First E-Book
-
Salaam, Pazuzu,
I am reading the book, whih I consider very important, and I am very tempted to send it privately to other people so that they know.
Do you have any rules concerning this? If you do, please let us know what your policy is on this question. I am sure I am not the only one who wants your findings to be fully known by as mahy people as possible, but also all consideration and respecto should be had as to your own requirements.
Thanks again and big congratulations on this achievement.
Salaam
-
Peace, Huruf.
Yes, of course you can send it PRIVATELY to anyone you want. That's what the book is for.
Do you have any rules concerning this?
As long as you don't mention to them the source (my user ID on this frum), then everything is OK.
Regards.
-
salaam Pazuzu
very interesting and useful book even if i have already read quite all ideas in your posts.
your book will be a reference for me.the black circle in map 10 page 119 seems to be too big. It touch Ethiopia and include the confluent/junction of the red sea and golf of aden
Peace
-
Dear noshirk
The main purpose of putting it into a book was for the sake of organization. The book is far more organized than the thread, and follows a more logical sequence (as per the honest opinion of my editor friend, that is).
Also, there are parts in the book (about 20%) that are not found anywhere in the Pharaoh thread. (I dont remember the thread to be 120 pages long).
Anyway, the further we advance in the series, the more the books will diverge from the contents of the threads. You will see that book 2 will contain about 40% totally new information.
As for map 10, the reasons why it's big are mainly
1- We haven't yet pinpointed the exact location of some landmarks.
2- The kingdom of Israel during Solomon's time reached the southern edge of the Asir region, as you will eventually see.
Peace...
-
Salaam Pazuzu.
The main purpose of putting it into a book was for the sake of organization. The book is far more organized than the thread, and follows a more logical sequence (as per the honest opinion of my editor friend, that is).
it is why i said that it will be a reference for me.
the proofs are convincing and structured.
I think we are many waiting for the new 40% and the structuration of the old 60%.As for map 10, the reasons why it's big are mainly
i was joking. The circle is not too big.
The was directed to this thread http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9604241.0I think however that you have to be careful when you use the word "conspiracy". Nowadays, When the label "theory of conspiracy" is put on a theory, it is generally to discredit it. It is what will be said by people who has no arguments to oppose to yours.
Peace
-
Dear All...
Due to security reasons, Ziggurat's mailbox will no longer be active, and I will no longer be sending anything from that address.
If you receive ANY e-mail from Ziggurat, from this point onward, please IGNORE it completely.
In the meantime, I will set up a new mailbox and notify you when it's done.
Regards.
-
Why so much secrecy?
Is it dangerous or what?
-
I sent you a PM but I just mentioning again lol I would definitely love to read the e-book/research. please send me a copy.
salam!
-
Dear All...
Due to security reasons, Ziggurat's mailbox will no longer be active, and I will no longer be sending anything from that address.
If you receive ANY e-mail from Ziggurat, from this point onward, please IGNORE it completely.
In the meantime, I will set up a new mailbox and notify you when it's done.
Regards.
Half way done , really loving it so far ).
-
Salam Pazuzu
impressive disclosing work, which do make a lot of sense .. one thing is confusing to me.. there are some articles in free minds which i find convincing to a great extent talking about a place in jordan named Petra where we can find remenents of people of Lout, Aad and Thamoud (elephant status and great houses built within mountains and rocks).. Articles agree to the fact that events happened more or less in the same territory ....is there any explanation?
-
Dear Hope.
Please consider the following points
-
The official FM stance is that Muhammad lived in the Jordan - Palestine area. This is based on the erronuous idea that the Arabic language was invented by the Nabateans (the north Arabians). This is completely FALSE. The Nabateans, whose kingdom flourished during the first and second centuries A.D invented the cursive script which later developed into the modern Arabic script we see today. They did not invent the LANGUAGE. In Book 2, I will prove to you that the Arabic language existed many centuries before the Nabateans, and I will show you Arabic inscriptions in South Arabia, written in the Musnad script. The FM stance has confused the Arabic language with the Arabic alphabet. The Arabic language came from South Arabia, not the north, This is why the classical anthropologists grouped Arabic with the so-called "South Semitic Languages". Just because there are columns with elephant motifs carved in their crowns in Petra, doesn't mean that the People of the Elephant were there.
-
The mountain-carved homes at Petra and the so-called "Mada'in Saleh" in North Saudi Arabia have abosulutely nothing to do with Thamud or Aad whatsoever. The people of Aad and Thamud are very ancient nations that lived before Abraham's time (before 1500 B.C). Petra and Madai'n Saleh are both Nabatean vestiges that were constructed in the first century A.D.
-
The Quran tells us that Aad lived near the Ahqaf (region of giant sand dunes). If you look up Al-Ahqaf, you will see that it is the name the Arabs have known for thousands of years, which describes the sand dunes along the southern borders of the Rub-al-Khali desert. Please go look it up on any map.
-
Thamudic = South Arabian culture. Please go look that up as well. Look up South Arabiab scripts, and you will get Zabur, Thamudic, Sheban, Himyari and even Ethiopian. This has nothing to do with Petra or the Nabateans whatsoever.
-
The people of Lot were destroyed with a volcanic eruption that rained down rocks of cooked clay upon their town. There are NO VOLCANIC MOUNTAINS anywhere in the Jordan-Palestine area.
All of these points will be made clear in Book 2.
Peace...
P.S. If you have received Book 1, please do NOT PRINT it, as we will soon (in about 1 week) release a fully edited version with all errata fixed.
-
-
Dear Hope.
Please consider the following points
[5) The people of Lot were destroyed with a volcanic eruption that rained down rocks of cooked clay upon their town. There are NO VOLCANIC MOUNTAINS anywhere in the Jordan-Palestine area.
Just want to check your info on volcanic activity in Jordan as I believe there is. Here are just a few sites which say otherwise
http//www.khammash.com/Web/Basalt_Bombs.htm
http//www.econ-environ-geol.org/pdf/Article-2.pdf
http//elearning.just.edu.jo/jjce/issues/paper.php?p=146.pdf
-
Quote from the first link given by Zenith
"Volcanology" is interesting. It involves understanding the destructive, yet beautiful, powers of nature, and, in Jordan, it is about discovering the "fossilized results of such creative acts. Early humans might have seen, in action, some of the youngest volcanoes in Jordan. Such volcanoes were active as recent as 1.5 million years ago, and even 0.5 million years. While the older ones date back to as much as 18 million years, way before humans walked this land. To those who've seen, the smaller and younger volcanoes might have performed a brilliant light show.
There are many earth landscapes made up of volcanoes extinct ages ago. That does not concern I think the historical interval with which we are dealing. Extinct volcanoes are like dead persons, they do not make history.
Salaam
-
Salam to Pazuzu and all,
Been a few months since i last read up on Pazuzu's postings, guess i missed the opportunity when Pazuzu was mailing out the E-book.
Can someone be kind enuff as to send me the E-book, it wud be much much appreciated. tks. My email add is [email protected].
once again...thank you in advance,rgds