Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. IS OPINION/CONJECTURE, RELATIVE TO ALLAH AND DEEN...LYING?

IS OPINION/CONJECTURE, RELATIVE TO ALLAH AND DEEN...LYING?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
21 Posts 6 Posters 40 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jaxal
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    SaLaM PRIEST

    I have a better example brother. When i moved to UK, the biggest problem i had was halal meat. At the time, i was yet guided by God. So for me, getting halal meat was the main problem. I did wonder about this issue, but usually I brushed it away. Everyone i met here, was a sunni, kept telling how important it is to follow thepath set by Allah and his mesenger by eating halal meat. Ofcourse later on i found out why this way of thinking was crap.

    Point is, anyone who comes here from Pakistan or arab country (I came here from UAE) has this problem, and becoz the society pushes the stoneage thinking on people who dont know about this, it only makes it harder for them to live here. Even now i have friends who have a problem with me going to KFC becoz they dont think the chicken is halal. And its not only regular muslims who have this problem, new converts have it too. Their first worry is where will they get Halal meat from.

    The above is a typical example of sunnis and shias and ahmadis making up something which they have no knowledge of and forcing other people to follow it. ITs not a opinion, or presumption or whatever. ITs plain down right LIE evil

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      PEACE, JAXAL,

      Point is, anyone who comes here from Pakistan or arab country (I came here from UAE) has this problem, and becoz the society pushes the stoneage thinking on people who dont know about this, it only makes it harder for them to live here. Even now i have friends who have a problem with me going to KFC becoz they dont think the chicken is halal. And its not only regular muslims who have this problem, new converts have it too. Their first worry is where will they get Halal meat from.

      The above is a typical example of sunnis and shias and ahmadis making up something which they have no knowledge of and forcing other people to follow it. ITs not a opinion, or presumption or whatever. ITs plain down right LIE evil

      Your example is a good one. These groups refuse to accept the fact that, whatever Allah didn't make haram to eat in Al-Quran, is halal. Here's a piece of irony for you. Each time these people slaughter animals in the "halal manner", they utter "Bismillah Allahu Akbar". This formula renders the meat haram to eat, because Allah has no such name/attribute as...Akbar.

      It is my understanding now that the flesh of swine is not haram to eat. Let me leave you with this

      6146 And to those who were Jews We made unlawful every animal having claws, and of oxen and sheep We made unlawful to them the fat of both, except such as was on their backs or the entrails or what was mixed with bones this was a punishment We gave them on account of their rebellion, and We are surely Truthful.

      55 This day (all) the good things are allowed to you; and the food of those who have been given the Book is lawful for you and your food is lawful for them; and the chaste from among the believing women and the chaste from among those who have been given the Book before you (are lawful for you); when you have given them their dowries, taking (them) in marriage, not fornicating nor taking them for paramours in secret; and whoever denies faith, his work indeed is of no account, and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers.

      Where, in Al-Quran, can one find Allah making the flesh of swine haram for the Jews? Allah says that He only prohibited them the fat of oxen, sheep, and animals with claws. Ayat 55 makes clear that the food of the People of the Book and our food are lawful to each other. With this in mind then...how is the flesh of swine haram for us, the muslim?

      Although I deviated from the topic of the thread, I hope that you and the rest others will critique/respond to it, as well as, halal food issue.

      Looking forward to your reply

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Offline
        E Offline
        el-Aziz
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        PEACE, TO ALL,
        A question I've been asking myself of late is...is opinion making/conjecturing, when ascribing something to Allah, His Deen, and His Quran, actually giving a lie to Him?

        Peace homie!

        I think you're right at the spot. This is also a form of shirk, assuming what God does when no one can speak that loud about something that we cannot somehow grasp.
        If we really KNEW what is to be conjectured with God, we would not be able to say it loud since there would be no need for it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          naxus
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Peace PRIEST_BOKMEI n all
          PRIEST_BOKMEI wrote

          Where, in Al-Quran, can one find Allah making the flesh of swine haram for the Jews? Allah says that He only prohibited them the fat of oxen, sheep, and animals with claws. Ayat 55 makes clear that the food of the People of the Book and our food are lawful to each other. With this in mind then...how is the flesh of swine haram for us, the muslim?

