Please Help Me.
-
Now we have a serious problem for those who promote that Abu Lahab was not a real man but a symbol, ?A Parable?, they need to consider the following questions
Why Allah didn?t say in sura 111,? Here is a parable? as He did in 1832?, would it be that it is a clear cut guess on their end to say that sura 111 is a parable and Allah clearly didn?t say that?
Why Allah called Abu Lahab with name Abu Lahab and in here the two men mentioned in the parable were anonymous?
There was no mention to the wives of the rich man and the poor man in the above parable which is almost identical to the alleged parable in sura 111, why is that?
In the above clear parable, it was clear that Allah told us that the anonymous rich man was UNBELIEVER, however in sura 111 there is absolutely nothing to suggest that Abu Lahab was an unbeliever neither a bad man in both 1111 and 111;2 , so why he was condemned in 1113?
In 1114 about his wife, I can?t see anything wrong regarding his wife carrying logs , what is wrong with that for her to be condemned in 1115, the end of the sura?
There is no question that they were real people who lived during the time of the prophet and for some rookies to come and suggest something else that contradict what is well established through the history, is nothing but saying things about Allah that is not true because Allah talked to us directly about those two in sura 111, this is exactly when they say that sura 111 is a metaphor while clearly we see in the Quran that Allah always tells us ?Here is a metaphor?, their fatal mistake ?saying that Allah means a parable with sura 111? is warned against in the Quran, let?s look at the following verses
74- Invent not similitudes for Allah for Allah knoweth, and ye know not.
75- Allah sets forth a parable (consider) a slave, the property of another, (who) has no power over anything, and one whom We have granted from Ourselves a goodly sustenance so he spends from it secretly and openly; are the two alike? (All) praise is due to Allah! Nay, most of them do not know.
76- And Allah sets forth a parable of two men; one of them is dumb, not able to do anything, and he is a burden to his master; wherever he sends him, he brings no good; can he be held equal with him who enjoins what is just, and he (himself) is on the right path?
(74)
(75)
(76)-> Clear from the 1674 that Allah is warning us from ? Invent not similitudes for Allah for Allah knoweth, and ye know not.?, this is clear that Allah is telling us not to invent parables and associated to Him, some may say that the warning is against making parables about Allah Himself, I say, sorry it can?t be because He already told us that THERE IS NOTHING LIKE HIM, and the warning in 1674 has to be against associating invented parables to Him, because in the very next verse 1675, He gave us a parable ? Allah sets forth a parable (consider) a slave??.?, and again in 1676 Allah sets forth another parable ? And Allah sets forth a parable of two men;???, see, how the slave and the two men in both parables were anonymous?, and how clearly Allah told us that ?Here is a parable? straight after warning us from inventing parables and associating it to Him?, this warning is for those who say sura 111 is a parable, their ego and arrogance made them so blind not to see those clear facts including that Allah never told us in advance that sura 111 is a parable, their logic regarding the matter of Abu Lahab, lacks merit, Quran understanding, and most importantly the common sense if the simple fact that sura 111 never suggested that Abu Lahab or his wife were bad humans is considered by them, well, what they also have to consider along with 1674-76, is 16105
Only they invent falsehood who believe not Allah's revelations, and (only) they are the liars.
(105)
Going by the Quranic lesson of verification, i would need clear proof of their existence to believe they were real.
- Allah never told us in sura 111 ?Here is a parable?
- There was no indication in sura 111 that Abu Lahab and his wife were bad people to be condemned.
- Comparing the alleged parable with the same parable in 1832-44, makes it very clear that sura 111 is not a parable.
But it really doesn't matter.
If it does not matter then the ones who started promoting this non sense should explain to us why it was important for them to promote it 1400 years after?, the old man said if it ain?t break don?t fix it, now how considering that Abu Lahab and his wife were real people can be considered a broken faith by the traditionists?
