No God Exists: Why Should I Be Good to humans?
-
I would like to see a world without God. Don't be surprised. Its just a case study of whether we can control the animals we have within us without religions/deen.
Okay, for a second let's say God doesn't exist. Belief has gone down the drain and all religions are banned. There is nothing called afterlife. There is no reason to believe in anything called karma because just like God it cant be measured in some lab. We can do whatever we like as long as no law is broken! You know in that case, government can punish us. Keeping this in mind and the idea that I am an atheist (just pretending), tell me why should I be good to certain people who provide nothing useful to me?
the specif group of people not useful to me in economic sense
not my teacher or employer
don't provide me any products
can't sell my own products to them
they don't live in my countryLets start from here. Give me rational reasons and moral values for which I should be good to them. Please, do debunk anything you deem illogical here. I am trying to see if a peaceful world without belief in God is possible.
Are you saying that all athiests have no morality? A lot of the morality we follow is not just religious, its cultural as well. Cultural and societal pressures play a big part in what we do and what we avoid in life.
-
?Oh we would have god or gods all right! whoever needs a god willget it, even if it is not called a godbut something else, may be dad, may be a Censor,may be a Presidente may be an Idea who rules or imposes criteria through its propounders or interreters. Ideas are not God, but they do have a potential for getting illegitimate power using them.
Finally God, gods mostly are ideas.
Also, power and thirst for power exist independently of gods or no gods or God or no God, and whoever thirsts for power will use everythign to get it. That is, will do the same power seeker sdo now but will use a different vocabulary.
Salaam
-
Are you saying that all athiests have no morality? A lot of the morality we follow is not just religious, its cultural as well. Cultural and societal pressures play a big part in what we do and what we avoid in life.
Read the past posts and see what is going on.
-
What makes us truly sophisticated is our share of Rabb in ourselves. One cannot say God does not exists but the answer is that God is a pantheistic phenomenon. The more developed a soul the greater their influence in the Grand Consciousness they are, but obviously the total Rabb is always greater in encompassing measure.
We are also not as independent as we may think due to above argument, but our aim is to become as independent as we can and a considerable part of Rabb. If a powerful soul has prophesied in the past we are victim to the prophecy if we are destined to fulfill it. We create the future in symbiosis together, affecting depending on our generation of independence. This collective makes Rabb. That way Rabb is always greater than an individual soul, but we are not separate from Rabb even if we are to be considered lifeless (in soul mental level).
Lifelessness is being a lack of conscious awareness and particularly those who are slaves to the Bodies, often called "The Flesh" (the Bodily = al-jinn). These people do not really exist even if they may be deluded enough to believe so in their own little sphere. These people are victims and the culprit is their own Bodies which were designed to deceive and corrupt. A grand majority of people in the World are "automated" beings very predictable and lost. It is hard to exit the delusion. The only way is to take steps to get out of its pattern, and the most crucial is to take control and cut off from its instinctive drive.
Living oblivious of who you are is vanity. One should reflect every time they do things in life of why they do it. "Why do I like to do this?". "Am I not a slave by this arousal and release of dopamine?"
I am sure a great amount of people would realize how vain lives they actually live doing meaningless things. What do they satisfy, a lowly primate or a powerful Spirit?
The only meaningful purpose is to nurture spirituality and make sure offspring get the equal level of nurture and to learn that Satan (the instinct) is the most important problem in their lives. The life does not have to be become unexciting but can be fairly exciting actually. You feel you grow in control of everything. Learn what comes from your Body and what comes from Spirit - make a separation. That Holy Spirit is very superior and powerful and is inherent in every conscious being but many do not let it grow within in them, or rather it is imperceptible to them.
Be safe
Amenuel -
Why would you want to see it?
lol, no, I just wanted to know how it would go. A claim circulating online is that the world will be peaceful without God/religions. But umm, all of us are pretty educated about what happens when men are given the right to decide what is moral.
