Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Inheritance according to Qur?an

Inheritance according to Qur?an

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
1.0k Posts 45 Posters 168.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #146

    What you mean separately dealt with, how you going apply 4176?

    It is at

    1. With regard to progeny, we are left with only a situation where the deceased is leaving behind the solitary Son. In this situation, Allah the Exalted has not made the Son as preferential. Instead, the parents and spouse of the dying person are declared preferential and their share is mandatory prioritized leaving the allocation for the living Son at the discretion of the dying person. Allah the Exalted has not prescribed the share for a solitary living son of the deceased.

    2. In case of a solitary son as heir, the living father and mother each get straight away 1/6th out of that inheritance which the deceased has left behind. The mandatory prioritized share of Wife is 1/8th out of the inheritance. In such cases, the Inheritance is divided into twenty-four parts; eleven out of twenty-four parts straight going to father, mother and the Widow, if they all are surviving, otherwise their respective share will also obviously go to the discretion of the dying person to allocate it to the next relatively near blood relation. Near Blood relation is referred by the relationship of Wombs, it thus includes grandfather, grandmother and grand-progeny.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Noon_waalqalami
      wrote on last edited by
      #147

      What you mean separately dealt with, how you going apply 4176?

      It is at

      1. With regard to progeny, we are left with only a situation where the deceased is leaving behind the solitary Son. In this situation, Allah the Exalted has not made the Son as preferential. Instead, the parents and spouse of the dying person are declared preferential and their share is mandatory prioritized leaving the allocation for the living Son at the discretion of the dying person. Allah the Exalted has not prescribed the share for a solitary living son of the deceased.

      2. In case of a solitary son as heir, the living father and mother each get straight away 1/6th out of that inheritance which the deceased has left behind. The mandatory prioritized share of Wife is 1/8th out of the inheritance. In such cases, the Inheritance is divided into twenty-four parts; eleven out of twenty-four parts straight going to father, mother and the Widow, if they all are surviving, otherwise their respective share will also obviously go to the discretion of the dying person to allocate it to the next relatively near blood relation. Near Blood relation is referred by the relationship of Wombs, it thus includes grandfather, grandmother and grand-progeny.

      No need to write so much; I asked to apply 4176 kalala no child 1 brother, 1 sister?

      4176 ... so to the male like share the two (feminine)

      Your answer should be simple 2/3 brother, 1/3 sister or m=2f

      Suggest applying to EVERY CASE test consistency; like program three logic gates...

      IF, so/ELSE IF, AND IF

      Input inheritors, output according to Qur'an!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #148

        Have you noticed what was not mentioned or prescribed in 411 and 412 which could also be a ground reality, leaving a question for the listeners to enquire about it?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          mahmuud
          wrote on last edited by
          #149

          Pleace look at this book about this matter

          http//www.quraniclesson.com/download.php?fid=1&ext=pdf&fn=Division%20of%20Inheritance%202nd%20Edition.pdf

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #150

            His basic premises, what to read afterwards 500 pages, is patently incorrect and far away from Qur'aan. Son concept is heavily controlling his mind.

            He begins with Status 1 as Son, Qur'aan gives status 1 to women.

            Daughter (s) are direct beneficiary by the shares determined by Allah the Exalted.

            One Son has nowhere been given direct share by Allah the Exalted.

            He forgets about the Bequest part which is fundamental to Inheritance division.

            He ignores difference between and to determine who is primary and secondary.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Noon_waalqalami
              wrote on last edited by
              #151

              Pleace look at this book about this matter

              http//www.quraniclesson.com/download.php?fid=1&ext=pdf&fn=Division%20of%20Inheritance%202nd%20Edition.pdf

              You keep spamming the forum with same link to stupid book by the clueless.

              Have you noticed what was not mentioned or prescribed in 411 and 412 which could also be a ground reality, leaving a question for the listeners to enquire about it?

              The verses are clear instructions to be applied in the real world and when someone asks to show them, it does little to answer with questions and perpetual expounding -- simply show distributions; it's not complex.

