Lord of the universes! Rab ilAlamin !

Wakas

peace shuaib, all,

From PRL

= Jiim-Nun-Nun (root of jinn) = veiled/concealed/covered/hid/protected (e.g. cloth, armour, grave, shield), invisible, become dark/posessed, darkness of night, bereft of reason, mad/insane/unsound in mind/intellect, confusedness.
Become thick/full-grown/blossom, herbage, garden.
Spiritual beings that conceal themselves from the senses (including angels), become weak and abject, greater part of mankind, devil/demon, people who are peerless having no match or equal, a being who is highly potent, sometimes refers to Kings because they are concealed from the common folk

I remember writing this root and I have a copy of Lanes. It does not mention 'locusts' in the root. I checked it again.

As a side note
I noted something interesting, when it says iblis became of the JNN , it says this means he adopted the disposition of the JNN. Similar to us humans when people compare us to animals "strong as a Lion" "he's like a fox" "they are sheep" etc. it doesn't mean we are or become the animal, we take on its characteristics. Just like iBLiS took on the characteristics of the JNN, i.e. unsound etc. (roots can be checked in PRL).

Wakas

shuaib

salam wakas,

thanks for posting that. i had a feeling that was the case (I didn't find any such nonsense in my lexicons either), and it explains our christian friend's great reluctance at being straightforward. I forgot about Iblis actually. I'm surprised our Christian friend didn't realize that he was claiming that Iblis is actually a locust.

dear apple pie,

Let me just ask you, would Jesus have done that? Firstly, half your posts are wise-cracks, and then it appears the other half are filled with false information. From the start you were asked a simple question, and instead of a simple answer, you gave smokescreen after smokescreen. It appears you are on a crusade with a mission to defame Islam any which way you can.. but being a Christian, at least be more straightforward and honest, and if you dont know or don't understand, just say so.

Using these kinds of methods, the only person you hurt is yourself.

unknownuser

Greetings shuaib,

Thanks for your reply.

I've simply asked WHERE in Lane's lexicon is there a statement that equates jinn with demonic locusts.

The equating of Jinn to Locusts is to be found by defining the Arabic terms and then plugging them into the contexts of the ayahs and suras.

This is how proper exegesis is performed.

As it is, you cannot allow yourself to do either?

Let me show you Lane?s classic definitions, and where they are used in your book of faith?

Let?s first review this example?

= ?husbanin?

?husbanin? definition

Verb. Noun. Plural. Calamity; Punishment; an affliction with which a man is tried; Evil; Mischief; Locusts; Dust; Smoke; Fire; definite reckoning; appointed courses; Numbering; Revolving firmament; computation, account, Running appointed and scheduled courses; Affliction; Thunderbolt; it is also used as a collective noun meaning darts or lightning. It comes from the root ?hasiba?, which means to think; consider; suppose, imagine, be of opinion, to reckon, calculate.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume two, pp. 564 - 567
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar pp. 122 - 123
A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, p. 34

?husbanin? can be found in Sura 55.5?.and is mentioned in conjunction with the sun and moon (i.e. blocking them from view, as described in the Book of Revelation).

And?.what is blocking the view??

Locusts; dust; smoke; fire?.

Summary

The merciful. (551)
He taught/instructed the Koran. (552)
He created the human/mankind. (553)
He taught/instructed him the evidence/logic. (554)
The sun and the moon with a count/calculation. (555)
AND, the star/planet
AND, and the trees, they (B) prostrate. (556)
8 ) AND, the sky/space He rose it,
AND, He laid/put/raised the scale/measuring instrument. (557)
That you not tyrannize/exceed the limit in the scale/measuring instrument. (558 )
AND, keep up the weight/measure with the just/equitable,
AND, do not reduce/decrease (cheat) in the scale/measuring instrument. (559)
AND, the earth/Planet Earth, He laid it for the creation. (5510)
In it (are) fruits
AND, the palm trees that of the buds/covers from which fruits
AND, flowers emerge. (5511)
AND, the seed/grain (of) the husk/chaff/external cover of seeds,
18 ) AND, the basil/fragrant plants. (5512)
SO, with which (of) your Lord's blessings (do) you deny/falsify?
He created the human/mankind from dry mud/clay as the pottery/earthenware. (55.14)
AND, He created the Jinn from (the) flaming blazing torch mixed with blackened smoke from fire. (55.15)

Thus, in this Biblical Eschatological sura, we already have the confirmation that Locusts have made their appearance on the scene, by the above definition?