I have been still doing research on morals in the atheist world theme. Unfortunately, what I find equals to what wahhabis and other sectarian scholars say to keep Muslims under control and without rights. That's scary. These days, even the atheist scholars have started looking like clerics to me. If today things look like this then imagine how the real atheist world will look like. Here comes the renowned Sheikh Richard Dawkins
https//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TkR5_czUar8/VpLXDnC20QI/AAAAAAAAAHE/fUNA5GtrWWM/s600-Ic42/d.pngThen salafi atheists (his fans) give him support
https//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-aE0l9Iirh14/VpNTLA4-ezI/AAAAAAAAAHo/0_t7qy7GCoo/s512-Ic42/salafiatheists.pngApparently, another atheist sheikh named Harris believes our decisions are not guided by free will. He also believes in violence and profiling of infidels called Muslims.
-
Religions being the culprit of everything is such a commonplace... As if religions were something outside human beings, some sort of etereal existence that fromthe nothingness manages to make men do that they the etereal thing named religion decides, because religions are also beings though etereal capable to decide and to decide instead of people.
Also ideas are not responsible for anything at all, but persons who old them or who hate them or who given them cult are the ones who are bad or good. As long as there is people there will be bad and good, because it is them who get the ideas and use them for this or that.
Salaam
-
It is the level of empathy that matters. Sympathy or not is one thing, but one needs empathy.
Be safe
Amenuel -
Religions being the culprit of everything is such a commonplace... As if religions were something outside human beings, some sort of etereal existence that fromthe nothingness manages to make men do that they the etereal thing named religion decides, because religions are also beings though etereal capable to decide and to decide instead of people.
Atheism is pretty much a religion.
God is like the cushion for the survival of the humans.
Take him out of the picture and you will find dominating humans taking over your mind and body. There will be no way to argue about why certain innocent person does not deserve to die.
It is the level of empathy that matters. Sympathy or not is one thing, but one needs empathy.
Not possible for certain groups
Group 1 Those who can't think independently and decide. Must stick to what the society says.
Group 2 Those who believe everything shown on tv is correct.
Group 3 Those who believe we know everything.
Group 4 Those who think rationality is the key to all the possibilities.Do you mean we are all atheists, or simply God does not exist?
No mention of God anymore. No one is allowed to practice his religion.
-
No mention of God anymore. No one is allowed to practice his religion.
Salaam,
Ok
God is just a weird excuse to do bad things.
The wicked will always find justifications for their doings.
People kill in name of freedom, democracy, love, etc etc etc
So I think it would not change anything, only a shift in motivation.Salaam,
Bender -
Salaam,
Ok
God is just a weird excuse to do bad things.
The wicked will always find justifications for their doings.
People kill in name of freedom, democracy, love, etc etc etc
So I think it would not change anything, only a shift in motivation.Salaam,
BenderI thank God that you understand it. That's what I have been saying all those years on this forum. People will kill in the name of whatever their ideology is. But you have to see who instigates people to do bad things in the name of God. If they are like this now just think about what would happen if God is banned from this world.
-
Ah, found a great journal article at emerald. It is similar to what MOF said here when we first started discussing the topic. But I'll still paste the most important parts of the article to show how it is true in the real world.
Evil is not a word used frequently among accounting academics. As with most social scientists, we shy away from such metaphysical and emotionally charged terminology. The rules of the game are rational discourse, reasoned exploration, and instrumentally legitimized actions. These rules aim to divorce sentiment and emotion from intellect and to substitute impartial evidence for nuanced moral codes and spiritual values. However, if we conceive of evil as that which deprives innocent people of their humanity and if we believe such behavior to be inherent in the human condition, then evil constitutes an elemental force of social systems (Hilberg, 1980; Katz, 1993; Adams and Balfour, 1998; Billstein et al., 2000) that can be ignored only at our peril. Yet, it is the instrumentally rational and legitimized roles and behaviors shrouded in hierarchical structures, technology, and expertise that enable us to distance ourselves from our emotions and mask the presence and potential of evil.
