Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. :: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

:: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
123 Posts 18 Posters 3.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Bender
    wrote on last edited by
    #67

    Only to admonish them that they are going to be the worst of the creatures. Condemned and cursed for ever. They were cursed also by Dawood alahisalam and Easa alahissalam.

    Salaam,

    hypno

    From where did you got this wrong understanding?
    Can you please give us some verses to support your understanding?
    Please don't quote 578 nope

    And who are Bani Israel according you?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Maha
      wrote on last edited by
      #68

      I agree

      The whole Qur'an is but the reminder for the Bani Israel and followers of Jesus, and it doesn't bring anything new which is not already in the Torah! Present Islam is but an invention of men as a new innovation, same as Christianity.
      Jesus was the most perfect Jew, same as Moses who is the greatest prophet of them all.

      That may seems to mean that Quran was written shortly after Jesus death .

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Maha
        wrote on last edited by
        #69

        Only to admonish them that they are going to be the worst of the creatures. Condemned and cursed for ever. They were cursed also by Dawood alahisalam and Easa alahissalam.

        Lol. rotfl David and Jesus were both from Bani Israel so it's hard to believe that They cursed themselves . Please use your brain.

        Peace .

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #70

          Lol. rotfl David and Jesus were both from Bani Israel so it's hard to believe that They cursed themselves . Please use your brain.

          Peace .

          The job of the jokers is to laugh and make people laugh mostly thru stupid things.

          Ease alahissalam did not belong to Bani Israel. He is not from that Qaum-nation. He was son of Syeda Maryam.

          Dawud alahissalam was the Messenger to Bani Israel. He also cursed those of his nation Bani Israel who did not believe.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 3 Offline
            3 Offline
            357
            wrote on last edited by
            #71

            So, could we keep up the subject gentlemen , and do try to answer the question

            Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!!

            (do try to answer without old or new hadiths),

            thank you

            Try this...........if you have time.

            http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9600004.msg239942#msg239942

            peace

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G Offline
              G Offline
              GODsubmitter
              wrote on last edited by
              #72

              Thank you so much brother @357!

              It is utterly interesting and informative!

              Thank you for the links and threads, don't know how would I be able to find them otherwise.

              peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #73

                Just read the first post. The evidence presented is very poor in my view.

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #74

                  Just read the first post. The evidence presented is very poor in my view.

                  Salaam,

                  I was wondering who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab, but could not find any answer from AlQuraan till now. But Allah has shown me something just now, lets take a look at it.

                  6940
                  6940 Indeed, it is surely a speech of a noble Messenger.

                  8119
                  8119 Indeed, it is surely a speech of a noble Messenger.

                  Who is this Rasoolin Kareem ?

                  Some say, he is Jibraeel - There is no evidence from AlQuraan that Jibraeel is a Rasoolin Kareem.

                  Some say, he is Muhammed - There is no evidence from AlQuraan that Muhammed is a Rasoolin Kareem.

                  No other choice left. But no body ever think, whom Allah called a Rasoolin Kareem. Can you guess? Try!! OK! Please check 4417

                  4417
                  4417 And We had already tried before them the people of Pharaoh, and there came to them a noble messenger.

                  A Noble Messenger is with "M", that is not Muhammed, not Me either but that is Musa. This is only messenger called Rasoolin Kareem in AlQuraan.

                  One word suffices to prove how erroneous is the premises of thread.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    mmkhan
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #75

                    One word suffices to prove how erroneous is the premises of thread.

                    How ? Will you please explain?

                    And what does means as per your understanding?

                    May Allah guide us to His path pr
                    mmKhan

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #76

                      How ? Will you please explain?

                      And what does means as per your understanding?

                      May Allah guide us to His path pr
                      mmKhan

                      ?? ?? ??

                      Pronoun Hum refers to the people whom Qur'aan addressed and before them in time line were the nation of Pharoah.

                      Pronoun Hum refers to the people . Subject of verb, that is who came to them is . It is indefinite noun therefore needs to be made somewhat specific so adjectival makes it specified. This is an episode of long time back than the people referred by ? .

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Borakk
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #77

                        Salam mmKhan,

                        This is my post in another topic regarding the issue. I'm posting it here

                        You do have a point from the Quranic perspective that Quran was given to Moses, not Muhammad. This view has some support in historical records because some manuscripts from the very early period of Islam (7th century) shows that the Saracens/Muhageerens/Hagarenes/Ishmaelites (today's "muslims&quot had very good relations with the Jews of the time. The jews were even fighting alongside the Muslims. Apparently, the hostility between Jews and muslims started after AbdulMalik ibn Marwan and gained full traction during Abbasid period when hadiths such as those which prophecise killing jews were invented.