              4176 they seek your ruling say The God gives you a ruling in al-kalalah if person died is not to person child/born...

              No children; we know only inheritors to enter the verse are mother and siblings. Therefore...

              1 sister, mother 1 - 1/2 sister = 1/2 mother
              2 sisters, mother 1 - 2/3 sisters, 1/3 each = 1/3 mother
              3+ sisters, mother unstated distribute evenly

              1+ sisters, 1+ brothers 21 ratio male to female

              mother, 1+ brothers 1 - 1/6 mother = 5/6 brothers

              mother, 1+ sisters, 1+ brothers 1 - 1/6 mother = 5/6 siblings 21 ratio male to female

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #152

                in al-kalalah

                What does it mean?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Noon_waalqalami
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #153

                  What does it mean?

                  Deceased left no crown/head of house 4176 al-kallah is father-less spouse-less.

                  Mathematical proof
                  1 = father (variable) + siblings mixed 21 ratio male to female
                  1 = y + 2x + x
                  1 = y + 3x (no solution without involving negative numbers (-2=y, 1=x))

                  1/2 sister + 1/4 wife = 3/4 to little
                  2/3 sisters + 1/2 husband = 1 + 1/6 too much

                  Likewise more contradictions with other computations with siblings and father/spouse.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #154

                    Deceased left no crown/head of house 4176 al-kallah is father-less spouse-less.

                    I infer from above---is it correct

                    You mean his father is not living at the time of his death-he is already dead. What about mother?

                    And spouse-less, you mean his/her spouse is not surviving at the time of his/her death.

                    What about a son? He be having a surviving son or might have died without a son.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #155

                      I infer from above---is it correct

                      You mean his father is not living at the time of his death-he is already dead. What about mother?

                      Correct, deceased did not have a father.
                      Mother may be alive since 411 IF ikh'wat mother =1/6

                      And spouse-less, you mean his/her spouse is not surviving at the time of his/her death.

                      Correct, deceased did not have a spouse.

                      What about a son? He be having a surviving son or might have died without a son.

                      Of course there is the possibility of kalalah with son/child otherwise no need to state if not to person child if kalalah is childless as most translators wrongly interpret.

                      Kalalah no child use 4176
                      4176 they seek your ruling say The God gives you a ruling in al-kalalah (fatherless spouseless) if person died is not to person waladun/child

                      Kalalah with son use 412 otherwise there is confusion what to give 1 sister 1/2 or 1/6

                      412... and if kna is a man inherited kallatan (fatherless spouseless) or woman and has brother or sister so to each one from them the sixth so if kn they were greater from that so they partners in the third

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #156

                        I infer from above---is it correct

                        You mean his father is not living at the time of his death-he is already dead. What about mother?

                        Correct, deceased did not have a father.
                        Mother may be alive since 411 IF ikh'wat mother =1/6

                        So alternate state could be that Father survives while the Mother is dead.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Noon_waalqalami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #157

                          So alternate state could be that Father survives while the Mother is dead.

                          All inheritors can be present or not present; with presence of father/spouse siblings get nothing.

                          1 - 1/3 mother (fixed 411) = 2/3 father; siblings = 0

                          1 - 1/6 mother (fixed 411) = 5/6 brother/siblings mixed

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #158

                            All inheritors can be present or not present; with presence of father/spouse siblings get nothing.

                            1 - 1/3 mother (fixed 411) = 2/3 father; siblings = 0

                            Where is this red part written?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Noon_waalqalami
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #159

                              Where is this red part written?

                              411 ... so if not was to person waladun/child and heirs person?s parents so to his mother the third

                              1 - 1/3 mother (fixed/known) = 2/3 father (variable/unknown)

                              Logical deduction AND IF OR NOT ELSE (used to build supercomputers) differentiates the human from most creatures.

                              Peace!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #160

                                411 ... so if not was to person waladun/child and heirs person?s parents so to his mother the third

                                1 - 1/3 mother (fixed/known) = 2/3 father (variable/unknown)

                                Logical deduction AND IF OR NOT ELSE (used to build supercomputers) differentiates the human from most creatures.

