Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. The fruits He made in pairs. (13:3)

The fruits He made in pairs. (13:3)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
62 Posts 19 Posters 1.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hawk99
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Anyway the fruitree always have male and female parts. This could be the pairs referring to in 133

    Agreed

    Thank you NielsJacob for this very enlightening subject, I am enjoying it very much.
    The implications of this subject are very broad and sets the stage for the examination
    of "pairs" throughout creation.

    5149 And of all things We created two mates; perhaps you will remember.

    3636 Exalted is He who created all pairs - from what the earth grows and from
    themselves and from that which they do not know.

    God bless

    peace

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      NielsJacob
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Peace hawk99

      Thank you NielsJacob for this very enlightening subject, I am enjoying it very much.
      )

      The implications of this subject are very broad and sets the stage for the examination
      of "pairs" throughout creation.

      Yes you are right. It could be nice to exam it well.
      I saw some at Answering-Christanity but I didn?t found their explanation complete.

      Did you see my last post

      What about this simple explanation

      There are no such thing as single fruit production.

      On the tree there are always more than one fruit.
      Not like for instant a carrot which isn?t a fruit and therefor appears alone.

      If the production of fruit is limited to one its only due to human hand interference.

      This explanation seems to simple but could be the case. (Please I need respond on this one)

      If this a fact it could be really amassing.

      Have you seen a single fruit on any plant?

      I now truing to see if thats the case. So for I haven?t found any fruit that are produced alone.

      God bless you too.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        truthseeker11
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Peace Niels Jacob,

        Anyway the fruitree always have male and female parts. This could be the pairs referring to in 133

        As huruf pointed out, the problem is 133 doesn't say "pair" referring to 2, but says "two pairs" referring to 4.

        What about this simple explanation

        There are no such thing as single fruit production.

        On the tree there are always more than one fruit.
        Not like for instant a carrot which isn?t a fruit and therefor appears alone.

        If the production of fruit is limited to one its only due to human hand interference.

        This explanation seems to simple but could be the case. (Please I need respond on this one)

        Same problem. 133 says "two pairs" meaning a total of 4. Are fruits always produced in fours?

        Back to square one; this seems to be a serious contradiction in the quran.

        May the infinite Creator guide us to the truth.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          huruf
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          No, I did not say four, I said one plus one each of them from a different pair. One from one pair or couple, another from another pair or couple. The ithnain is there to assert that it is just two we are considering, not four. Two members of a pair but not of th same pair but from different pairs.

          It may sound unusual as a formulation but quite logical.

          At least I do not see any reason that makes impossible that understanding. It is also a formulation which is used in legal and accounting parlance at least in Spanish.

          Salaam

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            good_logic
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Peace Trurhseeker.

            Where do you get "four" from.

            In fact the verse insist that it is " Ithnain" Look

            Does "Zoujain" " Ithnain" mean four to you?

            To me it means in pairs of two-Males and females"!

            GOD bless you.
            Peace.

            "

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              hicham9
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Zwgyn nyn ( ) means two mates

              ~ the (semitic) root zwg is related to joining.

              SLM

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                How do we acquire knowledge? Were creation not binary could we save anything in memory?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Offline
                  T Offline
                  truthseeker11
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Peace all,

                  My mistake! I misunderstood what huruf said earlier.

                  Question Why add "ithnain" to "zawjayn" when "zawjayn" itself means 2 mates?

                  It still doesn't make any sense. Do plants have "one plus one, each of them from a different pair"?

                  Why only "zawjayn" in 5149 and not "zawjayn ithnain"?

                  Peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Offline
                    H Offline
                    hicham9
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    According to the Qurn, everything is subject to the law of duality/dichotomy.
                    G-D is not a thing. Therefore only G-D is ONE.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      It is adjectival phrase. Those who know the classification system of plants might enlighten us.
                      And rendered in all fruits a duality of pairing-families.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H Offline
                        H Offline
                        hawk99
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        Yes you are right. It could be nice to exam it well.

