Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Pork & Logic

Pork & Logic

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
133 Posts 38 Posters 6.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    imrankhawaja
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    I can choose options of course. I can render the whole translation absurd and not correct. The probability that the context speaks of something else is high.

    It is improbable that a word, i.e. haram, means two completely opposite things depending on context, this would be absurd. Words do not work that way except to someone who likes to play around with interpretations.

    Take a look at the passage of which you speak

    Where do you find "dead animals"? It is a playful inference. The only the passage mentions about there is lifelessness (substantive).

    The passage begins by saying, and which is completely related to the previous passage which is not meant to separate the two clauses since the T on haramet is supposed to carry the predicate from a subject related to the context, is "... is good for your lifelessness and persistence and..." To be able to understand the context you need to first decipher the previous verse properly from start to finish, i.e. not like the pretenders in medieval times.

    Dal-Waw-Miim (Dal-Alif-Miim) = To continue, endure, persist, remain, persevere, last, stand still, keep alive.

    Above is the root of which is also used in Adam's name and is the purposeful name his ascendants have, i.e. children of Adam.

    Summary is that the haramet in the sentence does most probably refer to sanctified or goodly still, but the passage does not speak of dead animals or blood. There is no blood mention or "dead animals" in there. Get real for God's sake. Do you attempt to try the similar interpretation acrobatics as the past people?

    So lifelessness is forbidden according to you? How easy is it to forbid lifelessness when the majority of humans on Earth are in fact lifeless?

    Be well
    Amenuel

    your post is a perfect example of beating around a bush...

    if A=b then b= c then C=d hence d=A

    television tele mean FAR vision mean view..
    hence using televiosn or far view is both right ...

    thats what you are doing with the meanings of quran..

    jin mean hidden from eyes...

    so jin is resdie inside the body...

    languge rules and syntax i still wonder people never get a grip on it... how words meanings bring a new word for diffferent usgae .. when u understand that thing then understanding of interpretation you can easily get... otherwise

    the real problem is not in interepretation honestly its in your own head .. or may be you are not so knowledgeable how langauge derived words from one another..

    keep beating aroung the bush if its your way....

    a common word business , derived from busy ness...

    a businessman have no busniess in these days...

    a busy man have no busy ness in these days... how stupid is this to understand things like that rotfl

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      LastDay3
      wrote on last edited by
      #125

      I can choose options of course. I can render the whole translation absurd and not correct.

      I told you how it was to be interpreted. ........

      My argument would suit everywhere because HARAM MEANS SANCTIFIED... ALWAYS.
      You would be stupid to argue otherwise ..........

      Then Is your silly Al-Mesjed "al-Haram" a "Forbidden" temple too?

      If this was so then no one would be allowed to go there because it is "haram = forbidden" to you.

      Obviously it is the "sanctified/blessed/goodly" masjed.

      Salaam/Peace MoF,

      The root word "Ha-ra-ma = Haram" essentially always means "Forbidden" in QURAN TESTAMENT,

      and

      every root word thus essentially has
      a perfectly clear, straightforward and easy to understand "one/same meaning" throughout
      the QURAN TESTAMENT,

      and this is what makes QURAN TESTAMENT
      a perfectly Clear, absolutely Easy to understand EXCELLENT HEAVENLY SCRIPTURE
      with no ambiguity/flaw and with no difficulty/discrepancy in it, at all,

      =QURAN TESTAMENT 18/1-2 = 39/28 = 54/17, 22, .........

      by the Immense Grace of AL-LAH unto all of us above, from the very beginning.

