Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Oldest Qur?an manuscript MA VI 165

Oldest Qur?an manuscript MA VI 165

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
151 Posts 23 Posters 6.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dakhan
    wrote on last edited by
    #132

    Peace everyone -- verse 2215 came up in another thread and the issue in translation is mostly inconsistency, lack of cross-reference, context, and inserting words not present in the text especially this case concerning those who are on the edge of faith?

    Did you reach a conclusion about 2215 when you checked the photo's of the old manuscript ? What is your conclusion on it ? I can't help you with this because I have no Arabic knowledge, sadly.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Noon_waalqalami
      wrote on last edited by
      #133

      @ brother noon send me a link of these pages i mean where i can find whole quran.. in the same sequence.. thanx in advance,,

      Peace imrankhawaja,

      The manuscript 155 pages or ~1/4 of Qur'an (ch17v36 - ch36v55) download best result 132Mb link below...

      http//idb.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/diglit/MaVI165

      It takes a bit getting used to although after translating numerous pages it gets easier.

      Did you reach a conclusion about 2215 when you checked the photo's of the old manuscript ? What is your conclusion on it ? I can't help you with this because I have no Arabic knowledge, sadly.

      Peace Dakhan,

      No, script is fairly consistent with modern text except for verse numbering e.g. initialed chapters are single verse, etc.

      One simply needs to read context it's obvious not telling those on the edge of faith to extend a rope hang themselves?

      Likewise ask in context of the verses prior and following who exactly does "him" refer to other than back to who?

      2215 who be that think that never supports him the god

      Likewise ask how/why this word is translated as rope? by/with ?
      1884 surely we established we for him in the land and gave him from each thing means/course of
      2644 so threw they of ropes theirs and staffs theirs and say they of by might Firaun/Pharaoh surely we surely we the dominating
      1115 on neck hers cord/rope from palm fiber

      Therefore ...

      2214 surely the god enter the ones believes they of and do they of the righteous works gardens flow from underneath it the springs surely the god does what intends
      2215 who be that think that never supports him the god in the world and the afterlife so surely/let extends by means/course to the sky/heaven furthermore let him cutoff so let sees shall remove plan/disposition his what raged
      2216 and like such have descended we it signs clear and that the god guides whom intends

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Offline
        I Offline
        imrankhawaja
        wrote on last edited by
        #134

        Peace imrankhawaja,

        The manuscript 155 pages or ~1/4 of Qur'an (ch17v36 - ch36v55) download best result 132Mb link below...

        http//idb.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/diglit/MaVI165

        It takes a bit getting used to although after translating numerous pages it gets easier.

        handshake thanks buddy

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          imrankhawaja
          wrote on last edited by
          #135

          @ brother noon i want the one with translation... the copy i downloaded is just arabic

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Offline
            N Offline
            Noon_waalqalami
            wrote on last edited by
            #136

            @ brother noon i want the one with translation... the copy i downloaded is just arabic

            Peace, the translation is my own (manuscript has 154 pages), here are first 9 start manuscript v1736 to end ch17 start ch18...

            http//i65.tinypic.com/eze3q8.jpg

            http//oi65.tinypic.com/rtjggh.jpg

            http//oi66.tinypic.com/281zxh3.jpg

            http//oi68.tinypic.com/20h0h3s.jpg

            http//oi67.tinypic.com/352kd8g.jpg

            http//oi64.tinypic.com/29qdraa.jpg

            http//oi65.tinypic.com/oi9bls.jpg

            http//oi64.tinypic.com/1ik16r.jpg

            http//oi63.tinypic.com/ixd2t5.jpg

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Noon_waalqalami
              wrote on last edited by
              #137

              Peace -- someone messaged me about hamzah (&#1569 e.i. glottal stop?

              In this manuscript appears either as alif or small red dot next to alif...

              http//oi63.tinypic.com/avhtvp.jpg

              http//oi63.tinypic.com/24pav02.jpg

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G Offline
                G Offline
                Gahaiile
                wrote on last edited by
                #138

                Peace brother.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Man_of_Faith
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #139

                  Virtually no diacritical markers in the original manuscript.

