Reincarnation
-
Salam,
23100 "So that I may do good in that which I have left behind." No, it is but a word he is speaking. And there is a barrier to prevent them from going back until the Day they are all resurrected.
(99) (100
Kallaa= No, is referring to who, in the translation you provided?
And does the word 'word' refers to what the person is saying or to the execution of Death.
Btw, 'Nay' is more correct to me than 'No'..The Death comes to the Nafs not to the Rooh.. But what about sleep. What has sleep got to do with the taking of nafs .. Can you tell me your understanding of Ayah?
-
Salaam,
3942
God takes the souls when they die, and during their sleep. He then keeps those that have been overtaken by death, and He sends the others back until a predetermined time. In that are signs for a people who will think.Until death comes to one of them, he says "My Lord, send me back." "So that I may do good in that which I have left behind." No, it is but a word he is speaking. And there is a barrier to prevent them from going back until the Day they are all resurrected. 2399-100
He takes the soul during their sleep or when they die. And when they die, He keeps those souls. About the understanding of the people who sleep, i don't have a good answer yet. I need to do more research.
But to answer also, the 'word' the person is saying is"My Lord, send me back." So yes, this refers to the person not being send back to earth. And there are multiple verses in the Quran using those same terms. That there is only one life given.
Reincarnation is also a paradox, because you can't remember your 'past' life, and is by thus unneccesary to know. And even if you did remember, in how many ways would that effect you? Because it is about now, not then. The knowledge of the past life isn't given in your new life, and reincarnation is by thus made useless. Because in the old doctrine, you haver to try to brake away from this cycle. Reincarnation itself, is a dogma that isn't that old. Its about 2000 years old, and wasn't part of the older forms of Hinduism and Buddhism. It only spread because the school that proffesed this, was supported by a general, and so this dogma was forced on the conquered lands and got mixed with the religions. Later on this spread through the Roman empire and effected Jewish and Christian sects.
So what are trying to prove? Because the old doctrine can't be fitted into the Quranic laws, nowhere it is given to brake the cycle of re-births. Or have you found a new understanding of reincarnation? Remember, it only spread because of that general, if he hadn't, you would never had taken up this poll. I keep an open mind, so if you have something interresting, i'm listening. But history, science, theology and the Quran, speak against reincarnation.
The no, is referring to everybody reading the Quran. And nay or no, both are denials.
Peace
-
Salam Arnold,
The man in the ayah said many words expressing his regret and not just one word.
'Kallaa' is one word and to my understanding it is a word said by Allah to dismiss any chance for such person and also to point that there is a 'Barzakh ' 'min warae'him' ..What does 'min warae'him' mean? Does it mean 'ahead of them there lies a Barzakh'.. or behind them there lies a 'Barzakh'? And remember that such person wants to go back to what he left.
But to answer also, the 'word' the person is saying is"My Lord, send me back." So yes, this refers to the person not being send back to earth. And there are multiple verses in the Quran using those same terms. That there is only one life given.
I wish that you post those other ayat that speak about this thing so that we can have a closer look.About remembering past lives... We don't have to remember. What we have to know is that the present circumstances can tell the individual, if he/she opens their mind and heart, of things that he/she might have done before, othrewise he/she would not have been here in a certain way..
Look at the example of giving life to the dead when prophet Ibrahim took four birds...
Another one when Allah told the COI to die then brought them to life again .. Do you consider this a resurrection? And notice the word of Allah 'Die'.. That is the word I am talking about. Death is the word of Allah. The man can have no say in it.So what are trying to prove? Because the old doctrine can't be fitted into the Quranic laws, nowhere it is given to brake the cycle of re-births. Or have you found a new understanding of reincarnation? Remember, it only spread because of that general, if he hadn't, you would never had taken up this poll. I keep an open mind, so if you have something interresting, i'm listening.
It is not about proving anything. I just want the people here to help me find out what the Quran really says about many many things. Does it speak about reincarnation? Maybe it does,, why not? What is the Barzakh? Is it a time off, a vacuum? Is it the cycles of life that one has to go through for 'refinement' maybe? I would like to know what people here think. It matters to me. I don't think that you should blame it on the general!
But history, science, theology and the Quran, speak against reincarnation.
I would like to know what the Quran says for the time being. The Quran speaks about the man who died for a hundred year then was brought back to life,, The Quran speaks about the cave people,, the COI,, the people that Jesus brought back to life by the permission of Allah... and it is not resurrection yet..