Now?how do we know that the locusts are none other than the Jinn??

By simply looking at the context.

Observe that starting at ayah 55.5 (where the locusts are mentioned), we have concomitance via ?wa? and sequence via ?fa? all the way up to the Jinn in 55.15?

Hence, there can be no doubt that the locusts are just one attribute of the Jinn?.this is in addition to the other 19 that I posted in an earlier post ?.that got you so riled up?.

Compare to 55.15?

Wakhalaqa aljanna min marijin min narin

5515 And He created the Jinn from flaming blazing torch mixed with blackened smoke from fire.

= ?marijin?

?marijin? definition

A confused affair, or case; or error. Mixture, a mixture, or that which is mixed. A mixture of fire; or flame mixed with the black substance of fire; or flame of fire; or fire without smoke, whereof was created El-Jann, i.e. Iblees, the father of the Jinn, or Genii, or the Jinn collectively. Flame; fire free from smoke. It comes from the root ?maraja?, which means he (a beast of carriage) fed in a pasture. He sent a beast of carriage to pasture; or left it to pasture wheresoever it would; he pastured it. He mixed a thing with another thing, or two things together. He hath let them flow freely, yet so that one does not become mixed with the other; he hath made them flow. He marred or spoiled his affair. It (a deposit, and a covenant, and religion) became corrupt; impaired; spoiled; marred; or disordered. It (a ring on the finger, and an arrow) became unsteady.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume seven, p. 2704
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar p. 529

Here?we are told that Satan and the Jinn both emanate from the smoke.

Hence?.this is the same thing as stated in the Book of Revelation when the Abyss is opened and the Demonic locusts are set free such that they block out the light of day for their multitudes?

We have our first clue that Jinn are the locusts?

Next?from sura 18?

= ?ssaddayni?

?ssaddayni? definition

Dual noun. Two barriers. It comes from the root ?sadda?, which means he closed, or closed up an interstice, or intervening space; and stopped or stopped up or repaired and made firm or strong. Said of a multitudinous swarm of locusts; said of a collection of clouds rising. A swarm of locusts obstructing the horizon; locusts that have obstructed, or obstructing the horizon, by their multitude; signifying that which obstructs the horizon and therefore an epithet. A black cloud that has risen in any tract of the sky. Shade or shadow; cover; protection. To make barrier, rampart, obstacle, bar, stop, close, obstruct, dam, shut. Any building or construction with which a place is closed or closed up, or stopped or stopped up; a dam; a thing intervening as a separation, a partition, a fence, a barrier, a rampart, or an obstacle or obstruction between two other things; and a mountain.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume four, pp. 1328 - 1330
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, p. 253

It would be rather hard for the Muslim to miss the obvious Book of Revelation material contained in sura 18??here we have the second beast with two horns, from the earth?and, once again?the swarms of locusts?i.e. Jinn

Let me just ask you, would Jesus have done that?

Done what?lie like you did??

Lie #1)?..your quote?
Perhaps I should have explained that I speak Arabic

Lie #2)?..your quote?
As far as what i DO own, I own a 20 volume copy of Lisaan-ul-Arab

Lie #3)?..your quote?
and a oversized 10-volume copy of Taj-ul-Aroos
.

No thanks?.

Firstly, half your posts are wise-cracks, and then it appears the other half is filled with false information.

Operative word??appears??.

Since you are unable to refute my material?.how exactly would you even know??

Your constant begging & pleading with a Christian to give you the definitions of the words in your book of faith, is rather degrading towards you?.don?t you think??

It is rather clear that you cannot be bothered with matters that require serious inquiry.

After all?.you are Muslim?

Take care?

Tay

Peace Apple Pie,

Your comments to Shuaib

It is rather clear that you cannot be bothered with matters that require serious inquiry.
After all?.you are Muslim?

reflect the same nasty attitude that you started with. Why are you here?
If you have a problem with Muslims, then leave.

Peace,
Tay

shuaib

salam tay,

ya i dont think apple pie realizes that all he does is foster dislike towards the religion he is representing. it's ironic that his is mostly a message of hate whereas his religion supposedly is a religion of love. To say "After all, you are a Muslim," shows what his true motivations are and what racist thoughts go on in his mind.

apple pie,

I'll ignore the snide remarks again (turn the other cheek).

