Important Statement made by EX-evolutionist Dr. Gary Parker
-
Earth is 6000 years old and thats a inevitable scientific truth?
Khi- Ive told u many times now tht i dont endorse all of Kent's views neither Harun's. Dont u get this.
This is nonsense. Science has no morality of its own. I have told you before. Only human being can act morrally or immorally. But if you don't want to use your God-given reason then thats up to you but I telly you you are decieving yourself by taking non scientist like Dr. Kent seriously. At least listen to a proper "Creationist" scientist like Micheal Behe.
Regards,
Khi- False. Psedoscience like evolution does. They r racists though ofcourse they dont admit this at the outset. Hitler acted openly on evolution eradicating the sick n leaving only the good pure gened ppl survive. As far as Behe is concerned yes hes a biologist supporting Intelligent Design but u dont even seem 2 agree with him on tht. GOD Bless!
-
you wrote
"Khi- False. Psedoscience like evolution does. They r racists though ofcourse they dont admit this at the outset. Hitler acted openly on evolution eradicating the sick n leaving only the good pure gened ppl survive. As far as Behe is concerned yes hes a biologist supporting Intelligent Design but u dont even seem 2 agree with him on tht. GOD Bless!"Hitler acted imorrally, not science. Science created the atom bomb but it was human who acted imorally by exploding it over nagasaki and hiroshima. But I think the problem you have idmkhizar, I think, is that you take implications of science to be morality. But why? Science is always neutral, it we that either use wisely science or abuse it very badly but it us who can act in this way.
As for Behe - he has good arguments and those arguments are very valid scientific arguments. Scientists can engage with him intellectually. I can see he has good arguments because I have no prejuidice and I can look at things objectively...
Regards,
-
Dear LoteTree,
I would like to make you aware as I feel it is relevant in the bigger picture (and not for character assasination purposes) that Khizar also believes in Uri Geller as the real deal.
It might shed some light on his blind faith in charlatans and disregard of rationality even when repeatedly invited to it.
He was unable to defend his man, Uri Geller when I showed him a video of how he (Uri) behaved when challenged to do his super-dooper-paranormal thing on the (late) Johnny Carson's show in the 80's.
Regards.
-
Dear LoteTree,
I would like to make you aware as I feel it is relevant in the bigger picture (and not for character assasination purposes) that Khizar also believes in Uri Geller as the real deal.
It might shed some light on his blind faith in charlatans and disregard of rationality even when repeatedly invited to it.
He was unable to defend his man, Uri Geller when I showed him a video of how he (Uri) behaved when challenged to do his super-dooper-paranormal thing on the (late) Johnny Carson's show in the 80's.
Regards.
eh... When did you do this?
-
Link plz?
-
Hitler acted imorrally, not science. Science created the atom bomb but it was human who acted imorally by exploding it over nagasaki and hiroshima. But I think the problem you have idmkhizar, I think, is that you take implications of science to be morality. But why? Science is always neutral, it we that either use wisely science or abuse it very badly but it us who can act in this way.
Khi- Yes science shld be neutral but evolutionist "science" is not. Thts the whole pt. They adopted forgeries n propganda 2 spread their false views. thts y Creationists like Kent call evolution a relgion n NOT science. GOT tht?
As for Behe - he has good arguments and those arguments are very valid scientific arguments. Scientists can engage with him intellectually. I can see he has good arguments because I have no prejuidice and I can look at things objectively...
Regards,
Khi- So then i guess u shld be supporting Creation instead of evolution. GOD Bless!
-
Here is one on the general discussion board
http//19.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&goto=18687&rid=0&S=9a82097667239a037a9cbf9614eb8692#msg_18687
I requested a move of 4 or 5 other related (spam) threads to the trash on the same forum where you can now find them if you wish.
Regards.
-
Dear LoteTree,
I would like to make you aware as I feel it is relevant in the bigger picture (and not for character assasination purposes) that Khizar also believes in Uri Geller as the real deal.
It might shed some light on his blind faith in charlatans and disregard of rationality even when repeatedly invited to it.
He was unable to defend his man, Uri Geller when I showed him a video of how he (Uri) behaved when challenged to do his super-dooper-paranormal thing on the (late) Johnny Carson's show in the 80's.
Regards.
Khi- Is saw tht tape bro. Plz dont accuse me of such. Ofcourse if u have a chance 4 preparation then such is possible. However at the live experiment show here in germany Uri performed under CONTROLLED conditions n thts y i think tht the probability of him being a fake is quite low. Yet there were skeptics but i did not find their arguments convincing. I think i gave the link 2 the channel on 19.org. But this has nothing 2 do with my stand on Creation which is of utmost importance 2 me n 2 anyone who truly believes in GOD. GOD Bless!
-
Well Khizar if you review the thread on 19.org where I pointed you to James Randi, you said he was not to be trusted because he believed in evolution.
Is that not enough of a reason to raise it? Is that really a criteria for searching for truth? To distrust someone who accepts evolution?
You need to deprogram your prejudiced views and try to see things in a balanced way. Don't blindly follow - you are making many blunders and exposing yourself as foolish.
Regards.
BTW Johnny Carson's show where Uri Geller was told to select whatever trick he wanted to do with DEFINITELY UNTAMPERED spoons etc. was a CONTROLLED situation.
Uri was embarassed and unable to do anything because he got negative vibes or some other excuse which I can't recall now.
-
Well Khizar if you review the thread on 19.org where I pointed you to James Randi, you said he was not to be trusted because he believed in evolution.
Is that not enough of a reason to raise it? Is that really a criteria for searching for truth? To distrust someone who accepts evolution?
You need to deprogram your prejudiced views and try to see things in a balanced way. Don't blindly follow - you are making many blunders and exposing yourself as foolish.
Regards.
Khi- I don follow anyone/thing blindly. I do study n examine it very carefully n i know 4 sure tht most, if not all, evolutionists r materialistic ppl. They bother only abt this world n not the hereafter.
BTW Johnny Carson's show where Uri Geller was told to select whatever trick he wanted to do with DEFINITELY UNTAMPERED spoons etc. was a CONTROLLED situation.
Uri was embarassed and unable to do anything because he got negative vibes or some other excuse which I can't recall now.
Khi- I saw tht too but it is possible tht he had a bad day or was under pressure. I wldnt have believed Uri had such abilities wld i not have seen this live experiment show in Germany in 2004. GOD Bless!
-
Hello Truth,
I have just had a quick look at the 19.org for Uri Geller threads.
I feel that I have wasted my time -(
Regards,