Peace
-
Peace,
Good reply, yes, this is something we have to investigate. I just wanted to check the motives and background. I was always intruiged by the 'death' while sleeping. To bad my arabic is to bad to discuss the arabic uses of words surrounding this subject. But i can write down the history of reincarnation. And i'm not blaming the general, without him it wouldn't have spread like it had done. And then reincarnation maybe wouldn't ever be as known as it is now.
But i have researched a lot on the sciencitfical factors involving reincarnation. You've probably read the scientific approach topic i've written. And that summed together with history and my understanding of the Quran now, gives a negative answer on the old understanding of reincarnation.
Peace all
-
Peace,
Good reply, yes, this is something we have to investigate. I just wanted to check the motives and background. I was always intruiged by the 'death' while sleeping. To bad my arabic is to bad to discuss the arabic uses of words surrounding this subject. But i can write down the history of reincarnation. And i'm not blaming the general, without him it wouldn't have spread like it had done. And then reincarnation maybe wouldn't ever be as known as it is now.
But i have researched a lot on the sciencitfical factors involving reincarnation. You've probably read the scientific approach topic i've written. And that summed together with history and my understanding of the Quran now, gives a negative answer on the old understanding of reincarnation.
Peace all
I thought that some of the information you posted were pointing towards reincarnation and not against it especially some of the links..
-
No, then you've misunderstood it. It shows people don't get reborn on this world, and that children and people who remember past lives only tap into other people's memories that are left in the Quantum field. As for the recreation, you don't get recreated as something else, that is the reincarnation theory, that is what i'm trying to tell you. Reincarnation theory is that our present actions will determine our next rebirth on this wotld, and then we can end up as a human, animal or plant. That is the reincarnation theory. What i've told in my topic, is that we get recreated after our deaths, in a new universe, not on this earth And yes, our present actions will affect that new existence heavily.
But it doesn't support that we get born again on this world. We get recreated, in the 'same' bodies, the same design, and it will be the same conciousness. Only it will have the structure of your dominant features and behaviours you had on this earth.
So no, this is not reincarnation in the dogmatic sense, it coincides clearly with the Quranic resurrection, in a new universe, and yes i believe the universe will be created again after that, as the Quran also states. But reincarnation says you get reborn again on this world, and this scientific theory is against that.Peace
-
Hello All,
I have previously argued that allowing souls to experience full range of human experiences is more intellectually satisfying idea. And because of the reality of eternal hell is so terrible, I feel that it is more "just" for a compassionate and loving God to allow individuals an infinite number of chances to redeem themselves before they "stand" before "God". But I know apart from a single reference in the Quran, the whole reincarnational path to redemption is not supported by the scripture.
I would like to believe in a "reincarnational" path to our redemption. But I still ask myself this question "Redemption" implies that I have commited a "crime" previously. But I have no memory of that "crime". I have no way of verifying this. And I do not believe in the Christian doctrine of "original sin" because I have no way of verifying this either. And also because I am nothing like my father. I would like to think that we are born innocent so no sins of the father affecting the destiny of the child. The child has its own path - so what is it that I am redeeming myself against? To answer that Hinduism came up with the idea of "Karmic" debt. Perhaps this is like an "Indianised" version of the "Original Sin". And if we are indeed redeeming against our "Karmic" debt so that when we have karmic debt of zero, we will be liberated and hence enlightenment. But again how did we acquire the Karmic debt in the first place? And if Karmic debt was zero to start with then there was no need for to be born was there?
I also think that Karmic Debt idea has been mis-used by human beings to justify the creation of the CASTE system which becomes "Divinely Sanctioned" Apartheid. And Apartheid is systematisation of Racism. The Indian Caste system still blights that lives of millions of people in the Indian Subcontinent including Muslims too. We could not accept "Bantustan" in South Africa on political terms - why would we accept CASTE System based on religious ground.
The idea that if we are born armless and legless it means that we have maimed other individuals in our past life sounds very "just" punishment - or is it? Many people in the west have done away with the "Eye For an Eye, Tooth for a Tooth" justice system. Therefore how can we say that "Eye for an Eye, Tooth for a tooth justice" system operates on a Cosmic Karmic Scale? Also there does not seem to be the element of "Forgiveness" in the "Eye for an Eye, Tooth for a Tooth" justice system, and Forgiveness plays an very important role in the whole redemption process.
I also find that it is kind of heartless to view someone and say this person is severly disabled because of his sins in the past life. But it is not is it? His or hers disability can be traced to fluke of genetics. The fault in the mindless DNA copy process in the individual germ cells. To say that we choose to born disabled so that we can experience disability sounds interesting idea. But would you choose to be born disabled? I feel that I don't have to born disabled to experience disability. I can explore disability through my imagination. Just like we can explore the full range of human pridicament through art and literature. But perhaps the imaginative experience is not same as the "real" experience. But still feel that we are more inclined to be more compassinate towards the disabled individuals when we ourselves feel that we have been blessed with good health...others perhaps might think the opposite...
