Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Kitab (k-t-b) : Does it really mean 'a book'?

Kitab (k-t-b) : Does it really mean 'a book'?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
49 Posts 10 Posters 939 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Salam,

    what al-amiyr has put forward and compare it to your article

    Link pl

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      farida
      wrote on last edited by
      #25

      Salam,

      Link pl

      Oh my dear brother right here on this forum;
      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9604789.0

      salaam+

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #26

        Pl specific link for Alif Laam Meem.

        Is it from this site
        http//www.thehiddenbook.net/Enter.html

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          mmkhan
          wrote on last edited by
          #27

          Brother MMKhan, thank you for sharing your views.

          Just for discussion, in 22 we read 'thalika alkitabu. ...' Methinks 'this kitab' here refers to 'a-l-m', or 'a-l-m' (whatever it means or represents) is definitely a 'kitab'.

          Salaam brother Noh,

          You are welcome handshake

          Thalika means that and I also think that "a-l-m is that kitab".

          May Allah increase our knowledge and guide us to His only path pr
          mmKhan

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Offline
            B Offline
            Bender
            wrote on last edited by
            #28

            Dhalika , means both "this" and "that" refering to meanings of A L M, as, Man (Mankind) has suffered intensely. Dhalika, means, this suffering (for man/mankind), is due fleeing away from learned collection of principles.

            Salaam,

            How did you come to this conclusion brother hmm

            Salaam,
            Bender

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              farida
              wrote on last edited by
              #29

              Pl specific link for Alif Laam Meem.

              salaam
              Now that is being lazy brother. If you just ignore the posts from members, and only follow from post 1 to post 15, you would see that it's all about alif laam miym and it is still not finished.

              Is it from this site
              http//www.thehiddenbook.net/Enter.html

              Yes this is his site, but its needs to be updated. Brother al-amiyr has spent all his time on this forum so his site has been neglected and his forum is not active yet, as we are too busy here.
              salaam

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Offline
                B Offline
                bkanwar2
                wrote on last edited by
                #30

                Tenth form of verb, is written as =

                So to called letters under discussion are written like this

                Now let us convert root into the 9th form of verb. It would become , the first two Hemzas/Alifs, due Idgham (rule of combining letters) rule could also be written as . Which is exactly the imlah (spellings) of script of Quran.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Bender
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #31

                  Tenth form of verb, is written as =

                  So to called letters under discussion are written like this

                  Now let us convert root into the 10th form of verb. It would become , the first two Hemzas/Alifs, due Idgham (rule of combining letters) rule could also be written as . Which is exactly the imlah (spellings) of script of Quran.

                  Salaam,

                  Was this an answer to my question?

                  If so, then I still can't see "Man (Mankind) has suffered intensely".

                  Salaam,
                  Bender

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    al-amiyr
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #32

                    Tenth form of verb, is written as =

                    So to called letters under discussion are written like this

                    Now let us convert root into the 10th form of verb. It would become , the first two Hemzas/Alifs, due Idgham (rule of combining letters) rule could also be written as . Which is exactly the imlah (spellings) of script of Quran.

                    +salaam brother

                    I think that you made a mistake with the numbering of the verb forms.

                    That is the 9th form if we count from the ground form fa-"a-la
                    The tenth form is istaf'ala
                    The 9th form would be if-"a-lla
                    I can see you know it. It might just be hasty slip like we all do. I have also drawn a diagram of this in The Qur'aan Cosmological Model. I post it here.

                    +salaam

                    http//www.theholytablemountain.net/lexmod2.png

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Offline
                      B Offline
                      bkanwar2
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #33

                      Salaam,

                      Was this an answer to my question?

                      If so, then I still can't see "Man (Mankind) has suffered intensely".

                      Salaam,
                      Bender

                      Root means "He (a man) was in pain or suffered"

                      http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume1/00000119.pdf

                      Waazan/9th form of verb adds meanings of intensity to the root. To confirm this please see William wright Vol 1 page 43 (5.