          Well Allah make the flesh of swine haram here is the verse
          006.145
          YUSUFALI Say "I find not in the message received by me by inspiration any (meat) forbidden to be eaten by one who wishes to eat it, unless it be dead meat, or blood poured forth, or the flesh of swine,- for it is an abomination - or, what is impious, (meat) on which a name has been invoked, other than Allah's". But (even so), if a person is forced by necessity, without wilful disobedience, nor transgressing due limits,- thy Lord is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
          PICKTHAL Say I find not in that which is revealed unto me aught prohibited to an eater that he eat thereof, except it be carrion, or blood poured forth, or swineflesh - for that verily is foul - or the abomination which was immolated to the name of other than Allah. But whoso is compelled (thereto), neither craving nor transgressing, (for him) lo! thy Lord is Forgiving, Merciful.
          SHAKIR Say I do not find in that which has been revealed to me anything forbidden for an eater to eat of except that it be what has died of itself, or blood poured forth, or flesh of swine-- for that surely is unclean-- or that which is a transgression, other than (the name of) Allah having been invoked on it; but whoever is driven to necessity, not desiring nor exceeding the limit, then surely your Lord is Forgiving, Merciful.
          KHALIFA Say, "I do not find in the revelations given to me any food that is prohibited for any eater except (1) carrion, (2) running blood, (3) the meat of pigs, for it is contaminated, and (4) the meat of animals blasphemously dedicated to other than GOD." If one is forced (to eat these), without being deliberate or malicious, then your Lord is Forgiver, Most Merciful.
          FMSay ?I do not find in what is inspired to me forbidden except that it be already dead, or blood, or the meat of pig, for it is foul; or what is corruptly dedicated to other than God.? Whoever is forced without seeking disobedience or transgression, then your Lord is Forgiving, Merciful.
          Iagree completly with u,r first post but the flash of swine is made haram by Allah peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            PEACE, NAXUS,

            PRIEST Where, in Al-Quran, can one find Allah making the flesh of swine haram for the Jews? Allah says that He only prohibited them the fat of oxen, sheep, and animals with claws. Ayat 55 makes clear that the food of the People of the Book and our food are lawful to each other. With this in mind then...how is the flesh of swine haram for us, the muslim?

            Well Allah make the flesh of swine haram here is the verse 6.145

            YUSUFALI Say "I find not in the message received by me by inspiration any (meat) forbidden to be eaten by one who wishes to eat it, unless it be dead meat, or blood poured forth, or the flesh of swine,- for it is an abomination - or, what is impious, (meat) on which a name has been invoked, other than Allah's". But (even so), if a person is forced by necessity, without wilful disobedience, nor transgressing due limits,- thy Lord is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

            Thank you for your reply. Here's the problem though. According to Al-Quran, the Jews were only forbidden to eat animals with claws and the fat ox oxen and sheep, except, what adhered to the bones. If ayat 6145 is translated properly, then we have a contradiction/discrepancy in Al-Quran. What I mean is, according to Al-Quran Allah did not prohibit the Jews from eating swine, hence, it must be lawful for them, and their food and our food is lawful for each other...how, then, can the flesh of swine be haram? Do you see my question?

            Looking forward to your reply.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Y Offline
              Y Offline
              yfn123
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Peace PRIEST_BOKMEI,

              Your example is a good one. These groups refuse to accept the fact that, whatever Allah didn't make haram to eat in Al-Quran, is halal.

              Let's call the set of food that are clearly "haram" as HRMF. Then, logically the set of food not in HRMF is in the set NOT(HRMF). Now let's look at 55. "Alyawma ohilla lakumu alttayyibatu...". So all that is "alttayyibatu" is "halal". Thus, all food that is "alttayyibatu" is also "halal". Let's call this set of food that is "alttayyibatu" as HLLF.

              Now the question is NOT(HRMF) = HLLF? In other words, are all food in the set NOT(HRMF) by default "alttayyibatu"?

              Anwar Azim

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                naxus
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Peace bro PRIEST_BOKMEI n all dear bro i was studying Sura Al Maeda than i read the first verse which is
                51 O you who believe, honour your contracts. Made lawful for you are all the animals of the livestock, except that which is being recited to you, and what you are not allowed to hunt of the game while you are under restriction. God decrees as He pleases.
                the under line portion of the verse shows that all animals r law full except which is being recited in 006.145 n in 53 Allah specificaly forbidden flesh of swine my understanding is that Allah has forbidden the flash of swine because before 55 comes the verse 53 if the flash of swine was Hallal why Allah need to reveal 53 i think 53 has there to explain 55 so we didn,t got mixed up this is just my understanding but i,m open to suggestions n explainations peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  PEACE, ANWAR,

                  PRIEST Your example is a good one. These groups refuse to accept the fact that, whatever Allah didn't make haram to eat in Al-Quran, is halal.