There are 2 problems with your method of "exegesis."

You employ inaccurate (apocryphal) sources.

I've already mentioned the problems with QD (e.g., claims that a word is composed of 2 roots).

You quote a source which claims a primary meaning of husbaan is calamity, which is totally untrue. HUSBAAN is a neutral word that primarily is used to indicate a specified amount or return, but primarily the meaning is about counting. It does not mean calamity anymore than RESULT means calamity. In surah 55 (which you quote) it is used to claim that the sun/moon are under hisaab/counting i.e. a measured orbit.

It has NOTHING to do with blockage, or locusts.

(Incidentally, the reference for all of my claims here are straight from Lisaan-ul-Arab, Taj-ul-Aroos, or Lughaat-ul-Quran).

Using sources with false/biased information will lead to INCORRECT exegesis. You claim to use Lane's/other sources, but I think you rely primarily on the "other sources." You've tried pulling the wool over our eyes once already with respect to the root of jinn, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case here.

You use faulty logic in your exegesis.

The boy went to the store. And there he bought some bread.

According to your logic, the boy is a kind of bread. Needless to say this is a ridiculous statement, but that is EXACTLY what you are doing. Randomly linking words, claiming that just because the sentences are juxtaposed or connected with fa or wa, that the words are linked in meaning!

This reflects that you have made no real attempt to understand the verse, you simply are looking for cannon fodder for your crusade.

But that brings us back to the original question... does it say in Lane's that jinn have anything to do with locusts??? NO! The foremost Western Arabist according to you, did not think so, nor do ANY other lexicographers! And I bet, not even your faulty sources have directly claimed that jinn=locusts. You refuse to admit it but this idea is purely your own "brain"child. Nowhere do we find a person linking jinn with locusts except in your posts.

So in the future, use more accurate sources and use proper logic. The 3 equals 1 logic does not fly with most Muslims. And I bet most Christians would not approve of your tactics/rhetoric either.

Incidentally, OOPS of the day committed by apple pie

= ?marijin?

?marijin? definition

A confused affair, or case; or error. Mixture, a mixture, or that which is mixed. A mixture of fire; or flame mixed with the black substance of fire; or flame of fire; or fire without smoke, whereof was created El-Jann, i.e. Iblees, the father of the Jinn, or Genii, or the Jinn collectively. Flame; fire free from smoke. ....

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume seven, p. 2704
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar p. 529

Here?we are told that Satan and the Jinn both emanate from the smoke.

wildguest1956

peace shuaib, all,

From PRL

= Jiim-Nun-Nun (root of jinn) = veiled/concealed/covered/hid/protected (e.g. cloth, armour, grave, shield), invisible, become dark/posessed, darkness of night, bereft of reason, mad/insane/unsound in mind/intellect, confusedness.
Become thick/full-grown/blossom, herbage, garden.
Spiritual beings that conceal themselves from the senses (including angels), become weak and abject, greater part of mankind, devil/demon, people who are peerless having no match or equal, a being who is highly potent, sometimes refers to Kings because they are concealed from the common folk

Peace Wakas,

Could you quote the dictionnaries where you have found the informations I Have underlined ?

Thanks in advance,

JM

Wakas

peace JM,

Its from Lane's Lexicon. I have the CD Rom and unfortunately it doesn't give page references but anyone who has the actual books can verify what I wrote and provide a specific page reference if you want it.

Some of it can also be found in DofQ.

Wakas

unknownuser

Your constant begging & pleading with a Christian to give you the definitions of the words in your book of faith, is rather degrading towards you?.don?t you think??

Peace Apple Pie,

Your language has become quite unacceptable not to mention the flawed logic contained therein. I might add the degrading behaviour is in the manner you speak as an intellectual bully, nevermind what you pontificate.

It could be a desperation on your part since you are not making progress, you are becoming increasingly rhetorical and abusive. Whatever your reason this is not acceptable.

Salaam All,

If anyone wants to examine the faulty logic Apple Pie demonstrates just check out his logical reasoning. Here he asserts that someone is begging and pleading. Whether this is true or false is uncertain, and can not be proven, we can speculate on motives but there is no conclusive evidence. If a person makes such a false logical deduction how can you expect him to get his message right?

