Can a Moralist Atheist be mu'min - Issue Revisited
-
salaam arman
It is good to see that our understandings are gradually merging towards a point of agreement. In sha Allah, with some effort we can understand each other better.
With regards to 548 I believe this applies to the communities within the fraternity of book (ahl-al kitab) only. The you and they refered to in this verse are all different communities within the fraternity of book. I do not see this to imply that every community on earth has been sent down a law and a structure. (BTW my preferred translation for Sharia and Minjhaj is Menifesto and Open path.)
yes brother, i also hope that with discussion we can get greater understanding if Allah's will.
but for the first point about path of God only come to certain people, sorry brother i have to disagree. the straight path of God had come to everyone, my argument is based on these verses
Q1663-64
1663 By God, We had sent to nations before you, but the devil adorned their work for them. So he is their ally today, and they will have a painful retribution.
1664 And We have not sent down the Book to you except that you may clarify for them that in which they have disputed, and as a guidance and a mercy for a people who believe.Q 1636
And We have sent a messenger to every nation You shall serve God and avoid evil. Some of them were guided by God, and some of them deserved to be misguided. So travel the earth, and see how the punishment was of those who denied.Q 137
And those who reject say If only a sign was sent down to him from his Lord. You are but a warner, and to every people is a guide.how can you come into conclusion that there are still nation or people that has no messenger, thus has no access to the path of God in the form of law and structure? it might not be exatly the same as the teaching of Quran, but least they have to fit to those 3 citeria (and yes those criteria comes from 262). the differences between those paths of God is beatifully described in
Q 2138
Such is the coloring of God, and who is better than God in coloring? And to Him we are in service.I am not sure if you thoroughly read my opening post. In that post I have already clarified my understanding of these 3 conditions. Per my humble understanding, to have faith in God (condition 1) one does not necessarily need to profess the belief in a supreme deity faith in God may also be attained by acceptance of our obligation to put collective wellbeing of all living beings above our personal whims as a commitment to the common source and sustenance of life. Secondly, to have faith in the last day (condition 2) one does not need to profess the belief in afterlife rather faith in the last may be attained by acceptance of our accountability for our actions acknowledging that every action will beget its return in one way or other.. (Note, how Quran very selectively uses the terms last day ~ yawm al akhir ~ and afterlife ~ akhirat ~ in different contexts.) And because of this understanding I am unable to claim that moralist atheists cannot meet these 2 criteria.
i think i read them well brother. to make things clear, for the red one, is there any verse that justified this additional circumstances? or is it just based on your thinking and what you think must be covered in Quran? i totally don't remember about any verse implies anything close to that understanding. please be careful in here brother. this is exactly what i mean by surrendering what is right or wrong to God. if you can't come up with any verses, then you have made additional circumstances or addendum to Quran.
please dont insert any humanitarian teaching (or even anything) into Quran. it is already perfect
Yes, I do believe most of mankind do not really know what they say or believe.
When majority of atheist reject the notion of God they tend to reject the notion of a big-daddy deity sitting above the seventh sky directing the affairs of the world per his whims. Because, unfortunately that is the mainstream notion of the concept God. I too reject this notion such a concept is not but akin to placing ones faith upon a tagoot. Very few people actually conceptualize God as the Authority over all beings, without imagining him as another being. Very few people actually conceptualize God as the source and foundation of life without assuming Him to be another living entity.yes i agree with you. that holy-big-wise daddy image might not help you and me in increasing our iman. but to some people it might work. as long as it works, i see no objection as long as it leads to Tauhid/monotheism. everyone has their own style or approach to spiritualism and it is ok
When it comes to atheists I have seen two clear sub-groups among them. One group does acknowledge that our life on earth has a PURPOSE. They accept the responsibility of behaving righteously and acknowledge accountability. On the other hand there is another group who take the notion of no-God to imply no-responsibility, for them accountability is limited to what is scripted in man-made laws. I have absolutely no objection to acknowledge the second group as kafir. But I do not see how I can claim the first group as such.
i understand your thinking here. there are 2 groups of them, one looks okay and it seems they just dont know the truth yet, while the other is the bad one)
i also agree with you that we should differentiate our attitude towards them. you can see my opinion about this group in here
Yes i agree, there are many cases where people chose to be an atheist because he observes many imperfection/flaws in the behavior of the religious people or religious leaders.
