Verse 17:36 The New Idol???
-
enquirer wrote
Peace all. So a person could say jesus is the only son of god,without verification,and if you questioned him as to why he believed that,he could say; 'its part of my faith in the ghayb',(unseen.) ,or he could say; 'its written in gods book'.(the bible.) How does one get out of that conundrum?then how is jesus son of god? was there a union between god and a woman? for a man to be the son of his father, his father needs to impregnate his mother phsyically....is that how that person understands jesus being the son of god?
it is simple...if ur reasoning holds such a union to be conceivable, hold that belief the god already has stated in the quran those who do not wish to believe by it wont believe even if they were to be given portents! and those who believe by it believe it based on reasoning! -)
also, if u are of those who hold that god states to be of those without doubt by demanding proof of every verse of quran, then bring a verse from the quran where god states this! somebody suggested 2111 an 2147, but these were quoted half and/or out of context! infact, rather than asking proofs for verification of quran itself, the verses plainly suggest that the quran itself is the proof and truth from god! so if somebody wants proof for every verse of quran, it is fine! but if somebody says that god states to ask for proof before believing in it, then provide a reference where god states this!
as for 1736, 4157 is a clear example of those who uphold things without having regarding it 'ilm' and observe how their conjecture is done away with an assertion in quran...so god's revelation itself is 'ilm'! ofcourse, this is for those who believe in quran to be from god those who have doubts over the content of quran can ask for as many proofs as they like, only they would do well to not pretend speaking based on quran when they are as yet in doubt over it, and when asked for proof of their claims they can offer none! -)
-
kgb wrote
Not right now. Lets first settle the meaning of this one simple verse here.21107 Wama arsalnaka illa rahmatan lilAAalameena
21107 and not we sent you, except (sending you as) a mercy to the aalemeenbut as 21106 says
21106 Inna fee hatha labalaghan liqawmin AAabideena
21106 Lo! there is a plain statement for folk who are devout.so not will believe by it except who believe in god! -)
-
Peace be upobn you KGB,
Please start the thread only if you intend to REASON without arguing.
-
god is the rabb of all...of moses and of pharaoh and of annaas...they are all part of aalameen! -)
That is what the Alameen means, everything in the universe including the universe
cheers
-
Thank you TG. Your reply is much more reasonable and logical.
That is what the Alameen means, everything in the universe including the universe
This means there is still a possibility of other worlds within our universe. When human can't verify this how they are going to verify the each word of Qur'an.
Peace be upon you Kyle
Giving you reply is not arguing.
-
This means there is still a possibility of other worlds within our universe. When human can't verify this how they are going to verify the each word of Qur'an.
peace bro
i guess the Quran verse that it says Allah created 7 earths like our earth, is far more to incline that there is other worlds within the same and only universe
peace
-
Salaam
Thank you brother Ahmed Bahgat. I agree with you.
I posted that after listening to all this BS by these fake intellectuels who believe that they have the knowledge and wisdosm to verify each and every word of Allah. After reading Kyle's reply it looks like they absolutely have no knowledge to do so.
-
Salaam
Thank you brother Ahmed Bahgat. I agree with you.
I posted that after listening to all this BS by these fake intellectuels who believe that they have the knowledge and wisdosm to verify each and every word of Allah. After reading Kyle's reply it looks like they absolutely have no knowledge to do so.
I don't know bro how they are going to verify the existance of the Jinns, possibly by marrying them?
i don't know man, but I;m sure it can happen, would you reckon they will believe after that?
peace
-
Marrie said
What I understand from 1736 in the light of the context don't assert nothing before being perfectly sure.
For example to testify a false testimony, to provide a false information, to say you heard and you did not hear, you saw and you did not see, you know and you don't know "All of this is bad, and disliked by your Lord", this is why "For the hearing, eyesight, and mind, all these you are responsible for."I agree,does anyone else?
Me too
-
Salaam Ahmed Bahgat
I have to change my strategy of not interferring in their BS discussions by going after their faulty logic and pseudo philosophy.
That is what i do bro, remember, they have their deen and we have ours, unless they want to challenge us though, then we tell them like bushy "bring it on"
but I second your new stratagy
Salam
-
kgb wrote
Thank you TG.netime! -)
kgb wrote
I have to change my strategy of not interferring in their BS discussions by going after their faulty logic and pseudo philosophy.chill...polytheism is fine when understood within the framework of polytheism....likewise pantheism is fine when understood within its own framework! u will often find pantheists teaching u that quran is the work of man, their reasoning however is based on pantheism! so they will say that muhammad must have been a spiritually evolved person and the quran is what he wrote according to his understanding but they wont call it truth from god, they will call it muhammad's truth, as such they will never say that quran is from god or that the quran is infallible! the best way out for them is to try to explain quran as symbolism, as they are wont to do with other books! thus muhammad is no longer a real entity...he is only a archetype all this they do in accordance with pantheism...that the universe is god and every entity will attain to godhood..this is why u will often see them talking about 'maya' and 'nirvana'...the freedom from everything that exists without...to realising the potential (god) within! this is basically how they understand everything they live in the illusion that everything is an illusion...there is nothing without, everything is within..that is pantheism! however, like i said, within pantheism it might work...but when applied to quran it becomes a problem...as quran is purely monotheistic..so the faulty logic is in trying to propogate pantheism by applying it to quran! -)
-
ahmadbahgat wrote
Me tooyes...makes a lot of sense...but i believe it also applies to not pursuing that which has not come to us from revelation of god! like not upholding conjectures when v do not have with regards to the conjecture any 'ilm' from the revelation of god! -)
-
Peace be upon all,
All is from the god. Do you know of any other creator than the creator (AR-Rahmaan)?
And about the meaning of , cheking also the usage of and can shed some light on it; you can check verse like
.... 690
691
6921244
12104
12105
121062151
2181
2191
3022
I would advice to check the context of the verses.
There are many other verses pointing to knowledge when using the word al-?l()mine.
On the other hand, as far as I KNOW, no verse in the great reading is alluding to that the root has anything to do with "world".
Thus, translating as "the knowledgeables".
--
-
friend, all these have nothing to do with what i wanted to say.my point is that you cant even verify that physical laws are constant over time so how can you verify ALL of the statements of Koran.You would say "g=9,81 m2/sec for all times" is a scientific fact, however it is rather a strong belief.How can you be sure gravity wont become a repulsive force tomorrow morning.
peace kestrel,
You don't have to verify ALL of the statements of the Koran. Only the meaning of those statements. The message.
And you are right, we can't be perfectly, exactly sure of something. There will always remain that 0.00000000000001 percent of doubt even if you are sure. that is just how we are.
Our goal is to reduce that amount of doubt in our minds about our thinking.
We have a brain, we can use it to know with the best of our ability. That doubt is there for a reason. So that we keep questioning ourselves and gain a better understanding. But that doesn't mean we should completely abandon all reason and logic to follow what some books says.
and thanks for all the smileys. )