Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Oldest Qur?an manuscript MA VI 165

Oldest Qur?an manuscript MA VI 165

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
151 Posts 23 Posters 7.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Noon_waalqalami
    wrote on last edited by
    #137

    Peace -- someone messaged me about hamzah (&#1569 e.i. glottal stop?

    In this manuscript appears either as alif or small red dot next to alif...

    http//oi63.tinypic.com/avhtvp.jpg

    http//oi63.tinypic.com/24pav02.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Offline
      G Offline
      Gahaiile
      wrote on last edited by
      #138

      Peace brother.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Man_of_Faith
        wrote on last edited by
        #139

        Virtually no diacritical markers in the original manuscript.

        And all the claimed variations of Alef is just one and the same letter.

        Be well
        Amenuel

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          Noon_waalqalami
          wrote on last edited by
          #140

          Peace, another member messaged me to confirm if "alif" in old manuscripts i.e. b-s-m spelling was specific to bismillah or does it also occur in other instances...

          200 in name the god the almighty the merciful
          208 the god not deity except he for him the names the beautiful
          Birmingham Quran ch19v93-ch20v13
          http//oi65.tinypic.com/6sxq52.jpg

          MA VI 165 Quran ch19v97-ch20v16
          http//oi64.tinypic.com/2v9sq3t.jpg

          MA VI 165 Quran ch27v28-40
          http//oi63.tinypic.com/2zioifb.jpg

          2228 to witness they of gains for them and remembered/mention they of name the god in days well-known on what provided them from beast the cattle so eat ye of therein and feed ye of the miserable the poor
          2234 and to each community made we of rite of to remembers they of name the god on what provided them from beast the cattle so the deity yours deity one so to him submit ye of and give news the humble ones
          MA VI 165 Quran ch22v28-35
          http//oi66.tinypic.com/idhd9i.jpg

          2436 in houses which the god that elevate and remembered therein name his glorify for him therein in the early/morning and the evenings
          MA VI 165 Quran ch24v35-42
          http//oi65.tinypic.com/2qxx5bs.jpg

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            farati
            wrote on last edited by
            #141

            Peace, another member messaged me to confirm if "alif" in old manuscripts i.e. b-s-m spelling was specific to bismillah or does it also occur in other instances...

            200 in name the god the almighty the merciful
            208 the god not deity except he for him the names the beautiful
            Birmingham Quran ch19v93-ch20v13
            http//oi65.tinypic.com/6sxq52.jpg

            MA VI 165 Quran ch19v97-ch20v16
            http//oi64.tinypic.com/2v9sq3t.jpg

            MA VI 165 Quran ch27v28-40
            http//oi63.tinypic.com/2zioifb.jpg

            2228 to witness they of gains for them and remembered/mention they of name the god in days well-known on what provided them from beast the cattle so eat ye of therein and feed ye of the miserable the poor
            2234 and to each community made we of rite of to remembers they of name the god on what provided them from beast the cattle so the deity yours deity one so to him submit ye of and give news the humble ones
            MA VI 165 Quran ch22v28-35
            http//oi66.tinypic.com/idhd9i.jpg

            2436 in houses which the god that elevate and remembered therein name his glorify for him therein in the early/morning and the evenings
            MA VI 165 Quran ch24v35-42
            http//oi65.tinypic.com/2qxx5bs.jpg

            So, the Quran from Birmingham is the same as today? Now we have evidence that Quran never changed.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Noon_waalqalami
              wrote on last edited by
              #142

              So, the Quran from Birmingham is the same as today? Now we have evidence that Quran never changed.

              Peace, yes MA VI 165 as well (Birmingham is only two pages) which are same as today's except for verse numbering i.e. initials were not counted as separate verses and usage of alif mostly.

              e.g. the other day thought there was consistency error with missing alif in 1942 said?

              If we look carefully scribes had system to differentiate and applied consistently throughout manuscript...

              no alif if address to one person
              1942 when said to father his O father mine

              alif if referring to many people
              2152 when said to father his and folk his

              https//s27.postimg.org/wn1kjjhbn/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch19v33-v45.jpg

              https//s27.postimg.org/6srrtrhbn/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch21v43-v57.jpg

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Offline
                R Offline
                reel
                wrote on last edited by
                #143

                Peace, yes MA VI 165 as well (Birmingham is only two pages) which are same as today's except for verse numbering i.e. initials were not counted as separate verses and usage of alif mostly.