They are disgusted by the behaviour of the munafiqin, espescially the ones that sit on the high places. When they are observing another religion, another sample of munafiq pops up and this particular people are disgusted again. Everywhere they look they only see the munafiqin, until one day he said "that's enough!, no more religion for me!, they all lies!!!"
If this is the case, they are actually an honest and truth seeking people who had bad experience. This is where the reminder from us is really needed. We will remind them that there is still a true path of God open for him and invite him to observe it himself. That is our sacred duty towards these disappointed people. We should be aware that they have been through the bad days and may not believe this one easily because all the previous religions also say they are the right one.
If my understanding serves me properly, then this duty is called Hajj with some clear guidance on how to do it in Quran.
May ALLAH give us strength to do that again and again
We clearly have different understanding of what the verses of Quran say. My point is not about what Quran says, rather what you are saying. You are claiming that all of those, without exception, who fail to pledge their belief in the theological notion of "God" is necessarily placing their desire as their God - even if they act righteously. You are saying that the actions of those who profess goodness for the sake of goodness have no value. Irrespective of how they act they are doomed to hell If these are not propagation of hatred, I really dont know what hatred means.
Sorry brother 488 91 comes in the context of hypocrites who verbally professes faith and alliance to the messenger, but behind the curtain they conspire against the faithful. I do not see how this relates to Moralist Atheists. Rather the Moralist Atheists that we are discussing are exactly the opposite, they do not pledge their belief, but they behave and act like faithful they are honest about their words and they profess fair-dealing and forbid immorality.
You did claim that even a moralist atheist who seems to be righteous in his actions is a kafir and is needed to be treated as such. Why dont you explain for us how you propose to treat them?
Oh ya right, you are not suggesting to hate the moralist atheist you are just stating as a matter of fact your view that they are worse than a rapist who rapes a child.
Hatred has nothing to do with guessing that someone will go to hell because he disregard God. Quran already give clear information about that. If he is truly a good and honest people, i believe God will save him and give him guidance so that he can accept God and enter Heaven in the afterlife. but if God misguides him, then he really deserve it because God can not make wrong decision. God knows what is in their heart. while we are not.
Q 6 39
And those who deny Our revelations, they are deaf and dumb, in darkness. Whoever God wishes He misguides, and whoever He
wishes He puts him on a straight path.for those moralist atheist, if they repent, then they are our new brother. if they need time to grasp this monotheism concept, that's good. but if they wont, then just disregard them (no hatred, because someday they may change) until they make war on us. i think i have made myself clear about our attitude towards them.
about worse or equal to the rapist, yes. my opinion still stands. they dont know that what they are doing is a major sin, shirk. i think it is larger than rape because
Q 4116
God does not forgive that partners be set up with Him, and He forgives other than that for whom He pleases. Whoever sets up partners with God has indeed strayed a far straying.i found these verse that also gives us guidance about how we should behave towards those kafir.
Q 5822
You will not find any people who believe in God and the Last Day leaning towards those who oppose God and His messenger, even if they were their parents, or their children, or their siblings, or their kin. For these, He decrees faith into their hearts, and supports them with a Spirit from Him, and He admits them into estates with rivers flowing beneath them; abiding therein. God is pleased with them, and they are pleased with Him. These are the party of God. Most assuredly, the party of God are the winners.Q 5814
Have you noted those who befriended people with whom God is angry? They are now neither from you nor from them. And they
deliberately swear to lies while they know!Q 7164
And a nation from among them said Why do you preach to a people whom God will destroy or punish a painful retribution?