                        However the first question that comes to my mind is how come the quran discusses about Jesus, Mary, Zachariah, hijrah (emigration), Yathrib, Mecca and other concepts that came after Moses? Also, how come quranic manuscripts older than 7th century has not been found as the bible has been?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Offline
                          G Offline
                          GODsubmitter
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #78

                          Salam mmKhan,

                          This is my post in another topic regarding the issue. I'm posting it here

                          You do have a point from the Quranic perspective that Quran was given to Moses, not Muhammad. This view has some support in historical records because some manuscripts from the very early period of Islam (7th century) shows that the Saracens/Muhageerens/Hagarenes/Ishmaelites (today's "muslims&quot had very good relations with the Jews of the time. The jews were even fighting alongside the Muslims. Apparently, the hostility between Jews and muslims started after AbdulMalik ibn Marwan and gained full traction during Abbasid period when hadiths such as those which prophecise killing jews were invented.

                          However the first question that comes to my mind is how come the quran discusses about Jesus, Mary, Zachariah, hijrah (emigration), Yathrib, Mecca and other concepts that came after Moses? Also, how come quranic manuscripts older than 7th century has not been found as the bible has been?

                          Very interesting post...
                          But I think no Bible in its entirety was found before 7th C either... just some scattered scrolls in Hebrew I think...
                          And the oldest complete Hebrew Bible is from 10th century I think... (if you want I can gather the proofs and data again)
                          That's what made me think at one point that the Qur'an might be even earlier Scripture then the Bible... )
                          But then, historicity and linal perception of time is not such a serious category...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            mmkhan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #79

                            However the first question that comes to my mind is how come the quran discusses about Jesus, Mary, Zachariah, hijrah (emigration), Yathrib, Mecca and other concepts that came after Moses? Also, how come quranic manuscripts older than 7th century has not been found as the bible has been?

                            Salaam Borakk,

                            Please take a look at my reply#10 of this thread or click here. And regarding Eisa, Maryam, Zachariayya, I think they all are available at the same time of Musa as per 1928. And Yathrib, Makkah etc, are not referring to physical places as per my understanding.

                            Red I cannot say anything about manuscripts, they might have destroyed and that is not important as a part of this discussion.

                            If alQuraan was given to Musa in writing, it might have given in parts. For example, one task was given to Musa, like going to Firaun, then their communication, etc. is mentioned in writing and given to Musa and so on. This is how I think now.

                            May Allah increase us in knowledge and guide us to His only path pr
                            mmKhan

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              mmkhan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #80

                              ?? ?? ??

                              Pronoun Hum refers to the people whom Qur'aan addressed and before them in time line were the nation of Pharoah.

                              Pronoun Hum refers to the people . Subject of verb, that is who came to them is . It is indefinite noun therefore needs to be made somewhat specific so adjectival makes it specified. This is an episode of long time back than the people referred by ? .

                              Yes, so what is the problem here? How is this support what you said "One word suffices to prove how erroneous is the premises of thread."?

                              If you read my opening post, it already clearly said that this is referring to qawme firaun.

                              I think, you misunderstood the concept of this thread. Please re-read it.

                              May Allah increase us in knowledge and guide us to His only path pr
                              mmKhan

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #81

                                Yes, so what is the problem here? How is this support what you said "One word suffices to prove how erroneous is the premises of thread."?

                                If you read my opening post, it already clearly said that this is referring to qawme firaun.

                                I think, you misunderstood the concept of this thread. Please re-read it.

                                May Allah increase us in knowledge and guide us to His only path pr
                                mmKhan

                                I am talking about the pronoun in and not hum of verb Jaahum. This hum in is for the people to whom Qur'aan was addressing.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  mmkhan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #82

                                  I am talking about the pronoun in and not hum of verb Jaahum. This hum in is for the people to whom Qur'aan was addressing.

                                  Red Who are those people whom alQuraan was addressing in ?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    mmkhan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #83

                                    Salaam,

                                    One of our forum members said this today about this thread.

                                    The thread which you've referred above, clearly shows your fallacies and how you've failed to reply to the arguments which Mazhar has put forward against yours.

                                    I confess that I was wrong about 255 and 261 in this thread while discussing with Mazhar. But now Allah has corrected me as usual, alhamduliAllah hail

                                    I should also admit that I was asking for simple aayat to explain me that why I am wrong, but he want me to learn English grammar, then pronouns, then adverbs, then emphasis, rhetoric to see how I am wrong. Instead, he would have shown me in a simple manner what I was asking him. Anyways the simple way Allah guided me is with and .

                                    is used for past in alQuraan.
                                    is used for present and future in alQuraan.

                                    Simple as that. Both 255 and 261 used hence referring to past.