                  And all the claimed variations of Alef is just one and the same letter.

                  Be well
                  Amenuel

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Noon_waalqalami
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #140

                    Peace, another member messaged me to confirm if "alif" in old manuscripts i.e. b-s-m spelling was specific to bismillah or does it also occur in other instances...

                    200 in name the god the almighty the merciful
                    208 the god not deity except he for him the names the beautiful
                    Birmingham Quran ch19v93-ch20v13
                    http//oi65.tinypic.com/6sxq52.jpg

                    MA VI 165 Quran ch19v97-ch20v16
                    http//oi64.tinypic.com/2v9sq3t.jpg

                    MA VI 165 Quran ch27v28-40
                    http//oi63.tinypic.com/2zioifb.jpg

                    2228 to witness they of gains for them and remembered/mention they of name the god in days well-known on what provided them from beast the cattle so eat ye of therein and feed ye of the miserable the poor
                    2234 and to each community made we of rite of to remembers they of name the god on what provided them from beast the cattle so the deity yours deity one so to him submit ye of and give news the humble ones
                    MA VI 165 Quran ch22v28-35
                    http//oi66.tinypic.com/idhd9i.jpg

                    2436 in houses which the god that elevate and remembered therein name his glorify for him therein in the early/morning and the evenings
                    MA VI 165 Quran ch24v35-42
                    http//oi65.tinypic.com/2qxx5bs.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      farati
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #141

                      Peace, another member messaged me to confirm if "alif" in old manuscripts i.e. b-s-m spelling was specific to bismillah or does it also occur in other instances...

                      200 in name the god the almighty the merciful
                      208 the god not deity except he for him the names the beautiful
                      Birmingham Quran ch19v93-ch20v13
                      http//oi65.tinypic.com/6sxq52.jpg

                      MA VI 165 Quran ch19v97-ch20v16
                      http//oi64.tinypic.com/2v9sq3t.jpg

                      MA VI 165 Quran ch27v28-40
                      http//oi63.tinypic.com/2zioifb.jpg

                      2228 to witness they of gains for them and remembered/mention they of name the god in days well-known on what provided them from beast the cattle so eat ye of therein and feed ye of the miserable the poor
                      2234 and to each community made we of rite of to remembers they of name the god on what provided them from beast the cattle so the deity yours deity one so to him submit ye of and give news the humble ones
                      MA VI 165 Quran ch22v28-35
                      http//oi66.tinypic.com/idhd9i.jpg

                      2436 in houses which the god that elevate and remembered therein name his glorify for him therein in the early/morning and the evenings
                      MA VI 165 Quran ch24v35-42
                      http//oi65.tinypic.com/2qxx5bs.jpg

                      So, the Quran from Birmingham is the same as today? Now we have evidence that Quran never changed.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Noon_waalqalami
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #142

                        So, the Quran from Birmingham is the same as today? Now we have evidence that Quran never changed.

                        Peace, yes MA VI 165 as well (Birmingham is only two pages) which are same as today's except for verse numbering i.e. initials were not counted as separate verses and usage of alif mostly.

                        e.g. the other day thought there was consistency error with missing alif in 1942 said?

                        If we look carefully scribes had system to differentiate and applied consistently throughout manuscript...

                        no alif if address to one person
                        1942 when said to father his O father mine

                        alif if referring to many people
                        2152 when said to father his and folk his

                        https//s27.postimg.org/wn1kjjhbn/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch19v33-v45.jpg

                        https//s27.postimg.org/6srrtrhbn/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch21v43-v57.jpg

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          reel
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #143

                          Peace, yes MA VI 165 as well (Birmingham is only two pages) which are same as today's except for verse numbering i.e. initials were not counted as separate verses and usage of alif mostly.

                          No numbering, but we can still see the divisions on the pages
                          http//www.hazardlab.jp/contents/post_info/1/0/5/10504/quran.jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Offline
                            N Offline
                            Noon_waalqalami
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #144

                            No numbering, but we can still see the divisions on the pages

                            Peace, there was numbering i.e. dashes at end of verses and larger markings start/end of 10 verses which scribes used as reference and to keep count/checksum; although earliest manuscripts initials had no end verse marks thus not counted/combined into single verse, e.g.