They said A plea to your Lord, and perhaps they may be aware.Q 1660
To those who do not believe in the Hereafter is the worst example, and to God is the highest example, and He is the Noble, the Wise.i know that you feel sorry for those moralist atheists, but believe me, i think i have a stronger feeling towards my father that still mushrik until today. i believe that God judgment's is right and we are in no position to question it. furthermore, i love my God more than my father that already worked very hard to grow me up.
i know exactly that if my father die while he still mushrik, then he will go to hell. and of course i am in no position to hate him whatsoever. so please remove hatred from this equation.
may ALLAH gives us greater understanding and iman
-
Salam alihawa.
With regards to adding additional circumstances or addendum to Quran... no I do not believe I am doing that. I have derived my understanding of iman and kufr based on how these terms have been used in Qur'an. Once the notions of iman and kufr are separated from the notions of believing and disbelieving and properly aligned with acceptance / rejection of our responsibility / relationship with God - The understanding that I am proposing becomes the natural and logical understanding - the jealous God theory rather looks out of place with the message of God's Mercy and Justice in Qur'an.
Moreover, the believing (Jwa-nun-nun) is a totally separate topic which also has been discussed specifically in Qur'an. For example in 245-46 we are informed that seeking help through patience and salaat (reverence) is severe/difficult except for those who believe in meeting their Master. Note the use of the word severe here not "impossible". Also, in 278 Qur'an is talking about the uninformed people within the fraternity of books who do not have but their beliefs. "Believing" per Qur'an is like a two way sword - if placed correctly can be helpful to attain taqwa, otherwise can be misleading and even sinful. My understanding is derived based on these verses of Qur'an only - not from out of blue. Furthermore, I find support to my understanding in 2249 which I also discussed in the opening post.
Also, let's try to look at the below verse and discuss how to interpret this
494 O! Those who have put faith ? when you set forth in God?s path then clarify and do not say to those who offer you peace, ?You are not a faithful? seeking (mere) trifle of the life of the world ? then there are larger booties with God. That?s how you used to be from before. Then God favored upon you ? so clarify. Indeed of how you act - God happens to be All-aware.
(My personal translation, cross checking is recommended.)
Now imagine a moralist atheist who comes to us in peace - does not bring in hostility / enmity because of our difference in belief - and to the best of our knowledge acts righteously and deals fairly with everyone. Are we then with the above verse in mind authorized to tell them ?You are not a faithful?? Look also how this verse is treating this act of imposing "unfaithful" label as an act of seeking worldly gain. Think about it - when we earmark an otherwise peaceful neighbor as unfaithful based on what he believes - do we really try to please God who is our Master and their Master? Or is it our superiority seeking ego that we serve?
May Allah guide us to the straight way.
Regards,
Arman -
salam arman,
With regards to adding additional circumstances or addendum to Quran... no I do not believe I am doing that. I have derived my understanding of iman and kufr based on how these terms have been used in Qur'an. Once the notions of iman and kufr are separated from the notions of believing and disbelieving and properly aligned with acceptance / rejection of our responsibility / relationship with God - The understanding that I am proposing becomes the natural and logical understanding - the jealous God theory rather looks out of place with the message of God's Mercy and Justice in Qur'an.
so you admitted that those additional condition is basically derived form your understanding and logical thinking based on your observation how word iman and kufr are used is Quran, right?
do you think you have enough intellectual capacity to do that brother?
do you think your natural and logical understanding can find the loopholes and finally perfected Quranin in one of its clear and concise verse (muhkamat)?
do you think God forgot to include those things?
do you think God has authorized you to do that?this is the translation of Q 262
Surely those who believe; and those who are Jewish, and the Nazarenes, and the Sabians, whoever of them believes in God and the Last Day and does good works; they will have their recompense with their Lord, and there is no fear upon them, nor will they grieve.this is your "side note" or comment or whatever about what Q 262
"to have faith in God (condition 1) one does not necessarily need to profess the belief in a supreme deity ? faith in God may also be attained by acceptance of our obligation to put collective wellbeing of all living beings above our personal whims as a commitment to the common source and sustenance of life.Secondly, to have faith in the last day (condition 2) one does not need to profess the belief in afterlife ? rather faith in the last may be attained by acceptance of our accountability for our actions acknowledging that every action will beget its return in one way or other.."