                  Let's call the set of food that are clearly "haram" as HRMF. Then, logically the set of food not in HRMF is in the set NOT(HRMF). Now let's look at 55. "Alyawma ohilla lakumu alttayyibatu...". So all that is "alttayyibatu" is "halal". Thus, all food that is "alttayyibatu" is also "halal". Let's call this set of food that is "alttayyibatu" as HLLF. Now the question is NOT(HRMF) = HLLF? In other words, are all food in the set NOT(HRMF) by default "alttayyibatu"?

                  A little dizzying for me, Anwar. D Perhaps you could rephrase your reply.

                  Anyway, I would like to keep things simple and basic. Allah, has determined what is haram and those things are clearly delineated in Al-Quran. Man cannot make anything haram, it is not his province but Allah's. Now, all food that is halal may not be tayyib for a particular individual, however, this does not make that food haram simply because a particular individual may not be able tolerate it. For example, I can no longer tolerate shellfish, because it gives me hives. Shellfish, then, for me, is not tayyib nor is it haram, it is halal, because Allah has not made it haram in His Quran.

                  Hope this answered your post.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    PEACE, NAXUS,

                    Peace bro PRIEST_BOKMEI n all dear bro i was studying Sura Al Maeda than i read the first verse which is

                    51 O you who believe, honour your contracts. Made lawful for you are all the animals of the livestock, except that which is being recited to you, and what you are not allowed to hunt of the game while you are under restriction. God decrees as He pleases.

                    the under line portion of the verse shows that all animals r law full except which is being recited in 006.145 n in 53 Allah specificaly forbidden flesh of swine my understanding is that Allah has forbidden the flash of swine because before 55 comes the verse 53 if the flash of swine was Hallal why Allah need to reveal 53 i think 53 has there to explain 55 so we didn,t got mixed up this is just my understanding but i,m open to suggestions n explainations peace

                    51...except that which is being recited to you...

                    What is recited to us concerning haram food for the Jews, is contained in ayat 6146. With this in mind then, please, this time, answer the following question

                    According to Al-Quran, the Jews were only forbidden to eat animals with claws and the fat ox oxen and sheep, except, what adhered to the bones. If ayat 6145 is translated properly, then we have a contradiction/discrepancy in Al-Quran. What I mean is, according to Al-Quran Allah did not prohibit the Jews from eating swine, hence, it must be lawful for them, and their food and our food is lawful for each other...how, then, can the flesh of swine be haram?

                    Looking forward to your reply.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      naxus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Peace PRIEST_BOKMEI u,r argument is strong but than why Allah revealed 6145 n 53 wut is the need of these verses why the need of specifically those verses about the flesh of swine when already every animal on planet is made Hallal to us wuts the reason for that can u explain peace

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Y Offline
                        Y Offline
                        yfn123
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        PRIEST Your example is a good one. These groups refuse to accept the fact that, whatever Allah didn't make haram to eat in Al-Quran, is halal.

                        Let's call the set of food that are clearly "haram" as HRMF. Then, logically the set of food not in HRMF is in the set NOT(HRMF). Now let's look at 55. "Alyawma ohilla lakumu alttayyibatu...". So all that is "alttayyibatu" is "halal". Thus, all food that is "alttayyibatu" is also "halal". Let's call this set of food that is "alttayyibatu" as HLLF. Now the question is NOT(HRMF) = HLLF? In other words, are all food in the set NOT(HRMF) by default "alttayyibatu"?

                        A little dizzying for me, Anwar. D Perhaps you could rephrase your reply.

                        Ok... Are all food that are not haram tayyib? Keep "ohilla lakumu alttayyibatu" in mind when you answer.

                        Thanks.
                        Anwar Azim

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          PEACE, NAXUS,

                          Peace PRIEST_BOKMEI u,r argument is strong but than why Allah revealed 6145 n 53 wut is the need of these verses why the need of specifically those verses about the flesh of swine when already every animal on planet is made Hallal to us wuts the reason for that can u explain peace

                          1. What, in particular, makes the argument I'm presenting strong?

                          2. Ayats 6143 and 53, if they are translated correctly, create a discrepancy/contradiction within Al-Quran. We know it is impossible for ayats to contradict one anohter, hence, either both ayats are translated incorrectly or one of them is. Which ayat, given the all of the evidence presented, do you conclude is mistranslated? Abdul Omar Mannan, in his "Dictionary of the Holy Quran", writes the following concerning the definition of khaniza (so-called swine)

                          Main Entry KHANIZA compound word comprised of khinz-bad and ara- I see it bad; to stink; to be evil; to be bad; dirty; piggy; pig/swine/hog; proud; greedy; stubborn, obstinate, stupidly perverse. pg.166

                          1. The question is, which of the definitions, given all the evidence, is Allah using in Al-Quran? Is it the animal pig or the immoral behavior of people?