Other logical misconstructs are seeing things physically in all conditions as in the fire example. I see Apple Pie exhibiting fiery temperament and by his reasoning that would make him a demonic locust or satan....If the planes have wings then they must be angels etc...well OK that is a "clue"...

Apple Pie,

Your sincere and intellectually honest postings are welcome. However, learn something about human nature. Lay out the facts as you see it and let your message be in its emerging self. If you have to assert your message...well then you are sending other messages about you and people focus on that...

Peace

Wakas

peace All,

I had a brief discussion with Apple Pie a while ago (Oct 04), and based on that discussion, I decided not to read Apple's future posts.

In a way, its a pity, because the quality of information presented is very good, but the logic is severely flawed. Most, if not all, of Apple's arguments can be defeated by cross-referencing occurrence.

Also, I never said anything until now because people need to find out for themselves and make up their own mind if someone's posts are worthy of reading or not, but I can now see its not just me who thinks this.

Wakas

Tay

Peace Wakas,

Personally speaking, I agree, in that he does present some very good information. This is why I choose to keep reading his posts. I also agree that the connections he makes are flawed, which is a lesson in itself. In all, I have no problem with the man/woman, though I can no longer debate with him/her as it has proven fruitless time and again.

But I do have a problem with sweeping insults and find it difficult to bite my tongue in those situations where a person is disrespectful, particularly in this case, since the moderators(yourself included) have been more than welcoming and tolerant towards him/her.

Peace,
Tay

Andya_Primanda

I agree with Tay, Apple Pie has been abusing our tolerance. I kinda expected Apple to be a fair debater that is capable is saying 'I am wrong' if proven wrong, but I now know that this person is not like that.

unknownuser

Greetings shuaib,

Thanks for your kind words?

You quote a source which claims a primary meaning of husbaan is calamity, which is totally untrue. HUSBAAN is a neutral word that primarily is used to indicate a specified amount or return, but primarily the meaning is about counting. It does not mean calamity anymore than RESULT means calamity. In surah 55 (which you quote) it is used to claim that the sun/moon are under hisaab/counting i.e. a measured orbit.

It has NOTHING to do with blockage, or locusts.

(Incidentally, the reference for all of my claims here are straight from Lisaan-ul-Arab, Taj-ul-Aroos, or Lughaat-ul-Quran).

Thanks for positing your unreferenced opinion on the matter.

However, the classic definitions, as I have demonstrated, quite plainly paint the picture of a great calamity, comprised of punishment, evil, locusts, dust, smoke, and fire.

Using sources with false/biased information will lead to INCORRECT exegesis. You claim to use Lane's/other sources, but I think you rely primarily on the "other sources." You've tried pulling the wool over our eyes once already with respect to the root of jinn, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case here.

Lane is the ?gold standard? in properly exegeting the Koran.

It is liquid gold, actually.

You use faulty logic in your exegesis.

The boy went to the store. And there he bought some bread.

According to your logic, the boy is a kind of bread. Needless to say this is a ridiculous statement, but that is EXACTLY what you are doing. Randomly linking words, claiming that just because the sentences are juxtaposed or connected with fa or wa, that the words are linked in meaning!

I have presented the context of the ayahs used in my exegesis?.and you are free to check them for yourself.

Context?after all...is what clinches the whole deal?

But that brings us back to the original question... does it say in Lane's that jinn have anything to do with locusts??? NO! The foremost Western Arabist according to you, did not think so, nor do ANY other lexicographers! And I bet, not even your faulty sources have directly claimed that jinn=locusts. You refuse to admit it but this idea is purely your own "brain"child. Nowhere do we find a person linking jinn with locusts except in your posts.

I have already repeatedly answered your redd herring several times.

As you stated previously?

Quote
I've simply asked WHERE in Lane's lexicon is there a statement that equates jinn with demonic locusts.

Lane has indeed provided the classic definitions that lend ample credence to equate the Jinn to Locusts.

Let?s review this simple example?

Fabi-ayyi ala-i rabbikuma tukaththibani

5513 Then with which (of) your Lord's blessings will you twain deny?

= ?tukaththibani?

?tukaththibani? definition

Masculine dual. Will you twain deny. It comes from the root ?kadhaba?, which means to lie, say what is not a fact, lie to, falsely invent, tell lies about or against, fabricate a lie, relate a lie, say a falsehood, be wrong, be cut off, deceive, disappoint the expectation of. It is also said to signify he spoke truth; so as to bear two contradictory meanings.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume seven, pp. 2597 - 2600
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, pp. 481 ? 482

Observe that this question is directed at TWO entities.