you said that you did not believe you were doing that, but you just did.
please brother, for your own sake, please repent, i beg you.
even our prophet did not dare to do what you have done because of these verses
Q 69 44 - 47
6944 And had he attributed anything falsely to Us.
6945 We would have seized him by the right.
6946 Then, We would have severed his life-line.
6947 None of you would be able to prevent it.Moreover, the believing (Jwa-nun-nun) is a totally separate topic which also has been discussed specifically in Qur'an. For example in 245-46 we are informed that seeking help through patience and salaat (reverence) is severe/difficult except for those who believe in meeting their Master. Note the use of the word severe here not "impossible". Also, in 278 Qur'an is talking about the uninformed people within the fraternity of books who do not have but their beliefs. "Believing" per Qur'an is like a two way sword - if placed correctly can be helpful to attain taqwa, otherwise can be misleading and even sinful. My understanding is derived based on these verses of Qur'an only - not from out of blue. Furthermore, I find support to my understanding in 2249 which I also discussed in the opening post.
sorry you lost me there. i dont know what you are talking about in this paragraph.
Also, let's try to look at the below verse and discuss how to interpret this
Now imagine a moralist atheist who comes to us in peace - does not bring in hostility / enmity because of our difference in belief - and to the best of our knowledge acts righteously and deals fairly with everyone. Are we then with the above verse in mind authorized to tell them ?You are not a faithful?? Look also how this verse is treating this act of imposing "unfaithful" label as an act of seeking worldly gain. Think about it - when we earmark an otherwise peaceful neighbor as unfaithful based on what he believes - do we really try to please God who is our Master and their Master? Or is it our superiority seeking ego that we serve?
May Allah guide us to the straight way.
Regards,
Armani think i have made myself clear about our attitude towards them. if they want to know the truth, then we'll share it with them, if they wont, then just disregard them.
it does not mean that we have to be cruel. full of hatred and injustice to them, just apply what the Quran has to say about our attitude towards them. do you have any difficulties finding those verses? once you find them, they are all clear and nothing unusual that needs to be discussed i think.
do you still need to discuss about how you should behave towards those atheist after all this long and wide discussion?
-
Salam alihawa.
With regards to adding additional circumstances or addendum to Quran... no I do not believe I am doing that. I have derived my understanding of iman and kufr based on how these terms have been used in Qur'an. Once the notions of iman and kufr are separated from the notions of believing and disbelieving and properly aligned with acceptance / rejection of our responsibility / relationship with God - The understanding that I am proposing becomes the natural and logical understanding - the jealous God theory rather looks out of place with the message of God's Mercy and Justice in Qur'an.
Moreover, the believing (Jwa-nun-nun) is a totally separate topic which also has been discussed specifically in Qur'an. For example in 245-46 we are informed that seeking help through patience and salaat (reverence) is severe/difficult except for those who believe in meeting their Master. Note the use of the word severe here not "impossible". Also, in 278 Qur'an is talking about the uninformed people within the fraternity of books who do not have but their beliefs. "Believing" per Qur'an is like a two way sword - if placed correctly can be helpful to attain taqwa, otherwise can be misleading and even sinful. My understanding is derived based on these verses of Qur'an only - not from out of blue. Furthermore, I find support to my understanding in 2249 which I also discussed in the opening post.
Also, let's try to look at the below verse and discuss how to interpret this
Now imagine a moralist atheist who comes to us in peace - does not bring in hostility / enmity because of our difference in belief - and to the best of our knowledge acts righteously and deals fairly with everyone. Are we then with the above verse in mind authorized to tell them ?You are not a faithful?? Look also how this verse is treating this act of imposing "unfaithful" label as an act of seeking worldly gain. Think about it - when we earmark an otherwise peaceful neighbor as unfaithful based on what he believes - do we really try to please God who is our Master and their Master? Or is it our superiority seeking ego that we serve?
May Allah guide us to the straight way.
Regards,
ArmanInteresting.