      In this respect,

      "Al-Masjid Al-Haram" perfectly means (="The-Temple The-Forbidden&quot
      due to the Fact that

      our Lord AL-LAH has Forbidden (=Harrama) all fighting near/around/in it,
      as it is clearly emphasized in this Verse, in the first place, here (2/191),

      and in exact similar/same manner again

      "Al-Shahr Al-Haram" perfectly means (="The-Month The-Forbidden&quot
      due to the Fact that

      our Lord AL-LAH has Forbidden (=Harrama) all fighting in it,
      as it is clearly emphasized in this Verse, in the first place, here (2/217),

      and in exact similar/same manner again

      "Al-Ashhur Al-Haram" perfectly means (="The-Months The-Forbidden&quot
      due to the Fact that

      our Lord AL-LAH has Forbidden (=Harrama) all lewdness and brawl and quarrel in it,
      as it is clearly emphasized in these Verses, in the first place, here (9/36 = 2/197).

      Quran says it is not goodly to eat it nor meat from animals which have died on their own.

      It does not say forbidden. It is clearly a recommendation.

      "Haram" means "sanctified/blessed/goodly" and an'ema (&#1575 means "it is not" being a compound of and .

      "Haram/Harrama" essentially and always means "Forbidden," as we have clearly seen above,
      and also we clearly and unmistakably see it again here

      ===================
      33- Say My LORD has absolutely forbidden (=Arabic innama harrama)

      all lewd action, what is obvious from them and what is subtle,
      and sin, aggression without cause,
      and your setting up partners with AL-LAH that were never authorized by HIM,
      and saying about AL-LAH what you do not know.

      173- HE has absolutely forbidden (=Arabic innama harrama) for you

      what is already dead,
      the blood,
      the meat of pig,
      and what was dedicated to other than AL-LAH.

      But whoever finds himself/herself forced out of need and without disobedience or animosity,
      (only in this case) there is no sin upon him/her. For AL-LAH is Forgiving, Merciful.

      QURAN TESTAMENT 7/33 = 2/173

      So dear brother/friend MoF, as we can clearly see above
      your interpretation of this word here as

      "Haram" means "sanctified/blessed/goodly" (as you still claim it above)

      is fundamentally wrong, crooked/distorted interpretation that does Not make sense, in no way, at all.
      Because according to your wrong, crooked/distorted interpretation

      all these things that our Lord AL-LAH has absolutely forbidden (=Arabic innama harrama) unto us,
      in the above Verses here, in the first place,

      would actually be not forbidden (according to you) but just a recommendation!!!
      So whoever commits one or more of these dire Sins above would not even be sinful,
      because they were just a recommendation!!! (according to you)

      (*Please, let us absolutely see again what is Commanded unto us
      at the very end of that second Verse above

      But whoever finds himself/herself forced out of need and without disobedience or animosity,
      (only in this case) there is no Sin upon him/her. For AL-LAH is Forgiving, Merciful.

      So it is absolutely clear that exclusively and only in this case
      (=i.e. if one is forced out of need) --without disobedience or animosity-- it is not Sin then,
      due to Immense Forgiveness and Mercy of our Lord AL-LAH therein,

      but in all other cases, to commit one or more of these actions above are dire Sins,
      as it is clearly emphasized in the above Verse, in the first place.

      And then according to your crooked/distorted claim above again,
      this time because that there is even no innama
      at the beginning of these Verses in

      QURAN TESTAMENT 4/23-24

      consequently, to get married with one's own Mother and Sister/s and Daughter/s would actually be not forbidden (according to you)
      but on the contrary

      would be totally "sanctified/blessed/goodly" for Humanity!!! (according to you above)

      my dear fellow/friend MoF, you are thus absolutely out of your mind, again and again and again, .........
      because you are constantly inventing such utterly distorted/crooked satanic interpretations

      and presenting them as totally sane and sound interpretations of an "insightful" Man who knows basic arabic --(actually with your weird lexicons
      and unlimited fabricating time and insatiable lust for crookedness/distortion);

      but if you thus keep on ignorantly and arrogantly following your own ego (=25/43)
      and continue to let yourself be deceived by Iblees/Satan here (=17/64),
      you may regret it forever. (=38/79-85)

      But if you immediately repent and return to AL-LAH in this Rightful manner here,
      AL-LAH may forgive all your past sins and may admit you into/among HIS truthful Servants,
      in this Most Generous & Most Benevolent Manner here

      =QURAN TESTAMENT 25/68-69-70-71, 72-73-74-75-76

      Remain in peace/salaam.