What are the two entities??

Mankind.

Jinn.

This same exact phrase is repeated all the way through sura 55.

Ever wonder why?.?

It is because the entire sura pertains to the two.

Interestingly?..the very first time that this phrase is used in the sura, occurs in 55.13.

Let?s look?

The merciful. (551)
He taught/instructed the Koran. (552)
He created the human/mankind. (553)
He taught/instructed him the evidence/logic. (554)
The sun and the moon with a Calamity. (555)
AND, the star/planet
AND, and the trees, they (B) prostrate. (556)
8 ) AND, the sky/space He rose it,
AND, He laid/put/raised the scale/measuring instrument. (557)
That you not tyrannize/exceed the limit in the scale/measuring instrument. (558 )
AND, keep up the weight/measure with the just/equitable,
AND, do not reduce/decrease (cheat) in the scale/measuring instrument. (559)
AND, the earth/Planet Earth, He laid it for the creation. (5510)
In it (are) fruits
AND, the palm trees that of the buds/covers from which fruits
AND, flowers emerge. (5511)
AND, the seed/grain (of) the husk/chaff/external cover of seeds,
18 ) AND, the basil/fragrant plants. (5512)
SO, with which (of) your Lord's blessings will you twain deny? (55.13)
He created the human/mankind from dry mud/clay as the pottery/earthenware. (55.14)
AND, He created the Jinn from (the) flaming blazing torch mixed with blackened smoke from fire. (55.15)

Thus?we can clearly see that this phrase begins questioning Mankind and the Jinn BEFORE the ?creation? of Jinn in 55.15?..

This tells us that both Mankind and the Jinn had to have been described prior to 55.13.

Hence, since we now know that LOCUSTS are mentioned in 55.5, we can become quite confident that we were given an attribute of the Jinn in this ayah?

Additionally, guess where also makes an appearance?.?

That?s right?right in the heart of Jinn territory?.18.40?

Lane notes that the definition of LOCUSTS has also been assigned to 18.40?

Thus?we can see the evidence building beyond reasonable doubt?

Lastly?.

I?m glad to see that you only had to edit your post four times?

Last edited by shuaib on Tue May 10, 2005 746 pm; edited 4 times in total

Thanks?

khalil

Peace ApplePie

Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

unknownuser

Thanks for positing your unreferenced opinion on the matter.

However, the classic definitions, as I have demonstrated, quite plainly paint the picture of a great calamity, comprised of punishment, evil, locusts, dust, smoke, and fire.

Does not need to be referenced, it was done so earlier.

Nevemind. Lets use your "definition"

= ?husbanin?

?husbanin? definition

Verb. Noun. Plural. Calamity; Punishment; an affliction with which a man is tried; Evil; Mischief; Locusts; Dust; Smoke; Fire; definite reckoning; appointed courses; Numbering; Revolving firmament; computation, account, Running appointed and scheduled courses; Affliction; Thunderbolt; it is also used as a collective noun meaning darts or lightning. It comes from the root ?hasiba?, which means to think; consider; suppose, imagine, be of opinion, to reckon, calculate.

Your assertion is not correct since

1-) You are ignoring many other definitions, the definition does not have to be calamity, punishment etc...you can not eliminate "appointed courses" of the sun and the moon for example.

2-) You failed to link "jinn" in any shape or form, you used the planes have wings then they must be angels logic. You need tangible evidence not wishful thinking

Lastly?.

I?m glad to see that you only had to edit your post four times?

When you get to distinguish between "loose" and "lose" then turn your charm on us lol

PS Don't thank or I'll throw up!

unknownuser

Greetings Ash Shuura,

Thanks for your reply?

Apple Pie wrote

Thanks for positing your unreferenced opinion on the matter.

However, the classic definitions, as I have demonstrated, quite plainly paint the picture of a great calamity, comprised of punishment, evil, locusts, dust, smoke, and fire.

Does not need to be referenced, it was done so earlier.

References from books need page numbers.

Nevemind. Lets use your "definition"

Quote
= ?husbanin?