                      Please use formula of the language to derive the real meanings "Root + Waazan" = Meanings of word.

                      "Man (Mankind) has suffered intensely".

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Offline
                        B Offline
                        bkanwar2
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #34

                        +salaam brother

                        I think that you made a mistake with the numbering of the verb forms.

                        That is the 9th form if we count from the ground form fa-"a-la
                        The tenth form is istaf'ala
                        The 9th form would be if-"a-lla
                        I can see you know it. It might just be hasty slip like we all do. I have also drawn a diagram of this in The Qur'aan Cosmological Model. I post it here.

                        +salaam

                        Thanks a lot brother. I corrected my mistake.

                        Regards

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          mirjamnur
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #35

                          Root means "He (a man) was in pain or suffered"

                          http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume1/00000119.pdf

                          Waazan/9th form of verb adds meanings of intensity to the root. To confirm this please see William wright Vol 1 page 43 (5.

                          Please use formula of the language to derive the real meanings "Root + Waazan" = Meanings of word.

                          "Man (Mankind) has suffered intensely".

                          Salam bkanwar
                          please can you make a special topic?? it's very interesting. And please - if possible can you share those sites from William wright?
                          Thank you )
                          Salam

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Offline
                            C Offline
                            CamKrist
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #36

                            I decided to give a hand and sent a post into social bookmarks. I hope the popularity will rise in.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Bender
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #37

                              Root means "He (a man) was in pain or suffered"

                              http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume1/00000119.pdf

                              Waazan/9th form of verb adds meanings of intensity to the root. To confirm this please see William wright Vol 1 page 43 (5.

                              Please use formula of the language to derive the real meanings "Root + Waazan" = Meanings of word.

                              "Man (Mankind) has suffered intensely".

                              Salaam,

                              Sorry, I confirm only with The Quran as reference. As far as I know William wright or LaneLexicon is not the author of the Quran and I can also not find a verse which states that we have to look into LaneLexicon/William wright to confirm the meanings of the words of The Quran.

                              I realy don't understand your method, you take whole words split them in parts add some extra letters and make new meanings. If Allah wanted to split them in parts like you do then that is very easy for Him.
                              As an example I can give you the word ALLAH. I know from your other post that you splitted this word like this
                              allathi
                              La
                              illah .
                              If Allah wanted to split it like you do then there would be not a single time ALLAH but everywhere those 3 words, just like in
                              5922

                              Besides this why don't you go further and also split into parts, you are flexibel with this stuff, I am sure you can do the same trick also for and after you splitted this into something new then you can split the new words again in parts and make new ones etc etc etc.

                              Salaam,
                              Bender

                              ps Joe for offtopic -[

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Offline
                                B Offline
                                bkanwar2
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #38

                                Salaam,

                                Sorry, I confirm only with The Quran as reference. As far as I know William wright or LaneLexicon is not the author of the Quran and I can also not find a verse which states that we have to look into LaneLexicon/William wright to confirm the meanings of the words of The Quran.

                                I realy don't understand your method, you take whole words split them in parts add some extra letters and make new meanings. If Allah wanted to split them in parts like you do then that is very easy for Him.
                                As an example I can give you the word ALLAH. I know from your other post that you splitted this word like this
                                allathi
                                La
                                illah .
                                If Allah wanted to split it like you do then there would be not a single time ALLAH but everywhere those 3 words, just like in
                                5922

                                Besides this why don't you go further and also split into parts, you are flexibel with this stuff, I am sure you can do the same trick also for and after you splitted this into something new then you can split the new words again in parts and make new ones etc etc etc.

                                Salaam,
                                Bender

                                ps Joe for offtopic -[

                                Brother Bender, what everyone today thinks is Quran, is its translation. Which is not, what the real text is. The real text above this translation is what I am trying to understand and translate, irrespective of what translation or tradition has told us.

                                Do you know basics of language? If not and you really want to understand the text in question. My humble suggestion would be to please try to learn the language. If you need help. I shall be happy to lend a hand as much as I can.