      *Unfortunately, I do not have enough time to reply to all of
      such utterly distorted/crooked baseless interpretations of this fellow/friend (=MoF),
      which he keeps on fabricating here and in other threads as well,
      and repeating them in various manners again and again.

      Only from time to time, when I have enough time I immediately reply
      and thus clearly show the obvious distortion/crookedness in his baseless interpretations/assumptions,

      because it is a Responsibility (not only unto me) but unto every Believer (whenever they have the time/opportunity)
      to decisively refute the falsehood and clearly present the Truth in QURAN TESTAMENT.
      =34/48-49 & 3/104 & 73/20

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H Offline
        H Offline
        huwa
        wrote on last edited by
        #126

        How can pork be totally forbidden if there is an exception of consumption before the end of the verse (53)?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          imrankhawaja
          wrote on last edited by
          #127

          How can pork be totally forbidden if there is an exception of consumption before the end of the verse (53)?

          exception is only when u have no option left...

          let say i stuck in a plane with covered with full of ice around me and rest of the people dead around me... i even allowed to eat the flesh of human for keeping me survive if my attention is just to make myslelf surivive ...instead of cananbalism..

          on the condition of self defence you can kill to another perosn.. does not make killing recomendable , or does it?

          same if you clearly read what is written in the end of 53 u will understand what is the topic here

          So, whoever is forced by severe hunger and not seeking sin, then God is Forgiving, Compassionate.

          Peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Offline
            I Offline
            imrankhawaja
            wrote on last edited by
            #128

            my dear fellow/friend MoF, you are thus absolutely out of your mind, again and again and again, .........
            because you are constantly inventing such utterly distorted/crooked satanic interpretations

            and presenting them as totally sane and sound interpretations of an "insightful" Man who knows basic arabic --(actually with your weird lexicons
            and unlimited fabricating time and insatiable lust for crookedness/distortion);

            hahahahahahahaha rotfl rotfl funny or sad ..

            whatever

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              herbman
              wrote on last edited by
              #129

              peace to all,

              the subject of this thread might sound funny but still now I couldnt find any strong logic against pork meat to prohibit it. Can anyone provide some good point or arguement on this issue.

              peace

              Salam,

              because it is a scavenger!

              Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Man_of_Faith
                wrote on last edited by
                #130

                The points against the non-eating of pork are logical, it is a poor choice for humans.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Socrates
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #131

                  Pigs where created as a human-swine hybrid. This means that eating pork is indeed akin to cannibalism.

                  Therefore, i have one word to say on the matter SWINE

                  Peace
                  Live long and prosper

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Novice
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #132

                    Take a look at the passage of which you speak

                    Dal-Waw-Miim (Dal-Alif-Miim) = To continue, endure, persist, remain, persevere, last, stand still, keep alive.

                    Above is the root of which is also used in Adam's name and is the purposeful name his ascendants have, i.e. children of Adam.

                    Salam MoF

                    The root of is dl mm ww ( &#1608

                    is a noun and meaning "the blood"

                    Root dl ww mm ( &#1605 is different.

                    Peace

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Man_of_Faith
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #133

                      Salam MoF

                      The root of is dl mm ww ( &#1608

                      is a noun and meaning "the blood"

                      Root dl ww mm ( &#1605 is different.

                      Peace

                      That is a mistake. The root of is . The root of Arabic do not work the way you suggest or the historical sources. Adam's name means is Persistent.

                      The word with root is a descriptive way of referring to blood, but it does not only refer to blood.

                      In many examples including Adam's name it does not refer to blood.

                      Be well
                      Amenuel

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Users