Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. DO AYATS 5:5 AND 6:146, PRECLUDE THE PIG AS BEING HARAM...?

DO AYATS 5:5 AND 6:146, PRECLUDE THE PIG AS BEING HARAM...?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
165 Posts 23 Posters 1.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #93

    Sorry, but your analogy fails and you did not refute my claim, here's why. It is NOT necessary for the ayat to mention all the foods are halal, just the ones which are not. For the pig to be haram to the Jews/those who came before Al-Quran, you/we are required to have the ayat which says that the pig was haram to the Jews/those who came before Al-Quran, otherwise, we would be in violation of ayat 16116--making somethig haram which Allah did not definitively state was/is haram. So, please post the ayat where Allah says that the pig was haram to the Jews/those who came before Al-Quran.

    why you asking us to prove it, how anbout you go and ask a jew?

    What?, does a Jew no more than Allah? My God, you are simply out of touch. lol

    you are really confused man, but I tell ya, you are funny, thanks for the laugh

    Please don't project your character defects on to me. The only confused and superstitious here is you. You cannot, via Al-Quran, prove any of the nonsense you are spouting lol

    Btw pig was NEVER halal for the people of the book and even evangelists today like Dr. Kent Hovind are against the eating of pork and use the Bible to support that prohibtion. GOD Bless!

    If the pig was not halal for the People of the Book, then, Allah, would have stated that in Al-Quran, but He did not. He DEFINITIVELY made haram to the Jews/a people who came before Al-Quran, ALL animals with CLAWS and the fat of two animals--the sheep and the oxen. If the evangelists are against eating pork, it is not as a result of the command of Allah, but as a result of their own desire and superstition.
    Peace.

    confusion, confusion

    very clear you are,

    Please don't project your character defects on to me. The only confused and superstitious here is you. You cannot, via Al-Quran, prove any of the nonsense you are spouting lol

    those food mentioned were allowed, then they become forbidden as a punishment to their arrogance that you simulate really good

    Do you KNOW for a fact what foods were made haram to the Jews, do you, smart boy? If so, go to Al-Quran and show us. Where, in Al-Quran, does Allah say that the pig was haram to the Jews?

    now we need an explanation in how you follow the order of Allah in the Quran to BELIEVE IN THE PEVIOUS BOOKS SENT BY HIM?

    By Allah, I'm going to corner you using the Quran lol

    LOL!!You are truly out of you mind rotfl

    Your above ad hominem comments...are not a refutation of my analysis nor does it advance your own analysis. The only thing you've exposed is that, you are determined to support SUPERSTITION in derogation of Allah's Quran and Truth. Allah, did not tell you to take any of the previous Books for your Guidance along with Al-Quran, and, if you maintain that He does, then you are a liar, mate. Again, the corrupted/doubtful Torah, claims that animals with undivided hoofs were haram, however, Al-Quran contradicts that, in that, it says that only animals with claws were haram to the Jews. Now, which Book do you believe has the correct account? Don't you think Allah knows the difference between a hoof and a claw, though apparently, you and Marie do not? lol

    Your "argument" has be thoroughly dismantled. If you wish to serve your gods--SUPERSTITION and CONJECTURE, then that is fine by me. bravo

    Oh, yeah and...stop being a...SNEAK.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #94

      My analysis that PGM is not a muslim and just pretending to be, I met a few of those online but always exposed them

      I may be wrong, but I will see if he "the non arabic speaker truely understands the arabic words"

      now if he kept ranting about the same subject, he has to be one or the other

      1. He is obssessed with pigs
      2. He is faking his islam and just to stir the air between muslims
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #95

        My analysis that PGM is not a muslim and just pretending to be, I met a few of those online but always exposed them

