Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Is Quran anti- secular?

Is Quran anti- secular?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
209 Posts 16 Posters 5.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Hi Mquran,
    I didnt obviously mean 'dont kill' , 'dont cheat' laws. These are values, that any human, irrespective of any religion can realise and understand.

    How about lashing for adultery? What if the christians in the country do not relate to it?Would the law apply to them as well?

    What about marriage and divorce laws? What rules will be followed for the christians? the ones mentioned in Quran(which they dont believe and accept) or seperate rules for them, according to their beliefs?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      Jaxal
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      SALaM PM

      Excellent question. Only proves that Quran was never meant to run a country.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        mquran
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        I didnt obviously mean 'dont kill' , 'dont cheat' laws. These are values, that any human, irrespective of any religion can realise and understand.

        These are laws in the Quran though. If you don't take them as 'religious', thats fine.

        How about lashing for adultery? What if the christians in the country do not relate to it?Would the law apply to them as well?

        If they dont relate to it, they shouldnt have sex in the public space like animals. If they do, its not a personal thing anymore , is it ? Obviously, adultery and fornication in thier own space is thier (as with anyone else's) own affair.

        What about marriage and divorce laws? What rules will be followed for the christians? the ones mentioned in Quran(which they dont believe and accept) or seperate rules for them, according to their beliefs?

        There's no 'qisas' for marriage and divorce laws, i.e. whether you follow or not, there's no punishement stipulated unless of course, you cheat someone using marriage as a scam. If a marriage and divorce is straightfoward, there's no qisas or equal retribution.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          Hi Jaxal,

          SALaM PM

          Excellent question. Only proves that Quran was never meant to run a country.

          I honestly wanted to know what everyone out here thinks on this subject.

          I lived all my life in India. And I am sooo glad its a secular government and not a religious government (would be hindu government since they are the majority). If it was a religious government and muslims had to follow their religious laws, even if we dont believe it, it would be unfair, wouldnt it? Say, they followed crude laws like burning widows(sati) etc and if all people living in the country were forced to follow it?
          I am glad the people and the country chose a secular government where everyone is equal and we follow laws that are just to humanity in general, not taking into consideration any specific religion and religious beliefs.
          The same can be said for UK, America etc, isnt it?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mquran
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            I honestly wanted to know what everyone out here thinks on this subject
            .

            I didnt bother answering because this person generally doesn't know what he's saying and can't answer a question to save his life but if you want, I can deconstruct the sentence for you.

            I lived all my life in India. And I am sooo glad its a secular government and not a religious government (would be hindu government since they are the majority). If it was a religious government and muslims had to follow their religious laws, even if we dont believe it, it would be unfair, wouldnt it?

            The Quran isnt a comparison for this. In an islamic domain, anyone can perform any religious rituals as they so choose. However, ppl are bound by Quranic laws which one might call 'civil' instead of 'religious'. I caution against the use of both terms. Al-quraan gives laws, period. They dont have anything to do with your rituals.

            I am glad the people and the country chose a secular government where everyone is equal and we follow laws that are just to humanity in general, not taking into consideration any specific religion.
            The same can be said for UK, America etc, isnt it?

            Does al-quraan propagate a religion to you ? If so, I'd urge you to read al-quraan thoroughly and see where it preaches a 'religious' government.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              Jaxal
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              The only thing i need to know regarding you is that ur the kind of man who cant keep his marriage together. The rest, as 7 of 9 says, is irrelevant.

              SaLaM PM

              What you say is right. Even the indians have enough sense not to run their country using religion. IT has already excelled pakistan in nearly all ways.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                Obviously, adultery and fornication in thier own space is thier (as with anyone else's) own affair.

                So, according to u, there would be no punishment of lashing for adultery among the christians living under muslim law?

                There's no 'qisas' for marriage and divorce laws, i.e. whether you follow or not, there's no punishement stipulated unless of course, you cheat someone using marriage as a scam. If a marriage and divorce is straightfoward, there's no qisas or equal retribution.

                Would the widows be required to wait for a period of 3 months to marry again?
                Would they be required to follow divorce procedures like Quran says?
                Would all other punishments(from Quran) apply to them?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  mquran
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  PM, what did I tell you? Poor chap doesnt have the brains of a 6 yr old. It's good that now the women know what a sex pest he is ) so he can't pull off his lame lines on them.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    mquran
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    So, according to u, there would be no punishment of lashing for adultery among the christians living under muslim law?