The ?rational? practices of modernity predominately follow the logic of instrumental rationality (e.g. Weber, 1958, 1979; Habermas, 1984, 1987) as conventionally conceptualized. Instrumental rationality refers to the legitimization of action by appealing to the efficacy of the means employed in achieving the specified end without the need to appraise the legitimacy of the end (Jary and Jary, 1991). The conventional interpretation of rationality implies a neutral orientation possessing both constructive and destructive potential. The realization of this potential depends on parameters (i.e. individual morality or ideological zeal) distinct from, and independent of, the application of rational processes. Further, the realization of this potential cannot be separated from the social roles and institutional structures roles and structures constituted, and legitimated, by the logic of modernity. These institutional roles and structures obviate individual responsibility (Kelman and Hamilton, 1989), and equate the efficient achievement of organizationally specified goals with the public interest (Bauman, 1989).
Machines, professionals, and administrative hierarchies represent the physical, intellectual, and organizational manifestations of instrumental rationality. These manifestations define and construct the organizational context and over time overwhelm individual morality
One is rarely confronted with a clear, ?up or down? decision on an ethical issue; rather a series of small, usually ambiguous choices are made, and the weight of commitment and of habit drives out morality. The skids are further greased if the situation is defined or presented as technical, or calling for expert judgment, or is legitimized by organizational authority. It becomes an even easier choice if the immoral choice has itself been redefined, through a moral inversion, as the ?good? or ?right? thing to do (Adams and Balfour, 1998, p. 25).Organizational violence refers to physical or emotional harm done to individuals as a result of actions carried out on behalf of the organization and is the expression of administrative evil. We argue that the large scale forms of organizational violence ? such as the ?normalization? of nuclear war through budgetary practices or the facilitation of the Holocaust through the use of ?counting machines? ? differ only in magnitude from the daily acts of organizational violence, legitimized by rational economic analysis.
Modernity has deified instrumental rationality as an enabling logic. The application of this logic narrows the conception of ethics, professionalism, and politics and is operationalized through machines, experts/professionals, and administrative hierarchies Machines are the physical manifestations; professions are the intellectual manifestations; and administrative hierarchies are the organizational manifestations. ?When linked to bureaucracy and organization, the result is an unintentional tendency toward dehumanization and the elevation of technical progress and processes over human values and dignity? (Adams and Balfour, 1998, p. xxv).
Title "The rules are no game", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Source
http//dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570510620475 -
Religions being the culprit of everything is such a commonplace... As if religions were something outside human beings, some sort of etereal existence that fromthe nothingness manages to make men do that they the etereal thing named religion decides, because religions are also beings though etereal capable to decide and to decide instead of people.
PRIDE and ARROGANCE is the root of all evil.
The characteristic of "Uber Alles", an urge for supremacy upon others.. and makes ME or WE feel superior.It can be bound or mapped to any form of identity (ie I or ME).. or social group identity (ie WE) such as
- Religion (Muslim / Islam, Sunnis, Shiites, Quranist, Catholic, Orthodox etc..)
- Race / Ethnicity (Jews, Arabs, Aryan, White, Black, Han, Indian, Hutu, Tutsi etc..)
- Nationality (Germans, Japanese, American, Swedish, Turkish, Russian etc..)
- Ideology (Communist, Capitalist, Secularist, God Believers, Atheist etc..)
Having said that, Religion is BAD due to it's dogmatic nature..
I rephrase that.. any ideology which is based on DOGMA is BAD.
Dogma is a conception or an idea which MUST NOT and CANNOT be questioned..
And those who dare to do so must be silenced / killed due to blasphemy...Scientific methodology is generally GOOD due to it's NON DOGMATIC nature..
You don't believe in round earth? Fine... you don't believe in evolution? Fine...
You questioned the truthfulness of Newton's equation? Please.. feel free to step forward and prove otherwise..Back to the main topic..