        I may be wrong, but I will see if he "the non arabic speaker truely understands the arabic words"

        now if he kept ranting about the same subject, he has to be one or the other

        1. He is obssessed with pigs
        2. He is faking his islam and just to stir the air between muslims

        Your above ad hominem...is not a refutation of my analysis nor does it advance your own analysis. The only thing you've exposed is that, you are determined to support SUPERSTITION in derogation of Allah's Quran and truth. Allah, did not tell you to take any of the previous Books for your Guidance along with Al-Quran, and, if you maintain that He does, then you are a liar, mate. Again, the corrupted/doubtful Torah, claims that animals with undivided hoofs were haram, however, Al-Quran contradicts that, in that, it says that only animals with claws were haram to the Jews. Now, which Book do you believe has the correct account? Don't you think Allah knows the difference between a hoof and a claw, though apparently, you and Marie do not? lol

        Your "argument" has be thoroughly dismantled. If you wish to serve your gods--SUPERSTITION and CONJECTURE, then that is fine by me. bravo

        Oh, yeah and...stop being a...SNEAK...and now a...SLANDERER as well.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #96

          Another profile record added to Profiler 2005 database

          lol

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #97

            Another profile record added to Profiler 2005 database

            lol

            Your above ad hominem...is not a refutation of my analysis nor does it advance your own analysis. The only thing you've exposed is that, you are determined to support SUPERSTITION in derogation of Allah's Quran and truth. Allah, did not tell you to take any of the previous Books for your Guidance along with Al-Quran, and, if you maintain that He does, then you are a liar, mate. Again, the corrupted/doubtful Torah, claims that animals with undivided hoofs were haram, however, Al-Quran contradicts that, in that, it says that only animals with claws were haram to the Jews. Now, which Book do you believe has the correct account? Don't you think Allah knows the difference between a hoof and a claw, though apparently, you and Marie do not? lol

            Your "argument" has been thoroughly dismantled. If you wish to serve your gods--SUPERSTITION and CONJECTURE, then that is fine by me. bravo

            Oh, yeah and...stop being a...SNEAK.

            Oh, btw, When you turn to personal attacks, you scream out that you have been thoroughly proved wrong....loser lol

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #98

              Please mate

              Profiler 2005 does not accept duplicates

              can you come with something new so the program has enough info to profile you?

              cheers wink

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #99

                Please mate

                Profiler 2005 does not accept duplicates

                can you come with something new so the program has enough info to profile you?

                cheers wink

                Your above ad hominem...is not a refutation of my analysis nor does it advance your own analysis. The only thing you've exposed is that, you are determined to support SUPERSTITION in derogation of Allah's Quran and truth. Allah, did not tell you to take any of the previous Books for your Guidance along with Al-Quran, and, if you maintain that He does, then you are a liar, mate. Again, the corrupted/doubtful Torah, claims that animals with undivided hoofs were haram, however, Al-Quran contradicts that, in that, it says that only animals with claws were haram to the Jews. Now, which Book do you believe has the correct account? Don't you think Allah knows the difference between a hoof and a claw, though apparently, you and Marie do not? lol

                Your "argument" has been thoroughly dismantled. If you wish to serve your gods--SUPERSTITION and CONJECTURE, then that is fine by me. bravo

                Oh, yeah and...stop being a...SNEAK...and now a...SLANDERER.

                Oh, btw, When you turn to personal attacks, you scream out that you have been thoroughly proved wrong....loser lol

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #100

                  got you in no time

                  twisted

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #101

                    got you in no time

                    twisted

                    When you resort to personal attacks, you scream out that you have been thoroughly proved wrong...accept that and move on.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #102

                      PBM and Babe the Aussie Pig

                      do you like this movie title?

                      there also PBM and Wesekh the Egyptian Pig

                      which one you prefer for my next blockbuster?

                      I'm not kiddin lol

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #103

                        PBM and Babe the Aussie Pig

                        do you like this movie title?

                        there also PBM and Wesekh the Egyptian Pig

                        which one you prefer for my next blockbuster?

                        I'm not kiddin lol

                        When you resort to personal attacks, you scream out that you have been thoroughly proved wrong...accept that and move on.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Y Offline
                          Y Offline
                          Yosemite
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #104

                          so i searched for pig and i see this thread

                          but i mainly see argumentation on the disease present in the animal world

                          is the OP post about a mistranslation of a word present in the verse that says which food is prohibited? or what

                          please salam

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #105

                            The basic argument was that since food of the People of Book {Toraat and Injeel--Jews and Christians] has been declared permissible for the Believers and that since it is not mentioned in Qur'aan that meat of pig was prohibited for People of Book, therefore, meat of pig becomes permissible for believers too.