                    No. If they had sex publicly (in front of 4 ppl as the Quran stipulates) then there's punishment for them as with everyone else.

                    Would the widows be required to wait for a period of 3 months to marry again?
                    Would they be required to follow divorce procedures like Quran says?

                    As far as my reading goes, there's no punishable requirement for divorce laws. If you follow them, you gain Allah's rewards. If you don't, you won't.

                    Would all other punishments(from Quran) apply to them?

                    Such as what ?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      PM, what did I tell you? Poor chap doesnt have the brains of a 6 yr old. It's good that now the women know what a sex pest he is so he can't pull off his lame lines on them.

                      Did I miss anything here? What are u talking about? shock

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        No. If they had sex publicly (in front of 4 ppl as the Quran stipulates) then there's punishment for them as with everyone else.

                        oh, is this true for muslims as well?
                        Are muslims punishable only when they comit adultery in the presence of 4 people?!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          mquran
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Did I miss anything here? What are u talking about?

                          If you want, I can deconstruct the statement Rizwan/Jaxal/Sex-pest made (Only proves that Quran was never meant to run a country). Its a statement made by a person who will never quote the Quran to you but claims to be muslim (sic).

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            mquran
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            oh, is this true for muslims as well?
                            Are muslims punishable only when they comit adultery in the presence of 4 people?

                            Everyone is. In an islamic domain, people are all bound by the same laws.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              Jaxal
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              SaLaM PM

                              Are muslims punishable only when they comit adultery in the presence of 4 people

                              See in a normal civilized country, we dont need 4 people as witness. We need evidence. Again, one more reason why Quran was never meant to run a country D

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                Mquran,

                                Did I miss anything here? What are u talking about?

                                If you want, I can deconstruct the statement Rizwan/Jaxal/Sex-pest made (Only proves that Quran was never meant to run a country). Its a statement made by a person who will never quote the Quran to you but claims to be muslim (sic).

                                I would appreciate it, if u do not resort to calling people 'names'.
                                I would kindly request u to address anyone expressing their views here, with respect, EVEN if u disagree with them.
                                There is no point in a discussion if there is no respect for fellow human beings.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  mquran
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  See in a normal civilized country, we dont need 4 people as witness. We need evidence. Again, one more reason why Quran was never meant to run a country.

                                  Poor guy. He thinks ppl need to go round spying on others. This is what comes from not reading al-quraan but spending ones time pestering women.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    born_again
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    Oh, here we go again!

                                    ~0

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      mquran
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      I would appreciate it, if u do not resort to calling people 'names'.
                                      I would kindly request u to address anyone expressing their views here, with respect, EVEN if u disagree with them.
                                      There is no point in a discussion if there is no respect for fellow human beings.

                                      Im simply stating the truth about Rizwan. He has made a nuisance of himself and once precipitated a lady actually CRYING in a voice-chat room. As such, its best to be aware of this person.

                                      In continuing, lets deconstruct Rizwan's statement Only proves that Quran was never meant to run a country

                                      What is entailed from 'running a country' ?

                                      Answer strategic , tactical and operational activities. In other words, long-term, mid-term and short-term goals.

                                      Does al-quraan posess

                                      a) strategic goals Yes. If one reads the story of Adam, it tells you how what a society based on Allah's concepts will be like.

                                      b) tactical goals Yes, if one reads the stories of David and Solomon, it tells you about the tactics of running a mulk.

                                      c) operational goals al-quraan's ethical code is precisely what all humans need in order to run a clean and efficient government.

                                      In short, Rizwan is as usual, giving false accusations against the book. Try asking him for evidence if you will and you will see for yourself.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        Jaxal
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        I feel bad humiliating you. Almost felt pity for you. but looks like you havent learnt anything from your divorce.

                                        Im simply stating the truth about Rizwan. He has made a nuisance of himself and once precipitated a lady actually CRYING in a voice-chat room. As such, its best to be aware of this person.

                                        Ill take being a nuisance over being divorced anyday wink

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #31

                                          Oh, here we go again!

                                          ~0

                                          I agree with u born again.
                                          This attitude has to stop if we are to have a constructive discussion.
                                          All of us are bound to differ in our views and opinions.
                                          But that shouldnt permit anyone to use impolite behaviour in a public forum.
                                          We need to respect each other and also the differences.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users