?husbanin? definition

Verb. Noun. Plural. Calamity; Punishment; an affliction with which a man is tried; Evil; Mischief; Locusts; Dust; Smoke; Fire; definite reckoning; appointed courses; Numbering; Revolving firmament; computation, account, Running appointed and scheduled courses; Affliction; Thunderbolt; it is also used as a collective noun meaning darts or lightning. It comes from the root ?hasiba?, which means to think; consider; suppose, imagine, be of opinion, to reckon, calculate.

Your assertion is not correct since

1-) You are ignoring many other definitions, the definition does not have to be calamity, punishment etc...you can not eliminate "appointed courses" of the sun and the moon for example.
Indeed?.let?s look at appointed courses?

?Running appointed and scheduled courses? is the one that that you have underlined.

So?.what exactly would be running?.?

Let?s look?

97

kai ta omoiwmata twn akridwn omoia ippois htoimasmenois eis polemon kai epi tas kefalas autwn ws stefanoi omoioi crusw kai ta proswpa autwn ws proswpa anqrwpwn

And the likenesses of the locusts like horses having been prepared for war; and on the heads of them as crowns like gold; and the faces of them as the faces of men.

The answer is clear?

The locusts (i.e. Jinn) are in the likeness of horses.

The horses are running.

That is how they are described in both the Book of Revelation and subsequently copied-over by the authors of the Koran.

2-) You failed to link "jinn" in any shape or form, you used the planes have wings then they must be angels logic. You need tangible evidence not wishful thinking

Actually, the evidence is overwhelming.

PS Don't thank or I'll throw up!

Thanks?

unknownuser

Greetings back Apple Pie,

References from books need page numbers.

No one said that this is a formal discussion, if you want that standard you can't expect it by emposing it. You might be able to negotiate it.

?Running appointed and scheduled courses? is the one that that you have underlined.

So?.what exactly would be running?.?

Let?s look?

I have to stop you there, you are not looking at the same thing. The first argument is "running appointed and scheduled courses" and the second one which you chose to investigate is "what is running?".

Firstly, Its an ommission of "appointed and scheduled courses".

Secondly, you need to show from the quran that locusts, horses, dogs whatever run appointed courses.

unknownuser

Greetings Ash Shuura,

Thanks for your reply?

Apple Pie wrote
References from books need page numbers.

No one said that this is a formal discussion, if you want that standard you can't expect it by emposing it. You might be able to negotiate it.

Serious posters reference their verifiable positions.

Quote
?Running appointed and scheduled courses? is the one that that you have underlined.

So?.what exactly would be running?.?

Let?s look?

I have to stop you there, you are not looking at the same thing.

You did have it underlined?.did you not?..?

The first argument is "running appointed and scheduled courses" and the second one which you chose to investigate is "what is running?".

Really??

Firstly, Its an ommission of "appointed and scheduled courses".

Is it??

Secondly, you need to show from the quran that locusts, horses, dogs whatever run appointed courses.

Sure.

Take a look at sura 100?

Thanks?

unknownuser

Hello Apple Pie,

Serious posters reference their verifiable positions.

To rephrase, that is your standard. Its not a requirement according to house rules. It could be agreed subject to negotiation between parties.

You did have it underlined?.did you not?..?

What I underlined from your definition is "running appointed courses", you addressed "running"

This is what I would appreciate you address...

Really??

Are they the same? If so how?

Is it??

How is "appointed courses" included then?

Take a look at sura 100?

And where is the logical link to the word "running appointed courses" then? Care to elaborate your position more robustly?

unknownuser

Greetings Ash Shuura,

Thanks for your reply?

Quote
Serious posters reference their verifiable positions.

To rephrase, that is your standard. Its not a requirement according to house rules. It could be agreed subject to negotiation between parties.

Actually, it is expected for a person to reference their position.

This is proper etiquette.

Quote
You did have it underlined?.did you not?..?

What I underlined from your definition is "running appointed courses", you addressed "running"

Thus, by doing this, you are acknowledging Lane?s definition as truth?

Quote
Take a look at sura 100?

And where is the logical link to the word "running appointed courses" then? Care to elaborate your position more robustly?

Sura 100 requires a dedicated thread?.as it details the Jinn to be in the likeness of the Biblical locusts?

Perhaps I will share this with you some day?

Thanks?

unknownuser

Peace Apple Pie,

Thank you for NOT answering my question. roll

If you change your mind here it is, be my guest

Demonstrate the usage of running appointed and scheduled courses in the quran in examples that applies to locusts, bees, cattle or whatever animal you want based on your assertion.