RED Yes. I would say that dismissing others as having wrong faith is generally the ego (which is part of the flesh (through mind and brain)) trying to defend itself against things (ideas) that it perceives as a threat to its existence. This happens when we have come under the illusion that we are parts of the world like ideas, religions, professions, gender, ethnicity etc. We identify with these things, these ideas. We create a mental construct out of various building blocks such as religion (etc), and then fool ourselves into believing that this is us. The ego obviously goes into defencive mode when its religion (for example) is questioned, because it is perceived as its very existence is at stake. In a way its existence is indeed threatened, because when our identity is only made up of ideas (religions etc) then what else can the ego think? Obviously, the issue is that we associate things with ourselves that are not us. Like we should not associate stuff with God, so we should also not associate stuff with ourselves.
If your mind feels it has to label others are "them" and "wrong", then your perception is very unholistic... which in turn means that it is blinded by this Earthly world. Like you say, faith can be a double edged sword, and the problem is that we can not see in what direction it is currently cutting, especially when it is cutting in the wrong way. Blind is blind. But the blind is dead sure of being seeing, ironically.
Also, this explains why people get so heated up and angry when debating things like religion, politics and ethnicity. The reason is that we have built an identity our of these packages of ideas. But is our soul made up of religion, politics and ethnicity? No. Perhaps we ought to reconsider our own very essence then.
I found it very interesting to learn about the quranic connection between the need of labeling others as unfaithful, and seeking worldy gain. It makes total sense.
Kind regards
-
salam arman,
so you admitted that those additional condition is basically derived form your understanding and logical thinking based on your observation how word iman and kufr are used is Quran, right?
do you think you have enough intellectual capacity to do that brother?
do you think your natural and logical understanding can find the loopholes and finally perfected Quranin in one of its clear and concise verse (muhkamat)?
do you think God forgot to include those things?
do you think God has authorized you to do that?For better or worse my intellect is all that my Master has given me to work with and I?ll live or die based on what I understand making the most sincere us of the sense of right and wrong that my Master has bestowed me. If I consider myself incapable and inadequate and hence blindly follow a scholar or even a book, I would be associating partner with my Master. I seek refuge to my Master for being among the ignorant.
this is the translation of Q 262
Surely those who believe; and those who are Jewish, and the Nazarenes, and the Sabians, whoever of them believes in God and the Last Day and does good works; they will have their recompense with their Lord, and there is no fear upon them, nor will they grieve.Good at least you recognized that this is a ?translation?. I do not agree to the above translation which translates amana billahi as ?believe in God? rather than as ?have faith in God?. The difference is vast and the implications are far reaching. This is how I translate this verse
262 Indeed, those who have palced faith, and those who have become hudan or the nasara or the sabian? whoever put faith in God and the last day and acted righteously ? so for them their reward is with their Master, and they don?t have any fear, nor will they grieve.
this is your "side note" or comment or whatever about what Q 262
"to have faith in God (condition 1) one does not necessarily need to profess the belief in a supreme deity ? faith in God may also be attained by acceptance of our obligation to put collective wellbeing of all living beings above our personal whims as a commitment to the common source and sustenance of life.Secondly, to have faith in the last day (condition 2) one does not need to profess the belief in afterlife ? rather faith in the last may be attained by acceptance of our accountability for our actions acknowledging that every action will beget its return in one way or other.."
you said that you did not believe you were doing that, but you just did.
please brother, for your own sake, please repent, i beg you.
I am not adding anything ? what Qur?an says is clearly out there ? I have provided the supporting verses and proofs which you say you don?t understand. I just shared with you my understanding? and my reasoning? accepting or rejecting is up to you.
even our prophet did not dare to do what you have done because of these verses
Q 69 44 - 47
6944 And had he attributed anything falsely to Us.
6945 We would have seized him by the right.
6946 Then, We would have severed his life-line.
6947 None of you would be able to prevent it.These are generic verses. I understand Iman as ?Faith? (as in I am faithful to my Master), you understand iman as believing. I see clear indications in Qur?an that the term Iman CANNOT mean ?believing? and I have shared such proofs in this very thread. Our debate is not about what the Qur'an says in Arabic - our debate is about the meaning and understanding thereof. We each can blame the other for attributing falsehood about God - but the true interpretation is only with God. Let us leave the matter to God then?
sorry you lost me there. i dont know what you are talking about in this paragraph.