                            The food of People of Book is permissible. But which food? The food that has been declared permissible for Jews and Christians by the Last Messenger Muhammad Sal'lallaa'hoalaih'wa'salam and what he has declared prohibited for them that will obviously not be permissible for believers if they do not abide by the command of the Messenger, recorded not in history, but in the Qur'aan.

                            And exactly the same is permissible and prohibited for the believer. The pig is declared Haram for the believers and so is declared Haram for Jews and Christians in the Qur'aan. They accept it or not, it is their choice. No compulsion in Deen, the physical conduct of life.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              aynur
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #106

                              Please mate

                              Profiler 2005 does not accept duplicates

                              can you come with something new so the program has enough info to profile you?

                              cheers wink

                              ;D

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                aynur
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #107

                                The basic argument was that since food of the People of Book {Toraat and Injeel--Jews and Christians] has been declared permissible for the Believers and that since it is not mentioned in Qur'aan that meat of pig was prohibited for People of Book, therefore, meat of pig becomes permissible for believers too.

                                The food of People of Book is permissible. But which food? The food that has been declared permissible for Jews and Christians by the Last Messenger Muhammad Sal'lallaa'hoalaih'wa'salam and what he has declared prohibited for them that will obviously not be permissible for believers if they do not abide by the command of the Messenger, recorded not in history, but in the Qur'aan.

                                And exactly the same is permissible and prohibited for the believer. The pig is declared Haram for the believers and so is declared Haram for Jews and Christians in the Qur'aan. They accept it or not, it is their choice. No compulsion in Deen, the physical conduct of life.

                                bravo

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Q Offline
                                  Q Offline
                                  Q_student
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #108

                                  What is the status of Donkey''s meat ,lion's meat and Dog's meat etc for the muslims?
                                  Regards

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Y Offline
                                    Y Offline
                                    Yosemite
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #109

                                    The basic argument was that since food of the People of Book {Toraat and Injeel--Jews and Christians] has been declared permissible for the Believers and that since it is not mentioned in Qur'aan that meat of pig was prohibited for People of Book, therefore, meat of pig becomes permissible for believers too.

                                    The food of People of Book is permissible. But which food? The food that has been declared permissible for Jews and Christians by the Last Messenger Muhammad Sal'lallaa'hoalaih'wa'salam and what he has declared prohibited for them that will obviously not be permissible for believers if they do not abide by the command of the Messenger, recorded not in history, but in the Qur'aan.

                                    And exactly the same is permissible and prohibited for the believer. The pig is declared Haram for the believers and so is declared Haram for Jews and Christians in the Qur'aan. They accept it or not, it is their choice. No compulsion in Deen, the physical conduct of life.

                                    salam

                                    thank you very much, this clarified it perfectly

                                    peace

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      almarh0m
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #110

                                      Peace

                                      The people of the book or the Jews and Christians did not need to be told that Pig/swine is haram , they knew this from their own scriptures . " And the swine........you shall not eat of their flesh , nor touch their dead carcass " , Deutoronomy 148 . Other similar verses also can be found in Leviticus 117 and 1180 , but there are more of them .

                                      almarh0m

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #111

                                        What is the status of Donkey''s meat ,lion's meat and Dog's meat etc for the muslims?
                                        Regards

                                        Qur'aan says from herbivores some are declared permissible for eating. Dog and lion are not herbivores. Donkey has specifically been declared as beast of burden and not for eating.

                                        Pl try to read the classification of animal kingdom in the Qur'aan. Everything has been made distinct and evident for human guidance.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Q Offline
                                          Q Offline
                                          Q_student
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #112

                                          Qur'aan says from herbivores some are declared permissible for eating. Dog and lion are not herbivores. Donkey has specifically been declared as beast of burden and not for eating.

                                          Pl try to read the classification of animal kingdom in the Qur'aan. Everything has been made distinct and evident for human guidance.

                                          Salaam
                                          Would you provide appropriate verses ?
                                          Thanks

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users