                          Looking forward to your reply.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            PEACE, ANWAR,

                            Ok... Are all food that are not haram tayyib? Keep "ohilla lakumu alttayyibatu" in mind when you answer.

                            When you say...tayyib, do you mean for each and every human being or just for some? I'm not certain what point you are trying to make. Perhaps you need to explain yourself clearly at this time.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              naxus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              6145 Say ?I do not find in what is inspired to me forbidden except that it be already dead, or blood, or the meat of pig, for it is foul; or what is corruptly dedicated to other than God.? Whoever is forced without seeking disobedience or transgression, then your Lord is Forgiving, Merciful.

                              how can immoral behavier fits here

                              Forbidden to you is that which is already dead, and the blood, and the meat of pig, and what was sacrificed to other than God, and that which has been strangled, and that which has been beaten to death, and that which has fallen from a height, and that which has been gored, and that which the wild animals have eaten from except what you managed to rescue, and what has been slaughtered on alters, and what you divide by the arrows of chance. This is all vile. Today the rejecters have given up from your system, so do not fear them, but fear Me. Today I have perfected your system for you, and completed My blessings upon you, and I have accepted surrender as the system for you. So, whoever is forced by severe hunger and not seeking sin, then God is Forgiving, Merciful.

                              i don,t how can immoral behavier be fit there both the verses r about wutis forbiden n wut is not how can u fit immoral behavier there peace

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                PEACE, NAXUS,

                                6145 Say ?I do not find in what is inspired to me forbidden except that it be already dead, or blood, or the meat of pig, for it is foul; or what is corruptly dedicated to other than God.? Whoever is forced without seeking disobedience or transgression, then your Lord is Forgiving, Merciful.

                                how can immoral behavier fits here

                                Forbidden to you is that which is already dead, and the blood, and the meat of pig, and what was sacrificed to other than God, and that which has been strangled, and that which has been beaten to death, and that which has fallen from a height, and that which has been gored, and that which the wild animals have eaten from except what you managed to rescue, and what has been slaughtered on alters, and what you divide by the arrows of chance. This is all vile. Today the rejecters have given up from your system, so do not fear them, but fear Me. Today I have perfected your system for you, and completed My blessings upon you, and I have accepted surrender as the system for you. So, whoever is forced by severe hunger and not seeking sin, then God is Forgiving, Merciful.

                                i don,t how can immoral behavier be fit there both the verses r about wutis forbiden n wut is not how can u fit immoral behavier there peace.

                                6145 Say ?I do not find in what is inspired to me forbidden except that it be already dead, or blood, or the meat of pig, for it is foul; or what is corruptly dedicated to other than God.? Whoever is forced without seeking disobedience or transgression, then your Lord is Forgiving, Merciful.

                                6145 Qul la ajidu feema oohiya ilayya muharraman AAala taAAimin yatAAamuhu illa an yakoona maytatan aw daman masfoohan aw lahma khinzeerin fainnahu rijsun aw fisqan ohilla lighayri Allahi bihi famani idturra ghayra baghin wala AAadin fainna rabbaka ghafoorun raheem

                                Pardon me Naxus, I was thinking about the ayat where Allah turned some rebellious people into apes and swine. Regarding the above ayat, as well as the ayat I was thinking about, the common denominator is "something that is seen as bad". This includes meat that looks bad, as well as, people whose behavior is seen as bad/immoral. Now, if swine ( the animal) is actually what is being referred to in ayat 6145, then the following ayat means Allah turned human being s into apes and pigs

                                560 Say Shall I inform you of (him who is) worse than this in retribution from Allah? (Worse is he) whom Allah has cursed and brought His wrath upon, and of whom He made apes and swine, and he who served the Shaitan; these are worse in place and more erring from the straight path.

                                560 Qul hal onabbiokum bisharrin min thalika mathoobatan AAinda Allahi man laAAanahu Allahu waghadiba AAalayhi wajaAAala minhumu alqiradata walkhanazeera waAAabada attaghooti olaika sharrun makanan waadallu AAan sawai assabeel.

                                Is it your position that Allah actually turned human beings into pigs...or did their behavior reduce to them to the level of pigs, thus, their being "perceived as bad"?