I am begining to think that LIFE is not TEST anymore nor it is about working towards a Karmic Debt of zero. But rather I like to think LIFE as an EXPLORATION in the infinite possibility of Existence within the reality that many have called "God". To what end? So that we can comprehend the "infinity" of "God" and then? then we would become identical with the ONE. This known as "fanaa" in Sufi msyticism...Nirvana in Budhism etc... In that scenario everyone wishes to born normal in the world of matter to explore LIFE but how they are born is determined by the laws of nature.
So I have voted for reincarnation in the sense of Exploration of LIFE's infinite possibility of existence so that we come to know "God"...
Regards,
-
The man in the ayah said many words expressing his regret and not just one word.
Peace Taj
I'm preparing a long quran comment rearding this subject biut it will take me some time
regarding the word kalimah
yes it means one word, however it can be used metaphorically to represent more than one word, the Quran used it as such many times
peace
-
No, then you've misunderstood it. It shows people don't get reborn on this world, and that children and people who remember past lives only tap into other people's memories that are left in the Quantum field. As for the recreation, you don't get recreated as something else, that is the reincarnation theory, that is what i'm trying to tell you. Reincarnation theory is that our present actions will determine our next rebirth on this wotld, and then we can end up as a human, animal or plant. That is the reincarnation theory. What i've told in my topic, is that we get recreated after our deaths, in a new universe, not on this earth And yes, our present actions will affect that new existence heavily.
But it doesn't support that we get born again on this world. We get recreated, in the 'same' bodies, the same design, and it will be the same conciousness. Only it will have the structure of your dominant features and behaviours you had on this earth.
So no, this is not reincarnation in the dogmatic sense, it coincides clearly with the Quranic resurrection, in a new universe, and yes i believe the universe will be created again after that, as the Quran also states. But reincarnation says you get reborn again on this world, and this scientific theory is against that.Peace
Salam Arnold,
I only wish that you support what you write with Ayat Al Quran.. Thanx
-
The man in the ayah said many words expressing his regret and not just one word.
Peace Taj
I'm preparing a long quran comment rearding this subject biut it will take me some time
regarding the word kalimah
yes it means one word, however it can be used metaphorically to represent more than one word, the Quran used it as such many times
peace
Salam Ahmed,,
I appreciate your input. From my understanding of Al Quran the word 'Kalimah' does not only mean word but also used to emphasize a big meaning a beginning or end, a final decision or a big statement...
I think there is a word in English that fits that meaning..
Easa (pbuh) is a word from Allah.
To say that Allah has begotten a son is one big dreadful word to come out of their mouths..I mean the word 'Kalimah' in the Quran is not used for expression of feelings.. Even those who said that Allah has begotten a son,, they say it as if it was Allah who said so..
The word 'Kalimah' in , to my understanding, does not belong to the person when he was expressing his regrets..Will be looking forward to your study.
-
Hi Lote,
Hello All,
I would like to believe in a "reincarnational" path to our redemption. But I still ask myself this question "Redemption" implies that I have commited a "crime" previously. But I have no memory of that "crime". I have no way of verifying this. And I do not believe in the Christian doctrine of "original sin" because I have no way of verifying this either. And also because I am nothing like my father. I would like to think that we are born innocent so no sins of the father affecting the destiny of the child. The child has its own path - so what is it that I am redeeming myself against? To answer that Hinduism came up with the idea of "Karmic" debt. Perhaps this is like an "Indianised" version of the "Original Sin". And if we are indeed redeeming against our "Karmic" debt so that when we have karmic debt of zero, we will be liberated and hence enlightenment. But again how did we acquire the Karmic debt in the first place? And if Karmic debt was zero to start with then there was no need for to be born was there?
We are born innocent, so maybe the soul will change during sleep, some time later?
The idea that if we are born armless and legless it means that we have maimed other individuals in our past life sounds very "just" punishment - or is it? Many people in the west have done away with the "Eye For an Eye, Tooth for a Tooth" justice system. Therefore how can we say that "Eye for an Eye, Tooth for a tooth justice" system operates on a Cosmic Karmic Scale? Also there does not seem to be the element of "Forgiveness" in the "Eye for an Eye, Tooth for a Tooth" justice system, and Forgiveness plays an very important role in the whole redemption process.
We don't know whether it is a test or a punishment? That is the thing.