                        Peace NielsJacob, Thanks for replying to my post.

                        Copied from Tutorvista.com

                        Pathenocarpy in botany and horticulture means the virgin fruits; it is naturally or
                        artificially induced fruit production without the fertilization of ovules. The fruit
                        produced by parthenocarpy is seedless. Another biological mechanism
                        stenospermocarpy also produces seedless fruits, but here the seeds are aborted
                        while they are still small. In nature, parthenocarpy or stenospermocarpy occurs
                        as a mutation. If these conditions affect the flower, the plant cannot be able to
                        reproduce sexually but it might propagate by vegetative reproduction.

                        Some plants require pollination or stimulation for parthenocarpy. This is known
                        as stimulative parthenocarpy. Plants which do not require pollination or other
                        stimulation to produce by parthenocarpy is known as vegetative parthenocarpy.
                        Moving plants from one part of the world to another, it may lack pollinators so
                        parthenocarpic varieties are easier for cultivation. Some parthenocarpic plants
                        are developed by genetical modifications.

                        Pairs throughout creation

                        I think knowing the significance of pairs as per Quran which are revealed
                        in ayats 5149, 133 and 3636, contain knowledge which will bring us to the understanding
                        that as far as human perception is concerned, is a creation of pairs, opposites, similar
                        and dissimilar, balance and relative scale which ranges from one extreme to another.
                        Therefore some questions have answers built into that very same question by just
                        acknowledging the opposite, relative scale etc.

                        God bless

                        peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          amin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          Peace hawk99

                          Yes you are right. It could be nice to exam it well.
                          I saw some at Answering-Christanity but I didn?t found their explanation complete.

                          Did you see my last post

                          What about this simple explanation

                          There are no such thing as single fruit production.

                          On the tree there are always more than one fruit.
                          Not like for instant a carrot which isn?t a fruit and therefor appears alone.

                          If the production of fruit is limited to one its only due to human hand interference.

                          This explanation seems to simple but could be the case. (Please I need respond on this one)

                          If this a fact it could be really amassing.

                          Have you seen a single fruit on any plant?

                          I now truing to see if thats the case. So for I haven?t found any fruit that are produced alone.

                          God bless you too.

                          Salam Neil,

                          Thats a good explanation and fits well, shows the plurality or duality, indirectly showing that nothing created exists singular there's something to compare with. duality or diversity is part of creation and the source is the only singularity.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Offline
                            N Offline
                            NielsJacob
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #33

                            Peace all.

                            indirectly showing that nothing created exists singular there's something to compare with. duality or diversity is part of creation and the source is the only singularity.
                            Nice formulation

                            There ain?t such thing as single fruit production.

                            Its really exiting for me if this can be the explanation.
                            So far I havn?t found any such fruit.

                            The Pineapple appears to be a single fruit form the plant. But The pineapple ?fruit? is not really a fruit at all but is a mass of individual berries fused to the central stalk. This is why the ?fruit? has leaves on top. They are actually the continued growth of the stalk beyond where the berries are attached.http//faculty.ucc.edu/biology-ombrello/pow/pineapple.htm

                            But so far the claim stands He made the fruits in pairs. And we read it as it stand with no interpreation.

                            If you have any example of a singular fruit. Then of course the teori will fall to the ground.

                            May God led us...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              NielsJacob
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              Peace All.

                              In my research I found

                              A Poppy/Opium has a single fruit/capsule

                              And then again we can read about capsule In botany a capsule is a type of simple, dry fruit produced by many species of flowering plants
                              http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsule_(botany)

                              But is the capsule a fruit in the way its mentioned in Al Quran?

                              I don't know Arabic so, someone could please help here..

                              God Bless

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Offline
                                N Offline
                                NielsJacob
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                Peace
                                here I go again.

                                What about this translation. If we cant say there are more than one of every fruit

                                He gave all plants their male and female parts (N J Dawood (draft))

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  reel
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #36

                                  133 And it is He who spread the earth and placed therein firmly set mountains and rivers; and from all of the fruits He made therein two mates; He causes the night to cover the day. Indeed in that are signs for a people who give thought.