                No numbering, but we can still see the divisions on the pages
                http//www.hazardlab.jp/contents/post_info/1/0/5/10504/quran.jpg

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Noon_waalqalami
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #144

                  No numbering, but we can still see the divisions on the pages

                  Peace, there was numbering i.e. dashes at end of verses and larger markings start/end of 10 verses which scribes used as reference and to keep count/checksum; although earliest manuscripts initials had no end verse marks thus not counted/combined into single verse, e.g.

                  191 kaaf ha ya ain saad (no end verse marks counted as one with next verse)
                  192 remembrance mercy lord your devotee his Zakariyya

                  https//s26.postimg.org/jm1leh6p5/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch18v107-ch19v7.jpg

                  Here is another early 1st century AH Sana manuscript example end 9128-129 to 107

                  https//s26.postimg.org/qzurinuw9/Sana_Qur_an_ch9v127-ch10v7.jpg

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Noon_waalqalami
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #145

                    Peace, a forum user noticed Tanzil web site, 9127, the word "yarakum" is spelled with 'ya' in the Uthmanic script spelling, and with an 'alif' in the simplified Imlaei script spelling and wanted to confirm with older manuscripts.

                    There should be no alif in 9127 yarkum/seeth you (plural) same as in examples below...

                    2440 yarh/seeth it
                    26218 yarka/seeth you (singular)

                    https//s26.postimg.org/89glfarop/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch24v35-42.jpg

                    https//s26.postimg.org/ectklgskp/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch26v205-ch27v3.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #146

                      peace, thank you to Mazhar for pointing out likay l OR combined likayl

                      upon checking older manuscripts and usage within context...

                      (written as two separate words if referring to plural) OR (written as single word if referring to singular)

                      1670 needs to be consistent with 225 and likewise 3153 with 5723

                      not correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(315314)
                      not correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(57231)
                      3153 likay l tazan (plural)
                      5723 likay l tasaw (plural)

                      not correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(167011)
                      correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(22550)
                      1670 and among you whom (singular) intends to feeble the upkeep likayl
                      225 and among you whom (singular) intends to feeble the upkeep likayl
                      https//s7.postimg.org/wcrewdtqz/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch22v5-11.jpg

                      correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(333732)
                      3337 likay l being upon the believers (plural) critical
                      https//s7.postimg.org/4qonbw5az/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch33v33-38.jpg

                      correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(335054)
                      3350 likayl being upon you (singular) critical
                      https//s7.postimg.org/k1ygca557/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch33v50-53.jpg

                      correct http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(59717)
                      597 kay l being circulation between the rich (plural)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H Offline
                        H Offline
                        HP_TECH
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #147

                        Your corpus links are not working Noon

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Noon_waalqalami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #148

                          peace, correction found 1670 verse in old manuscript (Or 2165)

                          http//www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=or_2165_fs001r#

                          1670 and the god creation yours furthermore taketh of you and among you whom intends to feeble the upkeep likay/surely that may l/not knoweth after knowledge thing of indeed the god knower supreme

                          https//s7.postimg.org/n58ve3abf/Or_2165_Quran_manuscipt_ch16v65-75.jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • The_SardarT Offline
                            The_SardarT Offline
                            The_Sardar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #149

                            Peace, a forum user noticed Tanzil web site, 9127, the word "yarakum" is spelled with 'ya' in the Uthmanic script spelling, and with an 'alif' in the simplified Imlaei script spelling and wanted to confirm with older manuscripts.

                            There should be no alif in 9127 ىركم yarākum/seeth you (plural) same as in examples below...

                            2440 ىرها yarāhā/seeth it
                            26218 ىرك yarāka/seeth you (singular)

                            https//s26.postimg.org/89glfarop/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch24v35-42.jpg

                            https//s26.postimg.org/ectklgskp/MA_VI_165_Quran_ch26v205-ch27v3.jpg

                            The images are gone. You might wanna find it again.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Noon_waalqalami
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #150

                              peace, they're all here with other old manuscripts

                              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/17/vers/36?handschrift=107

                              https//i.postimg.cc/RhBMNmQW/ch17v35-46.jpg

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • The_SardarT Offline
                                The_SardarT Offline
                                The_Sardar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #151

                                Thank you dear brother for the link.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Users