                            191 kaaf ha ya ain saad (no end verse marks counted as one with next verse)
                            192 remembrance mercy lord your devotee his Zakariyya

                            https//s26.postimg.org/jm1leh6p5/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch18v107-ch19v7.jpg

                            Here is another early 1st century AH Sana manuscript example end 9128-129 to 107

                            https//s26.postimg.org/qzurinuw9/Sana_Qur_an_ch9v127-ch10v7.jpg

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Noon_waalqalami
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #145

                              Peace, a forum user noticed Tanzil web site, 9127, the word "yarakum" is spelled with 'ya' in the Uthmanic script spelling, and with an 'alif' in the simplified Imlaei script spelling and wanted to confirm with older manuscripts.

                              There should be no alif in 9127 yarkum/seeth you (plural) same as in examples below...

                              2440 yarh/seeth it
                              26218 yarka/seeth you (singular)

                              https//s26.postimg.org/89glfarop/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch24v35-42.jpg

                              https//s26.postimg.org/ectklgskp/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch26v205-ch27v3.jpg

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Offline
                                N Offline
                                Noon_waalqalami
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #146

                                peace, thank you to Mazhar for pointing out likay l OR combined likayl

                                upon checking older manuscripts and usage within context...

                                (written as two separate words if referring to plural) OR (written as single word if referring to singular)

                                1670 needs to be consistent with 225 and likewise 3153 with 5723

                                not correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(315314)
                                not correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(57231)
                                3153 likay l tazan (plural)
                                5723 likay l tasaw (plural)

                                not correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(167011)
                                correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(22550)
                                1670 and among you whom (singular) intends to feeble the upkeep likayl
                                225 and among you whom (singular) intends to feeble the upkeep likayl
                                https//s7.postimg.org/wcrewdtqz/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch22v5-11.jpg

                                correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(333732)
                                3337 likay l being upon the believers (plural) critical
                                https//s7.postimg.org/4qonbw5az/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch33v33-38.jpg

                                correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(335054)
                                3350 likayl being upon you (singular) critical
                                https//s7.postimg.org/k1ygca557/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch33v50-53.jpg

                                correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(59717)
                                597 kay l being circulation between the rich (plural)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  HP_TECH
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #147

                                  Your corpus links are not working Noon

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Noon_waalqalami
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #148

                                    peace, correction found 1670 verse in old manuscript (Or 2165)

                                    http//www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=or_2165_fs001r#

                                    1670 and the god creation yours furthermore taketh of you and among you whom intends to feeble the upkeep likay/surely that may l/not knoweth after knowledge thing of indeed the god knower supreme

                                    https//s7.postimg.org/n58ve3abf/Or_2165_Quran_manuscipt_ch16v65-75.jpg

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • The_SardarT Offline
                                      The_SardarT Offline
                                      The_Sardar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #149

                                      Peace, a forum user noticed Tanzil web site, 9127, the word "yarakum" is spelled with 'ya' in the Uthmanic script spelling, and with an 'alif' in the simplified Imlaei script spelling and wanted to confirm with older manuscripts.

                                      There should be no alif in 9127 ىركم yarākum/seeth you (plural) same as in examples below...

                                      2440 ىرها yarāhā/seeth it
                                      26218 ىرك yarāka/seeth you (singular)

                                      https//s26.postimg.org/89glfarop/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch24v35-42.jpg

                                      https//s26.postimg.org/ectklgskp/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch26v205-ch27v3.jpg

                                      The images are gone. You might wanna find it again.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Noon_waalqalami
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #150

                                        peace, they're all here with other old manuscripts

                                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/17/vers/36?handschrift=107

                                        https//i.postimg.cc/RhBMNmQW/ch17v35-46.jpg

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • The_SardarT Offline
                                          The_SardarT Offline
                                          The_Sardar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #151

                                          Thank you dear brother for the link.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users