I also find that it is kind of heartless to view someone and say this person is severly disabled because of his sins in the past life. But it is not is it? His or hers disability can be traced to fluke of genetics. The fault in the mindless DNA copy process in the individual germ cells. To say that we choose to born disabled so that we can experience disability sounds interesting idea. But would you choose to be born disabled? I feel that I don't have to born disabled to experience disability. I can explore disability through my imagination. Just like we can explore the full range of human pridicament through art and literature. But perhaps the imaginative experience is not same as the "real" experience. But still feel that we are more inclined to be more compassinate towards the disabled individuals when we ourselves feel that we have been blessed with good health...others perhaps might think the opposite...
We cannot judge because we don't know why the disability, which can 'hit' at anytime. The disability can be a test, or maybe a lesson, to the people who are around the disabled.
I am begining to think that LIFE is not TEST anymore nor it is about working towards a Karmic Debt of zero. But rather I like to think LIFE as an EXPLORATION in the infinite possibility of Existence within the reality that many have called "God". To what end? So that we can comprehend the "infinity" of "God" and then? then we would become identical with the ONE. This known as "fanaa" in Sufi msyticism...Nirvana in Budhism etc... In that scenario everyone wishes to born normal in the world of matter to explore LIFE but how they are born is determined by the laws of nature.
I need to think of that..
-
Salam "LT",
...And I do not believe in the Christian doctrine of "original sin" because I have no way of verifying this either. And also because I am nothing like my father. I would like to think that we are born innocent so no sins of the father affecting the destiny of the child. The child has its own path - so what is it that I am redeeming myself against?
JK- I believe you didnt understand the concept clearly. Think of it like this that we all sinned WITHIN Adam. We were all part of Adam and this is indicated in the Quran by the following verse
Recall that your Lord summoned all the descendants of Adam from, and had them bear witness for themselves "Am I not your Lord?" They all said, "Yes. We bear witness." Thus, you cannot say on the Day of Resurrection, "We were not aware of this."
Yusuf Ali
When thy Lord drew forth from the Children of Adam - from their loins - their descendants, and made them testify concerning themselves, (saying) "Am I not your Lord (who cherishes and sustains you)?"- They said "Yea! We do testify!" (This), lest ye should say on the Day of Judgment "Of this we were never mindful"
Pickthal
And (remember) when thy Lord brought forth from the Children of Adam, from their reins, their seed, and made them testify of themselves, (saying) Am I not your Lord ? They said Yea, verily. We testify. (That was) lest ye should say at the Day of Resurrection Lo! of this we were unaware;
Thus everyone has already witnessed GOD before he was born. Now ofcourse you are not responsible for your father BUT YOUR SOUL MAY HAVE BEEN PART OR RATHER WAS CONTAINED WITHIN THE INFINITE BUNDLE OF SOULS THAT WAS THERE IN YOUR FATHER/MOTHER AND SEPARATED AT BIRTH. Infact i believe a soul to be an infinte bundle of waves upon waves and this can split into two infinite bundles coming from the same source i.e. GOD. Hence we all were one unit of creation and now seprated. Moreover if you didnt commit any original sin why are you here? You would then probably be an angel or in paradise where there are no wars, droughts, diseases, disasters, etc. Also you claiming that children are innocent is not true. A child does have an inherent sin nature WHICH CAN BE OBSERVED. When you raise a child you never teach him to cheat and lie but it automatically tends towards doing these things. So original sin is very reasonable and observable too. GOD Bless! -
Peace Arnoldyasin,
You stated
children and people who remember past lives only tap into other people's memories that are left in the Quantum field
This can also be experienced in art - music in particular. When one is expressing from the soul, he/she has tapped into the field that all genuine artists tap into, often resulting in a nostalgiac melody that sounds as if we've heard it before.
This is a bit off-track, but what do you make of deja-vu? Would you consider it also tapping into the quantum field of timeless info?
Peace,
Tay -
Hello jonny,
Now ofcourse you are not responsible for your father BUT YOUR SOUL MAY HAVE BEEN PART OR RATHER WAS CONTAINED WITHIN THE INFINITE BUNDLE OF SOULS THAT WAS THERE IN YOUR FATHER/MOTHER AND SEPARATED AT BIRTH.
This is still the concept of "Original Sin".
Moreover if you didnt commit any original sin why are you here?
To explore LIFE and the Infinite Possibility of Existence.
Also you claiming that children are innocent is not true.
They are indeed innocent Jonny. Make no mistake on that.
When you raise a child you never teach him to cheat and lie but it automatically tends towards doing these things.
No child comes out of the womb and steals his or her dad's gold watch! Children don't have the concept of ownership at birth. These concepts are learned behaviour.