                                Salam bkanwar
                                please can you make a special topic?? it's very interesting. And please - if possible can you share those sites from William wright?
                                Thank you )
                                Salam

                                What do you mean? Start a seperate thread for these so to called Huroof e Muqataat? If so I can. I have understood the meanings of most of these so called letters, except few, for long time now

                                Here is a link for Wiiliam Wright's grammar book.

                                http//www.ghazali.org/arabic/WrightArabicGrammarVol1.pdf

                                Badar

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  mirjamnur
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #39

                                  Salam bkanwar2

                                  What do you mean? Start a seperate thread for these so to called Huroof e Muqataat? If so I can. I have understood the meanings of most of these so called letters, except few, for long time now

                                  yes. I'm very curious. I have already received a variety of opinions from different members of this site, but for me is not completely satisfactory. So i wait for your explanation. Thanks and Peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    Bender
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #40

                                    Brother Bender, what everyone today thinks is Quran, is its translation. Which is not, what the real text is. The real text above this translation is what I am trying to understand and translate, irrespective of what translation or tradition has told us.

                                    Do you know basics of language? If not and you really want to understand the text in question. My humble suggestion would be to please try to learn the language. If you need help. I shall be happy to lend a hand as much as I can.Badar

                                    Salaam brother,

                                    RED Do you mean the arabic text of The Book is also a translation? If so, then please give a verse for this understanding to support your claim.

                                    BLUE nope I only now how to read a little bit.

                                    GREEN Thank you for your offer, inshaAllah I will accept it and inshaAllah I will learn from you, but on condition that you support every claim of yours with ONLY examples from The Quran.

                                    First I want to learn why you splitted the word ALLAH in those 3 part.
                                    5922 clearly disapproves for me your understanding as they are used in the same sentence.
                                    We can create a seperate topic for this as this is way off-topic.

                                    Salaam,
                                    Bender

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      bkanwar2
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #41

                                      Salaam brother,
                                      First I want to learn why you splitted the word ALLAH in those 3 part.
                                      5922 clearly disapproves for me your understanding as they are used in the same sentence.
                                      We can create a seperate topic for this as this is way off-topic.

                                      Salaam,
                                      Bender

                                      Please read my write up at the bottom. You will find your answer. It written in simple English with readers in mind who are not familiar with the language. If you still have questions about it. Please feel free to ask.

                                      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9599853.50

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B Offline
                                        B Offline
                                        bkanwar2
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #42

                                        By the way, the write up/break down of so to called word/noun, Allah, has been on this forum and several others for over 2 years. I hate to use word challenge, but it is like a linguistic challenge from Quran and its language. There has been no objection to it except for one that is already addressed in this link; citing its use, both in language and current translation of Quran, as well, from books of the language with due references.

                                        Regards

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          mirjamnur
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #43

                                          Salam bkanwar

                                          i read the article but i have a question. the article states

                                          Let us turn to Qur'an itself for evidence. In Arabic script as well in the Qur'an, where a preposition ?Lee? is added in to a word containing a definite article ?Al? . Alif is dropped and so Lam of the definite article ?Al? joins with ?Lam? of preposition. Let us illustrate this point with some word examples from Qur'an itself.

                                          1. 21 Alif of ?Al? gone, lam is present and preposition ?Lee? added.

                                          2. 47 and 432, is the word same concept.

                                          but lil- muttaqin ( li+al+ muttaqin) and lil-rigal (li+al+rigal) is not the same as al mutaqin and al rigal. the second (al rigal) yes, is lam schamseia it becomes arrigal- for the idhram. but the word in the Quran is not ALILRIGAL is lil rigal (li+al+ rigal= lialrigal what is impossible to pronouncing so lilrigal 'for' the men as in 2.1 'for' the muttagin

                                          i don't know what has this to do with Al + ilah= Allah? alilah? here we have AL ILAHA not LILAHA confused

                                          so please you can explain??
                                          thank you and Salam

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users