Good soul are just good soul, regardless of their opinion / belief.
Bad soul are just bad soul, regardless of their opinion / belief.We don't need "God" or "Religion" to differentiate between good or evil..
https//s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/09/1a/79/091a790774e237d0e5e32619cc1efd34.jpg
-
Depends on how you define "God" Jafar and what the phenomenon really is. God's multiplied "self" structure means you basically are interconnected with the phenomenon called Rabb in Arabic and Aramaic. What makes a human advanced and way excelled in functionality is due to the "Superior Spirit" albeit many waste that gift utterly because they choose to follow their primate body. God stems out from your 'self' (called nafs in Arabic and Aramaic) so in the image of God you develop your Spirit... in the Father's footsteps as Jesus may have had put it, and the body is simply a huge stumbling block since it is not the real you and will entice you to things with its satan (instinct) and generate a blinding cloud if you give in to it.
The focus is not on any God but your realization in that God although God is a very poor descriptive term as it does seem more Pagan than describing its function. Rabb is a developing phenomenon and it is its image you follow and that stems out from your 'self'. We are all part of Rabb and it is not something which would be jealous for not being worshiped exclusively as you are it although a share. The Rabb is in you and you are in it, not separate.
And everything a person ever has to focus on in life is to 'come alive' rather than be dead and part of the world's "automation" (or instinct or "programming", there are many ways of defining it). All you would hope for is not to be dead. Even apparently alive you may be dead, lifeless in spirit. See the point in when Jesus slightly sarcastically says "Let the dead bury their dead" or is angry when his disciple is sad because he is going to "die".
Be safe
Amenuel -
PRIDE and ARROGANCE is the root of all evil.
The characteristic of "Uber Alles", an urge for supremacy upon others.. and makes ME or WE feel superior.It can be bound or mapped to any form of identity (ie I or ME).. or social group identity (ie WE) such as
- Religion (Muslim / Islam, Sunnis, Shiites, Quranist, Catholic, Orthodox etc..)
- Race / Ethnicity (Jews, Arabs, Aryan, White, Black, Han, Indian, Hutu, Tutsi etc..)
- Nationality (Germans, Japanese, American, Swedish, Turkish, Russian etc..)
- Ideology (Communist, Capitalist, Secularist, God Believers, Atheist etc..)
Having said that, Religion is BAD due to it's dogmatic nature..
I rephrase that.. any ideology which is based on DOGMA is BAD.
Dogma is a conception or an idea which MUST NOT and CANNOT be questioned..
And those who dare to do so must be silenced / killed due to blasphemy...Scientific methodology is generally GOOD due to it's NON DOGMATIC nature..
You don't believe in round earth? Fine... you don't believe in evolution? Fine...
You questioned the truthfulness of Newton's equation? Please.. feel free to step forward and prove otherwise..Back to the main topic..
Good soul are just good soul, regardless of their opinion / belief.
Bad soul are just bad soul, regardless of their opinion / belief.We don't need "God" or "Religion" to differentiate between good or evil..
https//s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/09/1a/79/091a790774e237d0e5e32619cc1efd34.jpg
Peace,
Could you spare at least this thread from trolling?Dostoyevsky said, as I have read If God oes not exist then everything is allowed.
Salaam
True '(
-
Peace,
Could you spare at least this thread from trolling?Where did I troll?
Belief in God / RELIGION has no correlation with being good or evil..
God Believer and Unbeliever has the same potential to be good or evil..Being Good or Evil has a POSITIVE correlation with the degree of EGO and PRIDE .
THe higher the degree of EGO and PRIDE the more evil one might become
THe lesser the degree of EGO and PRIDE the more good one might becomeThat's my my point..
Even the statement of "Why Should I Be Good to humans?" in the subject carries the notion of EGO ("I"/"ME" within..
Dostoyevsky said, as I have read If God oes not exist then everything is allowed.
I said if God doesn't exist then everything doesn't exist.