                                    But, this isn't effecting my opening post in anyways.


                                    Update on the opening thread

                                    Q. To whom alQuraan was given?
                                    A. alQuraan was NOT GIVEN to anyone.

                                    Here it is how...

                                    alKitaab was given to Musa, then
                                    Zuboor was given to Dawood, then

                                    Compilation of alKitaab given to Musa + Zuboor given to Dawood = Tawraat, then

                                    Tawraat was available with Eisa, then
                                    Eisa was given Injeel, then

                                    Compilation of Tawraat + Injeel given to Eisa = alQuraan.

                                    This is because,
                                    alKitaab was GIVEN to Musa - 172 and 7144
                                    Zaboor was GIVEN to Dawood - 4163
                                    Tawraat was REVEALED - 544
                                    Injeel was GIVEN to Eisa - 546 and 5727
                                    alQuraan was REVEALED - 2185

                                    This is how I understand it... Please note that this is my personal understanding, study the aayaat quoted by clicking on it's numbers. Hope this may help at least some people inshaAllah.

                                    May Allah increase our knowledge and guide us on His path pr
                                    mmKhan

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #84

                                      Salaam,

                                      But, this isn't effecting my opening post in anyways.


                                      Update on the opening thread

                                      Q. To whom alQuraan was given?
                                      A. alQuraan was NOT GIVEN to anyone.

                                      Here it is how...

                                      alKitaab was given to Musa, then
                                      Zuboor was given to Dawood, then

                                      Compilation of alKitaab given to Musa + Zuboor given to Dawood = Tawraat, then

                                      Tawraat was available with Eisa, then
                                      Eisa was given Injeel, then

                                      Compilation of Tawraat + Injeel given to Eisa = alQuraan.

                                      This is because,
                                      alKitaab was GIVEN to Musa - 172 and 7144
                                      Zaboor was GIVEN to Dawood - 4163
                                      Tawraat was REVEALED - 544
                                      Injeel was GIVEN to Eisa - 546 and 5727
                                      alQuraan was REVEALED - 2185

                                      This is how I understand it... Please note that this is my personal understanding, study the aayaat quoted by clicking on it's numbers. Hope this may help at least some people inshaAllah.

                                      May Allah increase our knowledge and guide us on His path pr
                                      mmKhan

                                      Salamun alaika,

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        mmkhan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #85

                                        Salamun alaika,

                                        Salaamun A3laika Mazhar,

                                        I was expecting someone will come up with this aayat.

                                        1587
                                        1587 And We have certainly given you, seven of the often repeated and the great Qur'an.

                                        Highlighted is to show what this aayat says. Aataina is not referring to alQuraan alA3zeem, but it is only referring to 7 of the often repeated. Why aataina is missing before alQuraan alA3zeem. This same structure can be found in 33.

                                        33
                                        33 He has sent down upon you, the Book in truth, confirming what was before it. And He revealed the Tawraat and the Injeel.

                                        Here again Injeel is not revealed, and anzala is referring only to Tawraat. Because there is no other aayat to support that alInjeel was revealed, but you will find some aayaat confirming Tawraat was revealed. As you clearly see that anzala is missing before alInjeel. Another example is in 459.

                                        459
                                        459 O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best and best in result.

                                        Please note that the word atiy3oo is used before the word 'Allah' and before the word 'alRasool' but atiy3oo is missing before the words 'those in authority among you'. This means, we are not asked to atiy3oo those who are in authority among you, but they also have to obey Allah and obey alRasool.

                                        Similarly you can clearly find difference between 332 and 592.

                                        332
                                        332 Say, "Obey Allah and the Messenger." But if they turn away - then indeed, Allah does not like the disbelievers.

                                        592
                                        592 And obey Allah and obey the Messenger and beware. And if you turn away ? then know that upon Our Messenger is only clear notification.

                                        This is a clear difference, in 332 atiy3oo is missing before alRasool. Once we understand this pattern of alQuraan, you will understand that aataiyna is not referring to alQuraan alA3zeem in 1587. If not, then there must be some other aayaat which will clarify that alQuraan was given and I don't find any. Please share if you find.

                                        May Allah increase our knowledge and guide us on His path pr
                                        mmKhan

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mazhar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #86

                                          laamun A3laika Mazhar,

                                          I was expecting someone will come up with this aayat.

                                          1587
                                          1587 And We have certainly given you, seven of the often repeated and the great Qur'an.

                                          Highlighted is to show what this aayat says. Aataina is not referring to alQuraan alA3zeem, but it is only referring to 7 of the often repeated. Why aataina is missing before alQuraan alA3zeem. This same structure can be found in 33.

                                          Salamun alaika,

                                          The sentence in translation and the inference are contradictory. Please try reconciling it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users