                                  I have been told by the biologist that inside a fruit there is a male and female. I am looking for the research paper to know whether it is confirmed.

                                  Does anyone know how seeds form in fruits?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    runninglikezebras
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #37

                                    I think you should reconsider what mates can include. Some examples from plant life

                                    The complexity of the morphology of flowers and its variation within populations has led to a rich terminology.

                                    Androdioecious having male flowers on some plants, bisexual ones on others.
                                    Androecious having only male flowers (the male of a dioecious population); producing pollen but no seed.
                                    Androgynous see bisexual.
                                    Androgynomonoecious having male, female, and bisexual flowers on the same plant, also called trimonoecious.
                                    Andromonoecious having both bisexual and male flowers on the same plant.
                                    Bisexual each flower of each individual has both male and female structures, i.e. it combines both sexes in one structure. Flowers of this kind are called perfect, having both stamens and carpels. Other terms used for this condition are androgynous, hermaphroditic, monoclinous and synoecious.
                                    Dichogamous having sexes developing at different times; producing pollen when the stigmas are not receptive, either protandrous or protogynous. This promotes outcrossing by limiting self-pollination. Some dichogamous plants have bisexual flowers, others have unisexual flowers.
                                    Diclinous see Unisexual.
                                    Dioecious having either only male or only female flowers. No individual plant of the population produces both pollen and ovules. (From the Greek for "two households". See also the Wiktionary entry for dioecious.)
                                    Gynodioecious having hermaphrodite flowers and female flowers on separate plants.
                                    Gynoecious having only female flowers (the female of a dioecious population); producing seed but not pollen.
                                    Gynomonoecious having both bisexual and female flowers on the same plant.
                                    Hermaphroditic see bisexual.
                                    Imperfect (of flowers) having some parts that are normally present not developed, e.g. lacking stamens. See also Unisexual.
                                    Monoclinous see bisexual.
                                    Monoecious In the commoner narrow sense of the term, it refers to plants with unisexual flowers which occur on the same individual. In the broad sense of the term, it also includes plants with bisexual flowers. Individuals bearing separate flowers of both sexes at the same time are called simultaneously or synchronously monoecious. Individuals that bear flowers of one sex at one time are called consecutively monoecious. (From the Greek monos "single" + oikia "house". See also the Wiktionary entry for monoecious.)
                                    Perfect (of flowers) see bisexual.
                                    Polygamodioecious mostly dioecious, but with either a few flowers of the opposite sex or a few bisexual flowers on the same plant.
                                    Polygamomonoecious see polygamous. Or, mostly monoecious, but also partly polygamous.
                                    Polygamous having male, female, and bisexual flowers on the same plant. Also called polygamomonoecious or trimonoecious. Or, with bisexual and at least one of male and female flowers on the same plant.
                                    Protandrous (of dichogamous plants) having male parts of flowers developed before female parts, e.g. having flowers that function first as male and then change to female or producing pollen before the stigmas of the same plant are receptive. (Protoandrous is also used.)
                                    Protogynous (of dichogamous plants) having female parts of flowers developed before male parts, e.g. having flowers that function first as female and then change to male or producing pollen after the stigmas of the same plant are receptive.
                                    Subandroecious having mostly male flowers, with a few female or bisexual flowers.
                                    Subdioecious having some individuals in otherwise dioecious populations with flowers that are not clearly male or female. The population produces normally male or female plants with unisexual flowers, but some plants may have bisexual flowers, some both male and female flowers, and others some combination thereof, such as female and bisexual flowers. The condition is thought to represent a transition between bisexuality and dioecy.
                                    Subgynoecious having mostly female flowers, with a few male or bisexual flowers.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      LMC
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #38

                                      I am really sorry, I have been reading this post and I got so sad that people are making a problem about 133. I just have to discuss this here. Please forgive me for bringing back an old topic, but I NEED to address it because this thread had no closure!!