                                Peace!

                                In the interpretation of law, and particularly in matters of money/wealth it is not permitted that the reader starts inserting new law in the name of logical deductions.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #161

                                  411 ... so if not was to person waladun/child and heirs person?s parents so to his mother the third

                                  1 - 1/3 mother (fixed/known) = 2/3 father (variable/unknown)

                                  Logical deduction AND IF OR NOT ELSE (used to build supercomputers) differentiates the human from most creatures.

                                  Peace!

                                  What will be the case if the diceased is a woma?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Noon_waalqalami
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #162

                                    What will be the case if the diceased is a woma?

                                    The same; why ask ? are not women included in the human category or want discuss nuances of Arabic?

                                    411 ... so to his mother the third

                                    3114 and We enjoined the human to his parents carried him his mother weakness upon infirmity and his separation in two years that be thankful to Me and to your parents to Me the destiny

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #163

                                      The same; why ask ? are not women included in the human category or want discuss nuances of Arabic?

                                      411 ... so to his mother the third

                                      3114 and We enjoined the human to his parents carried him his mother weakness upon infirmity and his separation in two years that be thankful to Me and to your parents to Me the destiny

                                      is dual active participle signifying The Father and the Mother. Parents being plural in english is perhaps not suitable translation particularly because it also denotes to act as parent. When genders are specified in text then they refer only to that gender not interchangeably.

                                      I have attempted in two parts and posted it seperately since Arabic text is used in images. You are requested to critically examine it. Thanks

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Noon_waalqalami
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #164

                                        I have attempted in two parts and posted it seperately since Arabic text is used in images. You are requested to critically examine it. Thanks

                                        Peace Mazhar, your article starts off well then turns into an illogical hairball with multiple errors started by assigning 2/3 to mixed children/siblings ignors clear instructions 2/3 is to females only, lacks comprehension of basic ELSE IF AND IF switch to different case and gives only partial distributions with remainder unaccounted.

                                        411 directs you The God in your children to the male like share the two (feminine)
                                        411 ELSE IF are nisa above two falahunna/so to them (feminine plural) thulutha 2/3

                                        4176... ELSE IF they were (feminine) two falahunna/so to them (feminine plural) the third dual (2/3)
                                        4176... AND IF they were siblings rijal wanisa so to the male like share the two (feminine)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          Noon_waalqalami
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #165

                                          Thank you. You have clarified it for me. This is what I understood. All I need to do now is irrefutably clarify when and under what conditions this applies.

                                          These are all conditions 1/6 or 1/3 to siblings applies (what differentiates sister in 412 and 4176).

                                          kalalah (fatherless spouseless, left no crown/head of household) has son

                                          412 .. so if kana/is (masculine) to you walad/offspring (i.e. if to person male child/born/son) so to them the eight from what you left from after a will you made in it or judgment (continue case if son...)

                                          and if is a man inherited kalalah (fatherless spouseless) or woman
                                          and has brother or sister so to each one from them the sixth
                                          so if they were greater from that so they partners in the third

                                          1 - 1/6 sister/brother = 5/6 son/s
                                          1 - 1/3 2+ sisters/brothers/mixed = 2/3 son/s

                                          1 - 1/6 mother - 1/6 sister/brother = 2/3 son/s
                                          1 - 1/6 mother - 1/3 2+ sisters/brothers/mixed = 1/2 son/s

                                          1 - 1/6 sister/brother = 5/6 children (daughter/s and son/s) 21 ratio male to female
                                          1 - 1/3 2+ sisters/brothers/mixed = 5/6 children (daughter/s and son/s) 21 ratio male to female

                                          1 - 1/6 mother - 1/6 sister/brother = 2/3 children (daughter/s and son/s) 21 ratio male to female
                                          1 - 1/6 mother - 1/3 2+ sisters/brothers/mixed = 1/2 children (daughter/s and son/s) 21 ratio male to female

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users