For the other millions who believe that Abu Lahab and his wife were real people, it matters because, those who promote this non sense are saying indirectly that those millions are dumb deaf and blind, which I agree it is a possibility but only if they can prove their case using the Quran, now those dumb millions whom I belong to them can easily slam dunk this alleged and non sensible claim using the Quran as I just did with the help of Allah.
here's why
If we take the surah to be just a story, then we might need to prove them real. If we take it to be a story with a purpose, a lesson or moral for us, then it doesn't matter.Bro, that put a smile on my face, but thanks for your go at it, based on your logic then we have to prove all other stories mentioned in the Quran are real, in addition we will need to prove that Allah is real because Allah is another story mentioned in the Quran, thanks for the insight bro I can?t prove that Allah is real though, I can only believe that He is real and I can only believe in what He tells me in the Quran that is 100% real. Even when it is a parable I have to believe 100% that it is a parable. And this is still considered real because the reality is to consider a clear cut parable as a parable.
Because that person in the story, whether real or not, is used as an example.
See, if it ain?t break, don?t fix it
That example, and what we learn from it, is what's important. Not whether the person really lived or not.
Well, you may have a word with the ones who came 1400 years after and say they were not real
Cheers
I feel if you take them as historical figures the teaching herein is not lost. I think it may be ignored if too much attention is held on the historical proof or biography of such people. Their mention in this context is meant to convey to the reader a particular idea or set of ideas.
JoePeace Joe
I guess you may also have a word with the ones who started this allegation that they were not real 1400 years after it was established, and please help me out in understanding the importance of it if I have to know that they were not real
Salam all
-
The matter is that they are stucked in their own trap. They dont have any means to explain who was AbuLahab and what did he do.
To find out what wrong he did, they refer to see the rest of Quran, This is rediculous.To further add, I would ask what is the meaning of the following verses
002.065
002.065 And well ye knew those amongst you who transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath We said to them "Be ye apes, despised and rejected."002.066
002.066 So We made it an example to their own time and to their posterity, and a lesson to those who fear Allah.Al-Qur'an, 002.065-066 (Al-Baqara )
Secondly explain following
Allah is saying that you already know. Which means Prophet had to rely on the historical knowledge, thats why he knew and thats why Allah is saying that you already know.I will start a new thread with a more strong question. So be ready with some real reason, and not Greek Philosophies to just try to justfy your thoughts in any case. Like it is said that in love and war everthing is allowed, So please don use Rubbish argumments, Please.................
VirtualEye.
-
VE The matter is that they are stucked in their own trap. They dont have any means to explain who was AbuLahab and what did he do.
To find out what wrong he did, they refer to see the rest of Quran, This is rediculous.Ridiculous to you, sure because you have rejected al-quraan. Al-quraan clearly calls itself 'ahsanal hadith kitaaban mutashabihan mathany' (the best news/narration , a book with similarities repeated'. Therefore, to understand al-quraan, one would do well to refer to other parts of it. Abu Lahab is simply in arabic as 'the father of the flame'. One doesn't need to refer to hadith/sunna/seera in order to get more detail of the man. Rather , one needs to appropriate his lesson. It's sad that sunnis treat al-quraan as if it was a book of history.
-
VE The matter is that they are stucked in their own trap. They dont have any means to explain who was AbuLahab and what did he do.
To find out what wrong he did, they refer to see the rest of Quran, This is rediculous.Ridiculous to you, sure because you have rejected al-quraan. Al-quraan clearly calls itself 'ahsanal hadith kitaaban mutashabihan mathany' (the best news/narration , a book with similarities repeated'. Therefore, to understand al-quraan, one would do well to refer to other parts of it. Abu Lahab is simply in arabic as 'the father of the flame'. One doesn't need to refer to hadith/sunna/seera in order to get more detail of the man. Rather , one needs to appropriate his lesson. It's sad that sunnis treat al-quraan as if it was a book of history.
Certainly one would refer to other parts of quran to understand over all. But with some starting point or clue....
Its not like that ,,,when you dont understand a single thing who was AbuLahab and what did he do....you just say read rest of Quran.For instance , If I write a book and I write an article "A", I explain something for some purpose, I have include some article for some reason, I will not say "Read the rest of book and this article is just extra without any reason. So you can read the rest of book to get expertise" ..................Certainly the read will ask me, then what the hell is this article doing in your book if it just refers to the rest of book.
To make you more comfortable... I ask
WHAT IS SPECIAL IN THAT SURAH IF WE HAVE TO JUST ASSUME THAT WE SHOULD JUST READ REST OF QURAN.???