Regards,
-
Peace Arnoldyasin,
You stated
children and people who remember past lives only tap into other people's memories that are left in the Quantum field
This can also be experienced in art - music in particular. When one is expressing from the soul, he/she has tapped into the field that all genuine artists tap into, often resulting in a nostalgiac melody that sounds as if we've heard it before.
This is a bit off-track, but what do you make of deja-vu? Would you consider it also tapping into the quantum field of timeless info?
Peace,
TaySalaam,
Yes, that could be possible, we're only on the edge of understanding this all, and these are exactly the things that are coming out these studies, so yes, highly possible. But you understand now what i try to tell? It is not reincarnation, it is tapping into other peoples memories, alive or dead.
This explains why some people 'remember' past lives.And the new scientifical theories that are talking about the afterlife(the scientists don't want to admit this, but that is their problem), coincide perfectly witht the Quran. So you will be created, but not into someone elses body or spirit, not into a other life, but you in a new creation, that is effected by this life now, that life will be effected by your actions and thinking now. Exactly like in the Quran and other Scriptures. So yes, a sort of karma, and yes a sort of reincarnation, but not the popular version, certainly not.
I would like to discuss more on this, but i only had 1 reaction on my topic.......
Peace
-
Peace arnold
this understanding of reincarnation is very interesting. actually when i say now that i believe in reincarnation, first of all it could never be a certainty. But i already thought of this it's mustn't be the reincarnation here on this earth, but i'm sure i existed before, and i will still exist after this coming death - which is just the passing of a gate - position actually in accordance with quran.
So actually it should rather be called rebirth (of the soul) in opposition to reincarnation (coming back to flesh). Note that reincarnation would then just be one possibility of rebirth.
your other thread is of great interest, but i just don't find the time even to read and understand it fully
lk
-
Salaam,
This is o such great importants, because finally we can take out the resurrection out of the myth section, and fill it in with our human logic. That's the beauty. And it coincides impressevily with the Quran. I will Godwilling write a new topic, trying to make it more simplified then in this topic.
-
Hello TAJ,
Hi Lote,
In the story of Adam's two sons, from where did Habeel learn to kill his brother Qabeel?I think both brothers lived quite happily farming and tilling the land. Then something happened to Habeel. God rejected his offering and accepted Qabeels and Habeel was jelous. He could not deal with God's rejection. What does that tell us?
How we deal with our experiences in life determines how we behave towards others. Habeel did not born with an Evil Heart. It was how he dealt with his experiences in life that determined how he reacted to being rejected. Good tortured by itself can become Evil.
But here what others made of that story
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel
But lets look at in the terms of reincarnation theory. For those who say reincarnation is about going through all life experiences...Did Habeel choose to be born to exeperience murdering someone and did Qabeel born to experience being murdered? If so then Habeel and Qabeel must have consulted each other before they were born agreeing to murder and to be murdered? What about the thousands of Victims of Hiroshima? - did they all consult each other before they are born so that they can all experience what it is like to be vaporised in a atomic explosions? Can you see where it is leading?
Life as an EXPLORATION of the infinite possibility of Existence does not have these kinds of problem. In this scenario you are born to Explore Existence in the Infinity that is God...so that you may know God and in knowing you can become identical with it...to know something fully you have to become identical with it...to merge yourself in the ONE SELF...THE ONE CONSCIOUNESS...THE ONE REALITY...then there is no separation...there is no longing to be reunited no sadness...but blisss, joy and happiness....
Regards,
-
Hi Lote,
I do believe that we are born innocent and my question was about the sins that humans commit later on. I understood from your earlier post that such things are learned and not from our nature.. that is why I asked the question of Qabeel and Habeel...
I think both brothers lived quite happily farming and tilling the land. Then something happened to Habeel. God rejected his offering and accepted Qabeels and Habeel was jelous. He could not deal with God's rejection. What does that tell us?
Many things!How we deal with our experiences in life determines how we behave towards others. Habeel did not born with an Evil Heart. It was how he dealt with his experiences in life that determined how he reacted to being rejected. Good tortured by itself can become Evil.
Dealing with others is part of the experience.
Life as an EXPLORATION of the infinite possibility of Existence does not have these kinds of problem. In this scenario you are born to Explore Existence in the Infinity that is God...so that you may know God and in knowing you can become identical with it...to know something fully you have to become identical with it...to merge yourself in the ONE SELF...THE ONE CONSCIOUNESS...THE ONE REALITY...then there is no separation...there is no longing to be reunited no sadness...but blisss, joy and happiness....
That is sufi stuff, Lote. "To be identical with it"... Isn't that what we call in Arabic Momaahatt?