                                      Same problem. 133 says "two pairs" meaning a total of 4. Are fruits always produced in fours?

                                      Back to square one; this seems to be a serious contradiction in the quran.

                                      Actually, it is not a contradiction, and in fact, it is a major miracle--if you understand the science behind plant development.

                                      Let's start with

                                      Exalted is He who created (in) pairs all things.

                                      This is an example of the inferiority of the English translation compared to the original Arabic. This verse does not say "in" pairs all things. Rather, if you look at a word for word translation, it says "the pairs", not "in pairs". That is, Allah created "all the pairs" of the Earth. i.e He created all the existing pairs, so what.

                                      kol=all

                                      In arabic you can say "kol alazwaj or "alazwaj kollaha" interchangeably.

                                      And of all things We created two pairs...

                                      In Arabic, (مِنْْ) “min“ could mean "some of"

                                      Definitions from, some, some of .

                                      Some of, of. Indicating a segment of; a portion of. In other words, "Some of all things we created pairs" in essence "a part of all things are made into pairs".

                                      and from all of the fruits He made therein two mates

                                      Same thing as above. A part of all the fruits have in them pairs. In other words of all the fruits, there are pairs within them (fi-ha). This could be referring to some of the fruits with seeds which are diploid (have two sets/pairs of chromosomes, from the male and female components of the plant)

                                      Believe it or not, this verse is a significant MIRACLE. It is something, the prophet Muhammad could not have known! Let me explain. This verse uses the terminology "zawjayni ith'nayni"--which is weird terminology. Zawjayni means "two"/"pair" and Ith'nayin also means "two". That means 4 in total! (2 pairs)! What???! That doesn't make any sense?!! Actually it does

                                      Double fertilization "The launch of seed development in flowering plants (angiosperms) is initiated by the process of double fertilization two male gametes (sperm cells) fuse with two female gametes (egg and central cell) to form the precursor cells of the two major seed components, the embryo and endosperm, respectively." From https//doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00452

                                      This is a peer reviewed scientific article, so cut the BS from those atheist/anti-Muslim websites that claim this Quranic verse is a contradiction because plants only have 1 sperm and 1 egg and that no plants have 2 pairs of sperm and eggs. WRONG THEY ARE!! Double fertilization happens in some fruits (not single fertilization, DOUBLE fertilization). I cannot believe the stupidity and ignorance of anti-muslim apologists and the BS they spew on their websites and forums!

                                      Now, did 7th century Arabs have a concept of double fertilization? How did Muhammad (pbuh) know??

                                      It seems to be that Allah is appealing to 7th century Arabs' astonishment with duality/dualism of the world and is saying "you see that thing that you are astonished by?--Allah created it". Allah said this in such a way to appeal to 7th century Arabs' dispositions while not making it a contradiction for future generations. Allah may have wanted to make it sound like to the 7th century Arabs that he was talking about duality in the world (Quran must support 7th century belief by relating to their dispositions) AND the objective nature of reality that will be discovered through science). If Allah said "and everything that exists in the heaven and the Earth are made in pairs", that would be a clear scientific error, but notice how the Quran was careful to avoid this. It is only human interpretation that messes things up; It is only the English translators that mess things up.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        LMC
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #39

                                        The word فيها , which was used in Quran 133 means "in"

                                        In other words, we see a "double marriage", "double mating", "double pairing"--double fertilization IN fruits!

                                        Here is a good resource talking about how double fertilization evolved specifically in "FLOWERING PLANTS" (Angiosperms)--fruit IS an organ of flowering plants--fruit is produced by flowering plants.

                                        https//bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/Book%3A_General_Biology_(Boundless)/32%3A_Plant_Reproductive_Development_and_Structure/32.2%3A_Pollination_and_Fertilization/32.2D%3A_Double_Fertilization_in_Plants

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • H Offline
                                          H Offline
                                          Houriya
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #40

                                          Peace mclinkin94,

                                          Welcome to the forum, thank you for your insights.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users