Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Time To Change Your Paradigm

Time To Change Your Paradigm

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
583 Posts 34 Posters 58.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hicham9
    wrote on last edited by
    #552

    So the world is flat ...

    Not "the world"!
    The ground, aka. terra firma.

    I'm a jinn by the way, a ninja

    Good for you, naruto.

    So Iblis was a jinn, a human created before Adam.

    Nop!

    Iblys was a malak,
    it existed long before Adem ...

    Now, it's the root of all evil.

    Zzzz

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Man_of_Faith
      wrote on last edited by
      #553

      Hello FreedomStands,

      So Iblis was a jinn, a human created before Adam.

      Nowhere does it mention Ibliss together with Jinn. Yet Ibless is misconceived and it is supposed to be used as a normal word in the context and not a proper noun.

      Jinns are humans made of fire before the humans?

      The word naar does not mean fire but it means light/heat/energy, and that is true. You probably know that the world is made of energy if you made your studies at school. Jinn is a very general expression for "the flesh" (lit. outer later), i.e. all cover of the world. So if 'nas' and 'jinn' are mentioned together it is because the language speaks of "spirit and flesh". Connect that in your mind and you see it logical that the "outer layer" of the world, that which you see, is made of naar, i.e. energy, but there is a world beyond that "flesh".

      That Shaytaan is mentioned together with Jinn is because the word Shaytaan means "instinct" and "jinn" is usually used to connote on "worldliness". Following one's instincts is worldliness and the desire to indulge in this world. To follow Shaytaan is to basically indulge in the beastly ways of your body and not some fictional character called Shaytaan.

      Be well bro'

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        FreedomStands
        wrote on last edited by
        #554

        Good for you, naruto.

        No!

        Iblys was a malak,
        it existed long before Adem ...

        Now, it's the root of all evil.

        Zzzz

        Iblis was a malak who was of the jinn meaning a hidden malak or what?

        I guess now might be a nice time, if you feel up to it, to lay it all out, maybe your whole theology and everything so that we might correct ourselves thereby.

        For mainstream Muslims, jinns are a creature that aren't angels or humans, though most of them don't really know what they are and might imagine silly things too.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          noble
          wrote on last edited by
          #555

          You're confounding with
          because you rely on Sunni translations ...

          LOL!

          is the plural of

          Ibliss was not a Malak he was a Jinn in the Garden, close to God, until God decided to create Adam, then all hell broke loose (excuse the pun), and so all of Ibliss, Adam and Eve got cast out of the Garden.

          Malak, singular for Malaika, is translated using Biblical terminology as Angels, Malaika are controllers (free-minds ijtihad).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Offline
            H Offline
            hicham9
            wrote on last edited by
            #556

            LOL! is the plural of

            Actually, is plural of
            Hence, is pl. also .

            Edit

            &

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              noble
              wrote on last edited by
              #557

              Dude, learn Arabic, don't rely on Farsi or Urdu, or whatever.

              Plural of is

              Arabic does not obey same rules for plural names, as in other languages.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H Offline
                H Offline
                hicham9
                wrote on last edited by
                #558

                Dude, learn Arabic, don't rely on Farsi or Urdu, or whatever.

                Plural of is

                = a people (indefinite)
                = the people (definite)

                This is a plurale tantum (Arabic &#1593.
                Ie., it has no sing. form!

                That said,

                denotes the corporeal.
                denotes the incorporeal.

                Arabic does not obey same rules for plural names, as in other languages.

                Believe me,
                you have no f. idea what you're talking about!

                I suggest you go back and graduate kindergarten.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  noble
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #559

                  = a people (indefinite)
                  = the people (definite)

                  This is a plurale tantum (Arabic ).
                  Ie., it has no sing. form!

                  That said,

                  denotes the corporeal.
                  denotes the incorporeal.

                  Believe me,
                  you have no f. idea what you're talking about!

                  I suggest you go back and graduate kindergarten.

                  OK, my Arabic is very rusty, and I didn't learn it the normal way through school, still learnt it from infancy as first language.

                  Jinns exist and are not Humans and that's all I have to say...

                  I have no time for your word games MoF and hicham9.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    noble
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #560

                    @hisham9

                    and by the way I was correct, I don't need grammar rules, because it is my language.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Man_of_Faith
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #561

                      Some people have already failed the test it appears, or have a long way of coming along. Problem is people do not understand that the behavioral part is way more important than what exact details one believes in as long as the concept is right.

                      Be well

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        noble
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #562

                        Some people have already failed the test it appears, or have a long way of coming along. Problem is people do not understand that the behavioral part is way more important than what exact details one believes in as long as the concept is right.