ALLAH REVEALED ALL THE MESSAGE TELLING EACH AND EVERYTHING IN DIFFERNT WAYS,,,THEN HE INCLUDED AN EXTRA SURAH WHICH ITSELF HAS NOT MEANING???VirtualEye.
-
VE Certainly one would refer to other parts of quran to understand over all. But with some starting point or clue....
Good for you. You've done some thinking, masha Allah. The starting point in the clear Arabic language which al-quraan will filter through its internal process.
Its not like that ,,,when you dont understand a single thing who was AbuLahab and what did he do....you just say read rest of Quran.
All I need to know about Abu Lahab is in the clear Arabic language
- Abu Lahab is the father of flame.
- Allah tells a person of that personality to PERISH.
- His wife is be carrying the fuel. What does fuel to do a flame?
- Her own neck is tied to that act. Showing her own inability to change.
The lessons is in this chapter is immense. Why would I need to look into history to find some details which Allah didn't see fit to include? You need to ask yourself, did Allah's publisher ask him to shorten the book to meet printer demands! Obviously Al-quraan, if you believe it's from Allah, is purposeful in its inclusions AND in its exclusions.
WHAT IS SPECIAL IN THAT SURAH IF WE HAVE TO JUST ASSUME THAT WE SHOULD JUST READ REST OF QURAN.
ALLAH REVEALED ALL THE MESSAGE TELLING EACH AND EVERYTHING IN DIFFERNT WAYS,,,THEN HE INCLUDED AN EXTRA SURAH WHICH ITSELF HAS NOT MEANING???We have to keep reading al-quraan if we believe. This is because al-quraan's revelation upon us is continuous. I haven't witnessed a person like Abu Lahab in my life before but when I do, it will be clearer to me.
-
Please refer to this thread
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=5683.0
VE
-
Peace,
he, mr.silly arguments, where are your answers? You keep shouting we have silly arguments, but you keep rejecting to answer mine, i only see playing though guy....
-
Peace be upon you all,
Lets all race each other to good deeds and righteousness and be symbols of this message we are debating. Lets not fall into the trap of name calling thus giving support to others.
-
Yes, you are right..... sorry VE...peace
-
Peace VE
This is a very good TOOL, that if you dont understand the real context of the Surah/verse directly condemning and cursing a person,,, then just refer to the rest of Quran as generally telling what is wrong and write. Very interesting.
Yes, the Lord repeats the messages that one may grasp them. As far as your initial sincerity goes it seems that you have abondoned it to condemn.
Then how come this person AbuLahab is directly being cursed fromt the start of surah?
You asked that people give an explanation using the reading, but you are now seeking an explanation from historical sources outside the reading. Which is it that you are asking for? You seem to be frustrated when one is not bringing an outside source to explain this particular hadeeth and then when someone does cite some historical source you say why are you not using the reading. Are you playing games, or is this what you call sincerity on your part?
Anyway I think my arguments here are of no use.
Why argue when you have asked something of the people in all sincerity?
You have turned around and bit just about everyone on the ass who has given you some sort of anwer.
You people can do anything and give any rubbish logics to get rid of any historical and/or Ahadith knowledge.
You did not ask of this in your sincere opening declaration. Why are you worrying about this particular thing now?
You people have changed the meaning of each and every verse of Quran just to justify that we dont need any additional knowledge.
You people? Why generalize? I do not think the reading is the only fount of knowledge in this world.
I assume if your motive is true then you must not have even learned any language from your parents and Allah would have revealed all the TRUTH on you directly,,,,because as you people think that Allah guides us directly if we want.
You trying to insult people kills your proposed sincerity.
I hereby quit this discussion considering that I am not enough to answer a dozen people just alone myself.
You sought to recieve answers in your preliminary post and clearly you really sought to give them. So much for your sincerity VE.
Joe
-
peace
how come no responses to AB post?
BTW Great find on the connection of those two stories ABsalam
God Bless
-
peace
how come no responses to AB post?
BTW Great find on the connection of those two stories ABsalam
God Bless
Cheers man, I discovered it on the same day i posted my comment with the help of Allah
Peace
