clearly intended

    1. ...wa huwa allah fi al-samawati ...
    2. ...and he is the god in the heavens ...

    Actually this example of yours proves otherwise; for me after reading what Mazhar Sahib has posted.

    Quran says ?ilahinnas? meaning God of mankind, which negates the existence of another deity for mankind to be worshiped.
    if we take it as "the god" it means "the god for man kind" and creates the possibility for "the god for jinns" the god for animals" "the god for heavens" the god for earth" so on and so forth but as I mentioned before Quran says repeatedly
    Laa ilaaha illaa alllah ?There is no God except Alllah?

    No one can make a dual and plural out of it since it is a Proper Name. And a proper name is always attributable to only and only one. Mazhar

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #66

      Laa ilaaha illaa alllah ?There is no God except Alllah?

      There exists absolutely no such reality as lord/deity/iela'aha except Allah.

      is accusative. In default state nouns are in nominative state. Here it is accusative because of the government of which is particle of absolute negation- negation of species- that renders the noun in accusative state which becomes its noun- Noun of La instead of its original nomenclature "subject of nominal sentence". Illa is exceptive particle, and the predicate of La is elided necessarily, since evident from first two words, negating existence. Non existence shows that those are mere conjectural thoughts and imaginative in nature. Only Allah exists.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Someone
        wrote on last edited by
        #67

        Dear Mazhar and Raaajah,

        So which one you think is the proper name of the creator?

        1- Allah

        2- Ar-rahamaan

        3- Al-haqq (please note that there is no plural for this word in the quran)

        Or does he have 3 proper (personal) names?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #68

          Dear Mazhar and Raaajah,

          So which one you think is the proper name of the creator?

          1- Allah

          2- Ar-rahamaan

          3- Al-haqq (please note that there is no plural for this word in the quran)

          Or does he have 3 proper (personal) names?

          At which place of 287 occurrences of the word from Root "Haqq" you have found it as Proper Name of Allah?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            Someone
            wrote on last edited by
            #69

            Mazhar,

            I cannot find now the verse about "allahou al-haqqou...", maybe you or someone else can remember and point out the verse, that could be helpful. I am sure there is one.

            On the other hand, for my previous questions, you can replace choice number 3- with anyone of these

            5923

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              muslim1984
              wrote on last edited by
              #70

              Pure logic brother Aymen! makes perfect sense.
              Thank you

              Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                ayman
                wrote on last edited by
                #71

                Peace Raaajah,

                aymen
                As you take your time to answer what Mazhar Sahib has brought up, I may comment on your remaining post

                Why waste my time on answering a derranged person? This would be like wasting time discussing politics with Gaddafi. You can see his typical derranged Sunni obsession with genitalia here in his conclusion on 741

                http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9602203.0

                We know that the majority of men even today are not aware of this fact that they have stiff erection about four times during the sleep each having a duration of 15 minutes, but quite many know that in the early hour of the morning their organ gets erected without their consent/desire. How many of us taken care that it could be noticed by others around us who are not asleep? Private part is private; its dimensions should not come into the sight/vision of others. Carefulness and chastity demand that we must sleep under the cover of unstitched cloth/sheet [}} to secure sanctity and dignity of our private part.

                Actually this example of yours proves otherwise; for me after reading what Mazhar Sahib has posted.

                But you didn't address the example. In fact, you don't seem to want to address anything I said. You made a big deal about al in allah being not the definite article. When I proved that it was the definite article since with the addition of li it becomes lillah, you simply remained silent after your argument was 100% defeated. Are you too proud to correct? What is the use of this discussion? If you were in my place what would you do if I made a big deal about an argument and I suddenly shut up when it was defeated and didn't go back and admit my mistake and correct it?

                Quran says ?ilahinnas? meaning God of mankind, which negates the existence of another deity for mankind to be worshiped.
                if we take it as "the god" it means "the god for man kind" and creates the possibility for "the god for jinns" the god for animals" "the god for heavens" the god for earth" so on and so forth but as I mentioned before Quran says repeatedly
                Laa ilaaha illaa alllah ?There is no God except Alllah?
                No one can make a dual and plural out of it since it is a Proper Name. And a proper name is always attributable to only and only one. Mazhar

                This is all false.

                On the first point, the word "ilah" means "god" and not "the god". So the entire argument is based on a misunderstanding.

                On the second point, I don't know how can an educated person propose nonsense such that a proper name cannot be plural. Have you ever heard of the proper name Pakistanis ? Does it apply to one and only one?? How do you expect me to take you seriously when you are copying and pasting such nonsense? Think. It is all very simple but you are making it too complicated for yourself and getting lost in the process.

                Peace,

                Ayman

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  ayman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #72

                  Pure logic brother Aymen! makes perfect sense.
                  Thank you
                  Peace

                  Peace brother and thank you for your understanding. The great reading is pure logic and makes perfect sense when we let go of the cloud of sectarian nonsense and preconceptions.

                  Peace and all best wishes,

                  Ayman

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Raaajah
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #73

                    Dear Mazhar and Raaajah,
                    So which one you think is the proper name of the creator?
                    1- Allah
                    2- Ar-rahamaan

                    the following thread might be help full
                    http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9602143.75

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Raaajah
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #74

                      aymen

                      On the second point, I don't know how can an educated person propose nonsense such that a proper name cannot be plural. Have you ever heard of the proper name Pakistanis ? Does it apply to one and only one?

                      We are talking about the Arabic word "http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.%20Tabweeb/00002.%20Allah/3.gif here and it absolutely applies to one and only!

                      On the first point, the word "ilah" means "god" and not "the god". So the entire argument is based on a misunderstanding.

                      even if we substitute "the god" with "god" the results would be the same as I mentioned above. However if we use "Allah" meaning the only and one "God" the picture becomes very clear.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #75

                        On the first point, the word "ilah" means "god" and not "the god". So the entire argument is based on a misunderstanding.