Any specific item I can help with?
i think i have made myself clear about our attitude towards them. if they want to know the truth, then we'll share it with them, if they wont, then just disregard them.
it does not mean that we have to be cruel. full of hatred and injustice to them, just apply what the Quran has to say about our attitude towards them. do you have any difficulties finding those verses? once you find them, they are all clear and nothing unusual that needs to be discussed i think.
do you still need to discuss about how you should behave towards those atheist after all this long and wide discussion?
It is not as simple as disregard them. Qur?an gives different treatment for the mu?min and kafir in terms of legal retribution ? for example in case of murder. We need to understand whom can we label as kafir and whom we cannot to correctly apply these rules. Besides in a globalized world we increasingly have to interact with people of non-religious background as our classmates, teachers, neighbors, employers and coworkers. We need clear understanding of whom we can earmark as kafir and whom we cannot.
I submit to my Master who runs the universe with Absolute Mercy and Absolute Justice ? not to the God portrayed by any Book. The book (Qur?an) is not but a wise reminder. It is only the mercy of my Master that He helped me to see His signs in this book. Indeed I have faced my face to the One who framed the heavens and earth in precision and I am not among the ones associating partners with Him.
Guidance is only with my Master, He guides to the straight way whomever He wills.
Regards,
Arman -
FINAL STATEMENT
ALLAH explicitly spells out the answer to the OP in many ways in His Quran.
ALLAH defines who muh'minun are not the OP.
82-4
82 Innama almu/minoona allatheena itha thukira Allahu wajilat quloobuhum wa-itha tuliyat AAalayhim ayatuhu zadat-hum eemanan waAAala rabbihim yatawakkaloona
83 Allatheena yuqeemoona alssalata wamimma razaqnahum yunfiqoona
84 Ola-ika humu almu/minoona haqqan lahum darajatun AAinda rabbihim wamaghfiratun warizqun kareemun82 Only the believers (are) those who when Allah is mentioned feel fear their hearts, and when are recited to them His Verses, they increase them (in) faith, and upon their Lord they put their trust.
83 Those who establish the prayer and out of what We have provided them they spend.
84 Those - they are the believers (in) truth. For them (are) ranks with their Lord and forgiveness and a provision noble. -
Allah's Covenant with mankind is pretty clear there are no grey areas unlike what is proposed by the OP.
735-36
735 Ya banee adama imma ya/tiyannakum rusulun minkum yaqussoona AAalaykum ayatee famani ittaqa waaslaha fala khawfun AAalayhim wala hum yahzanoona
736 Waallatheena kaththaboo bi-ayatina waistakbaroo AAanha ola-ika as-habu alnnari hum feeha khalidoona735 O Children (of) Adam! If come to you Messengers from you relating to you My Verses, then whoever fears Allah, and reforms, then no fear on them and not they will grieve.
736 But those who deny Our Verses and (are) arrogant towards them those (are the) companions (of) the Fire, they in it will abide forever. -
Belief is not as easy as people would think, just look around you!
If you are a believer, then in my understanding; one must have belief in
the Sustainer - l-qaymu (God),
the Sustainer - is the only judge (l-fatu),
the Sustainer - is the only guide (yahdī.
To whom one must have complete trust and reliance on, and call upon. (755, 4060)
This is nurtured by; One God consciousness, (yattaqna)
Learned through; reading the Qur'an (iq'ra). 96 1-6
Practiced by; doing acts of righteousness, following and implementing God's l-dni (system).
mn (Belief) is paramount to understanding the Qur'an, as it is written for the believers/God concious (lil'muttaqna), the rightly guided ones (muh'tadna), thus can only be understood by the sincere ones (l-mukh'lana).Please read srat l-nr (The Light) 2434-36 sun
-
Amin means confidence/security/faith/trust in something. It does not mean believe/think/suppose, that stands for.