                                Looking forward to your reply.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  naxus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Peace all bro Priest Bokhme regarding verse 560 i will go with the QXP translation which is

                                  560 Say, ?Shall I point out to you something much worse for retribution with Allah? Worse is the case of those whom Allah has rejected, and His Law of Requital hits them. And whom Allah?s Law relegated from the honorable stature of humanity and they started behaving like apes and swine (265). And they fell into becoming the slaves of TAGHOOT (tyrants and the priesthood of any religion 451). Such are in worse plight, and farther astray than the mockers.?

                                  but about 6145 n 51 the word lahma is there which means meat there is no other way to translate it if there was the word khinzeerin we could have translate it in another way but lahme is there with khinzeerin whicih does not make it symbolic
                                  now again about 55 does this mean there is contradiction/discrepancy in Al-Quran now yes there is a discripition of whicih is Hallal fot Jews in 6146 wut about Christens how do we know wut is forbidden n not forbidden for them the reallity is that Jews don,t eat Pig but the Christens do wut is u,r understanding infact i will wellcome any one who could explain this peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    unknownuser
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    PEACE, NAXUS,

                                    Peace all bro Priest Bokhme regarding verse 560 i will go with the QXP translation which is

                                    560 Say, ?Shall I point out to you something much worse for retribution with Allah? Worse is the case of those whom Allah has rejected, and His Law of Requital hits them. And whom Allah?s Law relegated from the honorable stature of humanity and they started behaving like apes and swine (265). And they fell into becoming the slaves of TAGHOOT (tyrants and the priesthood of any religion 451). Such are in worse plight, and farther astray than the mockers.? but about 6145 n 51 the word lahma is there which means meat there is no other way to translate it if there was the word khinzeerin we could have translate it in another way but lahme is there with khinzeerin whicih does not make it symbolic

                                    Lahma khanzeerin, in Al-Quran, does not mean pig, but "flesh that is seen as bad". Khanzeerin, according to The Dictionary of the Holy Quran, by Omar, is a compound term. So, khanzeerin, in all of the ayats in which we find this term, means...that which is "seen as bad".

                                    now again about 55 does this mean there is contradiction/discrepancy in Al-Quran now yes there is a discripition of whicih is Hallal fot Jews in 6146 wut about Christens how do we know wut is forbidden n not forbidden for them the reallity is that Jews don,t eat Pig but the Christens do wut is u,r understanding infact i will wellcome any one who could explain this peace.

                                    According to Al-Quran, the Jews were only forbidden to eat animals with claws and the fat of oxen amd sheep, except, that which adhered to the bones. With this in mind then, the Jews were never forbidden to eat swine, this is something which they imposed upon themselves

                                    393 All food was lawful to the Children of Israel, except what Israel Made unlawful for itself, before the Law (of Moses) was revealed. Say "Bring ye the Law and study it, if ye be men of truth."

                                    Allah, has made clear in Al-Quran that a party of the Jews tampered with the Law, hence, their not eating of pork is something which they invented/made a law. Ayat 6146 makes it absolutely clear what Allah forbade the Jews to eat. The question now is...do you believe Allah what Allah has said?

                                    If one refuses to accept what Allah has stated, one becomes guilty of jibt/superstition

                                    Main Entry SUPERSTITION/JIBT a notion maintained despite evidence to contrary a belief or practice resulting from ignorance or a false conception of causation.

                                    Regarding the Christians eating pork, well, they have it right.

                                    Looking forward to your reply.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N Offline
                                      N Offline
                                      naxus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      PEACE PRIEST_BOKMEI i,m not that knowledgeable in Arabic i see we r the only two person who is talking on this chapter now i have check the word khanzeerin on http//dictionary.sakhr.com/ n it still give me the meaning of Pork i guess we need a wider disscussion on that i,m opening a new thread so we can have a clear outcome thank u for u,r time peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        PEACE, TANVEER, MD

                                        IMHO...

                                        "IMO" or "I THINK" are conjectural statements not statements of fact. The question is then...do you know for a fact that what you are following is the truth or not? When you and others say...in my opinion, are you stating fact/knowledge or are you guessing/conjecturing?

                                        Looking forward to your reply.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          FreedomStands
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          PEACE, TANVEER, MD

                                          "IMO" or "I THINK" are conjectural statements not statements of fact. The question is then...do you know for a fact that what you are following is the truth or not? When you and others say...in my opinion, are you stating fact/knowledge or are you guessing/conjecturing?

                                          Looking forward to your reply.

                                          Are you enjoying your pig, Bokmei? There are other things on the menu too, free of charge, they are mentioned in the Qur'an.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users