                        Be well

                        Didn't they tell you, MoF, when in a hole, stop digging

                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Man_of_Faith
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #563

                          Nabster,

                          Not when I have started digging for a treasure down there which for sure is there. It would be wasted energy would it not? -)

                          Besides, I pointed at the appalling mannerism here and not what people say about something else.

                          Be well

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Someone
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #564

                            Peace all,

                            "ins" comes from the root/verb "anessa" which translates as "be friendly , be sociable".

                            "jinn" comes from the root/verb "janna" which translates as "envelop , enshroud , cover , curtain , cloak , conceal , blind , cache , screen , hide".

                            A hint to relate this to the reality, is to make the connection that people can be described as either "introvert" or "extrovert", it is not to belittle any of the 2 categories, both have good and bad qualities.

                            Just think that "most of the generosity and naivity" come from the "extroverts", and "most of the creativity and scheming" come from the "introverts".

                            Also, before the existance of language, all the people "bashar" were "introverts" or "jinn" due to non-existing forms of communication.

                            From http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=8469.msg41858#msg41858

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              FreedomStands
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #565

                              Peace all,

                              "ins" comes from the root/verb "anessa" which translates as "be friendly , be sociable".

                              "jinn" comes from the root/verb "janna" which translates as "envelop , enshroud , cover , curtain , cloak , conceal , blind , cache , screen , hide".

                              A hint to relate this to the reality, is to make the connection that people can be described as either "introvert" or "extrovert", it is not to belittle any of the 2 categories, both have good and bad qualities.

                              Just think that "most of the generosity and naivity" come from the "extroverts", and "most of the creativity and scheming" come from the "introverts".

                              Also, before the existance of language, all the people "bashar" were "introverts" or "jinn" due to non-existing forms of communication.

                              From http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=8469.msg41858#msg41858

                              So the introverts were created from smokeless fire and fire intensely hot before the extroverts, and the introvert Iblees made bold and haughty arrogant claims as compared to the extrovert Adam who was after him?

                              Iblees announced that introverts are made of fire, while extroverts are made of mud!

                              Am I getting it right? Help me out.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • H Offline
                                H Offline
                                huruf
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #566

                                jinn, means "covered" in that sense, it does not have to have the meaning of any particular being, it may apply to any being or thing provided it is covered.

                                Now a particular being the essence or foundation of which would be to be covered would be something else. May be in the Qur'an there are both. There may be people who afre jinn in th sense that for certain purposes they are covered ones, and then for other purposes they are not. And thtne those that their nature is to be covered.

                                Salaam

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  FreedomStands
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #567

                                  jinn, means "covered" in that sense, it does not have to have the meaning of any particular being, it may apply to any being or thing provided it is covered.

                                  Now a particular being the essence or foundation of which would be to be covered would be something else. May be in the Qur'an there are both. There may be people who afre jinn in th sense that for certain purposes they are covered ones, and then for other purposes they are not. And thtne those that their nature is to be covered.

                                  Salaam

                                  And whoever is covered is made before humankind and out of fire?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • H Offline
                                    H Offline
                                    hicham9
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #568

                                    According to the Quran (1527, 5515), it was l-Gn () that G-D apportioned out of a 'mrig' () from 'nr l summ' ( ) ...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • H Offline
                                      H Offline
                                      huruf
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #569

                                      And whoever is covered is made before humankind and out of fire?

                                      Whoever is covered is covered, full stop.

                                      There are covered that may be uncevered and may be there are covered that cannot be uncovered. May be when talking about jinn as opposed to something else it means covered as ooposed to things or beings that are uncovered both by their nature. May be.

                                      Salaam

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        noble
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #570

                                        Peace

                                        So much confusion,when the Quran makes it so simple, why go and do linguistics and semantics acrobatics when someone tells you that warm water is wet and warm air is dry?

                                        My genuine native understanding of Arabic makes me read the Quran that Jinns and Inns are beings, and I know for sure I am an Inns, and a sentient being.

                                        It tells me about Jinns who are different from me, because I was made from mud/clay, and they were made from smokeless fire, different elemental substances, so different beings, simple, stop complicating, because you are in danger of mocking Allah's Signs.

                                        PS. for those who like to play with words, some scholars/clerics think that Inns also refers to the derivative nasee, forget, which is that Inns have a propensity for forgetfulness taken as a blessing, you can play your acrobatics on this too )

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #571

                                          Salaam,

                                          If Jinns and Inns are not separate beings, why are they time and time again mentioned as created separate and of different substance?

                                          For those re-inventing and assigning their own meanings to the Quran's language, nevermind <-- These aren't the first linguistic acrobatics, nor will they be the last. Those who don't believe that Jinns are separate beings, their opinion is their own of course.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users