                        On the second point, I don't know how can an educated person propose nonsense such that a proper name cannot be plural. Have you ever heard of the proper name Pakistanis ? Does it apply to one and only one?? How do you expect me to take you seriously when you are copying and pasting such nonsense? Think. It is all very simple but you are making it too complicated for yourself and getting lost in the process.

                        Stupidity prevails when one makes up his mind of having superior knowledge. Those who know basic Arabic can understand the stupidity in calling as "plural" Proper Name, by a linguist in making.

                        A proper name can never be pluralized while retaining it as a Proper Name. Pseudo intellectuals never remember the basic principles of anything, and keep talking their nonsense.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Raaajah
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #76

                          aymen

                          How do you expect me to take you seriously when you are copying and pasting such nonsense? Think.

                          No one can make a dual and plural out of it since it is a Proper Name. And a proper name is always attributable to only and only one. Mazhar

                          now if you think that Mazhar is talking Non Sense and I am copying it then you must have already refuted the following or you think that this is non sense too.

                          A proper name is in its nature descriptive of only one object and therefore essentially singular. as soon as it becomes susceptible of plurality, as when we speak of twelve Caesars, or seven Jams es it ceases to be a proper noun.
                          Spain is the proper name of the country and Spaniard has been by some grammarians called the proper name of people; but later is a generic word characterizing any one of great number of persons by their connection with Spain

                          The Academician
                          edited by Albert Picket, John W. Picket

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Someone
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #77

                            Dear Mazhar and Raaajah,

                            So which one you think is the proper name of the creator?

                            1- Allah

                            2- Ar-rahamaan

                            3- (please note that there is no plural for this word in the quran)

                            4- (please note that there is no plural for this word in the quran)

                            Or does he have 4 proper (personal) names?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #78

                              Someone,

                              Dear open up any book about language, and first study therein the basic perception denoted to a Proper name, adjective and participles. The point will become clear.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                ayman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #79

                                Peace Raaajah,

                                now if you think that Mazhar is talking Non Sense and I am copying it then you must have already refuted the following or you think that this is non sense too.
                                A proper name is in its nature descriptive of only one object and therefore essentially singular. as soon as it becomes susceptible of plurality, as when we speak of twelve Caesars, or seven Jams es it ceases to be a proper noun.
                                Spain is the proper name of the country and Spaniard has been by some grammarians called the proper name of people; but later is a generic word characterizing any one of great number of persons by their connection with Spain
                                The Academician
                                edited by Albert Picket, John W. Picket

                                Of course this John Picket is saying nonsense too. All proper names can take plural. For example, when I say that I have three Mazhars in my classroom, do those people cease to have this proper name and are suddenly real "mazhars" common nouns, which in Arabic mean "appearences"?! People routinely use dual and plural proper names. Haven't you heard about the two Koreas? Again, proper names can be anything singular, dual or plural. Haven't you heard about Bahrain (dual) and Aljaza'ir (plural)?!

                                Again, proper names can be anything singular, dual, plural. Anyone can give anything any proper name. There is nothing preventing anyone from making some stone idols and naming them Allah and then say to people look at those Allahs or he can name them Allahat in Arabic plural. There are many people who are labeled Muslims by virtue of what is noted on their ID card or birth certificate. This doesn't mean that they are peacemakers. The difference is that proper names are just meaningless labels that don't describe truth and this is why they are not translated. So an idol given by some idolater the proper name Allah is not really the god/allah/al-ilah. The common noun describes truth and is not just a label that anyone can slap on anything.

                                Peace,

                                Ayman

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #80

                                  Of course this John Picket is saying nonsense too. All proper names can take plural. For example, when I say that I have three Mazhars in my classroom, do those people cease to have this proper name and are suddenly real "mazhars" common nouns, which in Arabic mean "appearences"?! People routinely use dual and plural proper names. Haven't you heard about the two Koreas? Again, proper names can be anything singular, dual or plural. Haven't you heard about Bahrain (dual) and Aljaza'ir (plural)?!

                                  Stupidity confounded. Also exposed that Aymen is not yet aware of what are the various types of nouns in Arabic and other languages. Mention of "three Mazhars" by a teacher in a class room will instantly expose that his degree in language is fake.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Someone
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #81

                                    Someone,

                                    Dear open up any book about language, and first study therein the basic perception denoted to a Proper name, adjective and participles. The point will become clear.

                                    Thanks for the advice, but if it were that simple we wouldn't have all this mixing.

                                    Now would you please take some of your precious time and give your answer with some explanation, so that I can follow your line of reasoning, if there is any.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Raaajah
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #82

                                      aymen

                                      Of course this John Picket is saying nonsense too.

                                      Haven't you heard about the two Koreas? Again, proper names can be anything singular, dual or plural. Haven't you heard about Bahrain (dual) and Aljaza'ir (plural)?!

                                      Seriously? I didn't expected this from a person of your caliber.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #83

                                        Thanks for the advice, but if it were that simple we wouldn't have all this mixing.

                                        Now would you please take some of your precious time and give your answer with some explanation, so that I can follow your line of reasoning, if there is any.

                                        Dear I gave you the most simple tool to understand. I didnt' ask you to go through various theories about Proper Name. I will give you explanation and you will bring another attributive name, as people call 99 names.

                                        There is another thread about Proper Name of Allah.

                                        Ar'Reh'maan Personal Name of Allah
                                        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9602143.0

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          ayman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #84

                                          Seriously? I didn't expected this from a person of your caliber.

                                          What is "this" exactly? My caliber is that I answered you while you can't answer anything I say.

                                          Peace,

                                          Ayman

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users