Inheritance according to Qur?an
-
It's a work in progress and today after having a look at all usages decided best/closest to render as such.
433 and to each We made/appointed heirs from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness
Use "for" if you like...
2148 and to/for each
6132 and to/for each
734 and to/for each tribe/nation a term
1047 and to/for each tribe/nation a messenger
137 and to/for each community a guide
2234 and to/for each tribe/nation We made/appointed a rite
4619 and to/for each degrees from what they have doneDid you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.
-
433 and to each (individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs (plural) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them (plural) their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness
Mind it, leave Arabic aside, your English even after switching over from "for" to "to" has not resolved the contradiction in your translation and your inferencem which I pointed out to you.
The translation and inference do not correspond to each other. In translation you say, "for all individuals We made heirs". And heirs are those who are eligible to inherit.
In your translation, "each" individual and "heirs" are two different entities.In the inference you say each individual is eligible to inherit.
Read your sentence carefully
and to each(individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs
If you know what the preposition "to" means you will realize the blunder in your understanding.
In the sentence "each" with prep "to" is a different entity and "appointed heirs" are different entities.
-
Did you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.
Mazhar -- you were clearly proven wrong on this topic and instead of correcting yourself and apologizing for wasting my time and spamming this thread you continue being a hard-head needing to have the last word and contributing absolutely nothing to this thread/topic and now you are grasping for anything to redeem yourself including debating if to use "to/for" which I've already told you use "for" if you like, it makes little difference.
Now go away! Play with housemaid or whatever.
-
Mazhar -- you were clearly proven wrong on this topic and instead of correcting yourself and apologizing for wasting my time and spamming this thread you continue being a hard-head needing to have the last word and contributing absolutely nothing to this thread/topic and now you are grasping for anything to redeem yourself including debating if to use "to/for" which I've already told you use "for" if you like, it makes little difference.
Now go away! Play with housemaid or whatever.
I know whenever you do not have an argument, you say like this or start reproducing a page length mathematical equations.
However, I will give you more points to ponder and realize how much you keep missing while jumping to conclusions and start thinking to have become the only scholar on the subject.
Do you know something about time-line? And do you know time-line in linquistics has a role to determine and understand a text when time adverbs are used therein?
Have you found any time adverb in Inheritance discourse? Did you give a second to understand it?
-
Did you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.
Take your time. Study further and come back if you have understood the difference. Believe me it will make you to think for some other alternative than switching "for" to "to" to make the verse serve your purpose because it exposed you instead of helping support your inference.
-
Take your time. Study further and come back if you have understood the difference. Believe me it will make you to think for some other alternative than switching "for" to "to" to make the verse serve your purpose because it exposed you instead of helping support your inference.
OK this is a thread on inheritance and if you want to open a thread on housemaids or to/for go right ahead.
-
OK this is a thread on inheritance and if you want to open a thread on housemaids or to/for go right ahead.
Yes this is about Inheritance. The points raised are in respect of your semblence verses about "to" and "for". But they were different. The question is relevant about that. Please come back with an answer.
-
Yes this is about Inheritance. The points raised are in respect of your semblence verses about "to" and "for". But they were different. The question is relevant about that. Please come back with an answer.
OK you're free to choose whichever you like; "to" comes out better and using "for" still does not help you...
457 woe to each liar flagrant
411 . and to their parents to each one of them the sixth433 and to each (individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs (plural) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness
2148 and to each (individual; noun)
6132 and to each (individual; noun) degrees from what they have done (plural) and not your Lord unaware of what they have done (plural)
734 and to each (individual; noun) tribe/nation a term
1047 and to each (individual; noun) tribe/nation a messenger
137 and to each (individual; noun) community a guide
2234 and to each (individual; noun) tribe/nation We made/appointed a rite
4619 and to each (individual; noun) degrees from what they have done (plural)Now your turn; I'll ask once again -- do not waste my time and like a coward avoid, divert, and run away...
Individuals are made/appointed/entitled as heirs from what left their parents, etc. and not as you infer/read that each individual is guaranteed three or more heirs which is easily proven a false reading and a contradiction simply by finding only one case since the beginning of humanity (~ 57 million people leave us each year or ~155,000 each day) where someone died and left less than three heirs or simply examine each kalalah case ...
4176 they seek your ruling say The God gives you a ruling in al-kalalah
Now distribute the shares or go away!