Primarily, a person should have faith in their own being, and called self-confidence in English.
Be well
Qarael Amenuel -
Peace All,
I am wondering if anyone can point out a single instance in quran of the word "amina" or its derivatives being used in relation to the preposition meaning "in" rather than "with".
Imraan
-
Amin means confidence/security/faith/trust in something. It does not mean believe/think/suppose, that stands for.
Primarily, a person should have faith in their own being, and called self-confidence in English.
Be well
Qarael AmenuelFaith, trust, security, are all part of belief.
-
Faith, trust, security, are all part of belief.
Make sure it is not blind for Allah/God (SWTY) does not tolerate blind faith. Salamun Alaykum dear sister of Mankind. group
-
Make sure it is not blind for Allah/God (SWTY) does not tolerate blind faith. Salamun Alaykum dear sister of Mankind. group
peace bravo handshake
-
Peace All,
I am wondering if anyone can point out a single instance in quran of the word "amina" or its derivatives being used in relation to the preposition meaning "in" rather than "with".
Imraan
Groan! Now I feel compelled to answer your passive aggressive comment! "FAITH in" does that sound better! All the same, belief in God is my point, if you don't believe, then how can you have faith? voodoo
-
Faith, trust, security, are all part of belief.
There are two different aspects of the same group of words.
There is one meaning which is to think or suppose something to be correct. The Arabic counterpart is Za Nun Nun.
There is another meaning which is to feel secure or safe, e.g. someone is self-confident. The Arabic counterpart is Alif Miim Nun.
In Arabic the two aspects use completely different roots so there cannot be a confusion like in English. A'min signifies when a person is confident as in "secure at heart". You cannot think or suppose something to be true with A'min but there has to be an absolute peace at heart.
The problem in English is that both words faith and believe are ambiguous in meaning, so they can mean that you think or suppose something to be correct. You cannot merely believe God to exist and use the word Amin in Arabic because it is too weak confidence. When you have amin this means confidence without doubt.
Also, if unspecified in discourse, amin alone refers to one's self-confidence primarily, it is to talk about the integrity of a person and how safe and secure they feel.
For this reason, amin is often left untranslated in texts because they doubt themselves how to translate the word properly into another.
Be well
Qarael Amenuel -
Peace All,
I am wondering if anyone can point out a single instance in quran of the word "amina" or its derivatives being used in relation to the preposition meaning "in" rather than "with".
Imraan
The preposition Be is difficult to directly translate into English and have it make sense. But "amin b'Allah" means something more like "confidence with Allah" than "confidence in Allah", i.e. the traditional understanding of Allah makes it sound a little silly. So it is like "your Amin (confidence) is with Allah". It has to do more with trust than believing, like you are relying on Allah and the power of Allah. As mentioned, the strongest connotation is safety and security, the feeling of "peace at heart" because you know the power of Allah is potent and is with you and therefore you have no doubt.
What is important however, is to know what Allah is as a phenomenon, but that I will not delve into on this forum. I tried to help you with the word Amin in conjunction with the "beh" preposition.
Be well
Qarael Amenuel -
peace
I was not talking about what we think or feel. I am speaking about something that only a believer would experience. Call it the English Belief, Security, Peace, Guidance, Trust, Reliance, Servitude all have the flavour of what I am trying to convey. You must KNOW that God exists with doubt, if not then belief, faith, confidence, trust, safety, security etc... in God has not entered the heart.
4914 "The Desert-Arabs say, "We have believed." Say, "You have not believed yet; but say , 'We have submitted,' for faith has not yet entered your hearts. But if you obey God and His Messenger, He will not diminish any of your deeds. God is Ever Forgiving and Merciful-to-all." (Safi Kaskas)
jedi
-
Don't worry about some of the comments they are just playing semantics.
peace
I noticed! Thank you for the support, I was starting to feel quite violent! voodoo I felt like I needed the Free-Minds Forum version of the Oxford English Dictionary, as my copy was rendered Gobbledy Goop! jedi