mother, father
mother, son
mother, daughter
mother, sister
mother, brother
mother, wife
mother, husband
father, son
father, daughter
father, sister
father, brother
father, wife
father, husband
son, daughter
son, sister
son, brother
son, wife
son, husband
daughter, sister
daughter, brother
daughter, wife
daughter, husband
sister, brother
sister, wife
sister, husband
brother, wife
brother, husbandmother, father, son
mother, father, daughter
mother, father, wife
mother, father, husband
mother, father, sister
mother, father, brother
mother, son, daughter
mother, son, wife
mother, son, husband
mother, son, sister
mother, son, brother
mother, daughter, wife
mother, daughter, husband
mother, daughter, sister
mother, daughter, brother
mother, wife, sister
mother, wife, brother
mother, husband, sister
mother, husband, brother
mother, sister, brother
father, son, daughter
father, son, wife
father, son, husband
father, son, sister
father, son, brother
father, daughter, wife
father, daughter, husband
father, daughter, sister
father, daughter, brother
father, wife, sister
father, wife, brother
father, husband, sister
father, husband, brother
father, sister, brother
son, daughter, wife
son, daughter, husband
son, daughter, sister
son, daughter, brother
son, wife, sister
son, wife, brother
son, husband, sister
son, husband, brother
son, sister, brother
daughter, wife, sister
daughter, wife, brother
daughter, husband, sister
daughter, husband, brother
daughter, sister, brother
wife, sister, brother
husband, sister, brother -
Reply 218
Did you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.
Remaining truthful to habit, you again repeated the Ayah and lengthy math page without using brain to attend to question.
457 woe to each liar flagrant
411 . and to their parents to each one of them the sixth433 and to each (individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs (plural) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness
457
433
Do you see the difference? Vowel signs is double in 433, in others it is single?
-
These are your trasnslation and then explanation
and to each(individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs
Individuals are made/appointed/entitled as heirs from what left their parents, etc. and not as you infer/read that each individual is guaranteed three or more heirs which is easily proven a false reading
See both. Why are you making mockery of yourself that you do not know even simple English?
Your translation says
"We have appointed heirs to each individual".
Get out of your madness to know what is there in the Verses about inheritance.
-
Get out of your madness to know what is there in the Verses about inheritance.
Mazhar -- I asked you to stay on topic, do not spam this thread; instead you post useless information.
You said that Allah said that each person will have three or more heirs -- that is proven false and a lie!
-
Mazhar -- I asked you to stay on topic, do not spam this thread; instead you post useless information.
You said that Allah said that each person will have three or more heirs -- that is proven false and a lie!
Your own translation says they are more than two. Reconcile your translation and respond to basic contradictions of yours.
-
Your own translation says they are more than two. Reconcile your translation and respond to basic contradictions of yours.
No it does not -- each individual is heir. Only way translation cannot contradict reality. it's same as...
6132 and to each (individual; noun) degrees from what they have done (plural; i.e. each individual) and not your Lord unaware of what they have done (plural; i.e. each individual)
In summary, like saying We made you each heirs entitled to a share from what left their parents, etc. not as you claim that Qur'an contradicts reality and each will have at least three heirs -- that is ridiculous!
-
My dear Noon,
Peace
If you are really interested to get complete picture and perception of Inheritance discourse, I have simplified the Article, best trying to make it reader friendly but not allowing him to float on the surface of the text, rather keep using his own intellect at every parargraph to grasp it before moving to next and agree or prove it wrong, in any sense, language, grammar, context, concordance.
The points towards I have been trying to draw your attention, like tanween and time-line---use of time adverb I have covered therein.
Allah the Exalted has covered all, even if there are hundreds of ground situations, in just five sub classifications. You can have hundreds of mathematical equations by just referring to those 5 classifications.
You might also notice the beauty of succintness by superb choice of words in the Ayah which could cover multiple situations. Please do pay attention to the meanings and perceptions by noticing what type of a word is it.
Daughter not Son is the central theme of Inheritance. It is incumbent upon death expecting wealthy person to bequeath for the Mother and Father; and nearer relatives.
-
My dear Mazhar,
You are a dumb OX devoid of simple logic and you wrote stupid article.
You are clueless on simple distributions; you run away from questions.
You distribute shares to son when it clearly says 2/3 is to females only.Qur'an is for people of intelligence not for stupid cattle without a brain!
Goodbye!
-
Noon,
Do open it and read it carefully. Don't be childish, take some time reading it, and then come back if you find objection on any para. Just quote para No. and what you say about it.
No one should waste time reading your stupid stuff. Stop spamming/polluting this thread.
-
No one should waste time reading your stupid stuff. Stop spamming/polluting this thread.
Allah the Exalted has covered all, even if there are hundreds of ground situations, in just five sub classifications. You can have hundreds of mathematical equations by just referring to those 5 classifications.
Daughter not Son is the central theme of Inheritance. It is incumbent upon death expecting wealthy person to bequeath for the Mother and Father; and nearer relatives.
Admin attention please! Placing of this thread under sticky by some was a mere reflexive fascination by lengthy table. It should be a cause of concern for the Administrator of the Forum as many visitors will think that this ridiculous thread by a person who does not know ABC of Arabic, even its vowel, has the approval and agreement of Free Minds. Should we give impression to general public how poor is Free Minds in Arabic and yet claims "Qur'aan alone"!!!
-
Admn Pl look into this
Yes this topic should be a sticky; it teaches logic, how to read Qur'an using cross-reference and context to extrapolate certain words and to take the best non-contradicting meaning.
He translates one word at two places in the same Ayah which are identical in all aspects, both in nominative case and absolute state , once masculine son, and then says it is genderless--any gender?
Is this the way we on this widely visited forum interpret Qur'aan making even mockery of word "logic"?